(except for the last one, which would
be awesome if it were possible). Any further ideas? If not, which one of
the above should I try?
--
Aaron Rainbolt
Lubuntu Developer
Matrix: @arraybolt3:matrix.org
IRC: arraybolt3 on irc.libera.chat
GitHub: https://github.com/ArrayBolt3
--
ubuntu-devel m
On 12/7/23 17:58, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Thu, Dec 07, 2023 at 03:11:31AM -0600, Aaron Rainbolt wrote:
For this reason, I need to have every reverse dependency autopkgtested
against the new signond packages in a PPA, lest I severely clog up the
archive.
You really, REALLY don't.
Pre-u
I am digging deep into the world of Ubuntu development and am trying to
make sure my alpha and beta testing is as effective as possible. I also
don't want to cash out an arm and a leg for expensive software to do so.
I've been using virt-manager (QEMU/KVM) for testing on virtual machines,
and while
the EULA. I would highly recommend installing
> virt-manager as a suitable alternative.
>
> On Fri 13 May 2022, 08:17 Aaron Rainbolt, wrote:
>
>> I am digging deep into the world of Ubuntu development and am trying to
>> make sure my alpha and beta testing is as effective
a license.
>
> TL:DR if it's solely community work, it shouldn't be a breach. Other
> things would be case by case.
>
>
> On Sat, May 14, 2022, 10:50 Aaron Rainbolt wrote:
>
>> Thanks, that's what I needed to know! Virt-manager is more than
>> sufficien
On Fri, Jun 10, 2022 at 5:21 AM Ernst Sjöstrand wrote:
>
> Den fre 10 juni 2022 kl 07:36 skrev Olivier Tilloy
> :
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Jun 10, 2022 at 1:49 AM Steve Langasek
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jun 09, 2022 at 01:00:45PM -0400, Nick Rosbrook wrote:
>>> > In the reports I refer to above, ap
ecome an official flavor, and I may end up simply maintaining it as an
unofficial installer by myself should I end up doing it.
Is this kind of project a possible candidate for becoming an official
Ubuntu Flavor, or is this enough info to declare it as not a possible
candidate?
Thanks
hat's awesome! I'll be watching for this, and if it's welcome, possibly
trying to contribute to it eventually. Thanks for letting me know!
On Fri, 24 Feb 2023 at 04:54, Aaron Rainbolt wrote:
Note, I'm asking this *very* early. I don't have the project I have in
mind even
On 2/24/23 11:51, Dan Bungert wrote:
On Fri, 24 Feb 2023 at 04:54, Aaron Rainbolt wrote:
I've seen more than one person annoyed by the fact that the mini.iso
netinstaller is no more.
The "flavor" would be able to be held in a
very small ISO file (preferably CD sized), and it
Huh. TIL. That's awesome.
On 2/24/23 14:33, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Fri, Feb 24, 2023 at 02:20:25PM -0600, Aaron Rainbolt wrote:
This makes good sense to me. The concern I'm noticing here is that Secure
Boot activates a kernel lockdown mode that prohibits kexec.
Incorrect. It di
On 2/24/23 11:51, Dan Bungert wrote:
On Fri, 24 Feb 2023 at 04:54, Aaron Rainbolt wrote:
I've seen more than one person annoyed by the fact that the mini.iso
netinstaller is no more.
The "flavor" would be able to be held in a
very small ISO file (preferably CD sized), and it wou
regression and the changes seem unlikely to cause any, so I uploaded
> in the hopes they infrastructure fairs better.
>
> I've now managed to run them and there is failure related to
> cross-bootstrap (yes sbuild --arch=armhf -d plucky also works);
> I'll dig deeper and hop
On Wed, 22 Jan 2025 12:46:41 +0100
Sebastien Bacher wrote:
> Hey Simon,
>
> Le 22/01/2025 à 00:01, Simon Quigley a écrit :
> > The Flavor channel is hardly a development channel; this move would
> > not make sense.
>
> Yet I often see topics like ISO build failures introduced by Ubuntu
> D
On Thu, 23 Jan 2025 10:04:10 +0100
Julian Andres Klode wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 21, 2025 at 03:19:14PM +, Robie Basak wrote:
> > I think it's about time that Ubuntu Developer realtime conversation
> > moved from IRC to Matrix. What do you think? Can we reach a
> > consensus on this topic?
>
>
On Wed, 22 Jan 2025 01:03:23 +
Simon Quigley wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have been working on a general effort to improve the new packaging
> guide[1]. As a general note, please consider joining me.
>
> As part of this effort, with the help of Aaron Rainbolt[2], I have
&g
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On Tue, 18 Mar 2025 19:54:55 +
Simon Quigley wrote:
> Hello Robie,
>
> On 3/18/25 02:37 PM, Robie Basak wrote:
> > Dear Ubuntu Developers,
> >
> > Following the move from IRC to Matrix, the topic of moving to
> > Discourse from mailing lists
On Mon, 31 Mar 2025 18:35:39 +0100
Robie Basak wrote:
> Currently there are 245 emails in the moderation queue for
> ubuntu-devel@ and 12 for ubuntu-release@. Most are spam. I get the
> impression there's been a massive increase in spam hitting the lists
> in recent weeks.
>
> If we shutter the
makes very little sense (especially
when there's a public list that is copied on this that we can look
through if a CoC violation does occur and we need context).
To those who reply here, please remove
community-coun...@lists.ubuntu.com from the reply list.
--
Aaron Rainbolt
Ubuntu Community Counc
18 matches
Mail list logo
