[Bug 2068529] [NEW] Focal: Reverse proxy POST with with body length >1000 is missing body

2024-06-05 Thread Wesley Hershberger
Public bug reported: POST requests to an apache2 server with the below configuration do not forward the message body. Affected versions: apache2 2.4.41-4ubuntu3.17 in focal Steps to reproduce: sudo apt-get install apache2 sudo a2enmod proxy sudo a2enmod proxy_http Add /etc/apache2/sites-enable

[Bug 2068529] Re: Focal: Reverse proxy POST with with body length >1000 is missing body

2024-06-07 Thread Wesley Hershberger
Thanks for the note Mauricio. The bug is not present in Jammy. I've edited the bug description to include a reproducer that reflects the message length limit. ** Description changed: POST requests to an apache2 server with the below configuration do not - forward the message body. + forward t

[Bug 2064176] [NEW] LXD fan bridge causes blocked tasks

2024-04-29 Thread Wesley Hershberger
Public bug reported: Hi, cross posting this from https://github.com/canonical/lxd/issues/12161 I've got a lxd cluster running across 3 VMs using the fan bridge. I'm using a dev revision of LXD based on 6413a948. Creating a container causes the trace in the attached syslog snippet; this causes the

[Bug 2064176] Re: LXD fan bridge causes blocked tasks

2024-04-29 Thread Wesley Hershberger
** Attachment added: "apport.linux-image-6.5.0-28-generic._9l2i4n1.apport" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/2064176/+attachment/5772647/+files/apport.linux-image-6.5.0-28-generic._9l2i4n1.apport -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs,

[Bug 1597017] Re: mount rules grant excessive permissions

2024-08-15 Thread Wesley Hershberger
Hi, gentle ping on this; is there an ETA for this to land in 22.04? Let me know if I can help with testing. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1597017 Title: mount rules grant excessive p

[Bug 2064717] Re: ceph-volume needs "packaging" module

2024-05-06 Thread Wesley Hershberger
This also affects ceph-volume 19.2.0~git20240301.4c76c50-0ubuntu6 in Noble. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064717 Title: ceph-volume needs "packaging" module To manage notifications

[Bug 2052661] Re: numba 0.58 is not compatible with python 3.12

2024-11-01 Thread Wesley Hershberger
Hi friends, Since Numba 0.59 has been released with support for python 3.12, are there plans to include numba in noble-updates/universe? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2052661 Title:

[Bug 2081231] [NEW] kernel 6.8.0-40: ext4 online resize on thin-provisioned storage gives 'invalid opcode'

2024-09-19 Thread Wesley Hershberger
Public bug reported: Hi, We're seeing failures of an ext4 resize on LVM and Ceph block devices in the LXD CI; the following call trace happens during resize2fs of an ext4 FS on an LVM lv. I'll also upload an apport report. Let me know if there's anything else I can provide! --- [ 54.268802] E

[Bug 2095203] Re: `netplan apply` fails in LXD container with physical NIC passthrough

2025-01-22 Thread Wesley Hershberger
** Description changed: Hello, When using physical NIC passthrough in LXD containers [1], netplan fails when trying to run `udevadm`. Using these LXD devices for the container, where enp6s0 is a spare physical NIC: ``` devices: - eth0: - name: eth0 - nictype: physical

[Bug 2095203] Re: `netplan apply` fails in LXD container with physical NIC passthrough

2025-01-24 Thread Wesley Hershberger
Hi Danilo, thanks for the note. I've updated the description with the netplan yaml and opened https://github.com/canonical/netplan/pull/539 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2095203 Title:

[Bug 2095203] [NEW] `netplan apply` fails in LXD container with physical NIC passthrough

2025-01-17 Thread Wesley Hershberger
Public bug reported: Hello, When using physical NIC passthrough in LXD containers [1], netplan fails when trying to run `udevadm`. Using these LXD devices for the container, where enp6s0 is a spare physical NIC: ``` devices: eth0: name: eth0 nictype: physical parent: enp6s0 typ

[Bug 2089411] Re: python perf module missing in realtime kernel

2025-02-20 Thread Wesley Hershberger
All set, thanks. ``` wesley@oracular2:~$ uname -a Linux oracular2 6.11.0-1006-realtime #6-Ubuntu SMP PREEMPT_RT Mon Feb 17 15:51:31 UTC 2025 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux wesley@oracular2:~$ python3 -c 'import perf; [print(c) for c in perf.cpu_map()]' 0 ``` ** Tags removed: verification-failed-

[Bug 2089411] Re: python perf module missing in realtime kernel

2025-02-26 Thread Wesley Hershberger
Thanks Manuel; unfortunately the generic kernel is not affected by this bug, only the variants (aws, azure, realtime, etc), so we can't verify with linux-generic. I don't have permission to access the packages for the RT kernel in the Noble ppa [1] (linked from [2]) but this bug/fix applies to all

[Bug 2089411] Re: python perf module missing in realtime kernel

2025-02-26 Thread Wesley Hershberger
** Tags removed: verification-done-noble-linux ** Tags added: verification-failed-noble-linux -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2089411 Title: python perf module missing in realtime kern

[Bug 2089411] Re: python perf module missing in realtime kernel

2025-02-26 Thread Wesley Hershberger
Looks like the symlink described in 1ecc312721 (/usr/lib/linux- tools/6.8.0-1023-azure/lib -> /usr/lib/linux-azure-tools-6.8.0-1023/lib) doesn't exist with package linux-tools-6.8.0-1023-azure, likely because the link's target doesn't exist. I checked the corresponding links in linux-realtime-tools

[Bug 2089411] Re: python perf module missing in realtime kernel

2025-02-19 Thread Wesley Hershberger
** Tags removed: verification-needed-oracular-linux ** Tags added: verification-failed-oracular-linux -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2089411 Title: python perf module missing in realt

[Bug 2089411] Re: python perf module missing in realtime kernel

2025-02-19 Thread Wesley Hershberger
Hi, I'm still seeing this bug with 6.11.0-1006-realtime, which should contain the patch [1] (thanks for the help Juerg) ``` wesley@oracular2:~$ uname -a Linux oracular2 6.11.0-1006-realtime #6-Ubuntu SMP PREEMPT_RT Mon Feb 17 15:51:31 UTC 2025 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux wesley@oracular2:~$ py

[Bug 2083029] Re: Try does not recover network

2025-03-21 Thread Wesley Hershberger
I've done some more looking at this and the bug runs pretty deep. During `netplan try`, netplan backs up both its configuration in /etc/netplan and the backend configurations for systemd-networkd and NetworkManager [1]. The problem with this is that the restored config files aren't picked up by sys

[Bug 2083029] Re: Try does not recover network

2025-03-22 Thread Wesley Hershberger
Opened a PR: https://github.com/canonical/netplan/pull/548 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2083029 Title: Try does not recover network To manage notifications about this bug go to: ht

[Bug 2104201] [NEW] LXD installer attempts to install when LXD snap is installed & disabled

2025-03-25 Thread Wesley Hershberger
Public bug reported: Install and disable LXD in Ubuntu 24.04 ``` sudo snap install lxd sudo snap disable lxd ``` Then run a command with lxc: ``` $ lxc ls Installing LXD snap, please be patient. ``` ** Affects: lxd-installer (Ubuntu) Importance: Low Status: New -- You received

[Bug 2083029] Re: Try does not recover network

2025-03-25 Thread Wesley Hershberger
** Description changed: + [ Impact ] + + `netplan try` fails to roll back network changes after an edit to + /etc/netplan/50-cloud-init.yaml. This occurs using both networkd and + NetworkManager backends. + + A user makes changes to their netplan configuration over ssh, expecting + that if the s

[Bug 2083029] Re: Try does not recover network

2025-03-25 Thread Wesley Hershberger
** Changed in: netplan.io (Ubuntu Focal) Status: New => Confirmed ** Changed in: netplan.io (Ubuntu Jammy) Status: New => Confirmed ** Changed in: netplan.io (Ubuntu Noble) Status: New => Confirmed ** Changed in: netplan.io (Ubuntu Oracular) Status: New => Confirmed

[Bug 2104201] Re: LXD installer attempts to install when LXD snap is installed & disabled

2025-03-26 Thread Wesley Hershberger
** Tags added: seg -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2104201 Title: LXD installer attempts to install when LXD snap is installed & disabled To manage notifications about this bug go t

[Bug 2104201] Re: LXD installer attempts to install when LXD snap is installed & disabled

2025-03-26 Thread Wesley Hershberger
I ran into this with autopkgtest (man 1 autopkgtest-virt-lxd), so it hung for a while and then failed as the first lxc command it ran didn't do anything. I haven't looked at the code but an early return (with some kind of descriptive error message) when LXD is disabled would be great. :) -- You

[Bug 2104201] Re: LXD installer attempts to install when LXD snap is installed & disabled

2025-03-26 Thread Wesley Hershberger
Looks good to me, thanks for hopping on this. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2104201 Title: LXD installer attempts to install when LXD snap is installed & disabled To manage notifi

[Bug 2104201] Re: LXD installer attempts to install when LXD snap is installed & disabled

2025-03-26 Thread Wesley Hershberger
A reminder that the snap is disabled would be ideal, but "not found" is also appropriate here IMO. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2104201 Title: LXD installer attempts to install when

[Bug 2104840] [NEW] sudo_logsrvd TLS log transport in Jammy

2025-03-27 Thread Wesley Hershberger
Public bug reported: [ Impact ] Users of sudo_logsrvd in Jammy are unable to configure TLS transport as sudo was built without OpenSSL in Jammy. This functionality is available in Noble and above as OpenSSL was inadvertantly included in sudo builds: 564d6d7f in cyrus-sasl2 introduced an indirec

[Bug 2056187] Re: fails to configure BOOTIF when using iscsi

2025-03-27 Thread Wesley Hershberger
Hi, just checking in on the status of this since LP#2093164 is waiting on it. Is this still blocked? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2056187 Title: fails to configure BOOTIF when using

[Bug 2104840] Re: sudo_logsrvd TLS log transport in Jammy

2025-03-27 Thread Wesley Hershberger
** Tags added: sts ** Also affects: sudo (Ubuntu Jammy) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2104840 Title: sudo_logsrvd TLS log transport in Ja