On Fri, Feb 16, 2024 at 03:33:26PM +, Robie Basak wrote:
> Bryce mentioned the difficulty of removing the slot. Unfortunately
> there's no UI for this, but I did confirm today that it can be done by
> API. I wrote a quick script so that we can do it easily if needed:
> https://git.launchpad.ne
On Wed, Aug 23, 2023 at 11:25:24AM +0100, Robie Basak wrote:
> I also posted here yesterday, having forgotten about this thread:
> https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/improving-the-git-ubuntu-based-sponsorship-workflow/37964
Both of these threads died, and sorry again for accidentally splitting
it.
I'
I also posted here yesterday, having forgotten about this thread:
https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/improving-the-git-ubuntu-based-sponsorship-workflow/37964
--
ubuntu-devel mailing list
ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubunt
On Fri, Jun 30, 2023 at 10:03:56AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> The one case where this is currently suboptimal is if the last comment on
> the MP is from an Ubuntu dev saying it needs changes, but the submitter has
> pushed new changes addressing that feedback without leaving a further
> comment
On Thu, Jun 29, 2023 at 10:55:21PM +0100, Robie Basak wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 29, 2023 at 02:36:06PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > I think the least-effort approach is for the handling of MPs for sponsorship
> > to match the handling of bugs: ~ubuntu-sponsors is unsubscribed, and it's
> > the respo
On Thu, Jun 29, 2023 at 02:36:06PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> I think the least-effort approach is for the handling of MPs for sponsorship
> to match the handling of bugs: ~ubuntu-sponsors is unsubscribed, and it's
> the responsibility of the submitter to re-subscribe them (and patch pilots
> h
On Thu, Jun 29, 2023 at 11:12:43AM -0700, Bryce Harrington wrote:
> However, as you point out, this does create a secondary issue of making
> it harder to make things disappear from the sponsorship queue
> _intentionally_. For the server team workflow, the unclosable cruft
> seems to be a minor an
On Thu, Jun 29, 2023 at 09:13:01PM +0200, Sebastien Bacher wrote:
> Hey Bryce,
>
> Le 29/06/2023 à 20:12, Bryce Harrington a écrit :
> > I do love automation, however I think we shouldn't rule out letting this
> > be somewhat manual. I.e. we already tell non-git-ubuntu sponsorees to
> > manually
Hey Bryce,
Le 29/06/2023 à 20:12, Bryce Harrington a écrit :
I do love automation, however I think we shouldn't rule out letting this
be somewhat manual. I.e. we already tell non-git-ubuntu sponsorees to
manually sub ubuntu-sponsors:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MOTU/Contributing
"Set the bug
On Thu, Jun 29, 2023 at 03:18:27PM +0100, Robie Basak wrote:
> # The "grabbing" of review slots
>
> This is the immediate problem.
>
> The sponsorship queue displays git-ubuntu MPs for which ~ubuntu-sponsors
> has a review slot. But if a member of the team votes (eg. "Needs
> Information"), then La
Dear Ubuntu Developers,
Currently it's unclear what patch pilots are supposed to do when an MP
in the sponsorship queue cannot be resolved immediately. This relates to
how the sponsorship queue behaves as MP state changes. It seems that we
should have a "manual for sponsors" that explains what to
11 matches
Mail list logo
