--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/942357
Title:
package flashplugin-installer 11.1.102.62ubuntu2 failed to
install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation
script
The kern.log has this line:
Jul 24 10:41:38 Lexington kernel: [ 6100.207979] hub 1-7:1.0: unable to
enumerate USB device on port 3
repeat without stopping while the computer is powered up. The time
changes but the message repeats over and over.
mark@Lexington:~$ uname -r
3.8.0-26-generic
howeve
This is Xubuntu 12.04. After an Update Manager update of
Chrome/Chromium, browser no longer operational.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/940554
Title:
chromium-browser crashed with SIG
This is Xubuntu 12.04 LTS. This is a clean install of Xubuntu in June
2013. After package update from Update Mgr., Chrome and Chromium fail to
launch.
chromium-browser 28.0.1500.71-0ubuntu1.12.04.1
google-chrome-stable 28.0.1500.71-r209842
neither run. I tried an advice to mv pepperflash bu
@kovid
Your behavior toward Dan is confusing, as he has been cordial and
informative. There is nothing to suggest he has been a "destructive
influence" in any of his posts. It was you who first showed attitude
toward both Dan and Jason in posts #7 and #9, the consequences being a
bug report that h
@kovid:
I understand that you have a full plate, but your initial reaction was
not just to question the legitimacy of the exploits but to dismiss them
as sanctimonious when people kept insisting that the issues were more
severe than you assumed. However, that you are apologetic is to be
respected.
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 861584 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/861584
Public bug reported:
Now my mouse has stopped working...
ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.10
Package: flashplugin-installer 10.3.183.10ubuntu5
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.0.0-12.19-generic 3.
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 861584 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/861584
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/865238
Title:
package flashplugin-installer 10.3.183.10ubuntu5
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: firefox
net.sourceforge.jnlp.LaunchException: Fatal: Initialization Error: Could not
initialize applet.
at net.sourceforge.jnlp.Launcher.createApplet(Launcher.java:728)
at net.sourceforge.jnlp.Launcher.getApplet(Launcher.java:672)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/793813
Title:
java applet will not load
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
I can replicate this bug consistently on a website that uses javascript
code from jQuery, Twitter, and Facebook. I can give the link to the
website if desired (it is a website I developed) or the direct link to
the simple javascript file so please let me know if that is desired. It
appears to happe
Please disregard comment #59 because the issue was an error in the
javascript that was causing a recursive function to be called via
javascript improperly. Once this was fixed the flashing hover icon no
longer happens.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs,
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: mount
Ubuntu 10.04 2.6.32-22-server amd64 server connects to OpenSolaris b134
server via iSCSI iSER over Infiniband switch fabric.
Ubuntu can mount and manipulate ext2, ext3, and ext4 iSCSI connected
partitions but not HPFS/NTFS partitions which contain
Public bug reported:
Had to replace a hard drive, bought new SSD of same size, have now tried
4 or 5 times to install from Live USB and always fails saying 'unable to
install grub bootloader" If I run boot-install separately it seems to
work but ubuntu still does not run.
ProblemType: Bug
DistroR
The "unable to save" message is due to file permissions, and the fact
that nvidia-settings is run as the current user.
To save settings, press Alt-F2 and run the command:
gksu nvidia-settings
Presumably the install needs to change so that nvidia-settings is run
with appropriate permissions.
I understand the upstream argument. (Been there, done that.) The GTK
folk did not *intend* to break compatibility (at least in a theoretic
sense), but did in fact break compatibility (in an actual sense). Their
intent was to introduce useful new behaviors into a release meant to
preserve old behavi
This is a GTK bug, and should have a priority considerably higher than
the present "low". (I do not know who can change priority, or where/how
GTK bugs should be tracked.)
The GTK folk released an iteration of a shared library. The iteration
was advertised as backwards compatible, but contained a
@reini - be careful before you count "everyone else". For me, the
environment variable hack made buttons work, but added occasional
crashes in libpango (reported elsewhere). You can work around the flaky
buttons with the keyboard (tedious). But you cannot work around Eclipse
crashing and losing wor
Strictly speaking, this is a bug in GTK. A new version of GTK shipped
that was meant to be compatible, but instead broke existing applications
(at the very least those based on Eclipse). The application use of GTK
might (or might not) be considered in some way improper, but practical
considerations
This is really a GTK bug, and the 2.18 GTK was meant to be backwards
compatible, but instead broke existing applications (at the very least
Eclipse-based applications). Seems this is the appropriate GTK bug report:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/gtk/+bug/442078
--
GDK_NATIVE_WINDOWS=1 still requir
Seems the work-around of setting the GDK_NATIVE_WINDOWS environment
variable is a bit uncertain. In my case, now I am getting a hard fault
in the GTK library (not really an improvement).
This really needs to get fixed in GTK.
--
Buttons in Eclipse not working correctly with GTK+ 2.18.1-1
https:/
Public bug reported:
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)
ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04
Package: capiutils 1:3.12.20071127-0ubuntu11
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-24.39-generic-pae 3.2.16
Uname: Linux 3.2.0-24-generic-pae i686
ApportVersion: 2.0.1-0ubunt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1006496
Title:
package capiutils 1:3.12.20071127-0ubuntu11 failed to install/upgrade:
subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit
I do not understand the last comment. I did notice that the error seems
to correspond to the timezone offset.
The timezone on my laptop and on my camera is properly set to PST.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://b
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: shotwell
For example, this picture was taken at 3:16pm PST, but Flickr thinks the photo
was taken at 10:16pm.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/dreadedhill/5557161777/meta/
ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.10
Package: shotwell 0.7.2-0ubuntu2
ProcVer
** Summary changed:
- Photos published to Flickr have the wrong date/time EXIF info.
+ Photos published to Flickr have the wrong date/time.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/742225
Title:
Shotwell shows 3:16PM (the correct time).
I did* not* modify the date/time.
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 10:04 AM, Jim Nelson wrote:
> It looks to me that Flickr is using the EXIF Date/Time (original) field
> instead of the other two (Digitized, Modified). For most cameras, this
> is the same valu
preston@mercury:~/Pictures/2011/03/24$ exiv2 -pa IMG_0841.JPG | grep -i date
Exif.Image.DateTime Ascii 20 2011:03:24
15:16:38
Exif.Photo.DateTimeOriginal Ascii 20 2011:03:24
15:16:38
Exif.Photo.DateTimeDigitized Ascii 20
** Attachment added: "The original photo, as requested."
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/shotwell/+bug/742225/+attachment/1941762/+files/IMG_0841.JPG
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.
Done.
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 4:26 PM, Lucas Beeler <742...@bugs.launchpad.net>wrote:
> Hi Preston,
>
> Could you attach to this bug report a copy of your original photo --
> just as it came from your camera's memory card? I can't use the JPEG you
> uploaded to Fl
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: shotwell
Running the current Shotwell release as distributed by Ubuntu.
Deleting a photo should set the focus to the nearest in sort order
photo, not back to the beginning of all photos.
ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.10
Package: shotwell 0.7
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/761437
Title:
focus set back to beginning on delete - not a good choice with large
numbers of photos
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ub
101 - 132 of 132 matches
Mail list logo
