Re: RFC: Ubuntu Seeded Snaps

2018-02-15 Thread Marcos Alano
IMHO, Snap Store is more like an app store (like Google Play Store), than a regular package repository (archive.ubuntu.com, a PPA or a third party repository). I think some ground rules and some policies are necessary, but we must avoid burocracy and give freedom to developer, so he/she can create

Re: RFC: Ubuntu Seeded Snaps

2018-02-15 Thread Mark Shuttleworth
On 02/09/2018 11:48 AM, Colin Watson wrote: > For better or worse, the snap store doesn't have teams. Should this be > rephrased in terms of collaboration or something? Well, I'd rather we set the expectation that the snap store learn to use LP teams. Mark -- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-d

Re: More diagnostics data from desktop

2018-02-15 Thread Ian Bruntlett
Hi Will, On 14 February 2018 at 15:22, Will Cooke wrote: > We want to be able to focus our engineering efforts on the things that > matter most to our users, and in order to do that we need to get some more > data about sort of setups our users have and which software they are > running on it. >

Re: More diagnostics data from desktop

2018-02-15 Thread Cassidy James Blaede
This makes sense from Ubuntu's perspective, and it will certainly be interesting to see the resulting data. I have a few concerns, but nothing insurmountable: How will this affect downstreams? Downstreams/non-official-flavors may want to disable or remove any diagnostics. Keep them in mind when des

Re: More diagnostics data from desktop

2018-02-15 Thread Juerg Haefliger
On 02/14/2018 04:22 PM, Will Cooke wrote: > Dear all, > > We want to be able to focus our engineering efforts on the things that > matter most to our users, and in order to do that we need to get some > more data about sort of setups our users have and which software they > are running on it. > >

Re: More diagnostics data from desktop

2018-02-15 Thread Will Cooke
On 14 February 2018 at 18:37, Alistair Buxton wrote: > > > * Information from the installation would be sent over HTTPS to a service > > run by Canonical’s IS team. This would be saved to disk and sent on > first > > boot once there is a network connection. The file containing this data > > woul

Re: merge-o-matic: Filtering for status pages

2018-02-15 Thread David Britton
Thanks Julian! This is great. :) -- David Britton -- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel

Re: More diagnostics data from desktop

2018-02-15 Thread Ernst Sjöstrand
Hi, "Send diagnostics information to help improve Ubuntu" sounds like you're continuously reporting things, but your proposal looks more like a single "installation ping" or something. I guess the apport and popcon reports would be continuous though? If you do this you should really make sure eve

Re: autopkgtest-build-lxd failing with bionic

2018-02-15 Thread Timo Aaltonen
On 14.02.2018 22:03, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote: > Hi, > > I am on bionic and managed to build bionic container for testing using: > > $ autopkgtest-build-lxd ubuntu-daily:bionic/amd64 > > Note this uses Ubuntu Foundations provided container as the base, > rather than the third-party image that y

Re: autopkgtest-build-lxd failing with bionic

2018-02-15 Thread Martin Pitt
Hello Timo, Timo Aaltonen [2018-02-15 16:50 +0200]: > On 14.02.2018 22:03, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I am on bionic and managed to build bionic container for testing using: > > > > $ autopkgtest-build-lxd ubuntu-daily:bionic/amd64 > > > > Note this uses Ubuntu Foundations provi

Re: autopkgtest-build-lxd failing with bionic

2018-02-15 Thread Stéphane Graber
On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 04:10:01PM +0100, Martin Pitt wrote: > Hello Timo, > > Timo Aaltonen [2018-02-15 16:50 +0200]: > > On 14.02.2018 22:03, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > I am on bionic and managed to build bionic container for testing using: > > > > > > $ autopkgtest-build

Re: autopkgtest-build-lxd failing with bionic

2018-02-15 Thread Julian Andres Klode
On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 04:10:01PM +0100, Martin Pitt wrote: > Hello Timo, > > Timo Aaltonen [2018-02-15 16:50 +0200]: > > On 14.02.2018 22:03, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > I am on bionic and managed to build bionic container for testing using: > > > > > > $ autopkgtest-build

Re: autopkgtest-build-lxd failing with bionic

2018-02-15 Thread Timo Aaltonen
On 15.02.2018 18:04, Julian Andres Klode wrote: > On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 04:10:01PM +0100, Martin Pitt wrote: >> Hello Timo, >> >> Timo Aaltonen [2018-02-15 16:50 +0200]: >>> On 14.02.2018 22:03, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote: Hi, I am on bionic and managed to build bionic container for

Re: autopkgtest-build-lxd failing with bionic

2018-02-15 Thread Iain Lane
[ autopkgtest-devel, this is https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel/2018-February/040138.html and thread FYI - Reply-To / Mail-Followup-To set to exclude ubuntu-devel from this subthread so reviews go to the right place ] On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 10:28:05AM -0500, Stéphane Graber wrot

Re: autopkgtest-build-lxd failing with bionic

2018-02-15 Thread Steve Langasek
On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 06:48:31PM +, Iain Lane wrote: > [ autopkgtest-devel, this is > https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel/2018-February/040138.html > and thread FYI - Reply-To / Mail-Followup-To set to exclude > ubuntu-devel from this subthread so reviews go to the right plac

Re: More diagnostics data from desktop

2018-02-15 Thread Dustin Kirkland
On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 4:16 AM, Ernst Sjöstrand wrote: > Hi, > > "Send diagnostics information to help improve Ubuntu" sounds like > you're continuously reporting things, but your proposal looks more > like a single "installation ping" or something. > I guess the apport and popcon reports would b

Re: More diagnostics data from desktop

2018-02-15 Thread Dustin Kirkland
On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 1:10 AM, Juerg Haefliger wrote: > On 02/14/2018 04:22 PM, Will Cooke wrote: >> Dear all, >> >> We want to be able to focus our engineering efforts on the things that >> matter most to our users, and in order to do that we need to get some >> more data about sort of setups o

Re: autopkgtest-build-lxd failing with bionic

2018-02-15 Thread Martin Pitt
Hello Iain, all, Iain Lane [2018-02-15 18:48 +]: > There's a patch attached here which fixes the problem for me. I'm not > sure if there's a better way to do this - basically it starts > network-online.target and waits for it to become active, with a timeout. > Review appreciated. I wouldn't