fo/ubuntu-devel
>
>
>
> --
> Christian Ehrhardt
> Senior Staff Engineer and acting Director, Ubuntu Server
> Canonical Ltd
>
> --
> ubuntu-devel mailing list
> ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
> Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
>
--
Loïc Minier
--
ubuntu-devel mailing list
ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
have potential for abuse though, and its
mere existence would cause people to wonder how much is being discussed
on it.
--
Loïc Minier
--
ubuntu-devel mailing list
ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
things
don't make sense to run in a chroot, while others do: I might want to
run a chrooted service, but I probably don't need a chrooted udev, is
there any guideline for this?
--
Loïc Minier
--
ubuntu-devel mailing list
ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubs
would make sense to
offer (optional) series-specific upload queues? e.g.:
dput ubuntu:oneiric foo.changes
where ubuntu:oneiric would be a place in Launchpad which rejects
non-oneiric uploads
--
Loïc Minier
--
ubuntu-devel mailing list
ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or uns
ap as it can't
do any retries.
Cheers,
--
Loïc Minier
--
ubuntu-devel mailing list
ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
tu-oneiric.git patch yet
The only thing to be careful about is to keep generating linux-libc-dev
on armel; all the versatile related stuff in the linux source package
can go away IMO
(Other impacted packages: debian-installer, I can take care of it, and
maybe rootstock?)
--
Loïc Minier
--
t versatile, you can also revert
32e7fd13de2db501a1c3d53a847c1ca666efdb42
UBUNTU: SAUCE: (no-up) select a v7 CPU for versatile
Thanks!
--
Loïc Minier
--
ubuntu-devel mailing list
ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
pdate-manager
I'm not sure ReleaseChecklist is the best place to document these, so
I've not updated it; if someone knows an existing place to list these,
I'm happy to merge my notes into it.
--
Loïc Minier
--
ubuntu-devel mailing list
ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings
gainst Ubuntu's udev since I guess we will
want to track it there anyway:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/udev/+bug/888191
--
Loïc Minier
--
ubuntu-devel mailing list
ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
ant application sandboxing but are we going to allow
replacing system services in apps? Would we allow an app to act as an
interactive desktop background? Are sandboxed apps always fullscreen
like on Android and iOS, or may they have resizeable windows?
[ 2/ (installed files) above seems like a no
--
when available as it's painful to have to rebuild the .axf whenever the
kernel or kernel cmdline change, and real hardware wouldn't use a boot
wrapper anyway.
I guess you're asking because you consider an U-Boot port? :-)
Cheers,
--
Loïc Minier
--
ubuntu-devel mailing li
ueprint from some discussion we
had on this:
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/release-r-monthly-snapshots
Cheers,
--
Loïc Minier
--
ubuntu-devel mailing list
ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
tall. After a month this needs to happen anyway, so why not right
> away?
At the very least it should be very easy to switch between using the
monthly and going to the rolling release; software-properties UI for
instance, or perhaps also a command-line tool.
--
Loïc Minier
--
ub
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> Will they start getting USN coverage?
Good point; I've added that as a question in the bp[1]
thanks,
[1]
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/release-r-monthly-snapshots
--
Loïc Minier
--
ubuntu-devel mailing list
ubun
of:
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/release-r-monthly-snapshots
(but please reword adequately if you like!)
--
Loïc Minier
--
ubuntu-devel mailing list
ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
changes from one monthly to the next. Launchpad series are
in too many places and would be too expensive to create/update monthly
:-/
We need an easy and solid way to switch between monthly and rolling
though; a bit like the software-properties flags for update frequencies,
which updates to i
proach that security updates would be built based on some version
of the rolling release and so users of older versions of the packages
would be forced to update to anything pulled by these security updates.
--
Loïc Minier
--
ubuntu-devel mailing list
ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Modi
evisit how we manage various types of data: how does one
"reset to factory settings"? How would one deploy an update from a
local file or OTA?
Plus we'd want these updates to be as small as possible; typically
deltas. Would be a good win over downloading hundreds of megs of .debs
fr
e proposal in the blueprint is to use "raring" as
this archive for building security updates and copy raring-updates only
monthly to raring.
(the SONAME change is just an example, there might be more subtle cases
like transitions which involve only versioned dependencies -- that we
sometimes d
7;s now at:
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/client-1303-monthly-snapshots
--
Loïc Minier
--
ubuntu-devel mailing list
ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
le
could run on other GNU/Linux distros and eventually perhaps even from
Windows and OSX as to target Ubuntu.
This should probably be a new thread though :-)
--
Loïc Minier
--
ubuntu-devel mailing list
ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
(or /tested, /releasable etc.) would
only be updated when the image passes tests.
--
Loïc Minier
--
ubuntu-devel mailing list
ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
On Fri, Mar 01, 2013, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Sounds familiar:
> http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/livefs-build-logs/raring/ubuntu/
haha, I couldn't find were the /latest were; checked cdimage and it
didn't have them :-)
--
Loïc Minier
--
ubuntu-devel mailing l
On Sat, Mar 02, 2013, Martin Pitt wrote:
> Loïc Minier [2013-03-01 12:10 +0100]:
> > I don't think we can make any commitment against all of Ubuntu or all of
> > main, but we could pick a subset by product and commit to some level of
> > API and ABI support for this sub
gather stats about how much use rolling vs
> monthly vs LTS gets, to see if there is actual non-trivial demand for
> one vs another (and deal with the 'default sticks' effect too).
+1 on stats; in fact whatever we implement we ought to revisit our
choice in some time to revie
t know the internals, I guess it's just one more
reference to the files as with the archive's pools/dists.
--
Loïc Minier
--
ubuntu-devel mailing list
ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
xes and latest features. We would have an easy
way to push an update for a security fix, and an easy way to stage what
goes in it. We do need some branch of (a subset of) the archive to
build that though.
--
Loïc Minier
--
ubuntu-devel mailing list
ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
're trying to land.
We also want peer reviews somewhere.
Finally, I'm not sure we can fit all the *buntu builds with the same
workflow; it worries me that we'd enforce the same transition logic to
e.g. unseeded universe packages and boot infrastructure.
--
Loïc Minier
--
ubuntu-dev
interested!
Cheers,
[1]
http://summit.ubuntu.com/uds-1303/meeting/21613/client-1303-add-app-model-and-lifecycle-to-platform-api/
[2] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-platform
--
Loïc Minier
--
ubuntu-devel mailing list
ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe
ackages from a set to be tested?
--
Loïc Minier
--
ubuntu-devel mailing list
ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
age creation.
Cheers,
--
Loïc Minier
--
ubuntu-devel mailing list
ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013, Loïc Minier wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 14, 2013, Sebastien Bacher wrote:
> > Does anyone know if we already have tools doing that
>
> We do! Kyle (Cc:ed) worked on a license scanner in lp:getlicenses; it
> requires internet connectivity (I guess due to th
sk point of view, the second option seems like the safest one,
but from an efforts point of view this depends on how much work it is to
produce an Unity 8 image with a new keyboard layouts / shortcuts
solution + finding a solution for Ubuntu Desktop.
--
Loïc Minier
--
ubuntu-devel mailing list
ub
7;t know whether this is on the roadmap)
--
Loïc Minier
--
ubuntu-devel mailing list
ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
s a workaround to the
locally installed one being broken. It might be possible to trigger a
memtest from a remove serial console, but I guess the most common use
case is to locally start it when investigating a hardware issue, or when
installing new hardware.
--
Loïc Minier
--
ubuntu-devel
; this probably needs non-trivial APT work though.
This would be a nice saving for both desktop and server users and would
avoid the question of the cost of keeping i386 enabled on amd64
installs.
--
Loïc Minier
--
ubuntu-devel mailing list
ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscr
think we'd want to
install more central agents/servers by default when we dont know the
general network topology. The trend seems to be for individual services to
advertise themselves over mDNS/Bonjour rather than anything centralized
and/or SLP.
> 3. How can I test my environment with co
On Mon, Jan 4, 2016 at 8:19 AM, Martin Pitt wrote:
> networkd is a supported component in Xenial, so you are welcome to use
> it. The server and snappy teams have discussed using it by default,
> and I'm not entirely sure about the latest word on it, but I believe
> the plan was to stay conserva
imiting the Sauce
which goes into the linaro branch with the Ubuntu Kernel Team; I
don't think this fundamentally holds up anything though
* if someone cares about providing better vanilla Linaro Kernel builds,
e.g. .debs, then that someone ought to start some spec on providing +
y in an Ubuntu kernel) etc.
--
Loïc Minier
--
ubuntu-devel mailing list
ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
s about security support
--
Loïc Minier
--
ubuntu-devel mailing list
ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
rous; you can do something like:
LD_LIBRARY_PATH="yourdir${LD_LIBRARY_PATH:+:$LD_LIBRARY_PATH}"
to be secure
Cheers
--
Loïc Minier
--
ubuntu-devel mailing list
ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
27;m trying some
> other approaches to see what happens at this point to break fakeroot.
I didn't use it so far, but isn't it what
$purge_build_directory="successful";
is for in /etc/sbuild/sbuild.conf?
According to this file, "always" is the default and will wip
On Fri, Nov 19, 2010, Loïc Minier wrote:
> I didn't use it so far, but isn't it what
> $purge_build_directory="successful";
> is for in /etc/sbuild/sbuild.conf?
>
> According to this file, "always" is the default and will wipe your
> chroot
of
implicit that we have this branch in every package, but there is not
way to tell whether the UDD branch is in use or not; listing it
explicitly when it's used solves this)
--
Loïc Minier
--
ubuntu-devel mailing list
ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
htt
the actual change manually into the trunk branch, then bump the version to
> 2.1.0-0ubuntu3 with a note about why -0ubuntu2 is skipped.
But this was actually a case of me not being able to commit to the Vcs
branch! :-)
What I usually do in these cases is copy the changelog to bzr myself, to
ide similar colors by default in
xterm/gnome-terminal/others?
Thanks!
--
Loïc Minier
--
ubuntu-devel mailing list
ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
#x27;s not practical to impose a specific
version scheming to all PPA packages immediately.
--
Loïc Minier
#!/bin/sh
# dput - wrapper for /usr/bin/dput asking for confirmation on some uploads
# Copyright (C) 2008 Loïc Minier
#
# Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person
48 matches
Mail list logo
