I just did test installs of 8.04.2 and 9.04 alpha 3, using the i386
alternate ISO in each case. I answered the question about the hostname
by supplying the FQDN in each case. Immediately on completion of each
install, I checked the various files.
For the jaunty alpha, the domain was correctly spl
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: icedtea6-plugin
http://www.jigzone.com/puzzles/daily-jigsaw
applet frame loads, with controls at left (including a small version of
the image that represents the current/selected puzzle), and message "The puzzle
is loading" at the right.
Reproducible after upgrade to jaunty alpha 6
t...@zaphod:~$ apt-cache policy icedtea6-plugin
icedtea6-plugin:
Installed: 6b14-1.4.1-0ubuntu4
Candidate: 6b14-1.4.1-0ubuntu4
Version table:
*** 6b14-1.4.1-0ubuntu4 0
500 http://nz.archive.ubuntu.com jaunty/main Packages
100 /var/
Yes it does. I have installed the Sun java6 software (bin, jre, jdk and plugin
version 6-12-0ubuntu1) , and run
sudo update-java-alternatives --set java-6-sun
When I then started firefox, I confirmed that the sun plugin was being used,
then that the jigzone applet worked correctly.
--
64-
A possibly aggravating factor is that with both the Sun and IcedTea plugins
installed, BOTH plugins are loaded. This appears to be because xulrunner is
loading plugins from two locations:
* /usr/lib/xulrunner-addons/plugins (or /usr/lib/xulrunner-1.9.0.7/plugins,
which is a symlink)
* AND /usr
Apport has just reported an occurrence of this crash on my system.
Jaunty/AMD64.
I note a duplicate entry in my full stack trace: g-closure_invoke is on stack
at # 1 and #5, both at the same address.
I am uploading the apport report, and will link to this bug when it
completes
--
tracker-inde
Just before tracker crashed on my sytem, I had a file system hit 99%
used, as I was copying files to it from a USB stick:
t...@zaphod:~$ df -h /vol/archives/
FilesystemSize Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/mapper/VG0-vg0--archives
99G 93G 1.4G 99% /vol/archi
New bug # 356097 created by apport, which has attacghed its files to
that bug. I have explicitly marked that as a duplicate of this bug.
--
tracker-indexer crashed with SIGSEGV in g_closure_invoke()
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/354567
You received this bug notification because you are a membe
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 354567 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/354567
** Attachment added: "CoreDump.gz"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24855582/CoreDump.gz
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24855584/Dependencies.txt
** Attachment adde
I can confirm that after the update to 6b14-1.4.1-0ubuntu6, and purging
sun-java6-plugin, my test cases work:
* http://java.com/en/download/help/testvm.xml
* http://java.sun.com/applets/other/Bubbles/index.html works
* http://www.jigzone.com/puzzles/daily-jigsaw works
If I then install sun-java6
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: update-notifier
Discussion on ubuntu-users from post https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives
/ubuntu-users/2009-August/193694.html shows a situation where a set of
security patches were released and available in both jaunty-security and
jaunty-updates.
After t
** Attachment added: "Patch for karmic."
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/30349430/apt-check-dup-vers.diff-0.87
--
apt-check.py counts security updates twice if pkg in -updates and -security
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/413885
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubu
I just reviewed the patch. It cpompares the versions using '<=', but
should probably be an explicit '==' as the critical condition is where
the same version appears in both places
--
apt-check.py counts security updates twice if pkg in -updates and -security
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/41388
** Attachment removed: "Patch for karmic."
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/30349430/apt-check-dup-vers.diff-0.87
--
apt-check.py counts security updates twice if pkg in -updates and -security
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/413885
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ub
I removed my original patch, as I realised that one of the changes
between versions 0.76.8 and 0.87 of update-notifier is that this bug has
been fixed in 0.87 (if the candidate version of the current package is
itself a security update,it does a 'continue', to process the next
package, and doesn't
Attributing the problem to sane, rather than the kernel USB drivers,
does *NOT* explain the fault that I have with VMware under feisty - i.e.
that a Windows XP VM running under edgy as host OS found my scanner, and
successfully scanned images, but that it failed when running with feisty
as the host
I have a LiDE 25 scanner that works fine in edgy with xsane. I run
Windows XP in a VMware virtual machine on the Ubuntu host. Software
running on the windows VM is also able to access the scanner.
When I upgraded to feisty, the scanner failed for both xsane and the
windows VM. lsusb reports th
I am on edgy, with evolution 2.8.1-0ubuntu4. I encounter crashes
occassionally. These crashes mostly seem to occur just as it is opening
a new window to display a message (usually the first message in a new
folder that I have just switched to).
The crashes started happening recently, possibly af
I have a system that started as breezy, and has been updated to dapper then
edgy.
My hostname is 'marvin'.
By default, the first entry in /etc/hosts read
127.0.0.1 localhost.localdomain localhost marvin
A later entry reads
192.168.13.2 marvin.chile.gen.nz marvin
If I move the localhost entry
Is this actually a duplicate of #561390?
--
dist-upgrade LVM on RAID: boot failure
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/570084
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://l
nvidia-173 fails with DKMS errors on 64-bit:
Setting up nvidia-173-kernel-source (173.14.16-0ubuntu2~kees2) ...
Removing all DKMS Modules
Done.
Adding Module to DKMS build system
driver version= 173.14.16
Doing initial module build
Error! Bad return status for module build on kernel: 2.6.31-8-gen
** Visibility changed to: Public
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/953740
Title:
gnome-panel crashed with SIGSEGV in g_signal_emit_valist()
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
I applied updates as detected this morning NZ time using update-manager, then
refreshed the lists and applied a second set of updates. aptdaemon crashed
during post-processing after instalation of the second set of updates.
/var/cache/apt/archives has two sets of files for aptdaemon:
tim@zaphod:
Still an issue. Running 12.10 64-bit, the attached file causes xpdf to
crash, but acroread 9 is happy
tim@zaphod:~$ apt-cache policy xpdf
xpdf:
Installed: 3.03-9ubuntu5
Candidate: 3.03-9ubuntu5
Version table:
*** 3.03-9ubuntu5 0
500 http://nz.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ quantal/unive
Crash file for latest attempt to openm PDF that causes crash
** Attachment added: "_usr_bin_xpdf.real.1000.crash"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xpdf/+bug/1050165/+attachment/3512929/+files/_usr_bin_xpdf.real.1000.crash
--
You received this bug notification because you are a membe
This now appears to be caused by a failed upgrade leaving a reference to
the CD in /etc/apt/sources.list.
My preferred mirror appears to be missing some packages that the upgrade
was trying to fetch. This caused a failed upgrade last night. I then
switched mirrors and updated/upgraded natty, usi
I am now confused:
- my 64-bit server upgraded from a CD burnt from the 20110915 daily 64-bit
server ISO, with no problems
- upgrade of a 64-bit VM which has no additional software succeeds using the
64-bit alternate ISO 20110920.5
- attempts to upgrade my main PC, running 64-bit natty, fail wit
Public bug reported:
System is running 64-bit natty. When I insert a CD burnt from image
ubuntu-11.10-beta1-alternate-amd64.iso, the upgrade process runs until
it is attempting to process the i386 Packages files. At that step, the
upgrade process stops with error 'W:Failed to fetch cdrom://Ubun
** Attachment added: "tar archive of contents of /var/log/dist-upgrade"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/848659/+attachment/2395627/+files/dist-upgrade-files.tar
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad
Further testing and research:
I used the server CD that successfully upgraded my server from natty to
oneiric, and it failed at the same stage.
On the server, main.log showed repositories being disabled, then
'running doUpdate() (showErrors=True)'
On the workstation, at the same stage in th
Doing the natty->oneiric upgrade in a 32-bit VM offers a clue:
the ISO is mounted as '/media/Ubuntu 11.10 i386', rather than as /media/cdrom
or /media/cdrom0. main.log shows:
2011-09-24 20:19:34,554 DEBUG AptCdrom.add() called with '/media/Ubuntu 11.10
i386'
2011-09-24 20:19:34,645 INFO ignoring
This time, the upgrade succeeded. Looking at main.log, I note that this
time I also said 'NO' to the question about use of the network to fetch
the latest updates.
I note that AptCdrom.add() was called successfully during both attempts.
Running 'md5sum -c md5sum.txt | grep -v OK' on the bad disk
Unfortunately, I have already removed references to the CD, so there are
no files matching /var/lib/apt/lists/*Ubuntu* at all .
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/848659
Title:
Upgrade fr
80 bytes may not be enough on a server running in 64-bit mode with a
large disk/array, given that the format string is 41 bytes lonmg -
including 2 '%d' variables . How many digits could there be in the
longest possible number of mis-matches on a system that has a raid
partition of maximum support
Public bug reported:
$ lsb_release -rd
Description:Ubuntu precise (development branch)
Release:12.04
Extract from output of 'sudo apt-get dist-upgrade':
Preparing to replace python-uno 1:3.5.0-2ubuntu1 (using
.../python-uno_1%3a3.5.1-1ubuntu1_amd64.deb) ...
ERROR: unopkg cannot be
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/960867
Title:
package python-uno 1:3.5.0-2ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade:
subprocess new pre-installation script returned error exit status 1
To ma
I ran apt-get dist-upgrade in a terminal, because update manager warned
that a partial upgrade needed to be run.
After running apt-get -f install, update-manager popped up again, with
71 packages to upgrade. No archives were fetched ('Need to get 0 B/40.8
MB of archives.') which indicates that tho
** Attachment added: "Terminal session log for upgrade"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/960867/+attachment/2907845/+files/bug-960897-upgrade.log
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bug
Possible upstream site http://www.foolabs.com/xpdf/home.html indicates
no recent development :
>From the home page:
Current version: 3.03 (2011-aug-15)
Xpdf 3.03 supports PDF 1.7.
Is this a bug in xpdf or in libpoppler (as the version of xpdf that is used by
ubuntu links against libpoppler):
t
Agreed.
It *should* be fixed, but it only affects users if:
1: they are upgrading using a CD/DVD
AND
2: the media is bad
(and they have used that media without verifying that the file checksums are
good)
Unfortunately, this will be hard to test, as it depends on having media
(such as a CD-RW dis
Using the daily build ISO http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/daily/20110915
/oneiric-alternate-amd64.iso appeared to work in a 64-bit virtual
machine. With internet access available, it also downloaded packages
files for the 32-bit architecture. However, the actual upgrade aborted
part-way through. The
** Attachment added: "tar archive of /var/log/dist-upgrade after attempt using
daily build from 2011-09-15"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-manager/+bug/848659/+attachment/2410881/+files/dist-upgrade-2011-09-15-daily.tar
--
You received this bug notification because you are
In natty, if the type characters match a singe directory entry, pressing the
TAB key results in the matching entry, with:
1: A space following
2: No escaping of embedded spaces or special characters
This is NOT related to unity - it appears for the classic desktop as
well
In previous releases, b
Tab completion for directory name completion (appending a trailing '/'),
and of handling embedded spaces in a file/directory name (by escaping
the space as '\ ') appears to be fixed, (at least for the 'gedit', 'ls',
'cd' and 'mv' commands), with
tim@zaphod:~/Documents$ apt-cache policy bash bash-
44 matches
Mail list logo
