[Bug 1805920] Re: iPXE ignores vlan 0 traffic

2018-12-03 Thread Vern Hart
Some interesting observations. The customer deployed a pair of Centos7 machines and confirmed the vlan0 tag issue existed there as well. That wasn't too surprising. However, they deployed a pair of Centos6 machines and they do NOT have the vlan0 tag issue. This seems to confirm that the issue is

[Bug 1805920] Re: iPXE ignores vlan 0 traffic

2018-12-05 Thread Vern Hart
The Centos7 deployments were to other blades in the UCS chassis and pings between the two Centos7 machines did not have vlan 0 tags. I'll add your ppa and update to your ipxe and test pod VM booting. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscrib

[Bug 1805920] Re: iPXE ignores vlan 0 traffic

2018-12-05 Thread Vern Hart
Sorry, I got that wrong. A deployment of a pair of Centos6 hosts to the blades did not have vlan 0 tags. The Centos7 deployments did have vlan 0 tags. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1805

[Bug 1805920] Re: iPXE ignores vlan 0 traffic

2018-12-05 Thread Vern Hart
I have not tried Centos6 VMs. The customer reported that he deployed Centos7 to the baremetal blades and saw, in ping traffic that incoming packets were vlan 0 tagged. Then he deployed Centos6 to two baremetal blades and, in a ping test, did not see any vlan tags. If this is true, it suggests Ub

[Bug 1805920] Re: iPXE ignores vlan 0 traffic

2018-12-05 Thread Vern Hart
Success. I installed ipxe-qemu from andreserl's ppa and was able to PXE boot a Pod VM from the infra node that wasn't running dhcpd. # add-apt-repository ppa:andreserl/maas # apt update # apt install ipxe-qemu # virsh list --all # virsh start elastic-3 I watched the console of the VM and it succ

[Bug 1405873] Re: -json output not valid when -class filter used

2018-11-09 Thread Vern Hart
I can confirm, this is still broken. In my output, I'm missing the leading and trailing square bracket. Also, between some stanzas there are close and open curly braces (on the same line) without a comma in between. Since those are the only two syntactical errors in the output I'm working with,

[Bug 1805920] Re: iPXE ignores vlan 0 traffic

2019-01-08 Thread Vern Hart
I was able to verify the fix works for bionic using maas 2.4.3. Am about to install cosmic on the customer hardware to verify the fix there too. I have run into a maybe-related issue with maas 2.5.0 filed separately here: https://bugs.launchpad.net/maas/+bug/1811021 -- You received this bug noti

[Bug 1805920] Re: iPXE ignores vlan 0 traffic

2019-01-11 Thread Vern Hart
I have run a test on cosmic. The test involved MAAS 2.4.3 installed on bionic on 3 of the blades of the UCS chassis in the customer's data center. I installed cosmic, 18.10 on a 4th blade and installed libvirt and qemu-kvm and defined a VM similar to how maas defines VMs. with this xml: https://pas

[Bug 1805920] Re: iPXE ignores vlan 0 traffic

2019-01-11 Thread Vern Hart
After realizing there are packages in the ci build [1] I installed the following version from there: 1.0.0+git-20180124.fbe8c52d-0ubuntu4.1 I redefined the testipxe vm from the above test, and it also successfully pxe booted. [1]: https://launchpad.net/~ci-train-ppa- service/+archive/ubuntu/

[Bug 1900775] Re: Cinder fails to create image-based volume if mirroring is enabled

2020-10-22 Thread Vern Hart
I tested Corey's fix (via ppa) side-by-side with a cinder unit with version 2:15.4.0-0ubuntu1~cloud0 (from bionic-proposed/train). I used a bionic qcow2 image with: openstack volume create --image bionic --size 3 --type stable2-az2 vernvol Again, glance is backended by the az1 ceph cluster so t

[Bug 1805920] Re: iPXE ignores vlan 0 traffic

2019-02-27 Thread Vern Hart
As negative confirmation: I tested a PXE boot with 1.0.0+git-20180124.fbe8c52d-0ubuntu2.1 on bionic and 1.0.0+git-20180124.fbe8c52d-0ubuntu4 on cosmic. As expected, the VMs failed to successfully PXE boot. ** Tags removed: verification-needed-bionic verification-needed-cosmic ** Tags added: veri

[Bug 1805920] Re: iPXE ignores vlan 0 traffic

2019-02-27 Thread Vern Hart
I have two nodes, bionic and cosmic. I enabled the proposed repo on each. I installed ipxe: apt install ipxe ipxe-qemu grub-ipxe On bionic, this gave me: # apt list --installed ipxe-qemu grub-ipxe ipxe Listing... Done grub-ipxe/bionic-proposed,bionic-proposed,now 1.0.0+git-20180124.fbe8c

[Bug 1805920] Re: iPXE ignores vlan 0 traffic

2018-12-12 Thread Vern Hart
The customer has bionic installed on 3 of the blades and I have installed MAAS 2.4.3 on them using the Foundation Cloud Engine. I don't have access to do the OS install myself. I could request a pair of blades installed with cosmic but I'm unsure if I need all 3 or if I can get by with just 2. Easi

[Bug 1805920] Re: iPXE ignores vlan 0 traffic

2018-12-13 Thread Vern Hart
It seems an important component to the failure scenario is the hardware. The customer equipment is a Cisco UCS chassis and the MAAS nodes are blades in that chassis. Even though we cannot find anything in configuration that specifically adds the vlan-0 tag (or priority tag), traffic between the bla

[Bug 1773449] Re: VMs do not survive host reboot

2018-05-29 Thread Vern Hart
** Attachment added: "bundle where bug occurs" https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1773449/+attachment/5146087/+files/bundle-25May18.yaml -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1773449 Tit

[Bug 1773449] Re: VMs do not survive host reboot

2018-05-29 Thread Vern Hart
I've pinged the customer for the specific details of the failure. >From my understanding, they pulled the power on the compute node -- but I will get confirmation on that point. There isn't anything out of the ordinary in the compute configuration so it's likely the instances came up as SHUTDOWN

[Bug 1773449] Re: VMs do not survive host reboot

2018-05-30 Thread Vern Hart
>From the customer: 1. This is a cold power off. The initial test was done by pulling the plugs on the box. Subsequent tests are from iDRAC where I do a cold power down. 2. The first test the vms did not boot automatically. After I realized they were not going to start I asked Craig to help me wi

[Bug 1805920] Re: iPXE ignores vlan 0 traffic

2019-02-12 Thread Vern Hart
Yes, sorry. I will try to test tonight (in a few hours) when I'm back at the hotel. Not that I only have bionic and xenial to test with. I can try to upgrade one of those to cosmic. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https

[Bug 1805920] Re: iPXE ignores vlan 0 traffic

2019-02-12 Thread Vern Hart
s/Not/Note/ -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1805920 Title: iPXE ignores vlan 0 traffic To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/maas/+bug/1805920/+subs

[Bug 1874719] Re: [SRU] Use the hostname as the node name instead of hardcoded 'node1'

2022-03-15 Thread Vern Hart
In the meantime, we keep having to add a post-deployment cleanup step to our deployment guides: Delete node1 crm resources (LP#1874719): $ juju run -m openstack --all -- sudo crm node delete node1 Which is overkill but works. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Bug 1874719] Re: [SRU] Use the hostname as the node name instead of hardcoded 'node1'

2022-01-21 Thread Vern Hart
Just to clarify, this is fixed in impish but is still a problem on older releases. Is that correct? And since the problem is fixed/fixable in corosync, this bug is probably invalid for charm-hacluster, right? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is