:-) Cool! The primary reason I think this progress-bar is worthwhile
is that people have more and more RAM in their computers, and they're
doing more with them, and Ubuntu provides the assurance that their
machine state will be correctly restored when they return from
hibernation, so the hibernat
Thinkpad X32. Upgraded-from-Intrepid-to-Jaunty. Gnome Power Manager
correctly detects the battery state, correctly issues a "low battery
warning" but doesn't initiate hibernation until 0% battery is reached.
Additionally, the normal battery light starts flashing orange at the
appropriate time...b
Here are what seem like the relevant logs based on this document:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DebuggingGNOMEPowerManager#head-7d2eb767e44a7231fae6964dcf12bc27fe507c9d
Please note that that my laptop *did* successfully hibernate, and return
from hibernation from the "gnome-power-cmd hibernate" command.
Public bug reported:
For Jaunty, it would be really nice if we could have a progress bar to
show the user how much longer they need to wait. It's non-essential,
functionally, but I think that the feeling of a "professionally polished
system" would be much improved with this feature.
** Affects:
Oops, sorry, I meant to write "Karmic" instead of "Jaunty"!
--
Return from hibernation progress bar
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/379673
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubu
'just another confirmation for the volume/brightness hotkey OSD
regression, this time on an X32.
How does GNOME intercept the suspend button's key-press event? Could
that same method be used to intercept hardware volume and brightness
events?
--
No notification when sliding audio volume, muting
I'd like to confirm that this problem is even worse on a wireless
network.
--
gvfs performs slowly on bulk sftp transfers
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/250517
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
Public bug reported:
An otherwise problem-free upgrade from 8.04.1 to 8.10 is marred -- well,
for me -- by the sudden, unexpected failure of pulse. I'm not sure if
it's in the pulse-esd layer. GNOME successfully starts pulse, and I can
play wavs with paplay, but for some reason, GNOME sounds don
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: firefox-3.0
Firefox 3 doesn't function correct with the latest Linux version (Hardy
Heron 8.04 version). Can't scroll with page up/down or the mouse keys...
Page back also doesn't work anymore...
ProblemType: Bug
Architecture: i386
Date: Tue Jun 3 23:54
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/14974651/Dependencies.txt
** Attachment added: "pluginreg.dat.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/14974652/pluginreg.dat.txt
** Attachment added: "profiles.ini.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/14974653/profiles.ini.t
Hi,
I just did a fresh install of Hardy, ran the updates, etc. The backlight of my
2673WKS Thinkpad X32 *still* stays on during suspend. It appears line 40:
true
is being skipped, because the if condition
fails. Even though I have a 2673, it's not an X31...
Could you please change lines 37
ahh. Thanks for the heads up YAA. Martin, do you think the updated
hal-info will ever make it into Hardy?
Cheers,
Nicholas
** Changed in: hal-info (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Fix Committed
--
[Hardy] Thinkpad X31 (ATI Radeon M6) suspend backlight on
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1
jason123,
Aha, my X32 *almost* works perfectly now! Thanks for mentioning the
dpms_suspend quirk. It seems to be the key to getting the X32 to work.
All of the other quirks do not seem to apply to the X32 -- it doesn't
seem to matter whether L40, L42, and L44 say true or false. Now if only
I co
thanks for the link.
I discovered this one, from the one you posted:
http://people.freedesktop.org/~hughsient/quirk/quirk-suspend-debug.html
"sudo pm-suspend --quirk-dpms-suspend" works the best yet. If this very
basic behaviour was implemented as the HAL and GNOME default, plus a
locked screen,
Here's the new hal.txt. I'm not sure if they're relevant to this bug,
but I noticed a few errors in it:
L766 "ThinkPad R50e"
L2329 "ThinkPad T41"
I'm not sure if a quirk-work-arround for the R503e or the T41 (or some
other laptop?) might be contributing to this... Is there any way I
could tempo
After fdi-cache is removed, suspend does not work properly (same
behaviour; the backlight turns off, then back on, and stays on).
Without hal-info, Fn-F4 unsurprisingly does not work, but suspending
from the System -> Quit menu produces the same behaviour with or without
hal-info. After re-instal
Has this bug been resolved yet? (I've grown re-accustomed to living
without NM, though it would be really nice to have again...)
--
network-manager fails to stop properly when connected to wireless
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/155216
You received this bug notification because you are a member
Yes, I have both the intrepid-updates, and intrepid-security
repositories enabled, and am running an up-to-date intrepid system
(upgraded from an up-to-date Hardy) I really do suspect that it's an
upgrade issue, and one which doesn't affect fresh intrepid
installations.
I added a test user post-u
I've been using iptraf to measure network traffic. My current
statistics are comparable with John's. Because gvfs-copy is also
significantly slower than scp, I wonder if FUSE might also be part of
this bug? No time for me to check right now, but is sshfs as slow as
gvfs-copy?
--
gvfs performs
While not the same speed, I've noticed an improvement recently (using
Intrepid). Is yours just as slow?
--
gvfs performs slowly on bulk sftp transfers
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/250517
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
I don't have two Intrepid machines to test this further, but I can test
Hardy-to-Intrepid if it would help. With the exception of the "file
operations dialogue", all line-speed measurements were taken with
iptraf.
Wireless G @ 54M
sftp peak: 1229 KB/s. Average is about 1 MB/s
sftp report
P.S. was there a major Hardy gvfs update between 2008-11-03 and
2009-02-13.
--
gvfs performs slowly on bulk sftp transfers
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/250517
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing lis
This also affects Hardy's ASC. I have a Realtek ALC888 (HDA Intel
integrated).
--
Asc can only be started with no sound option
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/229640
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailin
Mark, thanks again for your logs!
adneto: does your connection remain stable over time? After 15min to an hour,
kernels which produce those PHY transmission error crash my wireless router.
I'm posting some links to some kernels which might work. Please do not
enable the PPA, as synaptic will pu
B-ZaR, could you please attach the log from the following command?:
sudo bash -c lspci -vvnn > lspci-vvnn.log
--
linux-backports-modules-jaunty: b43 and ssb regression
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/405712
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subsc
I found some time to test this. 2.6.29-series kernels have the same
bug. I'm going to work through the 2.6.30-rcX (very quickly,
complements of those mainline kernel images) and then try to further
isolate the patch that with git bisect after that...well, that is, if I
find the time to later this
** Bug watch added: Linux Kernel Bug Tracker #10399
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10399
** Also affects: linux via
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10399
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
Post-Hardy regression: b43 and bcm94311 disconnects due to PHY t
** Also affects: kernel-xps-1330
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Bug watch added: Linux Kernel Bug Tracker #10399
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10399
** Also affects: linux via
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10399
Importance: Unknown
Status:
regrettably, linux-image-2.6.28-14 seems to behave identically to
2.6.28-13...
--
Post-Hardy regression: b43 and bcm94311 disconnects due to PHY transmission
error
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/263106
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscrib
Here's an update: I tried this with the live cd, linux-image
2.6.28-11...same problem. Tried linux-backports-
modules-2.6.28-11...same problem as 2.6.28-13.
linux-backports-modules-2.6.28-13 makes things even worse...
for some reason pcmcia is now loaded!?!?! SSB didn't need it before...
While
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: linux-backports-modules
Background:
I have a PCI BCM4318 which worked flawlessly with Hardy, with the b43 module.
I didn't test it when upgrading through Intrepid to Jaunty, so the following
might also affect Intrepid. WIth Jaunty it has the forever-r
Wow was I off with the "b43-pci-bridge" idea! At any rate, I decided to
roll a custom, very lean 2.6.30.3 vanilla kernel to use as a baseline
(and so I might have something that works if all else fails). b43 works
marvelously. I'll post my logs. Next I'll try 2.6.28.10 vanilla and
post those.
1. Linux DigitalMercury.dynalias.net 2.6.30.3-digitalmercury #1 Tue Jul 28
11:58:06 MDT 2009 i686 GNU/Linux
2.
** Attachment added: "dmesg.log"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/29631876/dmesg.log
--
linux-backports-modules-jaunty: b43 and ssb regression
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/405712
Y
3. lspci-vnn.log
** Attachment added: "lspci-vvnn.log"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/29631882/lspci-vvnn.log
--
linux-backports-modules-jaunty: b43 and ssb regression
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/405712
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is su
P.S. I just remembered that this bug was originally simply going to be
to show the differences between 2.6.8.13 and 2.6.8.13-with-backports.
Sorry!
bugs 405712, 297959, and 263106 all look like b43 kernel module problems (as
opposed to firmware problems)
I'm not sure if they're simply duplicates,
After reading through these bug reports, I see that yes, Intrepid is
affected.
bugs 405712, 297959, and 263106 all look like b43 kernel module problems (as
opposed to firmware problems)
I'm not sure if they're simply duplicates, or some other type of relation...
Since this bug, 297959, hasn't se
Well, I compiled a custom 2.6.30.3 kernel, just to see if the current
b43 driver works with the firmware Jaunty's fw-cutter downloads. It
does work. Perfectly. As I've tried multiple other firmware sources,
it seems evident to me this is an Intrepid and Jaunty bug -- I'll have
to test a Karmic a
3. lspci-vvnn.log
** Attachment added: "lspci-vvnn.log"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/29632327/lspci-vvnn.log
--
Post-Hardy regression: b43 and bcm94311 disconnects due to PHY transmission
error
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/263106
You received this bug notification because you are a membe
** Attachment added: "dmesg.log"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/29635137/dmesg.log
--
Post-Hardy regression: b43 and bcm94311 disconnects due to PHY transmission
error
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/263106
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is s
** Attachment added: "lsmod"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/29634222/lsmod
--
Post-Hardy regression: b43 and bcm94311 disconnects due to PHY transmission
error
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/263106
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribe
...that's odd... The linux-backports-modules-jaunty b43 driver is
working!!! And better than linux-image 2.6.28-13, despite loading that
pcmcia, and pcmcia_core -- are we using the pcmcia module as a shim
between the updated kernel interface that the updated ssb needs, and the
old interface the ke
** Attachment added: "lspci-vvnn.log"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/29635143/lspci-vvnn.log
--
Post-Hardy regression: b43 and bcm94311 disconnects due to PHY transmission
error
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/263106
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs,
...that's odd... The linux-backports-modules-jaunty b43 driver is
working!!! And better than linux-image 2.6.28-13, despite loading that
pcmcia, and pcmcia_core -- are we using the pcmcia module as a shim
between the updated kernel interface that the updated ssb needs, and the
old interface the ker
vanilla linux-2.6.28.10, with my minimal baseline config has the
b43-phy0 ERROR: PHY transmission error
and the 30 second lag to log into ssh...and I suspect the connection will soon
die
but it has the normal lsmod | grep b43 output
b436 0
mac80211 111884 1 b43
vanilla linux-2.6.28.10, with my minimal baseline config has the
b43-phy0 ERROR: PHY transmission error
and the 30 second lag to log into ssh...and I suspect the connection will soon
die
but it has the normal lsmod | grep b43 output
b436 0
mac80211 111884 1 b43
...and the connection just died. I didn't let the backports system run
long enough to see if it would, but the vanilla linux-2.6.28.10 b43
driver crashed my wireless router. As the backports one still has 30
second TCP delays, it's also useless to me.
--
linux-backports-modules-jaunty: b43 and ss
...and the connection just died. I didn't let the backports system run
long enough to see if it would, but the vanilla linux-2.6.28.10 b43
driver crashed my wireless router. As the backports one still has 30
second TCP delays, it's also useless to me.
--
Post-Hardy regression: b43 and bcm94311
Etienne,
Ah, you switched to another NIC altogether. I'll second your conclusion
of "too buggy to use". Originally, I would have avoided these issues
entirely by upgrading from this server from 8.04 LTS to 10.04 LTS, but
one of my good friend's only hard drive is on its last legs, and he
needed
For everyone who's following this thread, this message contains
instructions for what is either an instant solution, or failing that:
the very-near-future solution.
No worries Mark! Honestly, this sort of thing drives me up the wall...a
"computer", by definition, is supposed to take input from so
hopefully 2.6.28-14 will resolve this bug!
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Ubuntu Kernel Network Team
(ubuntu-kernel-network)
--
Post-Hardy regression: b43 and bcm94311 disconnects due to PHY transmission
error
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/263106
You received th
...need to test linux-image-2.6.28-14...which should make this bug
obsolete ;-)
** Changed in: linux-meta (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Ubuntu Kernel Network Team
(ubuntu-kernel-network)
** Changed in: linux-meta (Ubuntu)
Status: New => In Progress
--
linux-backports-modules-j
** Changed in: linux-meta (Ubuntu)
Status: In Progress => Confirmed
--
linux-backports-modules-jaunty: b43 and ssb regression
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/405712
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs m
linux-image-2.6.28-14 behaves like a branch of linux-image-2.6.28-13.
It does not work, and it fails identically to -13, rather than like the
backports-modules for -13
uname -a
Linux DigitalMercury.dynalias.net 2.6.28-14-generic #47-Ubuntu SMP Sat Jul 25
00:28:35 UTC 2009 i686 GNU/Linux
dmesg lo
Chow, I didn't have any luck when I tested your uswusp work -- maybe
uswusp (or the current state of Karmic, when I tested it) just doesn't
like my hardware...
Disappointing as it is that Ubuntu is apparently not going to replace
usplash with Plymouth, it at least means that implementing this prog
Mark,
Could you please test 2.6.30-rc1 to see if it still has this timeout bug
on your hardware?
http://kernel.ubuntu.com/~kernel-ppa/mainline/v2.6.30-rc1/linux-headers-2.6.30-020630rc1-generic_2.6.30-020630rc1_i386.deb
http://kernel.ubuntu.com/~kernel-ppa/mainline/v2.6.30-rc1/linux-headers-2.6.3
Thanks for the log B-ZaR. I just noticed that I forgot a pair of quotes in
that command though... I should have typed:
sudo bash -c "lspci -vvnn" > lspci-vvnn.log
the -vvnn options give much more detailed information; root access is
needed to access these details
--
linux-backports-modules-ja
My Linksys PCI BCM4318 NIC worked flawlessly with 8.04, with the b43
driver. After upgrading to 9.04, dmesg is flooded with
b43-phy0 ERROR: PHY transmission error
and the system becomes unresponsive. Additionally, auto rate doesn't
work, and the radio always chooses 1M...although I can manually
My Linksys PCI BCM4318 NIC worked flawlessly with 8.04, with the b43
driver. After upgrading to 9.04, dmesg is flooded with
b43-phy0 ERROR: PHY transmission error
and the system becomes unresponsive. Additionally, auto rate doesn't
work, and the radio always chooses 1M...although I can manually
Hi,
I'd just like to say that this bug affects my Thinkpad X32, and is not
fixed. Attached is the output from lshal.
** Attachment added: "hal.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/14222170/hal.txt
** Changed in: hal-info (Ubuntu)
Status: Fix Released => Confirmed
--
[Hardy] Thinkpad X
installed the latest updates this week, the backlight still remains on.
"xset dpms force off" works fine, as does "sudo radeontool light off".
** Changed in: hal-info (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Incomplete
--
[Hardy] Thinkpad X31 (ATI Radeon M6) suspend backlight on
https://bugs.launchp
It'd just like to confirm that this bug also affects my Thinkpad X32,
with ipw2200 chipset.
** Changed in: network-manager (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
network-manager fails to stop properly when connected to wireless
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/155216
You received this bug no
This sounds similar to bug 155216, though I'm not sure...
--
shutdown hang on Network Manager deactivating device
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/159216
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
u
Does the test kernel also provide the "ThinkPad Console Audio Control"
for devices that use snd_intel8x0?
--
No notification when sliding audio volume, muting volume on ThinkPad X23, X24,
X31, X32, X41, X60, T22, T40, T42, T60, R50e, R51, R52
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/357673
You received t
ahh, I see. So the "ThinkPad Console Audio Control" is a mixer in the
ThinkPad firmware, and that's why it works on older ACPI Thinkpads?
--
No notification when sliding audio volume, muting volume on ThinkPad X23, X24,
X31, X32, X41, X60, T22, T40, T42, T60, R50e, R51, R52
https://bugs.launchp
I recently installed took Slackware for a spin just for kicks. What I
noticed was that the Linux kernel *already* outputs resume from
hibernate status, as a percentage.
Something like:
Resuming from hibernate: 15%
The 15% redraws over itself. I imagine that resume from hibernate
exports this v
Hi Niels,
End of the academic semester, so I haven't had time to look into this more, and
unfortunately it doesn't look like I'll be able to answer your question before
10.04 ships. If my memory serves correctly, I got as far as debugging
undefined classes, because the XMind project didn't suc
P.S. I have 3.5.1+repack~1-0ubuntu3 installed, but XMind bundles a
different version, if the md5sum mismatch is any indicator.
e6e05cf592a9114d2a1b01480f9bac4d
/usr/lib/eclipse/plugins/org.eclipse.swt.gtk.linux.x86_3.5.1.v3555a.jar
vs
bc7ec013965dd478059f94322da1af0c
/usr/local/xmind/plugins/o
for me the fix in comment #90 worked exactly as described, big thanks
for the fix!
--
After 9.10 grub update can not boot into Wubi install
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/477104
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: eclipse
1) Ubuntu 9.10
2) I suspect eclipse-3.5.1+repack~1-0ubuntu3 ; although I'm not sure.
* osgi.framework.version=3.5.1.R35x_v20090827, is the version used by the
application that exposes this bug
First, a link to the patch, and Tristan's write up
I'm willing to consider this bug closed, because of improvements to the
mainline Linux kernel.
The latest debs of a 2.6.30-series kernel can be found here:
http://kernel.ubuntu.com/~kernel-ppa/mainline/v2.6.30.8/
You'll need the linux-image i386, linux-headers i386, and linux-headers
all. What
I'm willing to consider this bug closed, because of improvements to the
mainline Linux kernel.
The latest debs of a 2.6.30-series kernel can be found here:
http://kernel.ubuntu.com/~kernel-ppa/mainline/v2.6.30.8/
You'll need the linux-image i386, linux-headers i386, and linux-headers
all. What
Hi Reynaldo,
Does using a 2.6.30-series kernel fix this for you?
http://kernel.ubuntu.com/~kernel-ppa/mainline/v2.6.30.8/
You'll need the linux-image amd64, linux-headers amd64, and linux-
headers all. If you can, I would test the 9.10 Karmic Koala beta asap,
to see if your b43 NIC works with i
Do you still get this bug if you specify EXA in the device section of
xorg.conf?
Section "Device"
Option "AccelMethod" "EXA"
EndSection
--
Karmic: screen corrupted with ATI radeon driver
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/454551
You received this bug notification because you are a m
I have a Radeon M6 LY, R100. specifying EXA in my device seems to have
worked around the screen corruption issues I've seen. If it works for
others, can we add a quirk to the xorg.conf configuration logic that
will specify EXA for affected cards?
--
ATI graphics corruption with compiz on XAA
ht
I'm running Karmic, and am still experiencing this bug. I'll try
bumping the time_action and time_critical values to more conservative
settings, and will post an update soon. As I have an old battery, my
Thinkpad's critical power level is around 5%. Hibernate should occur at
4%, or 3% at the abs
P.S. When running gnome-power-manager in verbose mode, I get no output
before hibernate doesn't occur and the system dies. I mounted my
partition -o sync, and tail -f gpm.log in another tab, just to make sure
I wouldn't miss anything.
--
Action on critical battery is not triggered - gnome-power
Here's my Device section:
Section "Device"
Identifier "ATI"
Driver "radeon"
Option "AccelMethod" "EXA"
Option "AGPMode" "4"
# Option "AGPFastWrite" "yes"
# Option "EnablePageFlip" "on"
# Option
Evolution always crashes when moving from one address to another address
book from an address book. (If the email address is already present in
the second address.)
Evolution 3.2.3, Ubuntu 12.04
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
Same problem on my machine running lubuntu 12.10.
An update-notifier process is running and byobu's notification bar shows
that new updates are available. I would expect to get some sort of
notification in the LXDE panel as well. However, there is no
notification icon/ or popup.
Please let me kno
LG TX Express Dual.
Intel 3945 ABG
Kubuntu 8.04
Backport modules installed in an attempt to fix this bug. Even
tried the /etc/modules stunt
At least the backport modules gave me my led-light back
The errors above.
As soon as I open up multiple connections (twelve tabs in my
Firefox on start) the
Confirmed on an LG T1 Express Dual Kubuntu 8.04 with backports.
Ok, minor bug as far as I'm concerned ;)
--
Wireless LED does not blink with traffic with iwl3945 | iwl4965
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/224488
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
LG T1 Express Dual
Intel 3945 ABG
Kubuntu 8.04
Error-data as above.
This is a router-dependent bug.
I get these messages while connecting to a Netgear Mimo router, but
I do NOT see them when connected to a Sitecom router.
Specific model-versions not as interesting as the fact that changing
route
On Sat, 6 Oct 2007, Gabriel de Perthuis wrote:
> Seems to be fixed upstream, I'm glad:
> http://svn.0pointer.de/viewvc?view=rev&root=avahi&revision=1539
This still isn't fixed in hardy, quite a shame really.
--
Sten Spans
"There is a crack in everything, that'
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: python-avahi
The "/usr/share/python-support/python-avahi/avahi/SimpleGladeApp.py"
script brings in 30-40mb of x11 when installing apt-zeroconf / python-avahi.
Which is somewhat silly because the script is just an api-demonstration,
and not used in normal
I have the same problem.
Writing this comment connected to an open network, so it obviously
USUALLY works fine.
Earlier today tried connecting to two different open networks and both
generated the
same problems. /var/log/syslog visually looked like the first report on the
problem here.
I'm att
this fixes the issue for me
--
initramfs script: race condition between sata and md
https://launchpad.net/bugs/75681
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
I've gotten the same result as well
00:08.0 Ethernet controller: Atheros Communications, Inc. AR5212 802.11abg NIC (
rev 01)
Subsystem: Accton Technology Corporation Unknown device ee23
Control: I/O- Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr-
Stepping- SERR-FastB2B-
Public bug reported:
getifaddrs is a function to fetch a list of network interfaces. The
version provided by eglibc in lucid and earlier has a know bug where it
will call abort() when interfaces are added/removed during the
getifaddrs operation. This is somewhat problematic because it will cause
d
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: sauerbraten
Everything works in the main menu but as soon as I launch in to the real
3D game, the main menu is still shown and just some random graphics are
drawn on to it, like some lines and the red stuff while i get hit. The
same thing with running GTA
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/39205998/Dependencies.txt
** Attachment added: "XsessionErrors.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/39205999/XsessionErrors.txt
--
sauerbraten graphics all messed up on GM965. Basically 3D graphics wont even
start in the
fix this ?.
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43244
I think Rob Allan did a bisect and found a pretty precise commit in the
3.1.0-rc2 & 3.1.0-rc3 kernel that caused the issue.
Some firewire "refactoring".
On Sun, 2013-12-29 at 19:55 +, Christopher M. Penalver wrote:
> St
With the risk of stating the obvious, allowing unauthenticated packages
is not really an acceptable workaround.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1513232
Title:
do-release-upgrade no lon
Didt a manual bisect instead.
I've found the problem all the way back to the Ubuntu-3.1.0-1.1 tag.
I where not able to build the 3 earlier tags due to compliation errors.
Hope this helps so you can find and fix this error that seems to be
related to firewire and power settings.
--
You received
Found a work-around :
Disable the firewire module from loading during boot.
edit:
/etc/modprobe.d/blacklist-firewire.conf
uncommented the line:
blacklist firewire-ohci
Run:
sudo update-initramfs -k all -u
Im now able to boot the release kernel 3.2.0-24 without any problem only
down
** Description changed:
When trying to boot using kernel 3.2.x kernel the screen just goes blank and
harddisk IO stops.
Removing the quiet and splash options in combination with nomodeset seems to
reveal
that the booting stops due to an error in setting the firewire's power levels
(see at
3.8.0-30-generic kernel here, same problems multiple times a week
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/946899
Title:
[drm:i915_hangcheck_elapsed] *ERROR* Hangcheck timer elapsed... GPU
hu
Public bug reported:
When trying to boot using kernel 3.2.x kernel the screen just goes blank and
harddisk IO stops.
Removing the quiet and splash options in combination with nomodeset seems to
reveal
that the booting stops due to an error in setting the firewire's power levels
(see attachment)
** Attachment added: "picture of boot output"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/981936/+attachment/3068075/+files/firewire_bug.jpg
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/981936
Title:
Firew
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/981936
Title:
Firewire prevents booting
To manage notifications about this bug go
The problem persists of halting boot on firewire initialization.
It appears from the package description that the kernel is 64 bit
(Linux kernel image for version 3.2.0 on 64 bit x86 SMP )
But my machine is a Intel Duo T2300 (32-bit) which should then be a
Linux kernel image for version 3.2.0 o
1 - 100 of 140 matches
Mail list logo
