We did this quite good for gnome-app-install. Perhaps worth taking a
look:
AppInstall/widgets/AppDescView.py
--
improve the description format algorithm
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/23609
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.
The configuration dialog will only appear if changes have been made by
the user. So the user should already know the purpose of this config
file.
** Changed in: update-manager (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
--
Configuration File Change: Old Man Mindset
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/154
This bug isn't easy to fix. And we invested a lot of time in finding a
solution in update-manager/synaptic. But feel free to post a patch to
this easy problem.
--
'Downloading package information' and 'building dependency tree' progress
dialogs steal focus
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/35876
Y
Sure that you don't run any scripts which modify the file? Please report
a separate bug including the corresponding files if such an error
occurs.
--
Configuration File Change: Old Man Mindset
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/154459
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ub
What did you do before the crash? Where did you get the crash message
from?
** Changed in: packagekit (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Incomplete
--
aptDBUSBackend.py crashed with signal 7
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/302210
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Mvo was so kindly to patch the config file and upload a new packagekit
version to intrepid.
** Changed in: packagekit (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Released
--
"update information is outdated" displayed while Check has been performed
lately
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/223505
You recei
** Changed in: packagekit (Ubuntu)
Status: In Progress => Fix Released
--
PackageKit update to version 0.3.1 (2008-08-27) in Ubuntu 8.10
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/263005
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ub
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: packagekit
An update to 0.3.5 would provide us a lot of bugfixes and a more robust
apt backend, which now includes a fail recovery and better handling of
config file changes.
Furthermore the packaging has been improved too. See debdiff.
The freeze excep
** Attachment added: "Changes in the apt backend since 0.3.3"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18086747/aptDBUSBackend.diff
--
Freeze Exception for 0.3.5 and corresponding packagekit-gnome
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/276264
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubunt
** Attachment added: "Changes in the packaging of packagekit"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18086751/packagekit-debian.diff
--
Freeze Exception for 0.3.5 and corresponding packagekit-gnome
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/276264
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ub
** Attachment added: "Changes in packageking of packagekit-gnome"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18086760/package-gnome-debian.diff
--
Freeze Exception for 0.3.5 and corresponding packagekit-gnome
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/276264
You received this bug notification because you are a membe
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: gnome-app-install
The codec installation hook of gstreamer calls /usr/bin/gnome-codec-
install in Debian/Ubuntu. This hook can also be provided by PackageKit.
It would be nice to have an alternative here. Otherwise PackageKit has
to use a dpkg-divert.
Ch
** Attachment added: "alternatives.patch"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18362232/alternatives.patch
--
gnome-codec-install should be an alternative
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/280633
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
Public bug reported:
Gstreamer seems to use /usr/bin/gstreamer-codec-install instead of
/usr/bin/gnome-codec-install
write(2, "** Message: Missing plugin: gstr"..., 162** Message: Missing plugin:
gstreamer|0.10|totem|MPEG-1 Layer 3 (MP3) decoder|decoder-audio/mpeg,
mpegversion=(int)1, layer=(in
Because some time passed since I opened the ffe I updated it to the
current 0.3.6.
PackageKit is a quiet new product without any further dependencies in
Ubuntu. Therefor I would put the top most priority in having a as
poslished as possible version in Ubuntu Intrepid.
I haven't recieved any bug r
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 226079 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/226079
Am Dienstag, den 16.09.2008, 18:40 + schrieb James Westby:
> There are two places in this file, and possibly others in other files
> that call "error", I suspect it may be an old function, and not all
> co
Here is the fix. It also contains a fix in the lower level key handling.
(errors haven't been reported correctly)
** Attachment added: "fix_key_error_handling.patch"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/17735191/fix_key_error_handling.patch
** Changed in: software-properties (Ubuntu)
Status: C
I already updated my packaging to 0.3.3. So would you confirm the upload
of packagekit 0.3.3 and gnome-packagekit-0.3.3?
The 0.3.3 release is a bug fix release only. Which would also be nice to
have from the apt backend perspective.
Cheers,
Sebastian
--
Freeze Exception for PackageKit 0.3.2
ht
backends changed
Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2008 05:17:00 +0200
Changed-By: Sebastian Heinlein
Signed-By: Michael Vogt
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/intrepid/+source/packagekit/0.3.3-0ubuntu1
** Changed in: packagekit (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Fix Released
--
Freeze Exception for Package
Which third party source should be missing?
--
Adept Third-Party Software out of sync with sources.list
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/263456
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists
Could you please describe the situation of the crash more exactly? On
which items do you click and which applications do you start?
** Changed in: adept (Ubuntu)
Sourcepackagename: update-manager => adept
--
adept_manager version upgrade crash if /etc/apt/sources.list.d directory missing
https:/
I uploaded recent packagekit packages for Hardy to the following ppa:
https://launchpad.net/~packagekit/+archive
I don't think that it makes any sense to fix the outdated apt backend of
the 0.1.x series, since there are no serious users and it is in bad
shape.
The modern 0.3.x series of packagek
** Changed in: packagekit (Ubuntu)
Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released
--
Doesn't provide info about the type of an update
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/250970
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs ma
Does the command line tool pkcon work? E.g. "pkcon get-details xterm"
What kind of machine are you using? Is it a modern system?
--
packagekit says: The backend took too much time to process the synchronous
request - you need to fork!
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/272410
You received this bug
What do you expect? Reloading includes rebuilding the package cache,
which requires some cpu power. How long does it take?
--
Reload progress window eats cpu
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/207554
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to U
All of the above issues are addressed in the latest commits to the
jaunty packaging branch.
Cheers,
Sebastian
--
main incluson report for packagekit
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/319998
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
The version of packagekit in intrepid is 0.3.6. Are you sure which
system you are using?
There is no need to be a member of the packagekit group, since it was
only used by the daemon.
** Changed in: packagekit-gnome (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Incomplete
--
PackageKit Failed to update system
** Changed in: packagekit-gnome (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
** Bug watch added: freedesktop.org Bugzilla #19272
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19272
** Also affects: packagekit via
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19272
Importance: Unknown
St
There is now support for small screen devices in the user interface.
This will be part of the next version in Ubuntu.
** Changed in: packagekit-gnome (Ubuntu)
Status: New => In Progress
--
Minimum window size is far too wide and tall
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/281074
You received thi
This is a known bug that has already been fixed upstream and in Jaunty.
I don't want to promise an update to the intrepid version of packagekit.
** Changed in: packagekit (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
[intrepid] pkcon get-updates don't work after pkcon refresh
https://bugs.launchpa
Was fixed with 0.3.14-0ubuntu4
** Changed in: packagekit (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Released
--
package packagekit 0.3.14-0ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess
post-installation script returned error exit status 1
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/331647
You received this bug not
Which version of packagekit do you use? Are you running Intrepid or
Jaunty?
** Changed in: packagekit (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Incomplete
--
If there's an error, it doesn't remove /var/lib/dpkg/lock
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/321842
You received this bug notification because you are a
Nautilus should check if packagekit is installed and provide a better
error messsage.
** Changed in: packagekit
Status: New => Invalid
--
unable search for an application to open this file
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/338867
You received this bug notification because you are a member o
Public bug reported:
The remote login dialog (xdmcp) shows the Debian logo. it should be an
Ubuntu icon.
** Affects: gdm (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
Shows Debian logo on remote login
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/330130
You received this bug notification becaus
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: fast-user-switch-applet
In a XDMCP session fusa shows guest, reboot, shutdown and suspend. Which
is wrong and doesn't work.
** Affects: fast-user-switch-applet (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
Shows shutdown and suspend comma
** Changed in: update-notifier (Ubuntu)
Sourcepackagename: update-manager => update-notifier
Status: New => Confirmed
--
combine "Show updates" and "Install all updates"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/263513
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which
** Changed in: update-notifier (Ubuntu)
Sourcepackagename: update-manager => update-notifier
Status: New => Confirmed
--
confusing use of the word "Mark" in UI
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/263510
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscr
Actually PackageKit should have a better error message.
** Summary changed:
- Kpackagekit can't handle package dependency
+ Doesn't support installations which require a removal
** Description changed:
Binary package hint: kpackagekit
+
+ By convention the apt backend doesn't allow to instal
Could some of the KDE developers comment on this? I am not familiar with
cmake and its policies.
** Changed in: packagekit (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Incomplete
--
CMake can't find QPackageKit by default
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/345706
You received this bug notification because you ar
When the refresh operation starts we don't know how many files have to
be downloaded or how much data. Apt downloads first a few files which
point to others which hold more information. So the progress bar would
jump arround a lot. But PackageKit doesn't support a decreasing
progress.
** Summary c
I ported the APT backend to a different backend mechanism. It now
doesn't communicate using dbus but stdin/out. The work can be found in
the apt-dispatcher branch of the 0.4 series. I will merge it soon.
--
packagekit says: The backend took too much time to process the synchronous
request - you
Indeed. It was always my plan to ship the 0.3.x series in Jaunty. I
backported a small api addition to support kpackagekit 0.4.
Furthermore it is very misleading to judge about software quality only
taking the version number into account. If you are missing a feature or
important bug fix please re
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 342671 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/342671
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 342671
Doesn't support installations which require a removal or updates which
require additional software
--
Kpackagekit blocks updates when it needs to ins
** Summary changed:
- Doesn't support installations which require a removal
+ Doesn't support installations which require a removal or updates which
require additional software
--
Doesn't support installations which require a removal or updates which require
additional software
https://bugs.la
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 342671 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/342671
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 343124
Kpackagekit blocks updates when it needs to install or uninstall other
packages
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 342671
Doesn't support i
We need to make a freeze exception request.
** Changed in: packagekit (Ubuntu)
Status: New => In Progress
--
PackageKit update to version 0.3.1 (2008-08-27) in Ubuntu 8.10
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/263005
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, wh
Should be fixed in the 0.3 series
** Changed in: packagekit (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged => Fix Committed
--
Doesn't provide info about the type of an update
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/250970
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: packagekit
PackageKit and especially the apt backend has improved largely since the
start of the 0.3 series. Currently we ship the rather old 0.2.4 release
in Intrepid, which features a very basic and and buggy apt backend. The
backend in 0.3.2 can be reg
Since the differences between the 0.2.4 and 0.3.2 are quite large I
don't attach a full diff, but one of the apt backend, which is the
crucial part for Debian/Ubuntu.
** Attachment added: "Differences of the apt backend in 0.2.4 and 0.3.2"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/17493958/backend.diff
--
Actually PackageKit doesn't want to be an advanced package manager that
allows you to access all the information available in your native
package manager. I don't see the need for most users to see the
maintainer name of package.
--
KPackageKit can't show package maintainers
https://bugs.launchpa
on policykit-1. It is
open when we will see required kpackagekit and kde policykit support.
** Changed in: packagekit (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => In Progress
** Changed in: packagekit (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Sebastian Heinlein (glatzor)
--
Kubuntu GUI package man
Fix Committed
** Changed in: packagekit (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Sebastian Heinlein (glatzor)
--
Refresh progress jumps to ~90% very early
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/348053
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
I changed the policy in the 0.4.x and 0.5.x branch of PackageKit. It
should be part of the next release. An open issue is kpackagekit since
it doesn't yet call GetDepends(~installed, IDS_OF_UPDATES) to present
the user a list of changes (e.g. additional packages that would be
installed). Dantti is
Since we don't have got PolicyKit-1 support for KDE, we stick to the
0.4.x branch of PackageKit, which can only inform the user about
currently installing untrusted packages. The 0.5.x branch also allows to
cancel a session if you are not allowed to install untrusted packages.
I added support for
** Changed in: packagekit (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged => Fix Committed
--
Don't fail if dbus is not running
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/388623
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bu
** Package changed: packagekit (Ubuntu) => packagekit-gnome (Ubuntu)
--
Packagekit, No list on left handside box under search and above help button.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/397688
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
-
** Changed in: packagekit (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged => Fix Committed
--
libpackagekit-qt11 description: QT -> Qt
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/378419
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ub
** Changed in: packagekit (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Fix Committed
--
packagekit does not handle restart required
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/399918
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to kpackagekit in ubuntu.
--
kubunt
The developemnt of the smart backend is currently on stale. For daily
use you should use the apt backend.
--
packagekit and packagekit-backend-smart fail to use/see Ubuntu's repos.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/401151
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, w
** Changed in: packagekit (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged => Fix Committed
--
CMake can't find QPackageKit by default
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/345706
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubu
Have you already reinstalled the system?
** Changed in: packagekit (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
** Converted to question:
https://answers.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/packagekit/+question/79894
--
Evecy ahhebph to use apt-get = 'segmintation error,' Synaptic will stay on
scre
Seems to be a more generic Python problem
** Package changed: packagekit (Ubuntu) => python-defaults (Ubuntu)
--
aptDBUSBackend.py crashed with SIGSEGV in _PyObject_GC_New()
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/351974
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which i
** Package changed: packagekit (Ubuntu) => kpackagekit (Ubuntu)
--
Installation of some metapackages fails silently
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/367444
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubunt
** Package changed: packagekit (Ubuntu) => python-apt (Ubuntu)
--
aptDBUSBackend.py crashed with signal 7 in strlen()
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/352380
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubu
So you still have got the error? Do you get translated package
descriptions? Which package can you see in the list before the error?
In Karmic the APT backend uses a different mechanism for the
communication between the packagekit daemon and the backend. The issue
should be fixed there.
** Change
I rewrote the update calculation recently. Should be fixed in Karmic
soon.
** Changed in: packagekit (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Committed
--
update-viewer crashes: ValueError: list.remove(x): x not in list
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/374011
You received this bug notification because
There was an internal API change in python-apt. A new version of python-
apt has been uploaded with the corresponding breaks tag.
I already removed the corresponding code in upstream git repository.
** Changed in: packagekit (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Fix Committed
--
'PackageKitCache
Could you please run the packagekitd from the command line and
copy&paste the output here?
sudo /usr/bin/packagekitd --verbose --backend smart
** Changed in: packagekit (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Incomplete
--
packagekit and packagekit-backend-smart fail to use/see Ubuntu's repos.
https://
** Changed in: packagekit (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Fix Committed
--
doesn't handle non-ascii characters in update information
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/396513
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-b
I am currenty working on uploading a new version of the 0.4.x branch.
You can expcet it soon.
--
Needs update: PackageKit to 0.5.1 version
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/412938
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-
** Changed in: packagekit (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Fix Committed
--
crashes when installing packages from non ascii folders
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/347327
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bug
Debfile was merged with python-apt. This error should be fixed in
Karmic.
--
AttributeError: 'DebPackage' object has no attribute 'pkgName' when installing
virtualbox deb in kpackagekit
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/369081
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
B
This seems to be a bug in Python threading. In the 0.4.x branch we don't
use threading anymore.
** Changed in: packagekit (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Released
--
aptDBUSBackend.py crashed with SIGSEGV in PyType_IsSubtype(), after reboot and
login
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/343312
Yo
The emblems also have got a tooltip (the cursor is not visible in the
screen shot)
--
proprietary != commercial
https://launchpad.net/bugs/44925
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
You could just add a disabled apt line to the default sources.list or
place a file in /etc/apt/sources.list.d. This way it would appear on the
third party tab.
Although the differences between Canonical and Ubuntu are marginal, I
don't think that we should put it next to the Ubuntu components. The
But I don't see the need for this option at all, since I can not imagine
a label for this repo that would give the user an idea about which
applications are hosted there. So why should a user enable this
repository?
Would we have to display a disclaimer/licence agreement if the
repository gets ena
ngful
short description.
** Changed in: update-manager (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Sebastian Heinlein
** Changed in: update-manager (Ubuntu)
Status: Unconfirmed => Needs Info
--
add dapper-commercial to software-properties
https://launchpad.net/bugs/54774
--
ubuntu-b
Colors always have got the theming problem. How to deal e.g. dark or
excotic themes? So you suggest to color all files in /usr/bin?
Perhaps you should describe why you want to search for bin files.
Perhaps we can find a better solution than using colors in the list.
I think that this wishlist ite
** Changed in: update-manager (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Sebastian Heinlein
Status: Unconfirmed => Confirmed
** Summary changed:
- software updates
+ Show current version of an upgradable package
--
Show current version of an upgradable package
https://launchpad.net/bu
** Changed in: update-manager (Ubuntu)
Sourcepackagename: update-manager => app-install-data-commercial
Assignee: Sebastian Heinlein => (unassigned)
--
add dapper-commercial to software-properties
https://launchpad.net/bugs/54774
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubun
** Summary changed:
- add dapper-commercial to software-properties
+ Make the repos visible in the software properties
** Description changed:
- Binary package hint: update-manager
+ Every third party repository (canonical, omnit ...) should place a
+ source file in /etc/apt/sources.list.d. The
There is now a "From version %s to %s" string in my local branch.
Waiting for mvo to merge and upload
** Changed in: update-manager (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Sebastian Heinlein => Michael Vogt
Status: Confirmed => Fix Committed
--
Show current version of an upgradab
** Changed in: update-manager (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Fix Released
--
"you have new update" icon may launch multiple instances of update-manager
https://launchpad.net/bugs/34990
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubunt
** Summary changed:
- Cannot install "ubuntu-desktop" when upgrading from Breezy to Dapper Beta
+ [dist-upgrader] Cannot install "ubuntu-desktop" when upgrading from Breezy to
Dapper Beta
--
[dist-upgrader] Cannot install "ubuntu-desktop" when upgrading from Breezy to
Dapper Beta
https://launc
** Changed in: update-manager (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Fix Released
--
only one instance should be allowed
https://launchpad.net/bugs/42428
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
** Summary changed:
- Window too big in 800x600
+ [Dist-upgrader] Window too big in 800x600
--
[Dist-upgrader] Window too big in 800x600
https://launchpad.net/bugs/40792
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
** Changed in: update-manager (Ubuntu)
Status: Unconfirmed => Fix Released
--
"Software Properties" window is too small by default
https://launchpad.net/bugs/40540
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
** Changed in: update-manager (Ubuntu)
Status: Needs Info => Fix Released
--
Main window doesn't have focus on startup
https://launchpad.net/bugs/44634
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
** Changed in: gnome-app-install (Ubuntu)
Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released
--
poor search results in gnome-app-install
https://launchpad.net/bugs/52185
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
we now store the supported archs in the application data files. added a
better explanation.
** Changed in: gnome-app-install (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Fix Released
--
Unsufficient explanation for not ported applications
https://launchpad.net/bugs/47433
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ub
we now use a textview instead of the gtkhtml widget in edgy.
** Changed in: gnome-app-install (Ubuntu)
Status: In Progress => Fix Released
--
Package descriptions unreadable with white-on-black theme
https://launchpad.net/bugs/36686
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.c
** Changed in: gnome-app-install (Ubuntu)
Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released
--
gnome-app-install shows incorrect information on empty categories
https://launchpad.net/bugs/48044
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-
We now use little emblems (ubuntu, xubuntu and kubutu logo) and a short
informational sentence in the description: "APPNAME integrates well into
the Kubuntu desktop"
** Changed in: gnome-app-install (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Michael Vogt => Sebastian Heinlein
Status: Needs Inf
Progress update: the cached desktop files and some minor speed
improvements reduced the start up time to a third of the dapper version
(from 22 sec to 7 sec on my mac mini)
** Changed in: gnome-app-install (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => In Progress
--
Is too slow to be usable
https://launc
** Changed in: gnome-app-install (Ubuntu)
Sourcepackagename: gnome-app-install => vim-gtk
** Summary changed:
- gvim is installed but not reflected in menu
+ Show the desktop file in the app menu by default
--
Show the desktop file in the app menu by default
https://launchpad.net/bugs/50756
--
Fixed in my local branch. Waiting for mvo to merge and upload
** Changed in: gnome-app-install (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Michael Vogt
Status: Confirmed => Fix Committed
--
wrong icon (skype) for gnome-office
https://launchpad.net/bugs/52612
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubun
Extend the home user backup to a system backup. backup the list of
explicity installed packages.
** Changed in: gnome-app-install (Ubuntu)
Sourcepackagename: gnome-app-install => hubackup
Assignee: Michael Vogt => (unassigned)
--
Import/export list of programs
https://launchpad.net/bugs/200
We cannot include a browser widget to show html pages in the dist-
upgrade tool.
But we could include a link to a highlights tour in the release notes.
The release notes viewer supports links.
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QuickTourDraft seems to be dead?
--
Humanized changelog and news after a dist-
** Changed in: update-manager (Ubuntu)
Status: Needs Info => Fix Released
--
update-manager icon disappeared from panel
https://launchpad.net/bugs/41615
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
** Description changed:
When the sources.list is rewritten it can happen that only parts are
updated and vital bits like "deb http://$unknown_mirror/ubuntu breezy
main" are commented out. This leads to random error messages like the
ones below. After the sources.list rewrite and the apt-g
1 - 100 of 2529 matches
Mail list logo
