I did (1) then (2):
root@cupid:~# apt-get autoremove --purge gnome-do
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
Package gnome-do is not installed, so not removed
The following packages will be REMOVED:
gir1.2-dbusmenu-glib-0.4* gir1.2-unity-
(See comment #142 for current version and boot problem information). I
am able to boot from the live CD in text mode, and eventually get X to
start, as follows:
Boot live CD
Hit ESC when the first welcome screen appears
When a screen with boot choices appears, first select the language (English)
The situation with Lucid on this Averatec laptop is unchanged. However
today I tried booting the Fedora 13 i686 live CD. As before, with Fedora
and Ubuntu, Linux started up in a 1600x1200 mode, with only the upper-
left 1024x768 corner of the screen showing, but I was able to use the
System>Prefere
Kernel information while running Fedora 13:
[liveu...@localhost bug555]$ uname -a
Linux localhost.localdomain 2.6.33.3-85.fc13.i686 #1 SMP Thu May 6 18:44:12 UTC
2010 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux
--
[K8M800] Lucid 10.04 live-CD login failure, Screen origin shifted to center,
screen wraps, ttyN scr
I just performed the test in comment #7, after renaming gnome-
do.desktop (The file produced I've called Upgrade5, since I did some
upgrades in between).
No upgrades were made this time - various upgrades were held back. The
output file shows this.
** Attachment added: "apt-get upgrade output f
Actually I get the same error when I run update-manager.
Here's my sources.list file.
** Attachment added: "sources.list"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-manager/+bug/730775/+attachment/1902184/+files/sources.list
--
You received this bug notification because you are a memb
"Are you getting the error about gnome-do every time you try to
update/upgrade the system?" -- Yes, I am.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/730775
Title:
update-manager fails due to held
Actually, that's with
apt-get dist-upgrade
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/730775
Title:
update-manager fails due to held packages
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.u
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: update-manager
'E:Error, pkgProblemResolver::Resolve generated breaks, this may be
caused by held packages.'
I can't update this system either with the GUI update-manager or with
apt-get from the command line.
Linux distro/version and kernel version
No
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/730775
Title:
update-manager fails due to held packages
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listi
Errors from running apt-get:
# apt-get dist-upgrade
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
Calculating upgrade... Failed
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
libcanberra-gtk0 : Breaks: libcanberra-gtk3-0 (< 0.28-0ubuntu1) but
0.
Thanks, RedSingularity!
Before reading comment #3, I tried updating both wiith update-manager
and apt-get, with the same errors as before.
Tnen, after I read those instructions, I ran the two commands.
Here's ~/Desktop/Update1
** Attachment added: "apt-get update output"
https://bugs.launch
Here's the apt-get upgrade output.
Note the following error:
2011-03-08 08:48:01,892 - softwarecenter.db.update - WARNING - The file:
'/usr/share/app-install/desktop/gnome-do.desktop' could not be read
correctly. The application associated with this file will not be
included in the software catal
After running the 2 commands specified in #3, and rebooting, I tried
running update-manager - and again got the error message in a popup:
Could not calculate the upgrade
An unresolvable problem occurred while calculating the upgrade.
Please report this bug against the 'update-manager' package an
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: xserver-xorg-video-nouveau
I tried booting the Natty 11.04 beta-1 live cd (32-bit) on a compaq
presario with an nVidia chipset. The system took a long time to boot,
possibly because of fairly low RAM and possibly because the hard disk is
currently only fo
** Attachment added: "Xorg.0.log, lspci lsmod uname -a outputs"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/747069/+attachment/1962688/+files/bug.tgz
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/747069
Title:
Bug #707755 is against the same computer with an earlier build of Natty
11.04, as of 2011-01-252011-01-25.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/747069
Title:
[natty beta-1] Screen flashes o
The date in #2 is 2011-01-25
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/747069
Title:
[natty beta-1] Screen flashes on and of every few seconds with nouveau
driver
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
Here is some information regarding the FreeBSD installation on the same
machine, which works using the vesa driver:
[peter@compaq /etc/X11]$ uname -a
FreeBSD compaq.belew 8.2-RELEASE FreeBSD 8.2-RELEASE #0: Thu Feb 17 02:41:51
UTC 2011 r...@mason.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENE
My next experiment will be to boot in text mode, add an xorg.conf file
based on the one originally generated by the PC-BSD live CD, and see if
that works with the vesa driver. The problem is clearly with the driver
for the nVidia chipset, which is apparently essentially the same as in
Fedora 14.
-
This is a Compaq Presario SR1000 system (System Number EX325-AA-ABA)
(originally sold as "Microsoft Windows XP Media Center Edition 2005")
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/747069
Title:
See Bug #747069 for natty beta-1
** Changed in: ubuntu
Status: Invalid => New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/707755
Title:
Xorg usually won't start on Compaq system with nVid
Today I tried the 20 Jul 2011 daily build of 10.04.3 LTS. Again, after
selecting the "try Ubuntu" option at boot, the screen goes blank, the
disk runs for a couple of minutes, and action stops. After some
experimentation, I found I was able to ping the system from another host
on my LAN at a dhcp-a
After some research, I was able to run the 10.04.3 live CD on this
system as follows:
When booting the live CD, bring up the boot options by hitting ESC,
select the language, then hit F6 to bring up some options. Select
'nomodeset' and continue. Eventually the system came up in text mode, as
it wa
I was able to get the 2011-07-20 build of 10.04.3 to boot, using roughly
the same tricks that I used for another system described in bug#707755,
on a Compaq system.
For the live-CD boot line, I hit F6 and selected 'nomode' set. For the
rest of the command line, I removed 'quiet' and 'splash' and a
I'm not sure that the 'nomode' boot line setting was necessary for this
Openchrome display - I had used that (see previous comment) for a system
with an nVidia display.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launc
At any rate, even if the repaired driver isn't added to the .3 or .4
release of 10.04 LTS, this provides a workaround to allow someone to
install this LTS version in a system like this. It's a little beyond
what a newbie can be expected to do, though!
--
You received this bug notification because
Status today: I was also able to get through booting the 11.04.3 64-bit
version. So I tried to install it.
The problem with the boot sector mentioned in the original description
surfaced again. After getting the 11.04.3 64-bit live cd to run, I tried
installing the system. The install finished cor
** Description changed:
Note: This also affects the upcoming 10.04.3 update - see #9.
+ Note: A problem with writing the MBR from the installer has resurfaced - see
#12
I have installed the alpha-1 version of 'natty' 11.04 on a Compaq
Presario SR1000 system (System Number EX325-AA-ABA) (
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 86184 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/86184
Note - the above comment should probably be moved to bug #86184.
Also, I totally concur with the comments in #140. There has been too
much emphasis in Ubuntu on adding flashy new features that end users
really
I have just installed 64-bit 11.04 Natty on this system, and will not
make any further changes until the next LTS release comes out, assuming
that release is acceptable. This is a system I am relying on, so I
really can't afford to experiment any more on it.
Note that I was unable to run the syste
Also, I don't think I was able to get the system going as far as
described in #13 - the system simply could not identify the monitor.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/707755
Title:
Xorg
The machine won't boot from a USB stick. It does have a network boot
option, but I don't know how to utilize that.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/707755
Title:
Xorg usually won't star
This just happened 2 or 3 times on my Avaratec 3280 laptop.
Linux distro/version and kernel version
No LSB modules are available.
Distributor ID: Ubuntu
Description:Ubuntu natty (development branch)
Release:11.04
Codename: natty
Linux cupid 2.6.37-12-generic #26-Ubuntu SMP Wed Ja
Public bug reported:
I have installed the alpha-1 version of 'natty' 11.04 on a Hewlett-
Packard system originally sold as "Microsoft Windows XP Media Center
Edition 2005", and updated the Ubuntu software up to this morning. Often
it will not complete startup of Xorg - in this case, the screen is
** Attachment added: "tar with Xorg.0.log and other files"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/707755/+attachment/1807181/+files/hpbug.tar
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/707755
Title:
A while after, I rebooted, and this time the Gnome display came up. I
have attached the Xorg.0.log showing this.
Whether the X display starts is somewhat random. Sometimes I have to try
several times, or I can't get it to start at all.
I would be happy to use the free driver on this system, sinc
This system is exhibiting some disk drive errors, which may account for
these problems. Sometimes the swap partition was failing to mount, also;
but I added a swap file and commented-out the swap partition in
/etc/fstab. That didn't fix the display problem though.
I'm doing a RAM check now (it has
** Description changed:
- I have installed the alpha-1 version of 'natty' 11.04 on a Compaq system
- originally sold as "Microsoft Windows XP Media Center Edition 2005", and
- updated the Ubuntu software up to this morning. Often it will not
- complete startup of Xorg - in this case, the screen is
I plan to replace the hard drive, re-install Ubuntu 11.04 alpha, and
retest
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/707755
Title:
Xorg usually won't start on Compaq system with nVidia Corpora
** Description changed:
Binary package hint: gnome-panel
I have installed 11.04 'natty narwhal' beta-1 on my Averatec 3280
- notebook, and have updated it daily through this morning.
+ notebook, and have updated it daily through this morning. (2010-12-12).
This has a Unichrome display
This problem seems to have gone for some time now in the mode I normally
use. (This is 2011-01-28). I normally use "Ubuntu Classic Desktop (No
effect).
HOWEVER, if I choose just "Ubuntu Classic Desktop", I get no panels at
all (I only tried that once - it's possible that panels will appear at
rand
This works properly in Ubuntu 10.10
--
Rhythmbox music status not shown by Pidgin
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/371516
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://li
This appears to still be the case with vlc in Maverick 10.10. Previously
I had reported this not working with Rhythmbox and Pidgin (bug #371516 -
see comment no. 2 above) but it does now work with Rhythmbox. Versions:
vlc/maverick uptodate 1.1.4-1ubuntu1
rhythmbox/maverick uptodate 0.13.1-0ubuntu
System used for test in comment #6 - Dell Inspiron Mini 10 netbook:
Ubuntu version and kernel version
DISTRIB_ID=Ubuntu
DISTRIB_RELEASE=10.10
DISTRIB_CODENAME=maverick
DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION="Ubuntu 10.10"
Linux mini 2.6.35-22-generic #35-Ubuntu SMP Sat Oct 16 20:36:48 UTC 2010 i686
GNU/Linux
model
Top & bottom panels still don't appear on this system except in safe
mode, as of an upgrade this morning.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/689377
Title:
Panels fail to appear on Gnome s
On choosing just "Ubuntu Classic Desktop", I get either no panels at all
or just one panel. So that aspect of the bug still stands.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/689377
Title:
Panels
As of today, there has been a regression: in the absence of an xorg.conf
file, the initial resolution is again set to 1600x1200. It's possible to
use the Monitors dialog to set the res. to 1024x768, but before that is
done, the login screen's bottom panel is inaccessible, so that the GUI
mode can't
This problem has popped up over and over again with almost every Ubuntu
release. It largely affects people who deal with a number of languages
using the Latin character set, but are used to the US keyboard. I think
there may be other variant keyboards for which subscripts would be
useful, but I'm n
As of 11.04 "Natty" Ubuntu, the remaining problem is that the initial
display is set at 1600x1200. For Ubuntu with Gnome, the
System/Preference/Monitors dialog is accessible, and the screen res can
be changed to 1024x768 (see last few comments in bug #495553).
For the unichrome display, only Gnome
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: gnome-panel
I have installed 11.04 'natty narwhal' beta-1 on my Averatec 3280
notebook, and have updated it daily through this morning.
This has a Unichrome display which only supports Gnome in 11.04. This
display has had a number of problems with previo
** Attachment added: "current apt-show-versions output"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/689377/+attachment/1763969/+files/versions2010-12-12.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/68937
I tried a brief test of Safe Mode instead of Classic mode. The panels
appear properly in Safe Mode, but not (necessarily) in Classic (Gnome)
mode. I just tried 3 times:
Safe Mode: Panels ok
Classic Mode: only bottom panel
Safe Mode: Panels ok.
Just logging out between tests, not rebooting.
--
A new bug appeared yesterday: frequently the top and bottom panels don't
appear after login. I just filed this bug separately as #689377. This
happens most of the time in Classic Mode (Gnome), but not in Gnome Safe
Mode.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bug
The behavior is the same as in comment #2 after rebooting.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/689377
Title:
Panels fail to appear on Gnome startup on Averatec notebook running 11.04
alph
The behavior is the same as in comment #2 after rebooting.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/689377
Title:
Panels fail to appear on Gnome startup on Averatec notebook running 11.04
alph
Some new issues:
When I boot in safe mode. I can't use the wifi interface (configured
with network-manager), but the eth0 interface works (configured in
/etc/network/interfaces). Apparently network-manager is disabled in safe
mode.
When booting into the normal Gnome mode, the previously-configure
Note that further comments were added to Bug #689377 today, as further
problems appeared. I don't think these problem were due to the display
driver, but they do affect testing of display problems somewhat, and
vice versa. For example, if the xorg.conf file is removed, it's not
possible to go into
I built and installed the driver, and rebooted a couple of times. I've
added an archive containing Xorg.0.log and Xorg.0.log.old. There was no
xorg.conf file in /etc/X11.
The main change was that the login screen was no longer at 1600x1200.
The grub2 screen and the final Gnome screen appeared to b
I built and installed the driver, and rebooted a couple of times. I've
added an archive containing Xorg.0.log and Xorg.0.log.old. There was no
xorg.conf file in /etc/X11.
The main change was that the login screen was no longer at 1600x1200.
The grub2 screen and the final Gnome screen appeared to b
Actually, the remaining problem regarding the initial screen resolution
is covered by Bug #186103 - other issues on THIS bug seem to have been
resolved.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/49
Comment #53 is an accidental duplicate of #52. Oops!
This bug report contains the remaining issue in Bug #495553.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/186103
Title:
[K8M800] Panel on K8M800
The problem with the initial screen res of 1600x1200 is now covered by
Bug #186103.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/689377
Title:
Panels fail to appear on Gnome startup on Averatec not
How can one disable compiz on this system?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/689377
Title:
Panels fail to appear on Gnome startup on Averatec notebook running 11.04
alpha1
--
ubuntu-b
If the bottom panel does appear (this is kind of random), one can create
another panel after right-clicking on it. Such a panel will appear first
on the side of the screen, rather than the top. If one right-clicks on
the new panel, and tries to move it to the top, using the Properties
selection, it
I haven't applied the patch (#56) yet, but switching to text console and
back works fine, and hibernation seems to also.
Now I'll try the patch ...
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/186103
I applied the patch. It went well with via_mode.c, but there were some
errors with via_driver.c - here is via_driver.c.rej
--- via_driver.c(wersja 886)
+++ via_driver.c(kopia robocza)
@@ -725,7 +725,6 @@
break;
case VIA_K8M800:
pVia->DRIIrqEnable
I tried doing that. Running svn update from the src dir did nothing. I
then tried
svn update http://svn.openchrome.org/svn/trunk openchrome from /root
(openchrome is in /root/openchrome).
Skipped 'http://svn.openchrome.org/svn/trunk'
Uopenchrome/ChangeLog
Uopenchrome/src/via_mode.c
Uo
After restarting with xorg.conf in place, the screen comes up as
1024x768, with just the bottom panel (but that's another bug). I think
I'll try checking out the sources again from scratch and rebuild, later
today. Or perhaps there was some error in my use of svn.
--
You received this bug notific
Now -
svn checkout http://svn.openchrome.org/svn/trunk openchrome
...
Checked out revision 888.
I then tried to apply the patches. Again they seem to fail. I didn't try
to build.
Please send me fully patched .c files - I don't seem to be doing the
patches right, or the patch file is bad.
--
Yo
Ok - I re-checked-out and rebuilt the driver, with no patches, and the
native resolution is now 1024x768!
Many thanks, Bartosz!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/186103
Title:
[K8M800]
And thanks to the developers upstream!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/186103
Title:
[K8M800] Panel on K8M800 is not supported (Averatec 3280)
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs
Running 10.10 maverick with updates through today, there is a problem
that I can't switch to text console - the screen is full of big blocks
of color. I have to use alt-F8 or alt-F9 to switch back to the X
display.
Show Ubuntu version and kernel version
DISTRIB_ID=Ubuntu
DISTRIB_RELEASE=10.10
DIST
Clarification - #22 is with the lastest 'savage' driver.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/414330
Title:
When using vesa driver system with S3 Inc. VT8375 [ProSavage8
KM266/KL266] cra
I'm not sure - My report was regarding Ubuntu 9.04, which I've replaced
with 10.04 or 10.10 on my computers. For example on this 10.04 LTS
system, the current Pidgin is 2.6.6, with the MusicTracker plugin v.
0.4.19 - this seems to work with RhythmBox. Anyhow this report is pretty
old now.
--
You
This plugin is in Ubuntu's 'universe' repository - for example, for
'natty' it's in natty/universe. So yes, support has to come from
elsewhere. It needs to be installed with apt-get or Synaptic, etc.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscri
I ended up buying a new hard drive and installing Fedora 14. I'll try a
later alpha or beta of 11.04 though, as a live CD.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/707755
Title:
Xorg usually wo
** Visibility changed to: Public
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/722937
Title:
nm-applet crashed with SIGSEGV
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.u
My problem was with the live CD (I have FreeBSD taking up the whole
disk drive, and don't want to install Ubuntu in this system). There
doesn't seem to be an easy way to choose the desktop, since the system
auto-logins to Gnome when it starts up, without showing a login screen
(unless there is a p
I just noticed today that this bug has come back in 11.04 natty (alpha1
with updates through today). I sometimes use as many as 4 alternate US
layouts, so this is a real inconvenience.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
ht
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: network-manager
I updated my 11.04 installation a couple of hours ago on my Averatec
3280 laptop, and neither eth0 nor my wifi interface came up. Also the
nm-applet does not appear in the notification area. I finally had to
configure eth0 manually to make
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/724594
Title:
network-manager fails to bring up eth0
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo
Actually, networking works, but network-manager etc aren't working, so
you don't get an IP or netmask or default gateway. See bug #724594 -
manually set the network up, for example:
ifconfig eth0 192.168.2.43 netmask 255.255.255.0
route add default gw 192.168.2.2
This works for an Ethernet port.
The duplicate Bug #724594, which I created, seems to have been fixed,
both for Ethernet and wi-fi.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/724556
Title:
[Natty] isc-dhcp update breaks network
Hi Bartosz - Oops! I didn't see your last update until just now.
However, the fix seems to have been checked in; when I updated this
morning, the resolution seemed to be correct, 1024x768.
Thank you!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscrib
I don't particularly like the concept of the indicator applet OR the
"notification area" - similar concepts, lumping together several
applets; I'd rather just add these things individually and arrange them
individually.
BUT: this bug is about the keyboard indicator specifically, which has
lost a c
At any rate, this appears to be fixed in Lucid, Karmic, and the current
Natty alpha version. I can see the various USA keyboard versions
indicated, like USA, USA1 USA2 etc.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.l
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: initramfs-tools
I just started up Ubuntu 10.10 RC build 2010-10-07 (Live USB) on a Dell
netbook from a USB stick.
ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.10
Package: initramfs-tools 0.98.1ubuntu6 [modified: usr/sbin/update-initramfs]
ProcVersionSig
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/656609/+attachment/1678098/+files/Dependencies.txt
** Attachment added: "Df.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/656609/+attachment/1678099/+files/Df.txt
** Attachment added: "Dmesg.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/
I have the same problem after upgrading Ubuntu 10.04 to the released
version of 10.10. My 40_custom file looks like:
#!/bin/sh
exec tail -n +3 $0
# This file provides an easy way to add custom menu entries. Simply type the
# menu entries you want to add after this comment. Be careful not to chan
Adding to comment #4 - I have been able to boot from grub2 on this
system since Ubuntu 9.04.
See my Bug #432254.
--
10.10 BETA grub2 can't boot FreeBSD 8.1
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/649631
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ub
Ahavatar: Thank you! That works for me, too - in my case it's
menuentry "FreeBSD 8.1" {
set root=(hd0,3)
chainloader +1
}
Apparently the new grub2 doesn't know about the FreeBSD partition
letters, but can now find BSD boot partitions within the (hd0,3)
"slice". Maybe this is documented somewher
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: gnome-control-center
When I try to add a background image, the Add Wallpaper dialog shows
files and directories in reverse alphabetical order - "Z" before "A" for
example. I have noticed this since installing Lucid on my Dell netbook,
and the problem pers
--
"Add Wallpaper" dialog in the Change Desktop Background shows files in reverse
order (LUCID and MAVERICK)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/662960
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bug
I've attached a screenshot.
While attaching the screenshot, I just noticed that the dialog for
attaching a file to this bug report (viewed in Firefox) has the same
problem! So the problem is not confined to this package ...
** Attachment added: "Screenshot"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/
Thanks - I never noticed that you can reverse the sort order by clicking
on 'name'. That solved the problem! Not a bug! It's odd that that came
up that way through my installation of Lucid through the upgrade to
Maverick! :)
Not a bug, just embarrassing user dumbness!
--
"Add Wallpaper" dialog i
This problem persists with the post-RC 07-oct-2010 build.
Linux distro/version and kernel version
Ubuntu 10.10
Linux ubuntu 2.6.35-22-generic #33-Ubuntu SMP Sun Sep 19 20:34:50 UTC 2010 i686
GNU/Linux
model name : Mobile AMD Sempron(tm) Processor 2800+
cpu MHz : 800.000
If I just boo
** Description changed:
Binary package hint: xorg-server
+
+ [ Comments added for Maveric beta versions ]
It is now impossible to boot and log in on this system from the beta-2
live CD - see comment #111.
THIS NOW SEEMS TO BE 'CURED' by running kernels from Karmic - see
comments p
There seems to be some confusion in the comments between the Indicator
Applet 0.3.7 and the Notification Area 2.30.0, both of which appear in
my panels, showing different applets. Is this problem occurring in both
container applets, or just one?
--
visual corruption affecting several panel applet
Note for upstream: The screen resolution is not properly recognized
either on Fedora 13 and on CentOS 5.5 - in all cases the system tries to
start up in 1600x1200 mode, but in a Gnome system it's possible to set
the res. manually, then later install an xorg.conf file. On KDE systems
it's much more
801 - 900 of 909 matches
Mail list logo
