[Bug 272418] Re: openbox/Gnome wont launch from gdm

2008-12-05 Thread Super Jamie
solution works here also -- openbox/Gnome wont launch from gdm https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/272418 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mail

[Bug 305670] [NEW] Nautilus icons restricted to one screen in Openbox\GNOME session

2008-12-05 Thread Super Jamie
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: openbox When using an Openbox\GNOME session with two nVidia TwinView screens, I can only place Nautilus icons on the "primary" screen of the TwinView. Windows maximize properly (covering one screen only), the gnome-panel works as expected (one panel per

[Bug 286285] Re: kernel 2.6.27-7-generic bug BUG: scheduling while atomic: swapper/0/0x00000100

2008-11-17 Thread Super Jamie
2.6.27-8 fix working fine for me after a suspend and 24hrs solid torrenting over wlan, with the exception of the above "atomic" and "sched-domain" messages -- kernel 2.6.27-7-generic bug BUG: scheduling while atomic: swapper/0/0x0100 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/286285 You received this bu

[Bug 286285] Re: kernel 2.6.27-7-generic bug BUG: scheduling while atomic: swapper/0/0x00000100

2008-12-01 Thread Super Jamie
-10 kernel from -proposed working great here, with heavy wlan usage both before and after a suspend. no dmesg module errors whatsoever -- kernel 2.6.27-7-generic bug BUG: scheduling while atomic: swapper/0/0x0100 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/286285 You received this bug notification becaus

[Bug 295722] Re: Kernel bug: bad: scheduling from the idle thread!

2008-12-01 Thread Super Jamie
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 286285 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/286285 @Matthias: Yes, please read the duplicate bug report. The patched module which fixes it is in intrepid-proposed, install kernel 2.6.27-10 and related packages -- Kernel bug: bad: scheduling from the idle th

[Bug 286285] Re: kernel 2.6.27-7-generic bug BUG: scheduling while atomic: swapper/0/0x00000100

2008-11-23 Thread Super Jamie
@Nicoco: This bug seems fairly specific to Intel 4965 controllers, your 5100 sounds like it may be having a separate issue. I'd suggest searching for similar bugs which aren't duplicates of this one, and perhaps logging a new bug if you can't find existing reports of your issue. Here is the info t

[Bug 215496] Re: When setting mousekeys, xkbset reports "XKB not supported"

2008-11-14 Thread Super Jamie
It seems 'xkbset m' and Ctrl+Alt+Shift+Numlock both toggle mousekeys on the numpad. I imagine most laptop users wouldn't see this behaviour, due to their integrated Fn+ key numpads. A sideffect for me is that Ins0 Numpad5 and Numpad+ become right click whilst this state is active. 'xev' confirms Po

[Bug 295722] Re: Kernel bug: bad: scheduling from the idle thread!

2008-11-15 Thread Super Jamie
Same thing happened to me today. Dell Vostro 1200 laptop with Ubuntu 8.10, which I upgraded from Hardy. At the time, GDM was running but my Gnome\Openbox session wasn't logged in. I did have rtorrent running inside a screen, which I'd started via ssh, detached and logged off the ssh session. Here

[Bug 295722] Re: Kernel bug: bad: scheduling from the idle thread!

2008-11-15 Thread Super Jamie
dmesg while in error state ** Attachment added: "dmesg-bad.log" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/19667208/dmesg-bad.log -- Kernel bug: bad: scheduling from the idle thread! https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/295722 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which i

[Bug 295722] Re: Kernel bug: bad: scheduling from the idle thread!

2008-11-15 Thread Super Jamie
dmesg from fresh reboot ** Attachment added: "dmesg-fresh.log" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/19667212/dmesg-fresh.log -- Kernel bug: bad: scheduling from the idle thread! https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/295722 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which

[Bug 295722] Re: Kernel bug: bad: scheduling from the idle thread!

2008-11-15 Thread Super Jamie
Happened again last night. I may be able to reproduce this one with ~12 hours wait. Could importance be upgraded on this one? -- Kernel bug: bad: scheduling from the idle thread! https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/295722 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, w

[Bug 262550] Re: WARNING: Intrepid might burn down MacBook Pro

2008-11-15 Thread Super Jamie
Check dmesg, you may be having the same 100%-cpu-usage bug as here: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/295722 -- WARNING: Intrepid might burn down MacBook Pro https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/262550 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which

[Bug 295722] Re: Kernel bug: bad: scheduling from the idle thread!

2008-11-15 Thread Super Jamie
Looks like this may also be a duplicate bug report: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/286285 (sorry for comment spam) -- Kernel bug: bad: scheduling from the idle thread! https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/295722 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubu

[Bug 286285] Re: kernel 2.6.27-7-generic bug BUG: scheduling while atomic: swapper/0/0x00000100

2008-11-15 Thread Super Jamie
It appears to me that these two bugs are duplicates: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/295722 -- kernel 2.6.27-7-generic bug BUG: scheduling while atomic: swapper/0/0x0100 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/286285 You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Bug 286285] Re: kernel 2.6.27-7-generic bug BUG: scheduling while atomic: swapper/0/0x00000100

2008-11-17 Thread Super Jamie
I've applied the -8-generic kernel and backport modules from -proposed. It solves the constant "scheduling from the idle thread!" but I still got one "scheduling while atomic", and a couple of "attaching NULL sched-domain"s. I haven't tried it after a resume, I'll do that tonight. dmesg logs attac

[Bug 286285] Re: kernel 2.6.27-7-generic bug BUG: scheduling while atomic: swapper/0/0x00000100

2008-11-28 Thread Super Jamie
Looks like the new module is only in the -8 kernel from -proposed, it's not in the changelogs for -9. -- kernel 2.6.27-7-generic bug BUG: scheduling while atomic: swapper/0/0x0100 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/286285 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs

[Bug 369440] Re: gnome-terminal resizes to 80 width when reset

2009-06-23 Thread Super Jamie
No, Intrepid is not affected. -- gnome-terminal resizes to 80 width when reset https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/369440 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists

[Bug 336662] Re: minicom continually resizes gnome-terminal in jaunty

2009-05-04 Thread Super Jamie
On the advice of someone on the Gnome Bugzilla, I installed libvte 0.20.1 from Ubuntu Karmic, which has fixed the problem. Download for deb package is here: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/karmic/i386/libvte9/1:0.20.1-0ubuntu1 -- minicom continually resizes gnome-terminal in jaunty https://bugs.lau

[Bug 272418] Re: openbox/Gnome wont launch from gdm

2009-05-05 Thread Super Jamie
Same here. However, KLoK's .xsession script does function as intended. It also launches the desktop environment alot quicker. -- openbox/Gnome wont launch from gdm https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/272418 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscrib

[Bug 336662] Re: minicom continually resizes gnome-terminal in jaunty

2009-04-23 Thread Super Jamie
I'm having this problem as well, in Jaunty final release. If one has gnome-terminal maximised, minicom continually tries to resize, but can't because the window is maximised, so just appears to "blink" very rapidly. I can use minicom in stjerm (another vte-based terminal app) at any size I like,

[Bug 336662] Re: minicom continually resizes gnome-terminal in jaunty

2009-04-23 Thread Super Jamie
Bug appears to be related to gnome-terminal's handling of resize, as implemented by minicom. Minicom works in other terminals (xterm) with resizing, and with other libvte-based terminals (stjerm) with resizing. ** Package changed: minicom (Ubuntu) => gnome-terminal (Ubuntu) -- minicom continuall

[Bug 272418] Re: openbox/Gnome wont launch from gdm

2009-05-19 Thread Super Jamie
Good thinking. I would say "openbox --replace" is probably alot cleaner than the .xsession script, as the script seems to fill up ~/.xsession- errors with messages. You could even put "openbox --replace" in Gnome's "Startup Applications" and just launch a normal Gnome session. Thanks! -- openbox/

[Bug 286285] Re: kernel 2.6.27-7-generic bug BUG: scheduling while atomic: swapper/0/0x00000100

2009-01-05 Thread Super Jamie
What Mikel means is that this fix should be out of -proposed and into the main intrepid branch, so you don't have to run the -proposed kernel or -backports modules. I avoid running -proposed updates unless there's a package I specifically know I need, I've had other things break in the past. --

[Bug 286285] Re: kernel 2.6.27-7-generic bug BUG: scheduling while atomic: swapper/0/0x00000100

2009-01-13 Thread Super Jamie
@pauliephonic: This bug is only for Intel Wireless LAN. /sd 4:0:0:0/ indicates a storage problem. Have a look around the rest of Launchpad for the text in your logs, Google also indicates some users on Fedora 10 are experiencing the same issue. This bug is completely unrelated to your issue. -- k

[Bug 307594] Re: powder crashed with SIGSEGV

2009-02-20 Thread Super Jamie
As a workaround, downloading the POWDER Linux binary directly from the developer's website (http://www.zincland.com/powder/index.php?pagename=release) does work fine. -- powder crashed with SIGSEGV https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/307594 You received this bug notification because you are a member

[Bug 307252] Re: Powder segfaults when starting

2009-02-20 Thread Super Jamie
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 307594 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/307594 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 307594 powder crashed with SIGSEGV -- Powder segfaults when starting https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/307252 You received this bug notification because you ar

[Bug 305670] Re: Nautilus icons restricted to one screen in Openbox\GNOME session

2010-01-04 Thread Super Jamie
Openbox dev Dana Jansens advises this has been resolved upstream. http://bugzilla.icculus.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3888 Changing status to Fix Committed. ** Bug watch added: bugzilla.icculus.org/ #3888 http://bugzilla.icculus.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3888 ** Changed in: openbox (Ubuntu) Status: N