Re: [ubuntu/oneiric] pdf2djvu 0.7.7-1ubuntu1 (Accepted)

> pdf2djvu (0.7.7-1ubuntu1) oneiric; urgency=low > > * Rebuild > * Bump standards version to 3.9.2 > I'd like to take this opportunity to publicize the command dch -R for no change rebuilds. It DTRT most of the time. It appends and increments buildX or just increments ubuntuX. Micah -- ubunt

Re: [ubuntu/oneiric] pdf2djvu 0.7.7-1ubuntu1 (Accepted)

On 05/24/2011 10:12 PM, Steve Stalcup wrote: > Hi Micah, > > On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 8:50 PM, Micah Gersten wrote: > >> I'd like to take this opportunity to publicize the command dch -R for >> no change rebuilds. It DTRT most of the time. It appends and >> i

Using -v when merging from Debian

This is a friendly reminder that when merging a package from Debian, to use -v when building the source package. You pass it the last version that was in Ubuntu and it'll include everything after that in the _source.changes file. This allows all the recorded changes to show up on the -changes mai

when not to use an epoch and how to avoid a sync (was: Re: [ubuntu/oneiric] nvidia-common 1:0.2.30+1 (Accepted))

On 06/04/2011 05:25 AM, Alberto Milone wrote: > nvidia-common (1:0.2.30+1) oneiric; urgency=low > > * Add epoch to override the sync. The packages in Debian and Ubuntu > have the same name but different code and scope (LP: #792576). > So, in Ubuntu we have a sync blacklist to avoid syncing somethi

Re: [dpkg-dev] auto-generated patch too easily included (debian/patches/debian-changes-*))

On 06/15/2011 12:40 PM, Dave Walker wrote: > > Hi, > > Currently, if the upstream code is changed (anything other than > debian/*).. When dpkg-buildpackage is run, an automated patch is > created. This is a really nice feature, but it is very easy to miss > this. I have seen multiple uploads where

Re: release cadence for Q and R

On 06/15/2011 05:58 PM, Steve Beattie wrote: > On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 02:48:58PM -0700, Allison Randal wrote: >> Very valuable perspective, thanks. To other upstreams, do you have >> similar or opposite needs? > Perhaps this is just me being naive, but with upstreams, shouldn't we > be emphasizing

Re: New Launchpad feature: Diff between Sid and Oneiric

On 06/16/2011 04:26 AM, Dave Walker wrote: > > * The new page should probably indicate the sponsor of the Ubuntu > upload (if present). > > Thanks again! > > Kind Regards, > Dave Walker > > Actually, the "uploader" on this page is the sponsor. It should really show the person who got credit for

Call For Testing: Natty Firefox users (or willing to install Natty in a VM)

mozilla-security/+archive/ppa> [2] https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/798484 P.S. The current final Firefox 5 build and moon are currently finishing building on armel and will be copied to natty-proposed over the weekend. The other architectures' packages are available in the Ubuntu Mozilla

Re: Call For Testing: Natty Firefox users (or willing to install Natty in a VM)

On 06/17/2011 05:59 PM, Micah Gersten wrote: > > We need Natty users to test our latest Firefox Upgrade! > > *Background:* > Firefox 4 will not receive any more point releases, but rather Firefox > 5 is the security update for Firefox 4.0.1. Upstream Mozilla has > changed thei

Re: python-oauth (version question)

On 06/23/2011 02:32 PM, Barry Warsaw wrote: > Hi Rodney, Martin, > > As part of our bug 788514 efforts to get rid of python-support and > python-central on our CDs, I've run across python-oauth. There's good news > and bad news ;). > > The good news: Debian has version 1.0.1-3 which tracks upstrea

Re: Please test AirPrint on Natty and Oneiric

On 06/28/2011 05:52 PM, Daniel Chen wrote: > > Hi Till, > > On Jun 28, 2011 10:31 AM, "Till Kamppeter" > wrote: > > > > Before reporting bugs, please check your CUPS package version. It > must be 1.4.6-5ubuntu1.3 on Natty and 1.4.6-11 on Oneiric. Wait for > the mir

Reminder to update timestamps before sponsoring (was: Re: [ubuntu/oneiric] smarty3 3.0.8-0ubuntu1 (Accepted))

smarty3 (3.0.8-0ubuntu1) oneiric; urgency=low > > * New upstream release. (LP: #801924) > > Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2011 12:38:31 +0100 > Changed-By: Mat Scales > Maintainer: Ubuntu Developers > Signed-By: Micah Gersten > https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/oneiric/+source/smarty3/

Re: Reminder to update timestamps before sponsoring (or maybe not :))

On 07/07/2011 12:23 AM, Scott Kitterman wrote: > On Thursday, July 07, 2011 01:19:07 AM Micah Gersten wrote: >> smarty3 (3.0.8-0ubuntu1) oneiric; urgency=low >> >>> * New upstream release. (LP: #801924) >>> >>> Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2011 12:38:31 +0100

Re: "What I like least in Ubuntu"

On 07/25/2011 02:05 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote: > On Monday, July 25, 2011 02:41:29 PM Mackenzie Morgan wrote: > ... >> There was a discussion about it on IRC last week starting at >> http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/2011/07/18/%23ubuntu-devel.html#t20:43 >> >> In particular, this is the part about whether

packageset restrictions and archive reorg (was: Re: "What I like least in Ubuntu")

On 07/25/2011 03:46 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote: > On Monday, July 25, 2011 03:48:38 PM Micah Gersten wrote: >> On 07/25/2011 02:05 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote: >>> On Monday, July 25, 2011 02:41:29 PM Mackenzie Morgan wrote: >>> ... >>> >>>> There was

Re: packageset restrictions and archive reorg

On 07/25/2011 04:25 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote: > On Monday, July 25, 2011 04:52:42 PM Micah Gersten wrote: >> On 07/25/2011 03:46 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote: >>> On Monday, July 25, 2011 03:48:38 PM Micah Gersten wrote: >>>> On 07/25/2011 02:05 PM, Scott Kitterman w

Default libjpeg-dev in oneiric

CCing ubuntu-devel so people are aware of the issue Due to the accidental autosync, we pulled in a libjpeg8-dev that provides libjpeg-dev. Should we revert that one change (not provide libjpeg-dev in libjpeg8) or should we try to do the transition? There are a number of incomplete transitions AT

Re: Default libjpeg-dev in oneiric

On 07/29/2011 02:39 AM, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 06:13:49PM -0500, Kate Stewart wrote: >> On Thu, 2011-07-28 at 17:54 -0500, Micah Gersten wrote: >>> CCing ubuntu-devel so people are aware of the issue >>> Due to the accidental autosync, we pu

Re: Default libjpeg-dev in oneiric

On 07/29/2011 10:47 AM, Micah Gersten wrote: > On 07/29/2011 02:39 AM, Steve Langasek wrote: >> On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 06:13:49PM -0500, Kate Stewart wrote: >>> On Thu, 2011-07-28 at 17:54 -0500, Micah Gersten wrote: >>>> CCing ubuntu-devel so people are awar

SRUs for typo fixes in descriptions

So, there are a couple merge proposals right now for control file description typo fixes for natty: https://code.launchpad.net/~bones/ubuntu/oneiric/gnomebaker/fix-for-818364/+merge/70234 https://code.launchpad.net/~bones/ubuntu/natty/radiotray/fix-for-722886/+merge/70107 The package has either be

Patch Pilot Report 2011-08-03

bug 819679 - Sync subtitleeditor (universe) 0.39.0 from debian experimental (main). Builds fine, ACKd bug 819774 - Please sync zsnes 1.510+bz2-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main) FTBFS, assigned to reporter, unsubscribed sponsors gedit-plugin 3.1.2 merge approved, pushed, uploaded Bug #8

Re: Five build fixes a day

On 09/12/2011 10:02 AM, Colin Watson wrote: > We have 661 build failure bugs open right now: > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bugs?field.tag=ftbfs > > The good news is that this is down from well over 700 yesterday, so we > are making progress. > > The bad news is the build failure queue ha

Re: Five build fixes a day

On 09/14/2011 06:39 AM, Colin Watson wrote: > On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 01:27:00AM -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote: > > python-pythonmagick (pythonmagick) > Could use somebody who doesn't go cross-eyed looking at C++. > >> frogatto > I'm working on this now. > > You also missed a few on other archit

Re: Key signing party for UDS/Linaro in Orlando

On 10/03/2011 06:34 PM, Mackenzie Morgan wrote: > On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 6:53 PM, Jorge O. Castro wrote: >> On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 6:32 PM, Christian Robottom Reis >> wrote: >>> On Mon, Oct 03, 2011 at 12:20:38PM -0700, Deepak Saxena wrote: Is there usually a key-signing at UDS? If not, sho

Re: Getting new packages into Ubuntu

On 10/10/2011 02:24 PM, Stefano Rivera wrote: > Hi Sebastien (2011.10.10_20:34:48_+0200) >> Well you would perhaps have run into some issues where you need upgrades >> or fixes to the "platform" side and looked at the "main" archive to get >> those solved? Or you would have just contributed to extr

Re: [ubuntu/precise] aptsh 0.0.7+nmu2ubuntu1 (Accepted)

On 10/25/2011 02:25 AM, Nicolas Valcarcel Scerpella wrote: > aptsh (0.0.7+nmu2ubuntu1) precise; urgency=low > > * Merge from debian unstable. Remaining changes: > - debian/control: change Build-Depends from libreadline5-dev to > libreadline-dev for readline transition. > > aptsh (0.0.7

Re: [ubuntu/precise] aptsh 0.0.7+nmu2ubuntu1 (Accepted)

* Fixed top post On 10/25/2011 03:25 AM, Nicolas Valcárcel Scerpella wrote: > On Tue, 25 Oct 2011, Micah Gersten wrote: > >> On 10/25/2011 02:25 AM, Nicolas Valcarcel Scerpella wrote: >>> aptsh (0.0.7+nmu2ubuntu1) precise; urgency=low >>> >>> * Merge

Re: [ubuntu/precise] aptsh 0.0.7+nmu2ubuntu1 (Accepted)

On 10/25/2011 10:26 AM, Nicolas Valcárcel Scerpella wrote: > On Tue, 25 Oct 2011, Colin Watson wrote: > >> On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 03:25:58AM -0500, Nicolas Valcárcel Scerpella wrote: >>> We don't have that readline in our archive, i assume it's just a weird >>> debian naming thing >> >> On the co

Re: [ubuntu/precise] aptsh 0.0.7+nmu2ubuntu1 (Accepted)

Fixed Top Post... On 10/25/2011 11:26 AM, Steve Stalcup wrote: > > On Oct 25, 2011, at 1:32 AM, Micah Gersten <mailto:mic...@ubuntu.com>> wrote: > >> On 10/25/2011 02:25 AM, Nicolas Valcarcel Scerpella wrote: >>> aptsh (0.0.7+nmu2ubuntu1) precise; urgency=

Re: Patch Pilot Report 2011-10-25

On 10/25/2011 07:19 AM, James Page wrote: > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apcalc/+bug/880074 > Build OK - synced from Debian testing. Until we can sponsor syncs through the LP API [1], and as long as there's not an immediate need for the sync, we should probably just subscribe ubuntu-a

Re: data.tar.xz support added to Launchpad

On 10/25/2011 03:15 PM, Barry Warsaw wrote: > On Aug 26, 2011, at 10:32 PM, Colin Watson wrote: > >> It should now be possible to use xz compression for .deb packages >> uploaded to Ubuntu oneiric (using 'dh_builddeb -- -Zxz'). In order to >> do so, you must include this field in the relevant bina

Re: Patch Pilot Report 2011-10-25

On 10/25/2011 04:46 PM, Benjamin Drung wrote: > Am Dienstag, den 25.10.2011, 12:47 -0500 schrieb Micah Gersten: >> On 10/25/2011 07:19 AM, James Page wrote: >>> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apcalc/+bug/880074 >>> Build OK - synced from Debian testing. >&

swig2.0 transition and removal of swig1.3 for precise?

swig1.3 has been removed from Debian testing and unstable as it has been superseded by swig2.0. Does anyone have an objection to me setting up a tracker to drive the transition to swig2.0 and the eventual removal of swig1.3 from precise? Thanks, Micah -- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@

Re: swig2.0 transition and removal of swig1.3 for precise?

On 10/28/2011 01:24 AM, Micah Gersten wrote: > swig1.3 has been removed from Debian testing and unstable as it has been > superseded by swig2.0. Does anyone have an objection to me setting up a > tracker to drive the transition to swig2.0 and the eventual removal of > swig1.3

Re: [ubuntu/precise] xine-lib 1.1.19-3.1ubuntu1 (Accepted)

On 10/30/2011 05:35 PM, Reinhard Tartler wrote: > xine-lib (1.1.19-3.1ubuntu1) precise; urgency=low > > * merge from debian, remaining changes: > - Because the following libraries are only in universe, > build against internal copies of: > - libdvdnav, libdvdread, libfaad, libvcdi

Re: [ubuntu/precise] xine-lib 1.1.19-3.1ubuntu1 (Accepted)

On 10/30/2011 05:49 PM, Micah Gersten wrote: > On 10/30/2011 05:35 PM, Reinhard Tartler wrote: >> xine-lib (1.1.19-3.1ubuntu1) precise; urgency=low >> >> * merge from debian, remaining changes: >> - Because the following libraries are only in universe, >>

Re: Checklist of package changes for new distribution?

On 11/07/2011 11:55 AM, Colin Watson wrote: > On Mon, Nov 07, 2011 at 12:35:36PM -0500, Andrew Starr-Bochicchio wrote: >> This should no longer be needed in future releases of bzr-builddeb. I >> committed a change to use python-distro-info instead of having to >> manually fix this every six months.

Re: Using webkit 1.8 for the LTS(?)

On 11/29/2011 12:55 PM, Sebastien Bacher wrote: > Hi everybody, > > So following-up on the email I just sent and trying to improve how we > decide on things that might have an impact on others teams I would > like to discuss what version of webkit we will use for the LTS. > > In Oneiric we stayed o

Re: Using webkit 1.8 for the LTS(?)

On 11/30/2011 04:41 PM, Sebastian Heinlein wrote: > Am Dienstag, den 29.11.2011, 20:27 -0500 schrieb Rodney Dawes: >> On Tue, 2011-11-29 at 19:55 +0100, Sebastien Bacher wrote: >>> What is your take on using webkit 1.8? Is that choice good for other >>> teams? Is there any issue or concern you hav

Re: Using webkit 1.8 for the LTS(?)

On 11/30/2011 04:52 PM, Micah Gersten wrote: > On 11/30/2011 04:41 PM, Sebastian Heinlein wrote: >> Am Dienstag, den 29.11.2011, 20:27 -0500 schrieb Rodney Dawes: >>> On Tue, 2011-11-29 at 19:55 +0100, Sebastien Bacher wrote: >>>> What is your take on using webki

Patch Pilot report 2011-12-05

31 items in queue at the start of my shift Bug #900457 - Sync tracker 0.12.8-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main) - sync ACKd Bug #900351 - Please merge libparse-http-useragent-perl 0.33-1 (universe) from Debian unstable - debdiff was fine, test built, uploaded Review Seamonkey 2.5 branch

Re: xz-compression related upload failure

On 12/19/2011 02:43 PM, Stefan Potyra wrote: > Hi, > > just found out about trigger-rally-data failing to upload: > > > > As far as I'm aware, xz compression was supported within dpkg prior to Lucid, > so I presume that the upgrade pa

Re: xz-compression related upload failure

On 12/19/2011 02:48 PM, Micah Gersten wrote: > On 12/19/2011 02:43 PM, Stefan Potyra wrote: >> Hi, >> >> just found out about trigger-rally-data failing to upload: >> >> <https://launchpadlibrarian.net/87895494/upload_3177594_log.txt> >> >> As fa

Call For Testing: Lucid and Maverick Firefox users (or willing to install Lucid or Maverick in a VM)

cacert.org/index.php?id=1 should not give you a warning anymore 9. test gnome support: * Use Image as Background * Change Preferred Application (Mail-- in Gnome, set in System/Preferences/Preferred Applications) -- Micah Gersten Ubuntu Security Team -- ubuntu-devel mailing list u

Minutes from the Developer Membership Board meeting, 2012-01-16

== Meeting summary == * Present: micahg (chair), Laney, tumbleweed, geser, stgraber *Review of previous action items *cody-somerville to write some documentation on how to endorse someone (micahg, 14:08:02) - Deferred to next meeting *bdrung to talk to the TB about harmonising DMB member

Fwd: Team maintaining miniupnp: a set of 4 packages to manage IGD protocols

If anyone has any applications they like/watch depending on these 4 packages, this would be a great way to insure they're up to date and help Debian at the same time. Reverse-Build-Depends = * bitcoin (for libminiupnpc-dev) * eiskaltdcpp

Re: [ubuntu/precise] lzma 9.22-2ubuntu1 (Accepted)

On 02/07/2012 07:00 PM, Leo Iannacone wrote: lzma (9.22-2ubuntu1) precise; urgency=low * Merge from debian unstable (LP: #924044). Remaining changes: - make lzma Priority: required and Section: base since dpkg Pre-Depends on it. lzma (9.22-2) unstable; urgency=low * Upload t

Re: Is there any issue accepting several versions at once (Re: [ubuntu/precise] gnome-control-center 1:3.3.90-0ubuntu3 (Rejected))

On 02/27/2012 10:19 AM, Scott Kitterman wrote: > > Sebastien Bacher wrote: > >> Le 25/02/2012 17:15, Ubuntu Installer a écrit : >>> Rejected: >>> Rejected by archive administrator. >>> >>> gnome-control-center (1:3.3.90-0ubuntu3) precise; urgency=low >>> >>>* debian/patches/62_update_translati

Re: [RFC] Drop Non-smp PowerPC Kernel Flavor

On 03/14/2012 11:52 AM, Leann Ogasawara wrote: > Hi All, > > The Ubuntu Kernel Team has been evaluating some of the current > maintenance burdens for the upcoming Precise Pangolin 12.04 LTS release. > One area which would reduce the maintenance costs would be to drop the > non-smp PowerPC kernel fl

Re: [RFC] Drop Non-smp PowerPC Kernel Flavor

On 03/14/2012 12:00 PM, Colin Watson wrote: > On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 09:52:01AM -0700, Leann Ogasawara wrote: >> The Ubuntu Kernel Team has been evaluating some of the current >> maintenance burdens for the upcoming Precise Pangolin 12.04 LTS release. >> One area which would reduce the maintenance

Re: Every Ubuntu developer is a Unity developer?

You're an explicit member of the team since 2010-06-14, I have no idea why. Micah On 03/18/2012 07:24 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote: > Could whoever is administrator for the appropriate teams arrange it so that > ubuntu-dev don't get mails like this? > > Thanks, > > Scott K > > -- Forwarded

Re: [Bug 971000] Re: Sync wireshark 1.6.6-1 (universe) from Debian testing (main)

On 04/02/2012 01:00 AM, Fabrice Coutadeur wrote: > Sponsoring by parts so that each contributors get credit for hos work. > > @Evan: is a new version is bug-fixing only , please mention it in the > sync request, bringing some proof of it. > > anyway, thanks for your work! > While I like this in th

Re: third test rebuild of precise pangolin

On 04/03/2012 10:12 AM, Martin Pitt wrote: > Colin Watson [2012-04-03 16:08 +0200]: >> aisleriot (i386, amd64, armhf): >> libical (i386, armhf): > These two are in progress in the desktop team ATM. > >> heartbeat (i386, amd64, armhf): >> Needs to move to single includes rather than . > Actually,

Patch Pilot Apr 16-Apr 19

#975392 - was already sync'd, marked fix released Wanda the fish is a mute! - Bug #433631 - potential lucid SRU, not sure if precise is affected, linked Debian bug, asked patch writer to research, unsubscribed -sponsors Queue is down to 45 -- Micah Gersten Ubuntu Security Team -- ubuntu-d

Re: Planning for Quantal: Boost

On 04/25/2012 05:52 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote: > The current upstream Boost release is 1.49. This is also the default in > Debian. We should transition to that as the default for Quantal when archive > is set up (before general uploading starts). > > boost-defaults will need to be synced and bo

Quantal archive rebuild proposal

Now that we have the faster i386/amd64 buildds, I'd like to suggest at least one extra rebuild earlier in the cycle at least for i386/amd64 so there's time to get these changes upstream. Around alpha 1 ~ June 7 (archive raw, lots of failures, should catch most of the Ubuntu change related gcc-4.7

Re: Quantal archive rebuild proposal

On 04/27/2012 05:20 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote: > On Friday, April 27, 2012 05:13:21 PM Micah Gersten wrote: >> Now that we have the faster i386/amd64 buildds, I'd like to suggest at >> least one extra rebuild earlier in the cycle at least for i386/amd64 so >> there&#

Re: Quantal archive rebuild proposal

On 04/27/2012 05:46 PM, Micah Gersten wrote: > On 04/27/2012 05:20 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote: >> On Friday, April 27, 2012 05:13:21 PM Micah Gersten wrote: >>> Now that we have the faster i386/amd64 buildds, I'd like to suggest at >>> least one extra rebuild earlie

Re: Quantal archive rebuild proposal

On 04/27/2012 06:00 PM, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 05:46:50PM -0500, Micah Gersten wrote: >> Now that we can use -proposed during development, the only arch skew >> should be from autosyncs. > I don't think that's a realistic assessment of h

Re: Quantal archive rebuild proposal

On 04/27/2012 06:23 PM, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 06:11:38PM -0500, Micah Gersten wrote: >> On 04/27/2012 06:00 PM, Steve Langasek wrote: >>> On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 05:46:50PM -0500, Micah Gersten wrote: >>>> Now that we can use -proposed dur

Re: dh_python2 and /usr/share/pyshared in quantal

On 05/22/2012 12:22 PM, Sebastien Bacher wrote: > Le 22/05/2012 17:33, Barry Warsaw a écrit : >> Matthias made the change to try to catch unnecessary (invalid?) uses of >> pyshared, which might a worthy goal > Hey, > > Do we really need to break the archive version to figure those out, > can't we d

Re: dh_python2 and /usr/share/pyshared in quantal

On 05/22/2012 09:07 PM, Stefano Rivera wrote: >>> Do we really need to break the archive version to figure those out, >>> can't we do an archive rebuild of some way using a custom or ppa build? >> An i386 rebuild should be sufficient for this. > I'd have thought a grep through the lintian lab would

Re: [ubuntu/quantal] gource 0.38-1ubuntu1 (Accepted)

On 05/28/2012 02:20 PM, Ilya Barygin wrote: > gource (0.38-1ubuntu1) quantal; urgency=low > > * Change build dependency to libglew-dev to make sure we're building > with libglew1.7. > > I don't think we should be doing this. Once krita (1.5) and nux (1.6) are switched to glew 1.7, we should

Re: [ubuntu/quantal] jquery 1.7.2+debian-1ubuntu1 (Accepted)

On 06/04/2012 08:05 AM, Yolanda Robla wrote: > jquery (1.7.2+debian-1ubuntu1) quantal; urgency=low > > * Merge from Debian unstable (LP: #1006866). > - Drop Recommends: javascript-common to a Suggests:; there's no reason > we need to publish these scripts via http by default. > * Back

Re: System indicators will drop GTK2 support in quantal

On 06/29/2012 11:21 AM, Sebastien Bacher wrote: > Hi, > > I'm not sure how well that got communicated after UDS so I'm sending > an email to the devel list. > > With the LTS out the dx indicators' team is dropping gtk2 support for > indicator-* this cycle (i.e the system indicators: > indicator-ses

Re: coloring of sponsoring items

On 07/23/2012 05:31 PM, Benjamin Drung wrote: > Am Montag, den 23.07.2012, 17:20 -0500 schrieb Jamie Strandboge: >> Pleased to see that the queue was in good shape. > Should we adjust the coloring of the sponsoring items? The current > behavior is to use a yellow background color for items that are

Re: dropping old video drivers (was: new xorg stack in quantal-proposed)

On 08/02/2012 03:15 PM, Timo Aaltonen wrote: > > I didn't push updates for obsolete video drivers not depended on by > xserver-xorg-video-all, since I think it's probably time to remove them > from the archive (we dropped them from -video-all for 11.10). This > includes -apm, -ark, -chips, -glide,

Minutes from the Developer Membership Board meeting (Mon Aug 13)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 The Developer Membership Board (DMB) met on Mon Aug 13 at 19:00 UTC. Chair: * micahg Attendees: * stgraber * bdrung * tumbleweed * barry Guests: * dupondje * xnox Apologies: * Laney * cody-somerville == MOTU application for

Re: Proposing a New App Developer Upload Process

On 09/05/2012 11:46 AM, Didier Roche wrote: > Le 05/09/2012 16:26, David Planella a écrit : >> Al 05/09/12 14:29, En/na Scott Kitterman ha escrit: >>> >>> David Planella wrote: >>> * File name conflicts: there I would suggest exploring Daniel's proposal of relying on a conflict chec

Patch Pilot 2012-09-10 - 2012-09-11

049315), builds, sync'd Sync circos 0.61-3 (universe) from Debian unstable (main) (LP: #1049323), needs FFe for binary rename Queue at 52 ATM -- Micah Gersten Ubuntu Security Team -- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel

Patch Pilot report 2012/10

in TLS 1.2 workarounds - Bug #1051892 - looks fine, uploaded Sync sope 1.3.16-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main) - since sogo was already in, we sync'd this as well https://code.launchpad.net/~jtaylor/ubuntu/quantal/valgrind/various-fixes/+merge/128314 - uploaded -- Micah Gersten U

Re: [ubuntu/raring-proposed] libunity-webapps 2.4.3daily12.11.29-0ubuntu1 (Accepted)

On 11/29/2012 04:45 AM, Ubuntu Archive Robot wrote: > libunity-webapps (2.4.3daily12.11.29-0ubuntu1) raring; urgency=low > > * Automatic snapshot from revision 866 > > Date: 2012-11-29 08:00:12.447090+00:00 > Changed-By: PS Jenkins bot > Maintainer: Ubuntu Desktop > Signed-By: Ubuntu Archive Ro

Re: [ubuntu/raring-proposed] libunity-webapps 2.4.3daily12.11.29-0ubuntu1 (Accepted)

On 11/29/2012 09:26 AM, Didier Roche wrote: > Le 29/11/2012 16:12, Micah Gersten a écrit : >> On 11/29/2012 04:45 AM, Ubuntu Archive Robot wrote: >>> libunity-webapps (2.4.3daily12.11.29-0ubuntu1) raring; urgency=low >>> >>> * Automatic snapshot from revisio

Re: [ubuntu/raring-proposed] libunity-webapps 2.4.3daily12.11.29-0ubuntu1 (Accepted)

On 11/29/2012 09:44 AM, Didier Roche wrote: > Le 29/11/2012 16:37, Micah Gersten a écrit : >> On 11/29/2012 09:26 AM, Didier Roche wrote: >>> Le 29/11/2012 16:12, Micah Gersten a écrit : >>>> On 11/29/2012 04:45 AM, Ubuntu Archive Robot wrote: >>>>>

Daily snapshot changelogs don't reflect diff (was: Re: [ubuntu/raring-proposed] xpathselect 1.1.3daily12.11.29.2-0ubuntu1 (Accepted))

On 11/29/2012 09:59 AM, Ubuntu Archive Robot wrote: > xpathselect (1.1.3daily12.11.29.2-0ubuntu1) raring; urgency=low > > [ Mathieu Trudel-Lapierre ] > * Automatic snapshot from revision 1 (bootstrap). > * debian/control: > - Update style: use trailing commas at the end of dep lists. >

Launchpad fail, please ignore: Re: Daily snapshot changelogs don't reflect diff

On 11/29/2012 10:09 AM, Micah Gersten wrote: > On 11/29/2012 09:59 AM, Ubuntu Archive Robot wrote: >> xpathselect (1.1.3daily12.11.29.2-0ubuntu1) raring; urgency=low >> >> [ Mathieu Trudel-Lapierre ] >> * Automatic snapshot from revision 1 (bootstrap). >>

Re: [ubuntu/raring-proposed] libunity-webapps 2.4.3daily12.11.29-0ubuntu1 (Accepted)

On 11/29/2012 10:29 AM, Sebastien Bacher wrote: > Le 29/11/2012 17:04, Micah Gersten a écrit : >> I'm actually more concerned from the archive side than the project >> side of this. I'm wondering if there are uploads that aren't worth >> doing which ends up wa

Re: Deprecating the wiki-based Packaging Guide

On 12/18/2012 09:23 AM, Daniel Holbach wrote: > Hello, > > On 18.12.2012 01:52, Scott Kitterman wrote: >> UDD is not mature or reliable enough to be presented to new users as "the" >> way to do packaging for Ubuntu. I think the current guide is fatally flawed >> as is. >> >> As soon as a branch

Re: raring ringtail test rebuild

On 01/02/2013 09:58 AM, Matthias Klose wrote: > A test rebuild of raring ringtail started in 2012 for the amd64, i386 and > armhf architectures is now finished for all components on armhf. The amd64 and > i386 rebuilds will hopefully finish in a few days. > > Results can be seen at > http://people.

Re: [ubuntu/raring-proposed] fglrx-installer-updates 2:9.010-0ubuntu4 (Accepted)

On 01/21/2013 09:55 AM, Alberto Milone wrote: > fglrx-installer-updates (2:9.010-0ubuntu4) raring; urgency=low > > * debian/rules: > - Revert change to separate regen-from-templates from > the build target. This fixes a FTBFS. > > Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2013 16:49:43 +0100 > Changed-By: Albe

Re: Minutes from Developer Membership Board Meeting 2013-01-07

ons, but it is a difficult area that we will always be able to improve on. We never take any decision lightly — especially not rejections — as we are aware of the negativity they can generate. Most of us are readily available to discuss and guide applicants. Please find us [1] on IRC if you have any questions. Thanks, Micah Gersten On behalf of the DMB [1] https://launchpad.net/~developer-membership-board/+members -- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel

Re: Minutes from Developer Membership Board Meeting 2013-01-07

On 02/14/2013 04:26 AM, Sebastien Bacher wrote: > Le 22/01/2013 11:01, Stefano Rivera a écrit : > >We will be sending Bjoern an E-Mail explaining our concerns and ways > >that he can address them. >>> >When is that planned? He still didn't get those, we still have no >>> >clue what t

Re: Let's Discuss Interim Releases (and a Rolling Release)

On 02/28/2013 01:02 PM, Steve Langasek wrote: > Of course, there are some elements of this that are entirely for > Canonical to decide. For instance, it's Canonical's decision whether > or not it's going to fund security support for 6-monthly releases. As > ScottK mentions up-thread, it's doubtful

Re: Debian Sync - Re: Let's Discuss Interim Releases (and a Rolling Release)

On 02/28/2013 12:17 PM, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote: > On 28 February 2013 17:05, Scott Kitterman wrote: >> On Thursday, February 28, 2013 07:31:49 AM Rick Spencer wrote: >>> Daily Quality means that developers can ensure their components are stable >>> and useful before they upload, and our processes

Re: Debian Sync - Re: Let's Discuss Interim Releases (and a Rolling Release)

On 02/28/2013 02:11 PM, Jeremy Bicha wrote: > On 28 February 2013 14:33, Micah Gersten wrote: >> Yes, but our britney doesn't delay migration to allow for testing of the >> built packages or block based on RC bugs filed. I see us getting to the >> point at some time i

Re: Debian Sync - Re: Let's Discuss Interim Releases (and a Rolling Release)

On 02/28/2013 11:03 PM, Martin Pitt wrote: > Micah Gersten [2013-02-28 13:33 -0600]: >> Yes, but our britney doesn't delay migration to allow for testing of the >> built packages or block based on RC bugs filed. > Not on RC bugs, but we can still block them manually. Pin

Blueprint renaming doesn't notify subscribers (was: Re: Let's Discuss Interim Releases (and a Rolling Release))

On 02/28/2013 11:46 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote: > On Friday, March 01, 2013 04:43:09 PM William Grant wrote: >> On 01/03/13 15:46, Martin Pitt wrote:> Loïc Minier [2013-02-28 18:18 +0100]: I would think we should go over these questions at UDS next week; Steve Langasek has kindly prepared

Re: indicator-weather broken, should we drop it from raring?

On 04/19/2013 01:25 PM, Barry Warsaw wrote: > On Apr 19, 2013, at 06:36 PM, Sebastien Bacher wrote: > >> I guess you have a configured indicator with your location, right? ;-) > I do! But I fear I might forget my umbrella the next time I travel out of my > home location. :) > >> The current bug ma

Re: [ubuntu/saucy-proposed] livecd-rootfs 2.154 (Accepted)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 07/04/2013 11:50 AM, Ricardo Salveti de Araujo wrote: > livecd-rootfs (2.154) saucy; urgency=low > > [ Sergio Schvezov ] > * Adding ppa:ubuntu-unity/next for Touch to obtain unity8 and Mir. > * Switching to using the maliit plugin provided by

preinst-uses-dpkg-maintscript-helper-without-predepends lintian check

So, apparently, this was removed in lintian 2.5.11 since Debian oldstable has a high enough dpkg (1.15.8.13), but lucid doesn't (1.15.5.6ubuntu4.5). Should we add this check back to lintian in Ubuntu until lucid is EOL (we should be able to do this in Debian since there are lintian profiles now, s

Re: Review of current autopkgtest failures, bucket into teams

On 07/25/2013 05:19 PM, Steve Langasek wrote: > Hi Martin, > > On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 01:34:40PM +0200, Martin Pitt wrote: >> == foundations == >> saucy-adt-pandas (regression) > It looks like Dmitry Shachnev has fixed this up already - thanks, Dmitry! > > Beyond that, this is a package in univers

Re: [ubuntu/saucy-proposed] i7z 0.27.2-2ubuntu1 (Accepted)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 08/15/2013 09:58 AM, Jackson Doak wrote: > i7z (0.27.2-2ubuntu1) saucy; urgency=low > > * Merge from debian unstable. Remaining changes: > - debian/control: Future-proof by adding x32 to the architecture list > > Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2013 07:44:

Re: More sponsors needed

On 02/26/2014 02:27 AM, Jackson Doak wrote: > Hello everyone, > > Can some more people please work on reducing the sponsoring queue? > It's got 60+ requests now, many of which are important bugfixes or > release critical to different > flavours. http://reqorts.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/sponsoring/ We'

Next Developer Membership Board (DMB) Meeting is June 8

Due to the Memorial Day holiday in the US, we've canceled the Developer Membership Board meeting scheduled for May 25. The next meeting will be Monday June 8th, 2015 at 15:00 UTC. Thanks, Micah Gersten on behalf of the DMB -- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com M

Re: [ubuntu/wily-proposed] libxcb 1.11-0ubuntu1 (Accepted)

>From: Robert Ancell >Date: 10:09pm, Tue, Jul 14, 2015 >Subject: [ubuntu/wily-proposed] libxcb 1.11-0ubuntu1 (Accepted) >To: > > >libxcb (1.11-0ubuntu1) wily; urgency=medium > > * New upstream release (LP: #1402966) > * debian/control: >- Add build-depends on xutils-dev >- Bump build-de

Re: Patch pilot report: 2015-08-03

On August 3, 2015 8:42:05 AM CDT, Daniel Holbach wrote: >Hello everybody, > >NOTE: please help out with sponsoring, we have quite a number of >request >piled up! > > http://reqorts.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/sponsoring/ > >Here's what I got done in my shift today: > > > >syncpackage -s logan -b

Re: Does the backporters team need help?

On April 24, 2017 5:51:02 PM CDT, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: >On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 06:44:29PM -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote: >> The answer is clearly yes. I've attempted a few times to pass off >backports >> to someone new and apparently failed. I'll be glad spend a few >minutes >> getting you up

Re: Fwd: Call for votes: Developer Membership Board restaffing

>> Dan Streetman (ddstreet) >> Simon Quigley (tsimonq2) >> Thomas Ward (teward) >> Eric Desrochers (slashd) >> Micah Gersten (micahg) > >Hello @micahg, and thank you for your service on the DMB for all these >years (since 2011)! > >However, I can't help

Re: brainstorming for UDS-N - Performance

On 10/18/2010 02:53 PM, Mackenzie Morgan wrote: > On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 2:40 PM, Steve Langasek > wrote: >> On Tue, Oct 05, 2010 at 10:06:11PM -0400, Mackenzie Morgan wrote: >>> On Tuesday, October 05, 2010 07:29:11 pm Steve Langasek wrote: On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 10:11:16PM +0200, Allison

Re: More LiveCD space optimizations

On 10/08/2010 04:54 AM, Matthias Klose wrote: > [ compression related discussion removed ] > > So maybe we can save some MB with better compression, but we can save more by > not including files at all. Of course this requires inspection of the > packages > included on the liveCD. In the past

  1   2   >