Here's a debdiff for the upgrade, along with one for -signed.
** Patch added: "s390-tools-2.17.0-0ubuntu1.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/s390-tools/+bug/1934988/+attachment/5510535/+files/s390-tools-2.17.0-0ubuntu1.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you
With the -signed debdiff
** Patch added: "s390-tools-signed-2.17.0-0ubuntu1.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/s390-tools/+bug/1934988/+attachment/5510536/+files/s390-tools-signed-2.17.0-0ubuntu1.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Oh, I forgot to specify:
I tested the changes in a s390x VM by installing all "s390-tools-*"
packages and running their binaries with `--help` as argument as a
sanity check. I also tested a system reboot.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is sub
Public bug reported:
This patch bypasses the custom restarting logic backed into the postinst
script if the needrestart utility is present, as it allows sharing the
logic with the rest of the system.
It also changes the custom logic to compare the old package version to
the current one instead of
** Attachment added: "V2 addressing comments by bdmurray on IRC."
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pam/+bug/1935972/+attachment/5510741/+files/debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.
Thank you for the thorough review!
Here's an amended patch with the requested modifications.
** Patch added: "s390-tools-2.17.0-0ubuntu1.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/s390-tools/+bug/1934988/+attachment/5510749/+files/s390-tools-2.17.0-0ubuntu1.debdiff
--
You received t
** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu Focal)
Status: New => In Progress
** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu Focal)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Simon Chopin (schopin)
** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu Hirsute)
Status: New => In Progress
** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu Hirsute)
** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu Impish)
Status: Confirmed => In Progress
** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu Impish)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Simon Chopin (schopin)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu Focal)
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu Hirsute)
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu Impish)
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because
** Attachment added: "Standalone C program from the upstream test case"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssl/+bug/1931994/+attachment/5512579/+files/evp_extra_test.c
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
http
** Attachment removed: "Standalone C program from the upstream test case"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssl/+bug/1931994/+attachment/5512579/+files/evp_extra_test.c
** Attachment added: "Tiny test program"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssl/+bug/1931994/+atta
Updated description in preparation for SRU requests
** Description changed:
Problem description:
+
+ When passing a NULL key to reset AES EVC state, the state wouldn't be
completely reset on s390x.
https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/14900
-
+
Solution available here:
https://gi
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1931994
Title:
[Ubuntu 20.04] OpenSSL bugs im s390x AES code
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-z-systems/+
** Patch added: "Focal SRU debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssl/+bug/1931994/+attachment/5513254/+files/openssl_focal.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/193
** Patch added: "Bionic SRU debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssl/+bug/1931994/+attachment/5513255/+files/openssl_bionic.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1
** Patch added: "Hirsute SRU debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssl/+bug/1931994/+attachment/5513256/+files/openssl_hirsute.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs
** Patch added: "Impish debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssl/+bug/1931994/+attachment/5513257/+files/openssl_impish.debdiff
** Attachment removed: "Standalone C program from the upstream test case"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssl/+bug/1931994/+attach
Blocks migration to -updates as the fixed mir package FTBFSe.
** Also affects: glibc (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Tags added: update-excuse
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launc
Oh, sorry, I know see how my sentence is ambiguous. I meant that the
failing autopkgtests are fixed in the latest version of mir uploaded to
-proposed, but that version fails to build because of this bug. So the
mentioned fix is *not* for this bug.
--
You received this bug notification because yo
Regarding the bugproxy test case, it should be disregarded: I was the
one who originally added it, but then found a much smaller and self-
contained test case, and removed the attachment. For some reason,
bugproxy didn't like that.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
Oh, and thank you very much for the upload, much appreciated :-)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1931994
Title:
[Ubuntu 20.04] OpenSSL bugs im s390x AES code
To manage notifications a
Hi!
Would it be possible to have a repro case for the fixed bug? I'm not
familiar with the opencryptoki internals, and the checks are introduced
somewhat deep in the call hierarchy from what I can tell.
Thanks in advance,
Cheers,
Simon
--
You received this bug notification because you are a mem
The mosquitto test seems to be failing regardless of the version of
openssl, I'll take a look at puma.
On Tue, Jul 27, 2021 at 1:35 PM Gunnar Hjalmarsson <
1931...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote:
> @Simon: autopkgtest for mosquitto and puma fails on s390x.
>
> https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-arch
** Information type changed from Private to Public
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1928767
Title:
[21.10 FEAT] Upgrade openCryptoki to latest version (3.16+)
To manage notifications a
Thank you, Gunnar!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1931994
Title:
[Ubuntu 20.04] OpenSSL bugs im s390x AES code
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.ne
Public bug reported:
The upstream tarball ships with some test cases that are supposed to be
run against an installed package. They were removed from the .orig
tarball as they weren't licensed, but that has since been fixed upstream
(mostly, see https://github.com/opencryptoki/opencryptoki/pull/43
** Tags added: fr-1527
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1938268
Title:
Run the testcases in autopkgtest
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/
Here's a debdiff incorporating the above patchset into our version of
Valgrind
** Information type changed from Private to Public
** Changed in: valgrind (Ubuntu)
Status: Expired => In Progress
** Changed in: valgrind (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Simon Chop
My apologies, it turns out I didn't actually test-build on s390x. After
doing so, the build fails. I have a potential fix, waiting on the build
to finish.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/
Fixed version (some helper functions and macros were missing)
** Patch added: "valgrind.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/valgrind/+bug/1853271/+attachment/5514357/+files/valgrind.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
Here's a debdiff for the Hirsute SRU.
** Patch added: "opencryptoki_hirsute.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/opencryptoki/+bug/1928780/+attachment/5514578/+files/opencryptoki_hirsute.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, whic
** Description changed:
- The Opencryptoki Soft token does not check if an EC key is valid when an
- EC key is created via C_CreateObject, nor when C_DeriveKey is used with
- ECDH public data. This may allow one to perform Invalid Curve Attacks.
+ [Description]
+ The Opencryptoki Soft token does n
The backported package is available at the following PPA:
https://launchpad.net/~schopin/+archive/ubuntu/test-
ppa/+sourcepub/12592922/+listing-archive-extra
The version is 3.15.1+dfsg-0ubuntu1.1~ppa2, but it's the same code
otherwise. Waiting for repro before poking someone to upload the SRU
pack
Attached is a standalone version of the test file. I'm having trouble
with my VMs so I won't update the description just yet with steps to
confirm the bug and its fix just yet, but it's looking pretty good.
Small nit with the patch : there's a typo in the name of the function
;-)
** Attachment ad
This bug is not in the Ubuntu package but rather in a PPA package,
apparently setup by the upstream author, which conflicts with ours.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1080849
Title:
pa
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1080849 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1080849
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1080849
package libchromaprint-tools (not installed) failed to install/upgrade:
trying to overwrite '/usr/bin/fpcalc', which is also in package libchromapri
I've just tried to reproduce this bug on a quantal chroot on my Debian
box, but the test run went absolutely fine. Are you sure you used
pristine pytest or codespeak packages ?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bu
Hi !
I'm the current maintainer of pytest in Debian, and have lend a hand a
couple of times with codespeak-lib as well.
I haven't looked at codespeaklib testsuite yet, but it would not
surprise me that it is intended to be run by pytest, since pytest was
originately part of codespeak-lib and upst
Public bug reported:
There are a lot of failures, so here's a link to the full logs instead.
https://objectstorage.prodstack5.canonical.com/swift/v1/AUTH_0f9aae918d5b4744bf7b827671c86842/autopkgtest-oracular/oracular/s390x/p/pristine-tar/20240914_172257_16930@/log.gz
** Affects: glibc (Ubuntu)
.32-2) unstable; urgency=medium
* Team upload.
[ Simon Chopin ]
* Cherry-pick an OpenSSL fix (LP: #1945798)
-- gregor herrmann Thu, 13 Jan 2022 19:55:56 +0100
** Affects: libcrypt-openssl-rsa-perl (Ubuntu)
Importance: Wishlist
Status: New
** Changed in: libcrypt-openss
Thanks for the follow up! I'll try to fold the fix for this in the next
Jammy SRU, I don't know about other releases yet.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1947588
Title:
Infinite Loop i
** Description changed:
- TBD
+ [Availability]
+ The packages libxs-parse-sublike-perl, libobject-pad-perl, libindirect-perl,
libunicode-escape-perl, libunicode-string-perl are already in Ubuntu universe
and build for the architectures they're designed to work on.
- All of those new dependenc
I *think* this is a duplicate of
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssl/+bug/1974037 but I'll
keep it separate for now as the API used to trigger the issue isn't the
same.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
http
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1974037 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1974037
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1974037
openssl: EVP_EC_gen() segfault without init
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to U
FWIW, Debian just scrapped the postinst entirely, advising users to use
needrestart or checkrestart instead.
In my upcoming merge I'll revert the deletion, but I'd be happy to go
back and remove that part of the delta once I understand how all the
pieces fit together.
--
You received this bug no
Here's a MP using git-ubuntu (well, with a lot of manual fiddling):
https://code.launchpad.net/~schopin/ubuntu/+source/openssl/+git/openssl/+merge/423153
I'd appreciate it the upload would be using rich history support:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel/2021-October/041649.html
as th
** Merge proposal linked:
https://code.launchpad.net/~schopin/ubuntu/+source/openssl/+git/openssl/+merge/423153
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1974037
Title:
openssl: EVP_EC_gen()
Here's a merge of llvm-toolchain-13 that includes this patch, along with
another one for https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/llvm-
toolchain-13/+bug/1973041
Build in progress there:
https://launchpad.net/~schopin/+archive/ubuntu/rustc-1.59/+sourcepub/13636485/+listing-
archive-extra
** Pat
** Changed in: openssl (Ubuntu Kinetic)
Status: Confirmed => In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1974037
Title:
openssl: EVP_EC_gen() segfault without init
To manage no
Attached is a debdiff for the Jammy changes. I'm still working on
Kinetic as this will be folded into the merge, but I still need to do
some more work as some new patches have surfaced upstream since then, as
well as a new Debian revision. I feel the Jammy SRU should still move
forward.
Note that
** Description changed:
- Imported from Debian bug http://bugs.debian.org/1010958:
+ [Impact]
+
+ The fix for
+ https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssl/+bug/1968997 has
+ broken some code paths as the new string comparison functions now need
+ initialization, triggering segafults.
+
+
Refreshed version of the same thing, with the merge fixed, adding
Replaces/Breaks fields due to the Ubuntu/Debian divergence on which
package ships the new static libraries.
I used the dh-exec mechanism for the i386 exception as it is what is
used in the current Salsa 13 branch for their grpc-unab
** Summary changed:
- [MIR] z3
+ z3 is incorrectly marked as a MIR candidate
** Description changed:
- TDB by foundations.
+ rustc pulls llvm-13 into main (the llvm-toolchain-13 being already
+ partially seeded, it doesn't raise any issue), and z3 is a dependency of
+ it.
** Also affects: rustc
: z3 (Ubuntu Kinetic)
Status: Incomplete => Invalid
** Changed in: rustc (Ubuntu Jammy)
Status: New => Confirmed
** Changed in: rustc (Ubuntu Kinetic)
Status: New => Confirmed
** Changed in: rustc (Ubuntu Jammy)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Simon Chopin (schopin)
--
Yo
** Description changed:
- openssl.cnf as provided misses some directive, which make it a bit
- difficult to change security level, which since openssl 3 disables SHA1
- signatures.
+ [Impact]
+
+ The OpenSSL 3.0 lead to a lot of broken setups. Some of them are
+ regressions, but others are simply
** Patch added: "rustc.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rustc/+bug/1971128/+attachment/5593815/+files/rustc.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1971128
Title:
** Description changed:
+ [Impact]
+
+ The TLS test server `openssl s_server` can very easily be led into an
+ infinite loop if configured with incompatible settings and used via
+ DTLS. This makes it harder to test one's TLS configuration.
+
+ [Test plan]
+
+ In one session:
+ $ openssl s_serv
Public bug reported:
Imported from Debian bug http://bugs.debian.org/1012125:
Source: astroquery
Version: 0.4.6+dfsg-2
Severity: serious
Justification: RT
X-Debbugs-Cc: simon.cho...@canonical.com
Hi,
The autopkgtests for 0.4.6+dfsg-2 fail with attempts to write to
locations in /usr/lib, prevent
** Tags added: transition-openssl3-jj
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1976299
Title:
hashlib.algorithms_available lists algorithms that cannot be used
To manage notifications about th
Public bug reported:
Imported from Debian bug http://bugs.debian.org/1012204:
Source: ruby-tty-screen
Version: 0.7.1-2
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: scho...@ubuntu.com
Hi,
The autopkgtests for this package fail on s390x, apparently due to an
endianness issue. See
https://ci.debian.net/data/aut
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1968831 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1968831
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1968831
ruby-tty-screen: endianness bug detected by autopkgtest
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is sub
Public bug reported:
Imported from Debian bug http://bugs.debian.org/996235:
[,
]
** Affects: ruby-gitlab-fog-azure-rm (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Affects: ruby-gitlab-fog-azure-rm (Debian)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Tags: update-excuse
Public bug reported:
Imported from Debian bug http://bugs.debian.org/1012262:
Source: libisal
Version: 2.30.0-4
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: scho...@ubuntu.com
This package fails to build on big-endian architectures, notably s390x.
There's a fix available upstream:
https://github.com/intel/is
Adding fastp to the affected packages as this blocks its transition from
-proposed.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1976622
Title:
libisal: FTBFS on big-endian architectures
To manage
The chain is rustc -> llvm-13 -> llvm-13-dev -> z3, so that's still an
issue with Jammy, I think. Reopening :)
** Changed in: rustc (Ubuntu Jammy)
Status: Invalid => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
htt
Public bug reported:
The following tests started failing in the Ubuntu autopkgtest
environment, most likely due to the proxy.
30927s overridden_dns_resolution_with_gai
30927s overridden_dns_resolution_with_gai_multiple
30927s overridden_dns_resolution_with_hickory_dns
30927s overr
After a bit more investigation, the tests actually *always* failed,
except once, maybe because the random port chosen happened to match some
whitelist or something? In any case, the tests are likely *not* supposed
to work.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
B
** Changed in: needrestart (Ubuntu Noble)
Status: New => In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2068543
Title:
Config variable $nrconf{restart} is no longer accurate: it al
This fix will wait until the current SRU gets through the door.
** Changed in: needrestart (Ubuntu Noble)
Status: New => In Progress
** Changed in: needrestart (Ubuntu Noble)
Status: In Progress => Triaged
** Changed in: needrestart (Ubuntu Noble)
Importance: Undecided => Low
-
Reverting the tag while waiting for verification from the Core team
(pinged out of band)
** Tags removed: verification-done-noble
** Tags added: verification-needed-noble
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.la
Public bug reported:
Imported from Debian bug http://bugs.debian.org/1073997:
Source: giada
Version: 0.22.0-4
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.php?pkg=giada&ver=0.22.0-4%2Bb2
...
/<>/src/core/kernelAudio.cpp: In member function ‘int
giada::m::KernelAudio::ope
I'll have to stop the investigation on this, but with the attached
debdiff I managed to move the build forward, it now fails with:
/usr/bin/ld:
CMakeFiles/giada.dir/src/deps/juce/modules/juce_core/juce_core.cpp.o: warning:
relocation against `_ZN4juce20juce_compilationTimeE' in read-only section
Public bug reported:
mescc-tools fails to build on ppc64el with the following error:
test/test13/hello.sh
+ ./bin/M1 --little-endian --architecture ppc64le -f test/test13/hello.M1 -o
test/test13/hello.hex2
+ ./bin/hex2 --little-endian --architecture ppc64le --base-address 0x1 -f
elf_headers
** Description changed:
mescc-tools fails to build on ppc64el with the following error:
test/test13/hello.sh
+ ./bin/M1 --little-endian --architecture ppc64le -f test/test13/hello.M1 -o
test/test13/hello.hex2
+ ./bin/hex2 --little-endian --architecture ppc64le --base-address 0x1 -f
Public bug reported:
This is showed by the isa-support autopkgtest regression. It is solved
on the glibc maintenance branch.
** Affects: glibc (Ubuntu)
Importance: Medium
Status: In Progress
** Tags: update-excuse
** Tags added: update-excuse
** Changed in: glibc (Ubuntu)
Public bug reported:
In the last glibc merge, I dropped this piece of delta (pasting only the
commit as the diff is a bit massive):
commit 2c85e22ed40f15047fd290e8203fdc3ecbd2b6a4
Author: Simon Chopin
Date: Fri Aug 11 14:40:30 2023 +0200
Adjust libc6-dev Breaks to account for binNMU vs
Hi, verification done in a fresh Noble container:
root@needrestart-self:~# dpkg -l needrestart | tail -n 1
ii needrestart3.6-7ubuntu4.1 all check which daemons need to be
restarted after library upgrades
root@needrestart-self:~# sudo systemd-run -u no-self-restart sh -c 'set -e; apt
Verified in a fresh VM:
root@needrestart-motd:~/needrestart-3.6# dpkg -l needrestart | tail -n 1
ii needrestart3.6-7ubuntu4.1 all check which daemons need to be
restarted after library upgrades
root@needrestart-motd:~/needrestart-3.6# systemd-detect-virt
kvm
root@needrestart-motd:~/
Verified in a fresh container:
root@needrestart-nrconf:~# dpkg -l needrestart | tail -n 1
ii needrestart3.6-7ubuntu4.1 all check which daemons need to be
restarted after library upgrades
root@needrestart-nrconf:~# man needrestart
root@needrestart-nrconf:~# man needrestart | grep -i
Verified on a fresh container (with the conf then removed to show the
difference):
root@needrestart-nrconf:~# dpkg -l needrestart | tail -n 1
ii needrestart3.6-7ubuntu4.1 all check which daemons need to be
restarted after library upgrades
root@needrestart-nrconf:~# e^C
root@needres
Public bug reported:
We have shipped a patch for glibc since groovy that adds a fallback path
for clock_nanosleep_time64 to use CLOCK_MONOTONIC, to work around a bug
in WSL1 (see bug 1871240). This has since been fixed in the WSL1
implementation (WSL2 is out of scope as they use a full-blown Linux
** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Simon Chopin (schopin)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2044104
Title:
[UBUNTU 20.04] chzdev -e is rebuilding initra
Hi Alexandre!
I did a first review of the package.
My first question is a bit global: what's the use case for this? Is it
supposed to be used at build time? I think for now it would be easier to
have just a -dev package that provides the headers and static libraries,
and not bother with shared li
** Tags removed: verification-needed verification-needed-noble
** Tags added: verification-done verification-done-noble
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2063442
Title:
needrestart on Ub
** Description changed:
Please be advised that some part of the changes only apply to the Jammy SRU.
Current versions:
Jammy: 5.32ubuntu3~22.04.1
Noble: 5.34ubuntu2
+
+ This SRU follows the exception process as outlined at
+ https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#autopkgtest rather
It's on my board for this pulse.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2068933
Title:
all reports with LaunchpadPrivate in them are tagged need-$arch-
retrace
To manage notifications abou
I've looked a bit into it. It seems this has been going on for more than
a decade, it might just be that so far most explicitly private reports
we were getting were for crashes.
Just so that I'm clear, adding `apport` as a subscriber is needed for
the retrace/duplicate bit, but not for the generic
Ongoing work at https://github.com/canonical/apport/pull/367
** Changed in: apport (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged => In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2068933
Title:
all re
Can someone please modify the bug to adhere to the SRU template?
https://canonical-sru-docs.readthedocs-
hosted.com/en/latest/reference/bug-template/
It's a requisite condition for the fix to be uploaded and eventually
released.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu Oracular)
Status: New => In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2044104
Title:
[UBUNTU 20.04] chzdev -e is rebuilding initramfs even with
z
Note that while it's a bit curious that the infra suddenly started
routing those IPs, here I think rust-reqwest is wrong in the end. If you
want an IP that's not routed, you should use one from an IP range from
RFC 5735, as those should be treated by reasonable admins as follow:
> Network operator
** Description changed:
[ Impact ]
On Ubuntu Core 24 calling the command line
useradd --extrausers --groups somegroup somenewuser
... fails with:
useradd: cannot lock /etc/group; try again later.
It worked on 22.04. /etc is not writable. It also fails if somegroup is
a
Thanks for testing and catching that regression! I've found and fixed
the issue in an oracular upload. Once it clears -proposed I'll amend the
noble-proposed version.
** Changed in: shadow (Ubuntu Noble)
Status: Fix Committed => In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because yo
This is a new feature that I implemented based on what I had understood
were your requirements: integrating needrestart with /run/reboot-
required. Apparently, MOTD picks up whatever we write in that file.
Shall I walk that part back and not write to that file in the case of
kernel updates? I supp
** Tags added: foundations-todo
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2065863
Title:
needrestart causes kernel upgrade messages in motd
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https:/
Hi Sudip,
I've uploaded the Mantic and Jammy packages to the SRU queue. Thanks for
your work :)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2061637
Title:
[SRU] xx-svn-review crashed with ModuleN
Public bug reported:
This is an expansion on bug 2059337. There's likely a fair number of
custom services out there that are similar in nature to cloud-init,
unattended-upgrade and the likes. Rather than forcing every user to
track down and debug this issue, needrestart should instead have some
so
Well, we're not in the world of needrestart just yet, it's only seeded in
Server.
On Thu, 30 May 2024, 04:20 Seth Arnold, <244...@bugs.launchpad.net>
wrote:
> Adrien, thanks so much for digging into this again.
>
> This is so very complicated, why does openssl need special handling in
> the world
Steve, do you still have the crash file on your system? If so, could you
give us its mod and owner?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2066995
Title:
apport-gtk keeps prompting to report
Interestingly, I see the same "could not be opened" patter in my recent
logs, all for crashes within Python executables.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2066995
Title:
apport-gtk keeps
1 - 100 of 960 matches
Mail list logo
