Hi,
Here are the minutes of the server team meeting. They can also be found online
with the irc logs here: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MeetingLogs/Server/20110405.
Meeting Actions
* Daviey to submit UDS-O topic for translations and docs
* jamespage to helpout with verification of
Etherpad/Gobby
> to pick up this packaging/testing and take it from here?
I would be up for this; the upstream build process is completely
non-standard but we should be able to work it into something more
maintainable.
Cheers
James
--
James Page
Software Engineer, Ubuntu Server Team
signature.a
ive.
I'll take a look at the final bundled dependency over the next few days.
Cheers
James
--
James Page
Software Engineer, Ubuntu Server Team
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--
ubuntu-devel mailing list
ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify sett
to be done to the
proposed branches when SRU process complete - all three branches
marked as 'Needs Fixing' referring to linked bug.
Cheers
James
--
James Page
Ubuntu Server Developer
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--
ubunt
and has missing merge aspect - comment added.
Cheers
James
- --
James Page
Ubuntu Server Developer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJOgcbLAAoJEJyvzxFWdG+VyQsH/2REPr79Z+VReAXPMMnUUvr9
ug/850154
Not ready for SRU into Oneiric yet - un-subscribed ubuntu-sponsors
James
- --
James Page
Ubuntu Core Developer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iQIcBAEBCAAGB
queried what the current state of this package was in Debian (bug
reporter appears to have stepped forward as maintainer) as pushing a new
upstream release through that route would be preferable. Marking
in-complete and un-subscribed ubuntu-sponsors until queries/issues with
patch/encoding resolved.
C
not contain orig.tar.gz for new upstream snapshot; Provided
feedback and marked 'Needs fixing'.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sshfs-fuse/+bug/918869
- - Built and tested OK locally; used syncpackage todo sponsored sync -
w00t!
That's me done for today.
Cheers
James
-
ge/97807
Changelog and patch required some further work - queried whether it
might be better to re-sync from Debian which now has version 1.6.
That's me done for today (aside from landing the zentyal packages...)
Cheers
James
- --
James Page
Ubuntu Core Developer
-BEGIN PGP SIGN
Clint to discuss.
- --
James Page
Ubuntu Core Developer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJPfHIQAAoJEL/srsug59jDc4kP/jRcfkuwA04DiM6xzgdi+zg+
esyw8NtpkoCrTaxmU9YhP3MrByfCJLj2m0U34udbF8VZkHJv
James
- --
James Page
Ubuntu Core Developer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJPunb9AAoJEL/srsug59jDGEkP/icVhIsI1zloAJ1bUB1nIcVK
QbYYs+8jP8qfBjKxYVfBqZwmLusNEVOcb1J
ames
[0] https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/foundations-q-java7
[1]
https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel-announce/2012-April/000955.html
[2] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bugs?field.tag=java7-ftbfs
[3] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/JavaTeam/Java7Default
- --
James Page
Ubuntu Core D
uploaded but not accepted are hard to
differentiate on the report - they don't require any further sponsor
action so it would be good to be able to filter those out if possible.
Cheers
James
--
James Page
Ubuntu Core Developer
Debian Maintainer
james.p...@ubuntu.com
--
ubuntu-d
Hi Daniel
On 15/06/12 13:31, Daniel Holbach wrote:
> On 15.06.2012 14:08, James Page wrote:
>>> SRU's which have been uploaded but not accepted are hard to
>>> differentiate on the report - they don't require any further
>>> sponsor action so it would be
proposer to submit packaging changes back to Debian.
https://code.launchpad.net/~jfi/ubuntu/quantal/psensor/new-upstream/+merge/114792
- Merge not fully documented - asked proposer to update and
re-submit; marked WIP.
Cheers
James
- --
James Page
Ubuntu Core Developer
Debian Maintainer
james.p
James
--
James Page
Ubuntu Core Developer
Debian Maintainer
james.p...@ubuntu.com
--
ubuntu-devel mailing list
ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
/+source/blktap-dkms/+bug/1028135
- New upstream release for compat with 3.5 kernel - proposed by
upstream themselves which created some confusion as the packaging was
quite different. Worked with Mike on IRC to get the correct release
and uploaded a new version for ubuntu.
EOD
- --
James Page
//bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bugs?field.tag=java7-bytecode
[4] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/JavaTeam/Java7Default
- --
James Page
Ubuntu Core Developer
Debian Maintainer
james.p...@ubuntu.com
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - htt
to precise-proposed
- Low priority for cross-build issue - queried whether this is
really eligible for SRU, un-subscribed and pointed reporter
at SRU process.
Start: 69
End: 52 (plus uploads pending approval...)
Cheers
James
- --
James Page
Ubuntu Core Developer
Debian Maintainer
james.p...@
ient/fix-memory-report
- Change to landscape client code; also proposed upstream;
commented that should be accepted upstream first and then
released into Ubuntu. Marked WIP.
- --
James Page
Ubuntu Core Developer
Debian Maintainer
james.p...@ubuntu.com
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version
, unsubscribed ubuntu-sponsors with an
appropriate message.
- --
James Page
Ubuntu Core Developer
Debian Maintainer
james.p...@ubuntu.com
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with undefined - http://www.enigmail.net/
iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJRUEIkAAoJEL
olved). Asked proposer to re-base based on accepted upstream fix and
pointed them at the packaging guide on how to work with branches.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-json-patch/+bug/1185739
Uploaded - and pinged zul about status of Python3 -> Debian.
Queue length at end: 43
-1194855
- Uploaded
Length at end: 32
--
James Page
Ubuntu Core Developer
Debian Maintainer
james.p...@ubuntu.com
--
ubuntu-devel mailing list
ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
as impacts cloud-images.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/librcc/+bug/1183580
Already uploaded to trusty; reviewed saucy SRU and uploaded to
proposed for SRU team review.
- --
James Page
Ubuntu and Debian Developer
james.p...@ubuntu.com
jamesp...@debian.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE
x27; seeds). These
are not explicitly listed in either of these seeds but are pulled in
due to dependencies or Recommends.
ppp
usbutils
os-prober
aptitude
memtest86
... and discuss!
I'd like to land any changes early in 2014 prior to feature freeze.
Cheers
James
[0] http://pad.ubuntu.c
applications? Or do users still just use the
Oracle Java downloads instead and ignore what Ubuntu provides?
Let me know what you think...
Cheers
James
- --
James Page
Ubuntu and Debian Developer
james.p...@ubuntu.com
jamesp...@debian.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.15
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi Folks
On 21/01/14 18:16, James Page wrote:
> What do people think to this plan? Are OpenJDK and Tomcat7
> important packages for Ubuntu users? Will not having a well
> supported OpenJDK implementation in Ubuntu main discourage peop
04.5 release dates and would suggest
> releasing 14.04.1 first and 12.04.5 after (exact date TBD).
>
> What are other's thoughts here? Does anyone have a compelling
> reason for not providing a 12.04.5 point release?
+1 on release and proposal for timing - works well from a server team
On 08/04/14 18:10, Robie Basak wrote:
> A few last pieces are being worked in the last couple of days to
> final freeze.
>
> * James Page is struggling to find a release team member to review
> the docker.io feature freeze exception request (bug 1295093).
Now completed; Dave
generally +1
for the patch - made comment to this effect and started to peek at the
merge.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/augeas/+bug/1310120
- LGTM - uploaded to utopic and trusty.
Queue at end of period: 43
Cheers
James
- --
James Page
Ubuntu and Debian Developer
james.p...@ubunt
://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/isc-dhcp/+bug/1401141
Reviewed - but not comfortable sponsoring this set of SRU's to fix
infiniband support in isc-dhcp as the patches, although upstream, are
quite invasive.
Cheers
James
- --
James Page
Ubuntu and Debian Developer
james.p...@ubuntu.com
j
Hi All
sqlalchemy 1.0.x has been creating some awkward unit test races in some
OpenStack projects (specifically neutron, and I'm fed up of hitting
rebuild); I've started work on the transition to sqlalchemy 1.1.x for
artful in:
https://launchpad.net/~ci-train-ppa-service/+archive/ubuntu/2739/+p
Hi All
Mathias and I where discussing some challenges around fitting the Ceph
build with any level of parallelism in to a virtualized launchpad builder
(as used for the majority of architectures today).
Basically the current memory spec only permits a max-parallel of 2 (on
Xenial amd64). Ceph is
On Tue, 4 Jul 2017 at 23:36 Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
[...]
> Yeah, if we make all builders x4 the size, it may mean we will have 4x
> less /builders/.
>
Builders are currently 4G then with 4 cores? maybe a doubling might be a
more sensible proposal to start with.
I think I've also seen a sql
Hi SRU Team
I've made/proposed an update to:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/OpenStack/StableReleaseUpdates
For 20.04, OVN is the default/preferred SDN for OpenStack deployments on
Ubuntu; as such we'd like to include it in the SRU process we have for
stable point releases alongside OpenvSwitch.
We h
Forwarding to -devel for wider discussion
-- Forwarded message -
From: James Page
Date: Wed, May 12, 2021 at 10:00 AM
Subject: ceph: dropping support for armhf
To: ubuntu-server
Hi -server
Every cycle we go through a bit/lot of pain as new versions of Ceph are
released; the
-up coordination of this pre-freeze activity and act as a point
of reference for any freeze exceptions in terms of impact assessment
etc.
[0] https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/614981
[1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/552613
--
James Page
Software Engineer, Ubuntu Server Team
sign
On Wed, Jan 22, 2025 at 3:00 AM Michael Hudson-Doyle <
michael.hud...@canonical.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 22 Jan 2025 at 04:19, Robie Basak wrote:
>
>> I think it's about time that Ubuntu Developer realtime conversation
>> moved from IRC to Matrix. What do you think?
>>
> [snip]
I'm +1 on this move
38 matches
Mail list logo
