Infiniband mstflint package SRU with new HW support provided by Mellanox

2016-01-07 Thread Rafael David Tinoco
In the following bug: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mstflint/+bug/1470167 There is a direct request from Mellanox for Ubuntu to sync "mstflint" package with Debian. While that is okay for Xenial, after bisecting mstflint code with ConnectX-4 HBAs, I could see the exact commit that br

Re: about your wiki page on I/O schedulers and BFQ

2019-07-19 Thread Rafael David Tinoco
Hello Paolo, I'm looping the kernel team mailing list,just in case, that might help in the discussion. Best, Rafael On Thu, Jul 18, 2019 at 9:12 AM Paolo Valente wrote: > > Hi, > this is basically to report outdated statements in your wiki page on > I/O schedulers [1]. > > The main problematic

Re: Staging changes for future SRU landings

2019-10-22 Thread Rafael David Tinoco
afaiu block-proposed tags on bugs are not specific to any series, so you are blocking updates across all series. Not really desired. Following the thread you started, it seems that we can all agree to use block-proposed- instead. Does this resolve your concern? On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 09:24:10

Re: Question about backporting a fix for a Guake bug to Bionic

2019-11-17 Thread Rafael David Tinoco
On 11/16/19 5:25 PM, Robert Matusewicz wrote: > Hi, > > I'm new in Ubuntu world and I need advice on how to proceed with a bugfix > for Guake package. There is a bug #1760621 [1]. It's about Guake freezing > when libutemper is not installed on the system and user tries to close a > tab. From what I

RFC: Ubuntu HA resource-agents supportability

2020-03-30 Thread Rafael David Tinoco
Hello, As many as you know I'm currently revamping Ubuntu High Availability Packages For 20.04, considered HA (or HA related) packages are: - Core packages: - libqb - kronosnet - corosync - pacemaker - resource-agents - fence-agents - crmsh - cluster-glue - drbd-utils - dlm

RE: Ubuntu HA resource-agents supportability

2020-03-31 Thread Rafael David Tinoco
TL;DR version for this and the previous e-mail: * Please help selecting resource and fence agents we should support * 1) By *support* I mean.. leave fully supported agents in [main], for 20.10, and move the ones that shall get community support, or best effort support, into [universe]. 2) For 20

RE: RFC: Ubuntu HA resource-agents supportability

2020-04-02 Thread Rafael David Tinoco
> -Original Message- > From: Felipe Reyes > > > > > - "Deprecated" packages: > > > > - heartbeat > > - keepalived > > keepalived is used by OpenStack Neutron. In this context what would > "deprecated" mean?. > > apt-rdepends -r keepalived > Reading package lists... Done > Building d

RE: RFC: Ubuntu HA resource-agents supportability

2020-04-03 Thread Rafael David Tinoco
> I added a few comments below but I must admit that I didn't completely > get what you want. I'm sorry then, let me try to explain better... > The list includes so many things, what are you expecting: > - if they are important overall? > - if they are important for HA cases? > - if they should b

RE: RFC: Ubuntu HA resource-agents supportability

2020-04-07 Thread Rafael David Tinoco
> I added a few comments below, otherwise all the categories look > reasonable to me, thanks! Thanks for the feedback Dan! > > clvm- clvmd daemon (cluster logical vol manager) > > Was clvm dropped from lvm2? > https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lvm2/2.03.02-2ubuntu1 > I hav

RE: RFC: Ubuntu HA resource-agents supportability

2020-04-07 Thread Rafael David Tinoco
> I'm not sure where exactly this Xen resource agent should be placed on > the list -- but in practice, Xen wasn't in main, and that may influence > your thinking. I'll follow @cpaelzer's suggestion and keep it in "best effort". No hard commitment as it is in [universe], but at least some commitm

RE: RFC: Ubuntu HA resource-agents supportability

2020-04-08 Thread Rafael David Tinoco
> > > > pgsql - pgsql database instance > > > > > > shouldn't this be in fully supported? > > > > Pgsql is in [universe]. Unless SEG supports pgsql "by default", do you ? > > We're talking about postgresql right? It's definitely supported (it's > in main), and from a quick look

Re: RFC: Ubuntu HA resource-agents supportability

2020-04-28 Thread Rafael David Tinoco
, at least until I split all agents into more packages. I'm creating another discourse for fencing-agents as well, same thing. Please give me your +1 if possible, and feel free to -1 with suggestions. Cheers, -rafaeldtinoco On 07/04/2020 23:47, Rafael David Tinoco wrote: >> I added a

Re: RFC: Ubuntu HA resource-agents supportability

2020-04-29 Thread Rafael David Tinoco
On 29/04/2020 00:10, Rafael David Tinoco wrote: > Dan, Billy,and all... > > part of the result from this thread is at: > > https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/ubuntu-ha-pacemaker-resource-agents-supportability/ > <https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/ubuntu-ha-pacemaker-resource-agents

Re: Trademark concerns with Chef/Cinc package included in Debian and Ubuntu

2020-05-08 Thread Rafael David Tinoco
Forwarding to Ubuntu Devel Mailing list for broader audience. Should I just open a [RM] bug for all Ubuntu versions ? Any thoughts ? -rafaeldtinoco On 07/05/2020 19:01, Lance Albertson wrote: > I think removing it from Debian is the safe way to go currently. If > you want assistance with how we

open-iscsi new merge and licensing: OpenSSL + SHA3-256 , SHA256 , SHA1

2020-05-16 Thread Rafael David Tinoco
Hello list, I have been working in merging open-iscsi package: https://salsa.debian.org/rafaeldtinoco-guest/open-iscsi/-/commits/experimental with open-iscsi project upstream: https://github.com/open-iscsi/open-iscsi/ and also cleaning up the open-iscsi package a bit (thus will have to give sp

Re: Adjusting what fstypes df displays

2020-05-29 Thread Rafael David Tinoco
On 29/05/2020 01:38, Bryce Harrington wrote: > Two alternate approaches I'm weighing are a config file in /etc, or just > a package patch to carry in coreutils, but the env var approach feels > like it would be more flexible to users and hopefully more suitable for > upstream. Before I forward it

Re: Adjusting what fstypes df displays

2020-05-29 Thread Rafael David Tinoco
On 29/05/2020 11:03, Robie Basak wrote: > +1 for Bryce's approach. > > On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 10:56:34AM -0300, Rafael David Tinoco wrote: >> Perhaps this environment variable should be set by snapd package ? > I think this could be surprising - because we would b

+1 maintenance status − July 13-17

2020-07-17 Thread Rafael David Tinoco
This was my week and here is some of my notes about achievements and highlights: Overall status: -- - read all the maint+1 docs and @piloted in ubuntu-devel - qemu TCG memory issue causing spinned qemu instances to be killed casper has a qemu instance killed because of TCG (cdrom file cant

Erich Eickmeyer - MOTU Application

2021-01-11 Thread Rafael David Tinoco
Hello Everyone, I would like to ask you to join me and welcome Erich Eickmeyer as the newest member of MOTU. Erich, Thank you for your hard work and congratulations on the achievement! My very best regards in name of Ubuntu Dev Memb Board, -rafaeldtinoco Original Message Fro

Paride Legovini - Ubuntu Server Dev Application

2021-01-11 Thread Rafael David Tinoco
Hello Everyone, I would like to ask you to join me and welcome Paride Legovini as the newest member of the Server Dev Team. Paride, Thank you for your hard work and congratulations on the achievement! My very best regards in name of Ubuntu Dev Memb Board, -rafaeldtinoco Original Mess

iptables-legacy + iptables-nft = iptables-broken ?

2021-01-27 Thread Rafael David Tinoco
Hello devs... Some of you know, I have been developing a tool called "conntracker" at https://github.com/rafaeldtinoco/conntracker. While developing it, I have faced many "issues" regarding iptables differences among Bionic and Focal/Groovy and I would like to confirm one behavior I observed t

Re: iptables-legacy + iptables-nft = iptables-broken ?

2021-01-27 Thread Rafael David Tinoco
> This means that the POLICY has acted in all those table/chains > combination, NOT the rules I have in place. So, if I change the default > policy using iptables-legacy to -j DROP... then my iptables-nft rules > don't work at all. This means that one should really use > iptables-legacy (and no

Re: iptables-legacy + iptables-nft = iptables-broken ?

2021-01-27 Thread Rafael David Tinoco
OK.. I think I found the issue... sorry for the noise. TL/DR version: all the iptables targets working in compatibility mode (-j NFLOG, -j TRACE, etc) might face issues and not work correctly when using nf-tables by default (nft_compat -> x_tables over nftables). Explanation: If I execute m

eBPF support in HWE kernels + userland changes needed

2021-11-03 Thread Rafael David Tinoco
Hello list, I have been trying to address this issue for sometime now, without success. Hopefully this can gain some traction with this e-mail. I know many of you address most of your efforts into the current development version, but I'd like to call attention for something I judge is important

Re: eBPF support in HWE kernels + userland changes needed

2021-11-04 Thread Rafael David Tinoco
>> - #1 = Ubuntu HWE kernels aren't being compiled with BTF support, something >> that is critical for eBPF CO-RE, turning an eBPF object portable among >> different kernel versions. >> >> https://github.com/aquasecurity/btfhub/issues/9 >> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/19