Unity is ahead or at least in the direction to resolve bug #1 . I agree with
Martin. Looking forward to the outcome of the recent UDS...and hopefully by
the time the next release comes out, there would be enough PC makers to make
Ubuntu visible and easily available for consumers to buy in at least
This was reported during the natty alpha releases. This should closed
since it's not reproducible since final release.
Thanks for the follow up.
On May 19, 2011 1:01 PM, "Pedro Villavicencio" wrote:
> Thanks for the report, it has been some time without any response or
> feedback in this bug re
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: apport
while update manager bug appears
ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04
Package: apport 1.20.1-0ubuntu5
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.38-8.42-generic 2.6.38.2
Uname: Linux 2.6.38-8-generic i686
ApportLog:
Architecture: i386
CrashRe
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/768027
Title:
package apport 1.20.1-0ubuntu5 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess
installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
--
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: aptdaemon
carshed after update.
ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04
Package: python-aptdaemon.gtkwidgets (not installed)
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.38-5.32-generic 2.6.38-rc6
Uname: Linux 2.6.38-5-generic i686
Architecture: i386
Date:
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/724705
Title:
package python-aptdaemon.gtkwidgets (not installed) failed to
install/upgrade: trying to overwrite
'/usr/share/pyshared/aptdaemon/gtkwi
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: aptdaemon
bug shows up by opening update manager
ProblemType: Crash
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04
Package: aptdaemon 0.41+bzr586-0ubuntu2
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.38-5.32-generic 2.6.38-rc6
Uname: Linux 2.6.38-5-generic i686
Annotation: Applying so
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/726158
Title:
: [Errno 2] No such file or directory:
'/dev/pts/1'
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/m
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: aptdaemon
bug appears while installing deb file. - google chrome
ProblemType: Crash
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04
Package: aptdaemon 0.40+bzr541-0ubuntu2
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.38-1.28-generic 2.6.38-rc2
Uname: Linux 2.6.38-1-generic i686
Annota
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/713476
Title:
: 'dbus.Struct' object does not support
item assignment
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/713475
Title:
: 'dbus.Struct' object does not support
item assignment
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: aptdaemon
bug appears while installing deb file. - google chrome
ProblemType: Crash
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04
Package: aptdaemon 0.40+bzr541-0ubuntu2
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.38-1.28-generic 2.6.38-rc2
Uname: Linux 2.6.38-1-generic i686
Annota
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: aptdaemon
bug appears while installing deb packages - google talk plugin
ProblemType: Crash
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04
Package: aptdaemon 0.40+bzr541-0ubuntu2
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.38-1.28-generic 2.6.38-rc2
Uname: Linux 2.6.38-1-generic i686
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/713477
Title:
: 'dbus.Struct' object does not support
item assignment
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu
this bug is already resolved in maverick. just did a clean install on an
Acer D250 netbook KAV60 D250-1148
@Pedro: IMO this bug can be closed :)
On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 8:37 AM, Pedro Villavicencio
wrote:
> Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
> Ubuntu better. A
@Randall
After reviewing the link. It does not match what system76 is currently
offering
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 4:04 PM, Randall Ross (rrnwexec) <
rand...@executiv.es> wrote:
> It's done.
> Please refer to the official list of hardware. Please direct everyone
> you know to do the same.
> ht
Well I guess it's still up to all Ubuntu community members to really promote
OEMs and create demand for them.
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 6:54 PM, Randall Ross (rrnwexec) <
rand...@executiv.es> wrote:
> @Mark
> That's true. system76 is likely in a different category. I assume they
> are in the new "U
Computer stores are usually tied up with Microsoft in their sales/discount.
It boils up to risks presented to stores such as if they sell Linux they may
lose their "discount/promo" from Microsoft. Will the demand for other
platforms counter this risk? I don't know. It will take a big technology
Why can't Ubuntu local communities create a database of local stores in
their area to guide people interested in Ubuntu. Also we can create a list
of peripherals accepted by the kernel and are sold by these local stores.
This way, we can help fellow Ubuntu users to achieve to "just works" system
of
Dear Ubuntu.com / Canonical admin,
The certified hardware section of the site mentions company names like
HP, Dell, Toshiba, etc. while missing out companies like System76 that
actually sell Ubuntu computers. The current post list only shows
certified / compatible models but these companies dont
It may be just sign-in familiarity between empathy and pidgin
On Jun 23, 2010 5:30 AM, "Pedro Villavicencio" wrote:
I cannot reproduce the bug but I can confirm that the update doesn't
cause any regression, Been testing it for a couple of days and did not
noticed any regression so far, facebook
@Randall: I agree that Ubuntu should be made distinct. Users should always
remember that "linux" is just the backbone to make Ubuntu or any gnu
distributions to work with hardware. It just like saying calling Apple
computers as running on "darwin" instead of running on macOS.
On Jul 7, 2010
@lemalal: that link indeed is a dissapointment, very misleading, and
untruthful.
On Jul 21, 2010 2:07 PM, "lelamal" <1...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote:
> It may be old news, but it always strikes as something unpleasant:
>
http://www1.euro.dell.com/content/topics/segtopic.aspx/windows_or_ubuntu?c=uk
@reason: broadcom uses firmware that is exclusive to microsoft. I think
the easiest way to solve this is switch to a generic atheros or intel wifi
card. The broadcom driver is proprietary hence it will take longer to
resolve since broadcom does not seem to put sense of urgency to fix this.
On J
I agree. :)
On Jul 22, 2010 7:31 AM, "Reason" wrote:
> I know it's more a Broadcom issue then it is an Ubuntu one, but that
doesn't change the fact is doesn't work.
> Even more so it worked perfectly fine under 9.10.
> Using different hardware is a quick fix not a solution. Especially in a
lapto
I think there is a business model that exist. If I'm not mistaken it's
close to Google's Android OS. Again, canonical takes ownership of
marketing. What WE can do is support it, just like how Apple' s Mac fan
base. Early adopters like us should continue to promote Ubuntu.
On Jul 25, 2010 12:
The bios version of my netbook was not compatible to linux at all. When the
bios was flushed to a compatible version the power issues were resolved. It
seems most of the cheap netbook have proprietary firmware that works
exclusively on a ms win platform
On Jun 14, 2010 3:25 PM, "meshellwm" wrote:
301 - 327 of 327 matches
Mail list logo
