Re: Lowlatency Kernel is behind in Ubuntu Studio

2023-03-13 Thread Steve Langasek
On Mon, Mar 13, 2023 at 11:21:39AM -0700, Erich Eickmeyer wrote: > > > My point is that lowlatency shouldn't be grouped-in to these flavors, but > > > should be given higher priority and grouped-in with generic since it's > > > still used in desktop systems by default and is directly affecting the

Re: Lowlatency Kernel is behind in Ubuntu Studio

2023-03-13 Thread Thomas Ward
A general reminder to *everyone* with my Community Council hat on: Whether you are Canonical, an Ubuntu Flavor team member, or just a general community member, if you feel yourself starting to get hostile / aggressive in tone, step back and take a breather. There are an increasing number of t

Re: Lowlatency Kernel is behind in Ubuntu Studio

2023-03-13 Thread Steve Langasek
On Mon, Mar 13, 2023 at 06:03:00PM +, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote: > > > We pushed 6.1 out, and migrated, on generic only, to migrate lots of > > > packages in proposed, specifically nvidia & everything entangled with > > > it, and thus unblock autopkgtesting of all the userspace packages > > > w

Re: Lowlatency Kernel is behind in Ubuntu Studio

2023-03-13 Thread Erich Eickmeyer
On Monday, March 13, 2023 11:03:00 AM PDT Dimitri John Ledkov wrote: > On Mon, 13 Mar 2023 at 17:54, Erich Eickmeyer wrote: > > On Monday, March 13, 2023 10:29:50 AM PDT Dimitri John Ledkov wrote: > > > Ideally all flavours would be at 6.2 already, but due to various > > > reasons they are not. >

Re: Lowlatency Kernel is behind in Ubuntu Studio

2023-03-13 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
On Mon, 13 Mar 2023 at 17:54, Erich Eickmeyer wrote: > > On Monday, March 13, 2023 10:29:50 AM PDT Dimitri John Ledkov wrote: > > Ideally all flavours would be at 6.2 already, but due to various > > reasons they are not. > > This is understandable and perfectly reasonable. > > > This is not unique

Re: Lowlatency Kernel is behind in Ubuntu Studio

2023-03-13 Thread Erich Eickmeyer
On Monday, March 13, 2023 10:29:50 AM PDT Dimitri John Ledkov wrote: > Ideally all flavours would be at 6.2 already, but due to various > reasons they are not. This is understandable and perfectly reasonable. > This is not unique to lowlatency flavour, and applies to kvm, azure, > raspi, and many

Re: Lowlatency Kernel is behind in Ubuntu Studio

2023-03-13 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
Ideally all flavours would be at 6.2 already, but due to various reasons they are not. This is not unique to lowlatency flavour, and applies to kvm, azure, raspi, and many more kernel flavours all of which are still on v5.19 in Lunar. We pushed 6.1 out, and migrated, on generic only, to migrate l

Lowlatency Kernel is behind in Ubuntu Studio

2023-03-13 Thread Erich Eickmeyer
Hi everyone, I'm bringing this up as a matter of concern for the Ubuntu Studio daily images. I believe sometime after the release of 22.04, the lowlatency kernel was split from the build of the generic kernel. From what I understand it was to make the build process easier and shorter, but I cou