Hi folks,
On lun. 09 juin 2025 12:25:54, Utkarsh Gupta wrote:
[snip]
> > So I wonder if it's worth continuing with elections at all? What if the
> > Technical Board were to just appoint DMB members as they felt
> > appropriate with a simple announcement, inviting prospective members to
> > apply t
Hi,
On jeu. 05 juin 2025 09:51:45, Christian Ehrhardt wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 5, 2025 at 8:54 AM Robie Basak wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, May 22, 2025 at 11:08:57AM +0100, Robie Basak wrote:
> > > Providing at least six valid nominations are received, voting
> > > shall commence on 2025-06-12 and sh
Hi folks,
On mar. 18 mars 2025 18:27:02, Bryce Harrington wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 18, 2025 at 08:00:09PM +, Simon Quigley wrote:
[snip]
> > No qualms, I appreciate the work, but as a long-term goal, we might want to
> > discuss porting to a compiled language.
> >
> > I don't want the pitchforks
Hi folks,
Better late than never, glibc 2.41 should land in -proposed in during the
weekend. While upstream has done its usual job, I usually "bake" the
release much more than this, so there might be a bit more unforeseen
breakage than usual this time around, my apologies.
A high-level overview o
i,
On mer. 22 janv. 2025 19:39:04, Simon Quigley wrote:
> Hi Simon,
>
> On 1/22/25 04:51 AM, Simon Chopin wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> >
> > On mer. 22 janv. 2025 01:03:23, Simon Quigley wrote:
> > [snip]
> >> When you sh
Hi,
On mer. 22 janv. 2025 01:03:23, Simon Quigley wrote:
[snip]
> When you should (not) rewrite a copyright file to use DEP-5
> +++
>
> You **should** rewrite a copyright file to use DEP-5 if:
>
> * you are updating to a new upstream version
Hi Robie,
Thanks for bringing this up.
I'm all for moving to Matrix. The UX has some rough edges (notably
around replies vs threads), but I agree with most of your points.
I'm a bit more reserved about merging -devel and -release. I'm not
really confident that the tooling you mention would be en
source-into-unstable/
>
> Thomas
>
> ____
> From: ubuntu-devel on behalf of Simon
> Chopin
> Sent: Monday, January 13, 2025 10:41 AM
> To: ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
> Cc: Florent Jacquet
> Subject: `login` transition from src:shadow
Hi folks,
While reviewing Skia's merge of src:shadow, we've noticed that the
`login` binary has been removed from it, and it is now provided by
util-linux (which Skia has also diligently merged).
Before I upload those merges, I wanted to touch base, especially since
this move is accompanied by a
Hi folks,
On mar. 15 oct. 2024 12:57:03, Zixing Liu wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I am applying for the Masters Of The Universe (MOTU).
>
> You can find my application at
> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/liushuyu-011/MOTUApplication.
It is my pleasure and privilege to announce on behalf of the DMB that we
vote
Hi,
On ven. 13 sept. 2024 00:38:20, Dave Jones wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I'm applying for Ubuntu Core Developer. My application can be found at:
>
> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DaveJones/CoreDevApplication
>
> I've added an entry to the DMB agenda for 2024-12-09 (but am happy to
> turn up earlier, if time p
Howdy folks!
It is that time of the cycle when I announce the upcoming upload of
glibc 2.40 to the archive.
TL;DR: small release, look out for utmp vs i386, and rseq. I plan to
upload next week (Monday or Tuesday).
For the newcomers, this has historically been a fairly disruptive
activity for tw
Hi folks,
I had my +1 shift last week. On the first couple of days I st started looking
into the very old items on the excuses page to see if I could move the needle a
bit on them (see the mescc-tools paragraph further down, spoiler alert: no joy).
After that, I focused my attention on the cluste
Hi Miriam,
On lun. 17 juin 2024 10:29:57, Miriam Espana Acebal wrote:
> (Sorry, I sent incomplete)
>
> Hello everyone,
>
> Sorry for the delay... I was waiting for the resolution
> (reviews/acceptance) of some of the tasks I did
> (learning also .
> As Athos commented, I shadowed him on the last
Hi folks,
I was on +1 last week, and this is my report/hand-off document.
# Hand-off
For folks that are on +1 this week and the next, given the recent events (t64
transition and xz-utils-related woes) I suggest you head over to
#ubuntu-release and ask the Release Team if you can be of help on wh
ding dates these days. It
will indeed be the 2nd, thanks for pointing it out.
> On 1/31/24 09:07, Simon Chopin wrote:
> > Hi there!
> >
> > Small timeline update: I'm actually aiming at uploading the new glibc on
> > Friday, 3rd, so two days from now.
> >
&
Hi there!
Small timeline update: I'm actually aiming at uploading the new glibc on
Friday, 3rd, so two days from now.
> Hi folks!
>
> As usual in this time of the cycle, the new version of glibc is about to
> be released upstream (scheduled next Thursday, Feb 1st), and should thus be
> uploaded t
Hi folks!
As usual in this time of the cycle, the new version of glibc is about to
be released upstream (scheduled next Thursday, Feb 1st), and should thus be
uploaded to the archive shortly thereafter, presumably around Feb 7th.
Have a look at the upstream changelog if you're interested in the
d
Hi all,
During the release week, we decided to still do a +1 rotation: as in
yours truly. I was supposed to be shadowed by Paul Mars (upils), but it
turns out that Paul ended up going off on his own since I had some last
minute release-related things to investigate, some paperwork to do,
etc...
I
of the
distribution. We've opted to enable it.
As usual with this sort of flags, it might trip some code that
was silently buggy, resulting in FTBFS.
You can find a human-readable changelog for the 2.38 release there:
https://sourceware.org/git/?p=glibc.git;a=blob_plain;f=NEWS;hb=HEAD
timing
out, as well as a few builds of Rust crates that were just waiting for
their new build-deps to be available.
Cheers,
--
Simon Chopin
Foundations TeamUbuntu MOTU/Core Dev
simon.cho...@canonical.comscho...@ubuntu.com
--
ubuntu-dev
Hi,
This is a short report of what I've been up to this week as part of my
+1 rotation. Oddly enough, I seemed to have picked time-consuming issues
to work on, which makes for a short status.
===
Items requiring follow up:
* gi
=NEWS;hb=HEAD
[1]:
https://people.canonical.com/~ginggs/ftbfs-report/test-rebuild-20221215-lunar-glibc-2.37-lunar.html
[2]: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libunistring/+bug/2004264
[3]: https://launchpad.net/~schopin/+archive/ubuntu/glibc-2.37-snapshot
--
Simon Chopin
Foundations Team
reproduce it reliably, and
narrow it down to an issue in libgnat or libgcc_s in exception handling.
--
Simon Chopin
Foundations TeamUbuntu MOTU/Core Dev
simon.cho...@canonical.comscho...@ubuntu.com
--
ubuntu-devel mailing list
Quoting Heinrich Schuchardt (2022-06-29 12:56:57)
> On 6/29/22 10:33, Simon Chopin wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > As part of our efforts to support the Rust toolchain in main, we need to
> > have libgit2 in main (dependency of cargo). However, it currently links
> > agai
, nor does it re-export any of their symbols (assuming I understand
the output of readelf -s correctly).
Could someone confirm that this does not represent a breaking change?
Cheers,
--
Simon Chopin
Foundations Team Ubuntu Core Dev
simon.cho...@can
h in turns FTBFS
due to endianness issues. I cherry-picked an upstream patch and
submitted it to Debian, which was subsequently synced.
That's all!
--
Simon Chopin
Foundations Team Ubuntu Core Dev
simon.cho...@canonical.comsch
## racket
The package add an explicit Recommends: libssl1.1, I just changed it to
libssl3.0 and all went well.
--
Simon Chopin
Foundations Team Ubuntu MOTU
simon.cho...@canonical.comscho...@ubuntu.com
--
ubuntu-devel mailing
html
[2]: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bugs?field.tag=transition-openssl3-jj
--
Simon Chopin
Foundations Team Ubuntu MOTU
simon.cho...@canonical.comscho...@ubuntu.com
--
ubuntu-devel mailing list
ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
for us. The fix has been
uploaded directly to Ubuntu
as well as forwarded to Debian.
Have a nice end of year :)
Cheers,
--
Simon Chopin
Foundations Team Ubuntu MOTU
simon.cho...@canonical.comscho...@ubuntu.com
--
ubuntu-
Hi,
(dropping the ubuntu-release@ from the CC list, as the moderation delay
makes having a thread there a bit senseless)
Quoting Robie Basak (2021-11-22 17:59:32)
> On Fri, Nov 19, 2021 at 12:54:22PM -0500, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote:
> > I'd like to raise something. I apologize for sending thi
ginggs:
https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/transitions/html/openssl3.html
Thank you for your patience.
Cheers,
--
Simon Chopin
Foundations Team Ubuntu MOTU
simon.cho...@canonical.comscho...@ubuntu.com
--
ubuntu-devel mail
Hi all!
This week was my second +1 rotation. It is worth mentioning that in the
middle of the week I was accepted as MOTU, which seemed like good timing \o/
## rgain3
The Python3 3.10 upload triggered a couple of bugs in the ADT specs. I submitted
a MR directly to Debian [0]
[0]: https://salsa.
Hi Robie,
Quoting Robie Basak (2021-10-11 12:39:00)
> I think it's worth noting what happened with nodejs in Bionic:
>
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nodejs/+bug/1779863
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nodejs/+bug/1794589
>
> Summary: nodejs incorporated the version of ope
.1 will
be kept around as long as they're depended on. However, the autopkgtests
of packages lagging in the transition, or even of their rdeps, might
start to fail if they build the tests during the autopkgtests. If that's
the case, you might want to get the package rebuilt against Open
Hello,
My apologies, it seems I never got around to send my +1 shift report,
so here it is.
I have been on +1 maintenance from 2021-08-16 to 2021-08-21. This was my first
+1 rotation, and since the impish feature freeze was on the 19th, a good chunk
of my work has been on getting new upstream ver
Hello,
As some of you may be aware, the OpenSSL project is working towards a
major OpenSSL 3.0 version, which will not be ABI compatible with
the current 1.1 branch[0]. They have recently released a first Release
Candidate version[1], and in order to prepare for a stable release, I've
uploaded a v
Hello,
For your information, there's a bug[0] in the autodep8 implementation for R
packages that can generate wrong control metadata for the autopkgtest of
some R packages, see for instance [1]. So if you see weird failures with
test dependencies refusing to install, it might very well be because
38 matches
Mail list logo
