Re: apport permission error

2020-03-06 Thread Alex Murray
On Wed, 2020-03-04 at 03:49:39 +1030, Robie Basak wrote: > On Tue, Feb 25, 2020 at 09:09:24AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: >> Thanks, it's easy enough to back out later (as long as someone actually >> raises a flag when things break!), so I'm ok with that. > > bacula's various postinsts (at least

Re: apport permission error

2020-03-03 Thread Robie Basak
On Tue, Feb 25, 2020 at 09:09:24AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > Thanks, it's easy enough to back out later (as long as someone actually > raises a flag when things break!), so I'm ok with that. bacula's various postinsts (at least bacula-sd.postinst) fail with fs.protected_regular=2. This breaks

Re: apport permission error

2020-02-25 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
On Tue, Feb 25, 2020 at 6:10 PM Steve Langasek wrote: > On Tue, Feb 25, 2020 at 02:04:51PM +1030, Alex Murray wrote: > > > On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 02:04:37PM -0800, Kees Cook wrote: > > >> On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 03:45:39AM +, Seth Arnold wrote: > > >> > I'm worried that turning this flag on

Re: apport permission error

2020-02-25 Thread Steve Langasek
On Tue, Feb 25, 2020 at 02:04:51PM +1030, Alex Murray wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 02:04:37PM -0800, Kees Cook wrote: > >> On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 03:45:39AM +, Seth Arnold wrote: > >> > I'm worried that turning this flag on for the first time in an LTS > >> > release > >> > may be break

Re: apport permission error

2020-02-25 Thread Alex Murray
On Tue, 2020-02-25 at 02:42:58 +1030, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 02:04:37PM -0800, Kees Cook wrote: >> On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 03:45:39AM +, Seth Arnold wrote: >> > I'm worried that turning this flag on for the first time in an LTS release >> > may be breaking too many ex

Re: apport permission error

2020-02-24 Thread Steve Langasek
On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 02:04:37PM -0800, Kees Cook wrote: > On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 03:45:39AM +, Seth Arnold wrote: > > I'm worried that turning this flag on for the first time in an LTS release > > may be breaking too many expectations. > > Adapting applications may be too much effort; beca

Re: apport permission error

2020-02-21 Thread Kees Cook
On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 03:45:39AM +, Seth Arnold wrote: > I'm worried that turning this flag on for the first time in an LTS release > may be breaking too many expectations. > > Adapting applications may be too much effort; because I don't know what > exactly apport is doing here it is hard t

Re: apport permission error

2020-02-20 Thread Seth Arnold
On Fri, Feb 14, 2020 at 09:31:55AM -0300, Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo wrote: > > > > It's worth noting whoopsie-upload-all is run as root. I've discovered > > > > that changing /proc/sys/fs/protected_regular from 1 to 0 allows > > > > whoopsie-upload-all to write to the file. I imagine that appor

Re: apport permission error

2020-02-14 Thread Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo
On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 01:11:59PM -0800, Brian Murray wrote: > On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 08:47:03AM -0300, Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 03:43:28PM -0800, Brian Murray wrote: > > > I've recently been investigating a bug[1] where whoopsie-upload-all, > > > provided