Re: git-ubuntu build

2023-06-09 Thread Bryce Harrington
On Fri, Jun 09, 2023 at 09:11:34PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Wed, Jun 07, 2023 at 09:27:47PM -0700, Bryce Harrington wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 07, 2023 at 06:41:14PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > > > It does not exist, actually! I recall we dropped it a few years ago, > > see see f2dc622e.

Re: git-ubuntu build

2023-06-09 Thread Steve Langasek
On Wed, Jun 07, 2023 at 09:27:47PM -0700, Bryce Harrington wrote: > On Wed, Jun 07, 2023 at 06:41:14PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > > As git-ubuntu sees increasing use, including for such things as requests for > > sponsorship of Debian merges, I've had an itch to scratch regarding the > > compl

Re: +1 maintenance report

2023-06-09 Thread Brian Murray
On Fri, Jun 09, 2023 at 06:20:55PM +0100, Danilo Egea Gondolfo wrote: > I had a shorter week with some Netplan distractions but here we go: > > 1. delve > > FTBFS due to the installed bpftool not matching the running kernel version. > I tried to workaround this by calling bpftool directly from >

Re: git-ubuntu MPs in the sponsorship queue

2023-06-09 Thread Robie Basak
On Fri, Jun 09, 2023 at 12:13:29PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Fri, Jun 09, 2023 at 12:32:38PM +0100, Robie Basak wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 05, 2022 at 05:41:04PM +0100, Robie Basak wrote: > > > I've arranged for MPs against git-ubuntu repositories to appear in the > > > sponsorship queue[1]. >

+1 maintenance report

2023-06-09 Thread Danilo Egea Gondolfo
I had a shorter week with some Netplan distractions but here we go: 1. delve FTBFS due to the installed bpftool not matching the running kernel version. I tried to workaround this by calling bpftool directly from /usr/lib/linux-tools-. It kinda worked but the build still fails for a different rea

Re: Symbols files for C++ libraries for Ubuntu main

2023-06-09 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
On Fri, 9 Jun 2023 at 20:10, Steve Langasek wrote: > > Hi Seb, > > On Fri, Jun 09, 2023 at 02:27:02PM +0200, Sebastien Bacher wrote: > > I would like to ask if there is any chance the MIR team would reconsider > > their position on the topic (at least until the day we have a somewhat > > working s

Re: git-ubuntu MPs in the sponsorship queue

2023-06-09 Thread Steve Langasek
On Fri, Jun 09, 2023 at 12:32:38PM +0100, Robie Basak wrote: > On Tue, Jul 05, 2022 at 05:41:04PM +0100, Robie Basak wrote: > > I've arranged for MPs against git-ubuntu repositories to appear in the > > sponsorship queue[1]. > I was using the fact that ~ubuntu-sponsors is requested for review in a

Re: Symbols files for C++ libraries for Ubuntu main

2023-06-09 Thread Steve Langasek
Hi Seb, On Fri, Jun 09, 2023 at 02:27:02PM +0200, Sebastien Bacher wrote: > I would like to ask if there is any chance the MIR team would reconsider > their position on the topic (at least until the day we have a somewhat > working solution we can use)? > which also included those types of change

Re: Symbols files for C++ libraries for Ubuntu main

2023-06-09 Thread Sebastien Bacher
Hey there, We had been struggling with a few of those cases recently in desktop and I was going to send an email about the topic then checking the archive I found back that discussion that I had forgotten about. I would like to ask if there is any chance the MIR team would reconsider their p

Re: git-ubuntu MPs in the sponsorship queue

2023-06-09 Thread Robie Basak
On Tue, Jul 05, 2022 at 05:41:04PM +0100, Robie Basak wrote: > I've arranged for MPs against git-ubuntu repositories to appear in the > sponsorship queue[1]. I was using the fact that ~ubuntu-sponsors is requested for review in a git-ubuntu MP to make it appear in the sponsorship queue. But if som