Re: Proposal: move byobu (and run-one) to universe

2022-06-15 Thread Dave Jones
On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 11:30:34AM -0700, Brian Murray wrote: [snip] I don't think byobu is widely installed by default and subsequently having it moved to universe would not make much difference i.e. users would still need to install it. It's widely installed because it's seeded on the server;

Re: Proposal: move byobu (and run-one) to universe

2022-05-20 Thread Paride Legovini
Dan Streetman wrote on 10/05/2022: > On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 3:41 PM Brian Murray wrote: >> >> On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 02:55:43PM -0400, Dan Streetman wrote: >>> On Wed, May 4, 2022 at 11:22 AM Paride Legovini wrote: Hi -devel, The status of src:byobu appears to be less than i

Re: Proposal: move byobu (and run-one) to universe

2022-05-10 Thread Dan Streetman
On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 3:41 PM Brian Murray wrote: > > On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 02:55:43PM -0400, Dan Streetman wrote: > > On Wed, May 4, 2022 at 11:22 AM Paride Legovini wrote: > > > > > > Hi -devel, > > > > > > The status of src:byobu appears to be less than ideal, and this has been > > > the c

Re: Proposal: move byobu (and run-one) to universe

2022-05-10 Thread Brian Murray
On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 02:55:43PM -0400, Dan Streetman wrote: > On Wed, May 4, 2022 at 11:22 AM Paride Legovini wrote: > > > > Hi -devel, > > > > The status of src:byobu appears to be less than ideal, and this has been > > the case for several cycles now. I think we should consider moving it > >

Re: Proposal: move byobu (and run-one) to universe

2022-05-10 Thread Dan Streetman
On Wed, May 4, 2022 at 11:22 AM Paride Legovini wrote: > > Hi -devel, > > The status of src:byobu appears to be less than ideal, and this has been > the case for several cycles now. I think we should consider moving it > from main to universe in kinetic. The general feedback from the Server > Team

Re: Proposal: move byobu (and run-one) to universe

2022-05-10 Thread Jeremy Bicha
On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 2:31 PM Brian Murray wrote: > I don't think byobu is widely installed by default and subsequently > having it moved to universe would not make much difference i.e. users > would still need to install it. byobu is installed by default but not enabled by default. Personally

Re: Proposal: move byobu (and run-one) to universe

2022-05-10 Thread Brian Murray
On Mon, May 09, 2022 at 09:39:46AM +0100, Robie Basak wrote: > I'm on the fence on this one. > > On one hand, if it's not really being cared for upstream, then you're > right in asking about whether demotion is appropriate. > > On the other hand, it does Just Work, and I've been pointing > inexpe

Re: Proposal: move byobu (and run-one) to universe

2022-05-09 Thread Robie Basak
I'm on the fence on this one. On one hand, if it's not really being cared for upstream, then you're right in asking about whether demotion is appropriate. On the other hand, it does Just Work, and I've been pointing inexperienced admins to it for years as a console-sharing leave-things-running so

Proposal: move byobu (and run-one) to universe

2022-05-04 Thread Paride Legovini
Hi -devel, The status of src:byobu appears to be less than ideal, and this has been the case for several cycles now. I think we should consider moving it from main to universe in kinetic. The general feedback from the Server Team about this proposal is positive. We are not aware of anything specif