If you run "sudo avahi-daemon" that starts Avahi manually, bypassing the
init script which is what does the check before starting it.
--
avahi-daemon disabled because there is a unicast .local domain
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/327362
You received this bug notification because you are a membe
No .. if you want to start Avahi manually and daemonize it
sudo avahi-daemon -D
Regards,
Trent
--
avahi-daemon disabled because there is a unicast .local domain
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/327362
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed
This is not an Avahi bug. It is a complex series of steps/setup
involving tools other than Avahi. So if anything its more an ubuntu-
docs bug, btu right now the facilities to do this are not installed by
defuakt.
** Changed in: avahi (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
--
In Ubuntu, avahi l
Hi Denis,
Unfortunately this bug report isn't too helpful to us as there are no
more details.
Is this a common problem you see? Does it happen every time? Once off?
Thanks,
Trent
--
avahi daemon uses a lot of CPU when network is not availiable
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/257687
You receive
Hi Steve,
Anything that is broken by this is inherently broken, not the Avahi
setup - and -they- should be fixed.
The link local default is installed at the lowest preference, and should
not be used if a better one exists.
The original bug report was about openswan, what specific problems have
y
Hi Thomas,
On 19/02/2009, at 2:25 AM, ThomasNovin wrote:
> $ host -t SOA local
> local has SOA record localhost. backbone.telia.net. 1 3600 900
> 360 3600
>
> Hmm. I'd say avahi's way of detecting this is pretty bad. Is it
> perhaps
> possible to add a local addition of the .local-domain
Hello,
On 21/02/2009, at 9:45 AM, db wrote:
> Public bug reported:
>
> avahi discover shows that avahi in ubuntu isn't ipv6 enabled. mdns-
> scan
> also doesn't show ipv6 resources. Scanning from a debian lenny system
> shows that the ubuntu 8.10 box isn't publishing / on ipv6 for avahi.
Avahi
Any chance of an explanation for the denial for hardy (denied by
"Thierry Carrez")
I am also a hosting company and since 6.06 we've had to patch this
ourselves.. we are now building new servers with 8.04 and find ourselves
doing it again - I'm sure we're not in that small a minority.
--
vsftpd m
I'm not sure how you ended up without an avahi group but it definitely
creates one on install (confirmed in practice) and from the postinst
script:
if ! getent passwd avahi >/dev/null; then
adduser --disabled-password --quiet --system \
--home /var/run/avahi-daemon \
--g
** Changed in: avahi (Ubuntu)
Importance: Untriaged => Medium
Status: Unconfirmed => Confirmed
--
Dapper->Edgy upgrade disabled avahi-daemon
https://launchpad.net/bugs/55836
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: vmware-player
I had the vmware-player packages install, but I decided I wanted to try
out vmware workstation trial.
I downloaded it and ran the script, it said vmware software was already
installed.
I purged the vmware-modules-`uname -r` and vmware-play
** Changed in: avahi (Ubuntu)
Status: Unconfirmed => Confirmed
--
avahi-bookmarks not packaged
https://launchpad.net/bugs/50792
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
** Changed in: vmware-player (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => VMware Build Team
Status: Unconfirmed => Confirmed
--
on purge, vmware player leaves /etc/vmware/locations which makes official
vmware distributions uninstallable
https://launchpad.net/bugs/50772
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing
Yes I beleive this should definitely be a candidate for dapper-updates
Once dapper-backports is going the new version would be a good candidate
for that.
--
pop-up dialogs doesn't close.
https://launchpad.net/bugs/41813
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubu
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: ubiquity
I have a NVIDIA card which is currently incorrectly detected to go under
the vesa driver (separate bug pending on that)
But when narrowing down the time zone location the second screen of
ubiquity (in my case to Perth, Western Australia)
It is
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: xserver-xorg
I have a pair of PCI-E 7600GT cards, the live cd fails to detect them as
using the "nv" driver [which works if i put it in manually and start a
second X server] and sues "vesa" instead which is terribly slow.
lspci output:
01:00.0 VGA compa
I beleive this is planned but not yet done, i knwo the kubuntu guys are
working on it, not sure if anyoen else is doign it in gnome but I would
certainly be interested in looking at it.
That said I really don't like the whole /etc/default thing as it stops
you from even one-time starting avahi
pe
joe - this has been the topic of long debate between the ubuntu guys
DHCP and DNS currently have 'policy exceptions'
the responsible people currently do not feel avahi can be granted such
an exception at this stage.
enabling by default is not an option, we simply need to determine the
'best' way
This appears resolved in debian now
--
evolution-exchange-storage crashes constantly
https://launchpad.net/bugs/26380
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Disabling IPv6 increaseing the throughput of your internet connection
makes no sense and I think thats just circumstantial, sorry :)
The place where it *does* make a difference is the speed of new
connections, it seems that in some cases certain dns servers ignore
requests for IPv6 records and so
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: bcm43xx-fwcutter
Source: bcm43xx-fwcutter
Debian Version: 20060501-4 (unstable)
Ubuntu changes were just a fake sync, so OK to override
** Affects: bcm43xx-fwcutter (Ubuntu)
Importance: Untriaged
Status: Unconfirmed
--
Please sync bcm43x
pare.
> One is dns request to the D-Link 504T ADSL modem/router and the other is
> directly to a DNS server with packets merely routed by the modem.
>
> --
> IPv6 should be disabled by default
> https://launchpad.net/bugs/24828
--
Trent Lloyd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Bur.st
** Visibility changed to: Public
--
lynx gets stuck in infinite loop rendering invalid HTML
https://launchpad.net/bugs/60879
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
I'm afraid I can't seem to reproduce this now so I will close.
** Changed in: gaim (Ubuntu)
Status: Needs Info => Rejected
--
gaim does not deactivite 'paste' command when no buffer, and executing it
causes crash
https://launchpad.net/bugs/49691
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@
You may need to dpkg --purge bonjour (someone else had an issue where it
wouldnt uninstall with apt due to tryign to fix the kubuntu-desktop
problem at the same time)
--
umnet dependencies libavahi-compat-libdnssd1
https://launchpad.net/bugs/69962
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists
Is avahi running?
ps aux|grep avahi
--
Avahi warning when launching gobby
https://launchpad.net/bugs/69457
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Can you try: cat /etc/default/avahi-daemon
also note that this error will popup (the 'warning you are using the
howl compat layer') whether avahi is running or not, if thats what you
are referring too.
--
Avahi warning when launching gobby
https://launchpad.net/bugs/69457
--
ubuntu-bugs mailin
The purpose this serves is that avahi-daemon will now be installed by
default, but we do not want it to start by default, this is an option
provided by the network preferences.
This is somewhat slightly confusing, but it's been determined the 'best'
way to do this
** Changed in: avahi (Ubuntu)
Is avahi-daemon actually running?
If you install 'avahi-discover' and run it, can you see your own
services (workstation service, for example)
Also, if so, what network interface do you have / what type is it?
--
Automatic Service Discovery-Button in the network-admin can't be set
https://launc
Public bug reported:
With avahi-daemon being disabled by default, many users get confused as
to why avahi is not working when installed
There are 2 main cases
1) They install avahi and it "just doesnt work"
2) They install avahi, it's not working, they try to manually run
"/etc/init.d/avahi-dae
** Changed in: avahi (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Avahi Team
--
/etc/init.d/avahi-daemon should print a message if disabled and run
interactively
https://launchpad.net/bugs/65603
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubunt
Fergal: you can run the script with /etc/init.d/avahi-daemon (dont
forgot to also fix the /etc/default/avahi file)
Please note that with the change to upstart in ubuntu I beleive the
/etc/rc?.d stuff has changed but I'm not really familiar with the
changes there (they are backwards compatible, e.g
Yes this would violate the no open ports policy if this package is
installed by default
nss-mdns (much like a standard DNS resolver) opens a port at the time of
tryign to resolve in order to receive responses
When avahi is installed it uses that, and its open ports, but in
standalone mode it open
Actually it's not the only package, I know among other things bittorrent
and rsync have this option, and it's there so that avahi can be
installed by default but not enabled on an ubuntu system.
Yes it is a little confusing, that is unfortunate.
As for upstart/rc?.d links, thats the price of mov
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 56426 ***
Ah yes I forgot dbus starts it not rc?.d.. oops..
What would you propose is the best solution?
Given dbus starts it.. im thinking perhaps we could move the default
start behavior to ONLY affect the dbus script and leave /etc/inti.d
/avahi-daemon to wo
While it is started by dbus, it links to ../init.d/avahi-daemon so the
init script is the one used by dbus
See also Bug #65587
** Bug 65587 has been marked a duplicate of this bug
--
/etc/init.d/avahi-daemon is useless
https://launchpad.net/bugs/56426
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@l
See in Bug #65587
---
Ah yes I forgot dbus starts it not rc?.d.. oops..
What would you propose is the best solution?
Given dbus starts it.. im thinking perhaps we could move the default
start behavior to ONLY affect the dbus script and leave /etc/inti.d
/avahi-daemon to work as expected
That wo
See https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-
devel/2006-October/021733.html for a revised proposal
--
/etc/init.d/avahi-daemon should print a message if disabled and run
interactively
https://launchpad.net/bugs/65603
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubunt
Just to confirm, this works fine for me in edgy
--
gdm loses focus when mouse pointer is outside window (when initially started)
https://launchpad.net/bugs/28712
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
This is actually due to nss-mdns not avahi directly
** Changed in: nss-mdns (Ubuntu)
Sourcepackagename: avahi => nss-mdns
--
mdns listed in nsswitch.conf causes excessive time for dns lookups
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/94940
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ub
The binary package is called libnss-mdns
--
mdns listed in nsswitch.conf causes excessive time for dns lookups
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/94940
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubun
This is not a bug in Avahi.
Avahi addresses are assigned if and when DHCP gives up trying to assign
an address. The root of your problem will be DHCP timing out for some
reason - I can't speculate to this but you should check I think
/var/log/daemon.log to see what happened around the time it gav
Marking as confirmed. This is a known issue.
Unfortunately the .local detection script does not work if no root
"local." domain exists. A possible fix may be to have libnss-mdns not
lookup .local hosts with more than 2 labels i.e. lookup test.local but
not machine.test.local
Seems all MS networ
Hi Bruce,
Your comment doesn't indicate whether this has actually been pushed into
Ubuntu and if it can be installed with the Avahi compat layer?
Can you let me know?
Thanks,
Trent
--
mdns service discovery in cups
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/28953
You received this bug notification becau
Uh... how on earth did this happen?
The package is installed and runs setup yet /etc/init.d/avahi-daemon
doesn't exist?
--
Feisty beta can't install avahi-daemon on partial upgrade
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/99150
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, w
-daemon or an if [ -x or something, which we will do but not until
feisty is released.
** Changed in: avahi (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Low
Assignee: (unassigned) => Trent Lloyd
Status: Unconfirmed => Confirmed
Target: None => later
--
Feisty beta can
Apparently we violate policy by not using invoke-rc.d also.
--
Feisty beta can't install avahi-daemon on partial upgrade
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/99150
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing
Yeh, the other server actually never recieves the query. It works when
you first do the restart because the names are announced the first time
- but once they fall out of the cache it can't resolve them again as the
queries are never received.
Unfortunately it is a common problem with dodgy wifi
I'd like to repoint out that mDNS is an *untrusted*, *ad-hoc* source.
if you have something relying on mDNS for any secure operation then THAT
IS BROKEN, not Avahi.
SetHostname in avahi has nothing to do with the 'sethostname' from LSB..
All sethostname in Avahi does is change the hostname avahi
That is completely bogus... using SetHostName certainly does not change
your IP, in fact because Avahi drops its privileges, it couldn't do this
even if it wanted to.
The only thing here is that it simply says "From foobar.local" - which
is just a result of using libnss-mdns to lookup the reverse
Loye,
With all due respect.. this is completely and utterly irrelevant.
You could have this kind of interaction with any piece of software, they
could download and install MSN and chat to each other.. or use windows
file sharing.. or one of a million ways to interact with each other over
a networ
Please note that this SetHostname command does not in any way change the
hostname of the computer.. only that which Avahi represents itself on
the local un-trusted mDNS domain. Thus this is not much of a security
risk and at worst a nuisance.
I am not quite sure what you mean about the Destinatio
** Attachment added: "apt.log (from submitter)"
http://librarian.launchpad.net/7392203/apt.log
--
Ugrade aborts from 6.10 to 7.04
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/108826
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu
** Attachment added: "main.log (from submitter)"
http://librarian.launchpad.net/7392198/main.log
--
Ugrade aborts from 6.10 to 7.04
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/108826
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubun
This is odd... there is no reason avahi-daemon should affect Network managers
access in any way.
I will attempt to find out how you can find some debug info out.
--
[feisty] avahi daemon interacts badly with network-manager
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/82287
You received this bug notification
eth0:avahi is bought up on any interface that does NOT have a real IP,
it is a link local IP only needed when a normal IP is not available.
According to RFC3927 "When an operable routable address is available on
an interface, the host SHOULD NOT also assign an IPv4 Link-Local address
on that inter
I will close this bug now, let me know if you have any further queries.
** Changed in: avahi (Ubuntu)
Status: Unconfirmed => Rejected
--
avah port setup to Eth0 which isn't a valid interface
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/109750
You received this bug notification because you are a member
** Changed in: avahi (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Trent Lloyd
--
[feisty] avahi daemon interacts badly with network-manager
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/82287
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubu
Apparently the usual cause for this is having no reverse DNS setup
--
mdns listed in nsswitch.conf causes excessive time for dns lookups
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/94940
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubu
Closing at submitters request. Thanks for your report.
** Changed in: nss-mdns (Ubuntu)
Status: Needs Info => Fix Released
--
gnome-nettool window does not repaint correctly when avahi hostname is used.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/66845
You received this bug notification because you
Any updates on this bug Jens?
--
avahi's "enable_avahi" script does not turn on MDNS resolution
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/78680
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ub
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: gnome-volume-manager
Currently, if a CD is inserted with both UDF and ISO9660 file systems,
the ISO9660 is mounted instead.
This is contrary to /etc/fstab
/dev/scd0 /media/cdrom0 udf,iso9660 user,noauto 0 0
even typing "mount /media/cd
this might be a bug in 'mount' rather than gnome-volume-manager, or
maybe both? not sure how it works
If i run mount -t udf /dev/scd0 /media/cdrom0 it happily mounts UDF
--
Mounting UDF should be preferred over ISO9660
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/112584
You received this bug notification bec
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: upstart
I upgraded my machine to feisty and caused loss of TTYs, it mangled the
tty1-tty6 files
The last line now reads
"/sbin/getty 38400 tty2exec /sbin/getty 38400 tty2" (same for each
different tty)
Which obviously is wrong, I suspect one of the up
Hi There,
If we look at the line
"overwrite `/usr/lib/libdns_sd.so.1', which is also in package bonjour"
As far as I am aware 'bonjour' is not an official package, hence the
conflict
You would need ot remove the bonjour package first and then installation
should suceed.
--
libavahi-compat-lib
Can you please run
dpkg -L bonjour
and paste the output?
** Changed in: avahi (Ubuntu)
Status: Unconfirmed => Rejected
--
libavahi-compat-libdnssd1_0.6.13-2ubuntu2_i386.deb will not install
https://launchpad.net/bugs/68503
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https
** Changed in: avahi (Ubuntu)
Status: Unconfirmed => Fix Released
--
Automatic Service Discovery-Button in the network-admin can't be set
https://launchpad.net/bugs/65308
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
** Changed in: avahi (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Wishlist
--
avahi-bookmarks not packaged
https://launchpad.net/bugs/50792
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
No you need to *remove* the package
This is a package of bonjour - apples implementation, obviously the
Avahi compatability layer for Bonjour (DNSSD) would conflict with this,
hence the failed install
And because bonjour is not an official ubuntu package (e.g. not in the
ubuntu archives) we haven
** Bug watch added: Avahi #67
http://www.avahi.org/ticket/67
** Also affects: avahi (upstream) via
http://www.avahi.org/ticket/67
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
** Changed in: avahi (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Low
Assignee: (unassigned) => Trent
Attaching!
** Attachment added: "lspci -vvn output"
http://librarian.launchpad.net/6793430/lspci-nvidia.txt
--
NVIDIA 7600GT detected as vesa not nv
https://launchpad.net/bugs/87003
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bug
Here's the same thing but run as root so the capabilities etc are shown
** Attachment added: "sudo lspci -vvn output"
http://librarian.launchpad.net/6793448/lspci-nvidia.txt
--
NVIDIA 7600GT detected as vesa not nv
https://launchpad.net/bugs/87003
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lis
Confirmed here with azureus & some in browser applets.
--
azureus-> java: xcb_xlib.c:50: xcb_xlib_unlock: Assertion `c->xlib.lock' failed.
https://launchpad.net/bugs/86103
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Hrm... looks like dbus is not running?
--
[apport] service-discovery-applet crashed with DBusException in __new__()
https://launchpad.net/bugs/86636
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
AIUI, nss-mdns does actually attempt to do this.
Can you attach the nsswitch.conf you had at the time?
--
removing libnss-mdnss leaves system unusable
https://launchpad.net/bugs/88745
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Hrm it's a shame you don't remember as we can't see if it was off
standard and why it wasn't automatically edited
the default is
files mdns_minimal [NOTFOUND=return] dns mdns4
--
removing libnss-mdnss leaves system unusable
https://launchpad.net/bugs/88745
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-b
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 89940 ***
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 89940
Sync request: service-discovery-applet 0.4.4 from Debian/experimental (main)
--
[apport] service-discovery-applet crashed with AttributeError in
gc_services_cb()
https://launchpad.net/bugs/90089
Please remember this has *nothing* to do with whether your modem/router
*supports* IPv6, but whether its inherrently broken and doesn't handle
DNS queries properly.
I'm not saying this makes it any less of a problem but you must
understand its a bug in the devices, they should just pass the DNS
re
It is not 'useless' it is installed as a last resort thus should not
cause any problems
It what way does it confuse openswan?
--
avahi-autoipd gives me an useless default route
https://launchpad.net/bugs/99489
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/ma
That route tells it to just send packets for any IP directly out the
interface, this is usefull because in a LAN using zeroconf LL IPs (as
avahi-autoipd), only hosts without another non-LL ip should have an LL
ip.
So without a default (last resort) route out the interface, if you only
had an LL ip
Howdy,
>>> breaking ip6tables completely, since IPv6 autoloading got disabled,
>>> and any sane person will do firewall configuration before
>>> configuration the network interfaces.
> On my system, the upgrade also had the very unkind effect ofI usually
> load a firewall on given protocol once
Has anyone affected by this tried this in feisty? Apparently there may
be some changes in glibc 2.5 which affect this?
Trent
--
IPv6 should be disabled by default
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/24828
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct s
Thomas Butter wrote:
>> Link local addresses aren't limited to just "link diagnostics", also
>> when using avahi/zeroconf, you may well have dns for just the local link.
>>
>
> I am no avahi expert so I could be wrong. I think avahi/zeroconf only
> uses the dns protocol, but won't use the glib
I fail to see how avahi-daemon could be breaking your network
Also it is not insecure it is simply "a security risk" like any other
network service running on your machine, there are no known remote bugs
but that doesn't mean none exist
--
Dlink WNA-2230 will not work (listed as "works out of th
What version of Ubuntu are you running?
--
avahi did not warn .local SOA in use
https://launchpad.net/bugs/98763
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Hrm, 7.04 beta according to the forum post...
there is code to detect this I wonder why it didn't work
If you run
host -t soa local.
What happens?
Trent
--
avahi did not warn .local SOA in use
https://launchpad.net/bugs/98763
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https:/
It is worth noting while the ifupdown changes will cause any static
setups to continue working, it will break setups relying on
autoconfiguration, which are quite common for those using IPv6.
--
IPv6 should be disabled by default
https://launchpad.net/bugs/24828
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubun
As I understand it, a patch has now been applied to glibc
"A fixed glibc with the following patch has been uploaded today:
14:30 < Mithrandir> Uploading to ubuntu (via ftp to upload.ubuntu.com):
glibc_2.5-0ubuntu13.dsc: done. glibc_2.5-0ubuntu13.diff.gz: done.
glibc_2.5-0ubuntu13_source.changes:
Rock, I really do feel this is the right solution
I guess at the end of the day your blacklisting kicked enough upraw to
fix the problem, so I guess it was the right move :)
Cheers!
Trent
--
IPv6 should be disabled by default
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/24828
You received this bug notificat
I am a little confused your bug report isn't quite clear enough to
indicate the problem.
Can you show me the exact tcpdump lines?
--
avahi-autoipd in roaming mode set ip address to 0.0.0.0
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102865
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubunt
Well it's a 2 line fix, probably worth doing I guess.. it is a local DoS
I guess its not *that* important, i.e. its not remote etc
--
Local user can crash avahi-daemon with ServiceBrowserNew() call
https://launchpad.net/bugs/95743
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https:/
This is *not* caused by DHCP releases simply being renewed I have tested
this just now (with both NetworkManager and a standard ifup)
I can think only possibly it might happen if you got a new IP every
lease every few seconds but this seems silly as everything else would
drop out also
In short: n
Possibly makes sense to apply this patch also to disable this function
if Avahi is already disabled.
Although perhaps we should still check if Avahi is stopped in this case
(in case it was started manually) but not send an alert, or perhaps it
makes sense not to do a popup notify at all
also perh
I've just realised I'm totally wrong the message that is actually
appearing is from update-notifier, not /etc/network/if-up.d/avahi-daemon
unfortunately its midnight I must goto bed I will continue to
investigate this issue tomorrow
--
Avahi behaves badly where there is a unicast .local-domain.
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: discover-data
My NVIDIA 7600GTs are not detected as using the nv driver (which works
fine) and uses vesa instead.
FTR, I have 2 of these cards but it should still detect the primary :)
** Affects: discover-data (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
** Attachment added: "lspci -vv output for video cards"
http://librarian.launchpad.net/6496986/lspci-vv.txt
--
NVIDIA 7600GT detected as vesa not nv
https://launchpad.net/bugs/87003
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bug
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: libnss-mdns
Quote from debian report #411978
"Hi,
When /usr is not mounted and libnss-mdns is installed hostname lookups will
fail because lib_mdns* is in /usr/lib instead of /lib.
Apart from the more obvious things like nfs-mounting /usr, somet
It's actually nothing to do with being started by D-BUS
It was simply decided by the developers to do it this way, because
editing the RC symlinks was considered "wrong" I guess.
I admit this was a bad way to do it, I was going to implement a patch to
check how it was being started but I wasn't a
** Bug watch added: Avahi #72
http://www.avahi.org/ticket/72
** Also affects: avahi (upstream) via
http://www.avahi.org/ticket/72
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
Avahi possible regression in 0.6.10-0ubuntu3.2
https://launchpad.net/bugs/72728
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
u
This is known upstream, see Avahi bug #72 (linked)
I hope this will be fixed shortly.
--
Avahi possible regression in 0.6.10-0ubuntu3.2
https://launchpad.net/bugs/72728
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
1 - 100 of 493 matches
Mail list logo
