Re: [Bug 357601] Re: package linux-image-2.6.28-11-generic 2.6.28-11.40 failed to install/upgrade: failed to delete `/boot/vmlinuz-2.6.28-11-generic.dpkg-new': Read-only file system

2009-05-25 Thread sammcj
Ogasawara > Hi sammcj, > > It seems to make sense that the kernel would fail to install if /boot > was read only. Any idea how /boot may have become read only prior to > the update? Or are you positive it was read-writeable prior to the > update and it was indeed the up

[Bug 357601] Re: package linux-image-2.6.28-11-generic 2.6.28-11.40 failed to install/upgrade: failed to delete `/boot/vmlinuz-2.6.28-11-generic.dpkg-new': Read-only file system

2009-04-08 Thread sammcj
** Attachment added: "BootDmesg.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/25010128/BootDmesg.txt ** Attachment added: "CurrentDmesg.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/25010129/CurrentDmesg.txt ** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/25010130/Dependencies.txt ** A

[Bug 357601] [NEW] package linux-image-2.6.28-11-generic 2.6.28-11.40 failed to install/upgrade: failed to delete `/boot/vmlinuz-2.6.28-11-generic.dpkg-new': Read-only file system

2009-04-08 Thread sammcj
Public bug reported: when upgrading from 8.10 to 9.04 my /boot somehow became read-only. Upgrader crashed and a very painfully slow attempt to downgrade back to the old setup / recover itself. had to re-mount /boot and do dpkg -r and apt-get -f install. ProblemType: Package Architecture: i386 Di

[Bug 502433] Re: Lucid: b43 fatal DMA error on Dell Mini 9

2010-05-03 Thread sammcj
Its not just the 'Dell Mini 9' it's also HP Mini's! This is pretty serious, I'm surprised 10.04 went live with this bug, especially now that netbooks are so big. -- Lucid: b43 fatal DMA error on Dell Mini 9 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/502433 You received this bug notification because you are

[Bug 357601] Re: package linux-image-2.6.28-11-generic 2.6.28-11.40 failed to install/upgrade: failed to delete `/boot/vmlinuz-2.6.28-11-generic.dpkg-new': Read-only file system

2009-11-27 Thread sammcj
I wish I could, I did a fresh install of xubuntu :) -- package linux-image-2.6.28-11-generic 2.6.28-11.40 failed to install/upgrade: failed to delete `/boot/vmlinuz-2.6.28-11-generic.dpkg-new': Read-only file system https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/357601 You received this bug notification becau

[Bug 1000252] Re: virtualbox-dkms 4.1.12-dfsg-2: virtualbox kernel module failed to build [Makefile:576: /usr/src/linux-headers-3.2.0-23-generic/arch//Makefile: No such file or directory]

2012-09-21 Thread sammcj
root@nas:/mnt/shares/downloads# dpkg-reconfigure virtualbox-dkms -- Deleting module version: 4.1.12 completely from the DKMS tree. -- Done. Loading new virtualbox-4.1.12 DKMS files... Building only for 3.2.0-31-generic Building initial module

[Bug 994883] Re: virtualbox-dkms 4.1.12-dfsg-2: virtualbox kernel module failed to build

2012-09-21 Thread sammcj
root@nas:/mnt/shares/downloads# dpkg-reconfigure virtualbox-dkms -- Deleting module version: 4.1.12 completely from the DKMS tree. -- Done. Loading new virtualbox-4.1.12 DKMS files... Building only for 3.2.0-31-generic Building initial module

[Bug 994883] Re: virtualbox-dkms 4.1.12-dfsg-2: virtualbox kernel module failed to build

2012-09-21 Thread sammcj
Reinstalling does not fix the issue for me. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/994883 Title: virtualbox-dkms 4.1.12-dfsg-2: virtualbox kernel module failed to build To manage notificat

[Bug 994883] Re: virtualbox-dkms 4.1.12-dfsg-2: virtualbox kernel module failed to build

2012-09-29 Thread sammcj
FIXED by added a more up-to-date version of virtualbox to my server: echo "deb http://ppa.launchpad.net/debfx/virtualbox/ubuntu precise main" >> /etc/apt/sources.list apt-get update apt-get dist-upgrade Then run service vboxdrv setup -- You received this bug notification because you are a mem

[Bug 939795] Re: Better handle lxc-net job failing to start (when user doesn't need it)

2013-07-19 Thread sammcj
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 928524 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/928524 also present on raring with linux 3.9.0. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/939795 Title: Better

[Bug 259830] Re: Honor gnome proxy setting

2011-11-28 Thread sammcj
A major faulty, I cannot believe this still has not been fixed, no gwibber at work! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/259830 Title: Honor gnome proxy setting To manage notifications abo

[Bug 626176] [NEW] hostapd doesn't work when launched by init script

2010-08-29 Thread sammcj
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: hostapd By default hostapd will not launch properly from it's init script. Symptom: Script appears to work, say's its started hostapd and exits, but in fact hostapd is not running. Fix: Uncomment out RUN_DAEMON="YES" in /etc/default/hostapd Change re