No, this is still a problem.
For example right now acpid 1.0.6-9ubuntu4.9.04.2 is available in
jaunty-security, but the changelog is not on changelogs.ubuntu.com. This
means that I can't review it from within aptitude before upgrading.
(I can of course open a web browser and find the changelog on
> Some more regression discussion:
> We tried backporting this patch to intrepid, but we found that this produced
> a regression: some keys such as the left/down arrow keys no longer repeated.
> The good news is that no one has produced this regression yet using the
> patched evdev packages in j
Made this bug private, since the DSA is available. (The previous mail to
slurm-announce was also public)
** Visibility changed to: Public
--
SLURM Security Flaw
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/363904
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed
** Attachment added: "debdiff between 1.3.13-1 and 1.3.15-1 for jaunty"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/25846901/1.3.13-1_to_1.3.15-1.debdiff
--
SLURM Security Flaw
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/363904
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscr
The attached debdiffs is between current versions in intrepid and
jaunty, and the fixed versions in sid and lenny.
--
SLURM Security Flaw
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/363904
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-b
** Attachment added: "debdiff between 1.3.6-1 and 1.3.6-1lenny3 for intrepid"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/25846942/1.3.6-1_to_1.3.6-1lenny3.debdiff
--
SLURM Security Flaw
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/363904
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which
I just got pointed at this bug when asking for intrepid linux-image-
debug packages on IRC.
I see how some might think it makes sense to throw kernel debug packages
with normal debug packages. However I disagree.
Debug information for kernel+modules is special because it is needed for
low level d
waspbr:
No, this bug has nothing what so ever to do with Xorg, you should report a
separate bug for your xorg problems.
Mårten:
Yes, it was a change in sata_nv that caused the problem. To be more specific it
was commit 2fd673ecf0378ddeeeb87b3605e50212e0c0ddc6, as I wrote in my upstream
bug repo
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: xmonad
Hi,
I hereby request a FFE to sync the following two source packages from
Debian unstable to Intrepid:
xmonad 0.8-1
xmonad-contrib 0.8-1
I know this is very late in the release cycle, but I still think this
would make sense. I also hope that it
** Attachment added: "diffstat_xmonad-contrib_0.7_0.8.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18145980/diffstat_xmonad-contrib_0.7_0.8.txt
--
FFE: Please sync xmonad and xmonad-contrib 0.8-1 from Debian unstable
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/277338
You received this bug notification because you
** Attachment added: "diffstat_xmonad_0.7_0.8.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18145995/diffstat_xmonad_0.7_0.8.txt
--
FFE: Please sync xmonad and xmonad-contrib 0.8-1 from Debian unstable
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/277338
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
** Attachment added: "install_0.8-1.log"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18145999/install_0.8-1.log
--
FFE: Please sync xmonad and xmonad-contrib 0.8-1 from Debian unstable
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/277338
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which i
** Attachment added: "pbuilder_xmonad-contrib_0.8-1.log"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18146003/pbuilder_xmonad-contrib_0.8-1.log
--
FFE: Please sync xmonad and xmonad-contrib 0.8-1 from Debian unstable
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/277338
You received this bug notification because you are
** Attachment added: "pbuilder_xmonad_0.8-1.log"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18146006/pbuilder_xmonad_0.8-1.log
--
FFE: Please sync xmonad and xmonad-contrib 0.8-1 from Debian unstable
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/277338
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubun
Oh, he seems to have uploaded it yesterday, when I had already started
putting this together. Of course we should sync xmonad-contrib 0.8-2
instead.
As -2 only makes this small change to the build options I don't think
there is any reason to believe that it will not compile/install/run in
Intrepid
** Summary changed:
- FFE: Please sync xmonad and xmonad-contrib 0.8-1 from Debian unstable
+ FFE: Please sync xmonad 0.8-1 and xmonad-contrib 0.8-2 from Debian unstable
** Description changed:
Binary package hint: xmonad
+
+ UPDATE: 2008-10-03
+ Changed Summary to request xmonad 0.8-1, xmona
)
Should I have changed the bug status myself? Just so I know the
correct work flow for next time.
On Friday 03 October 2008 09.20.40 Pär Andersson wrote:
> As -2 only makes this small change to the build options I don't think
> there is any reason to believe that it will not compil
Sorry for not replying to this earlier!
I have had a hardware failure in my home workstation where I do all my Ubuntu
testing/development. It took some time, but now I have gotten it into a
somewhat usable state. :-)
On Sunday 05 October 2008 12.56.59 StefanPotyra wrote:
> Ok, libghc6-utf8-stri
On Saturday 04 October 2008 15.01.45 StefanPotyra wrote:
> ok, the haskell-devscripts change looks good to me, and as haskell-
> utf8-string is currently not in intrepid, we won't risk breakage.
I think you missed that haskell-utf8-string only is the name of the source
package. It is at version 0
Public bug reported:
There are no repository files for [version]-backports on
http://ddebs.ubuntu.com. (In /dists there is no directories for hardy-
backports, gutsy-backports etc)
However if you look manually under /pool the dbgsym packages for
backports is available.
** Affects: ubuntu
Im
I have verified this bug using an unpatched mainline linux-2.6 kernel,
found the commit causing trouble, and reported the bug upstream.
** Bug watch added: Linux Kernel Bug Tracker #11615
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11615
** Also affects: linux via
http://bugzilla.kernel.org
0.5.4 is now in intrepid and I can verify that it builds and works as
expected on hardy (I backported it using prevu).
I believe this should be fixed by an SRU.
SRU justification: the current version in hardy doesn't work at all.
How to reproduce the error: aptitude install googleearth-package;
"Reported on 2008-01-24" and not a single response from any ubuntu
developer or Security Team member about this?
All packages are built on the normal build servers. I really can't see
any reason for it to be hard to get ddebs.ubuntu.com signed, either by
the standard archive key or a separate one.
Public bug reported:
The source package python-3.0 3.0.1-0ubuntu8 uses python2.6 to build the
documentation. (See debian/patches/htmldoc-python26.dpatch)
However python2.6 is missing from the Build-Depends. I think it should
be added to make the dependency obvious, without this you also can't
bac
As I said in my previous reply debtorrent will NOT work without the
necessary infrastructure. Debtorrent is a great idea, but a sync is
unfortunately not enough to get it working on Ubuntu.
--
[sync request] Please sync debtorrent from Debian unstable (main)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/106382
** Changed in: Debian
Bugwatch: Debian Bug tracker #410061 => Debian Bug tracker #423131
Status: Fix Released => Unknown
** Summary changed:
- [need-packaging] nspluginwrapper
+ Please sync nspluginwrapper from Debian unstable (was: [need-packaging]
nspluginwrapper)
** Tags removed:
nspluginwrapper is now included in Debian unstable so this should be a
sync request bug.
However the package in Debian currently fails to build from source on
both sid and gutsy due to a missing build dependency. I have reported
this upstream and the sync should probably wait until that bug is
clo
I can confirm this on amd64. Output below for mpeg, mp3 and ogg files.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ uname -a
Linux bacon 2.6.20-15-generic #2 SMP Sun Apr 15 06:17:24 UTC 2007 x86_64
GNU/Linux
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ file Katter.mpg
Katter.mpg: MPEG sequence, v1, system multiplex
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ tracke
Are you sure? Looking at the first comment to this bug it works fine
without full path on i386. I can also get good output from other file
types without full path:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ tracker-extract vga1.png image/png
Image:Comments=Created with The GIMP;
Image:Height=315;
Image:Width=1078;
How
The FTBFS bug is now fixed upstream. 0.9.91.4-2 builds fine in a gutsy
pbuilder, please sync.
** Summary changed:
- Please sync nspluginwrapper from Debian unstable (was: [need-packaging]
nspluginwrapper)
+ Please sync nspluginwrapper 0.9.91.4-2 from Debian unstable contrib (was:
[need-packagi
bug still present in auctex 11.83-7ubuntu1. CompilationLog is attached.
** Attachment added: "CompilationLog"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/9830379/CompilationLog
--
auctex is uninstallable
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/137263
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
> I can confirm that this is not the case, as I do use such a setup in my
> laptop. lsmod only shows aes, but not aes-i586.
Sorry, I was mistaken.
> It would probably pop up if I had entered it in /etc/modules, but since
> we cannot modify that file easily (you would need some magic to detect
> t
This is caused by debian/patches/70_trust_error.dpatch which was
incorrectly added to the latest ubuntu version. That was meant to close
LP: #39459, which was however already fixed in the current ubuntu
version so now that patch instead cause this bug.
I have verifyed that removing 70_trust_error.
** Attachment added: "gnupg.debian.patch"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/9609670/gnupg.debian.patch
** Tags added: patch
--
gpg ignores 1 as valid trust value
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/147343
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug co
The link at the top of the page, after "The following releases of Ubuntu
are available:" for gutsy links to feisty.
--
release link broken
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/148119
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
u
wine 0.9.45 for amd64 is in gutsy now.
** Changed in: wine (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Fix Committed
--
There is no 64 bit package available.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/43324
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.
I know it is not entirely correct to add ubuntu-main-sponsors to this.
However, the package is in main, and kernel team have completely ignored
this for four months now. (I have submitted this bug, sent e-mail to
their list, made a patch and sent that to the list etc.)
I also know that they probab
Feel free to modify my changelog entry, or remove it and write your own,
whatever. I don't really need any credit for a small one line fix :-)
--
gutsy amd64: flashplugin-nonfree not working
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/133452
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubun
Yes, bug 138145 is probably quite easy to fix, but please post those
comments on that on that bug instead of this one.
Also while I believe that your patch would work, it will install the
wrapped plugin the wrong way. -n is used to prevent nspluginwrapper from
creating symlinks as this is handeled
flashplugin-nonfree-9.0.48.0.0ubuntu9 did not attempt to fix this bug so
it is not strange that it is still present.
However you seem to have some other problem with your nspluginwrapper.
-n is a ubuntu specific option that is patched into nspluginwrapper and
it is working fine for me. If it is no
updated patch that applies to 9.0.48.0.0ubuntu9
** Attachment added: "flashplugin-nonfree.debian.patch"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/9249110/flashplugin-nonfree.debian.patch
--
gutsy amd64: flashplugin-nonfree not working
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/133452
You received this bug notifica
same patch as debdiff
** Attachment added: "debdiff_9.0.48.0.0ubuntu9-9.0.48.0.0ubuntu10"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/9249116/debdiff_9.0.48.0.0ubuntu9-9.0.48.0.0ubuntu10
--
gutsy amd64: flashplugin-nonfree not working
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/133452
You received this bug notificati
Is flash mentioned in the list of installed plug-ins in firefox? (Type
"about:plugins" in the address field to see the list.)
Are you running gutsy i386 or amd64?
--
flashplugin-nonfree does not install flashplayer
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/138985
You received this bug notification because
Debian seems to have a fix for this problem.
http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/contrib/g/googleearth-package
/googleearth-package_0.3.2/changelog
** Changed in: googleearth-package (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
make-googleearth-package doesn't use latest version
https://
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: gnuserv
Current ubuntu version is 3.12.7-4 and have no ubuntu specific changes.
3.12.7-5 is needed for gnuserv to work with emacs22 which is now in
gutsy.
Debian changelog:
gnuserv (3.12.7-5) unstable; urgency=low
* Adding support for emacs22 (Than
Couldn't update-manager also check if nvidia-glx-new is supported and
ask if it could replace nvidia-glx with that? Off course this check
should only happen if nvidia-glx is already installed.
--
Should install nvidia-glx-new instead of nvidia-glx for video cards that can
handle -new
https://bug
The attached patch for linux-meta in gutsy adds linux-image-debug meta
packages for generic, 386, ume and server as these are the architectures
that have linux-image-debug packages available according to
packages.ubuntu.com.
The patch was also sent to the [EMAIL PROTECTED] list.
** Attachment ad
Public bug reported:
The cupsys apparmor profile is still to restrictive. I am using cupsys
1.3.0-4ubuntu3 on amd64 and get the following errors to dmesg.
This is when trying to print to PDF, which seems to fail:
[110434.217141] audit(1189790585.293:18281): operation="capable"
name="dac_overrid
Confirmed. debmirror is broken in gutsy and won't download packages.
marcolinos solution worked for me as well.
** Changed in: debmirror (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
Unable to download packages using Gutsy debmirror
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/136634
You received this bug no
Public bug reported:
http://changelogs.ubuntu.com needs to be updated/synchronized with the
Ubuntu archive much more often.
Currently it lags several hours behind. This means that the "show
changelog" feature of aptitude, and probably other package managers, is
almost always broken for new versio
Sorry for forgetting about this bug. Thank you Anthony porting this to a
newer crypsetup.
Reinhard: I only think this is needed for the root file system. If you
for example only have /home on dm-crypt then it will set up after
leaving initramfs. This means that all kernel modules are available and
One more thing, should this bug really still be Incomplete+Undecided?
--
Add optimized cipher modules to initramfs
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/73862
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
u
Public bug reported:
syslogd needs to be allowed to change uid/gid to the syslog user.
The attached patch applies to latest ubuntu apparmor bzr.
** Affects: apparmor (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Tags: patch
--
syslogd profile needs setuid+setgid
https://bugs.la
** Attachment added: "apparmor-syslogd.diff"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/9344028/apparmor-syslogd.diff
** Tags added: patch
--
syslogd profile needs setuid+setgid
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/140672
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the
Is there any chance of getting this in before the BetaFreeze tomorrow?
I see that there are deb packages with 0.9.45 (build by Scott Ritchie)
on http://wine.budgetdedicated.com.
--
UVF exception request for Wine 0.9.44
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/139001
You received this bug notification bec
Debtorrent seems like a great feature, but it is probably to late to get
it working for Gutsy?
It needs to have some extra repository meta data generated. For Debian
these files are available at http://merkel.debian.org/~ajt/extrapieces/.
This URL is also hard coded into the python source code.
T
This debdiff makes postinst add the correct alternative.
** Attachment added: "debdiff_9.0.48.0.0ubuntu8-9.0.48.0.0ubuntu9"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/9097740/debdiff_9.0.48.0.0ubuntu8-9.0.48.0.0ubuntu9
** Tags added: patch
--
gutsy amd64: flashplugin-nonfree not working
https://bugs.la
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: amsn
This is using latest amsn 0.97RC1+dfsg-0ubuntu1, gutsy, x86_64.
amsn starts, but when selecting "Log In" absolute nothing happens, no
login window, no console output, no nothing. The rest of amsn GUI is
still working, I can enter the preferences and
Do you also use amd64?
I suspect that an ordinary backtrace would be useless, as aMSN is
written in TCL, an interpreted language, so the backtrace would only be
of the interpreter. Also I would have to figure out where to put a
breakpoint, as aMSN as I said doesn't crash, but continue working.
I
I did some more testing.
It seems that if I disable "auto-connect on startup" then I get a proper
login after a restart. If I then re-enable auto-connect and restarts
amsn again the problem returns.
--
amsn can't log in
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/137048
You received this bug notification be
** Tags added: patch
--
No kernel debug image meta packages
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/92553
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/ma
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: auctex
i can't install auctex in gutsy.
The following NEW packages will be installed:
auctex
0 packages upgraded, 1 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
Need to get 0B/1126kB of archives. After unpacking 4268kB will be used.
Writing extende
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 134717
Auctex in feisty does not work when emacs is upgraded to emacs22 from
feisty-backports
--
auctex is uninstallable
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/137263
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the
This is not a duplicate of 134717.
That bug is against feisty-backports and only discusses backporting
while this is a bug in auctex in gutsy. To mark this as a duplicate you
should first change the description, and also add auctex(Ubuntu) to the
affected packages.
--
auctex is uninstallable
htt
Does this package contain a 64-bit wine binary? Will that binary run
32bit Windows applications? If not then I think it would be a big
misstake to include it.
The thing users want when they install wine is to run some specific
Windows program, and probably 99.9% of all Windows programs is only
dis
** Summary changed:
- UVF exception request for Wine 0.9.44
+ UVF exception request for Wine 0.9.45
--
UVF exception request for Wine 0.9.45
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/139001
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
** Attachment added: "diffstat_0.9.42_0.9.45.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/9444145/diffstat_0.9.42_0.9.45.txt
--
UVF exception request for Wine 0.9.45
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/139001
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug conta
** Attachment added: "wine_0.9.45-0ubuntu2.dsc"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/9444144/wine_0.9.45-0ubuntu2.dsc
--
UVF exception request for Wine 0.9.45
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/139001
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact f
** Attachment added: "debdiff_0.9.45-0ubuntu1-1_0.9.45-0ubuntu2"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/9444149/debdiff_0.9.45-0ubuntu1-1_0.9.45-0ubuntu2
--
UVF exception request for Wine 0.9.45
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/139001
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubun
** Attachment added: "buildlog_0.9.45-0ubuntu2_amd64.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/9444147/buildlog_0.9.45-0ubuntu2_amd64.txt
--
UVF exception request for Wine 0.9.45
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/139001
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which
** Attachment added: "debdiff_0.9.42-0ubuntu1_0.9.45-0ubuntu2"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/9444148/debdiff_0.9.42-0ubuntu1_0.9.45-0ubuntu2
--
UVF exception request for Wine 0.9.45
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/139001
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bu
I tried sending the following to launchpad by mail earler today, but it
must have gotten stuck somewhere...
Some people seems to think that the lib/lib32 issue on amd64 is
release-critical, and Scott have posted on the motu list that he won't have
time to fix this until later.
For this reason I
Martin: I am not seeing any more cups audit messages, but on the other
hand some of the "too powerful" capabilities seems to have been given to
cups now. If I can help debug this further to produce a better solution
please let me know.
--
apparmor profile error messages
https://bugs.launchpad.net
Same problem with the version from Debian:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# dpkg -i /home/paran/Desktop/auctex_11.83-7_all.deb
Selecting previously deselected package auctex.
(Reading database ... 220790 files and directories currently installed.)
Unpacking auctex (from .../Desktop/auctex_11.83-7_all.deb) ...
Reinhard, if you look a bit closer you will see that I did just that
together with my last comment. :-)
--
auctex is uninstallable
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/137263
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bu
Off course, but it sounded like it could take a little longer than this
before you got time to fix this. I checked on REVU before submitting my
e-mail that didn't make it through. Should have checked again before
posting again manually perhaps.
Anyway the duplicated work doesn't matter, it wasn't
Updated debdiff that applies to 2.6.22.12.14
** Attachment added: "linux-meta_2.6.22.12.14_linux-image-debug.debdiff"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/9464658/linux-meta_2.6.22.12.14_linux-image-debug.debdiff
--
No kernel debug image meta packages
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/92553
You rece
** Changed in: auctex (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Confirmed
--
auctex is uninstallable
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/137263
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.
> Repeating, don't use the by-path or the by-id link. At least for me,
it doesn't work.
Then you should report a separate bug because of course they should
work. Here is a part of my xorg.conf that is working in latest Hardy:
Section "InputDevice"
Identifier "microsoft-kbd"
D
This bug is caused by an configuration change that is undocumented, the
man page contains options that are no longer valid. This is made worse
by the fact that the error message is very unclear.
Both problems are resolved in upstream git (freedesktop.org, not
debian).
The Debian package is also m
Confirmed once agin on latest Hardy. When starting any KDE4 application
they block while waiting for scim, until it fails. The simple fix of
removing all scim-related packages worked here as well:
libskim0
skim
libscim8c2a
scim-bridge-agent
scim-bridge-client-gtk
scim-bridge-client-qt
scim-bridge-
** Attachment added: "debdiff"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/13153277/amsn_bug_212973_debdiff
--
tray icon in KDE4
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/212973
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ub
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: amsn
On KDE4 the tray icon from AMSn ends up as a normal window and not in
the tray as expected.
The issue have been discussed in the KDE bugtracker, and was fixed in
amsn svn revision 9595. Attached is a debdiff which includes the patch
from SVN as deb
Some more info:
I did verify that the tray icon still works as expected on KDE3.
The patch itself was taken from svn using:
svn diff -r 9594:9595
https://amsn.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/amsn/trunk/amsn
--
tray icon in KDE4
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/212973
You received this bug notificat
** Changed in: amsn (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
tray icon in KDE4
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/212973
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://li
Public bug reported:
In addition to the existing meta packages for
linux-image-[generic/server] and linux-headers-[generic/server] I
think there should also be packages for
linux-image-debug-[generic/server] that depend on the latest debug
image packages.
Without this the debug image package have
I run into this bug yesterday when I upgraded my laptop from edgy to
feisty.
I have an encypted root filesystem (dm-crypt + LUKS) on /dev/sda3. The
initramfs hook script from cryptsetup tries to open /dev/sda3 before the
device has been created wich obvously fails so that the machine can't
boot.
The problem seems to be linux-meta-2.6.17.11 packages that have been
uploaded to edgy-security without corresponding kernel packages.
For example the meta package linux-image-generic now depends on linux-
image-2.6.17-11-generic which does not exist in the repository.
--
Unmet dependency in meta
Yes, the patch is against the cryptsetup ubuntu package and only
modifies a few lines of debian/initramfs-cryptroot-hook.
However the patch is for 1.0.4-8ubuntu1 and don't seem to apply cleanly
to the current feisty version 1.0.4+svn26-1ubuntu1. I can make a new
version tomorrow if you don't want
** Changed in: kdebase (Ubuntu)
Sourcepackagename: kdebase => kdelibs
Status: Unconfirmed => Confirmed
--
Keycode 111 starts ksnapshot (hardcoded?)
https://launchpad.net/bugs/67894
--
kubuntu-bugs mailing list
kubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubunt
patch
** Attachment added: "Add optimized cipher modules to initramfs"
http://librarian.launchpad.net/5215026/initramfs-cryptroot-hook-patch
--
Add optimized cipher modules to initramfs
https://launchpad.net/bugs/73862
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.u
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: cryptsetup
The initramfs hook script only adds a module named $cipher.ko for each
cipher that is used. Some ciphers have assembly optimized kernel modules
on some architectures wich should be used instead as they give much
better performance. (Using aes-i
I think a name like "ssh-import-launchpad-id" would be more appropriate
for something this Launchpad specific.
--
ssh-import-id: retrieve a key from a public keyserver and add to the
authorized_keys file
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/524226
You received this bug notification because you are a
With version 2:8.660-0ubuntu1 on amd64, the list of files with an
executable stack is shorter:
xorg-driver-fglrx:
/usr/lib/libGL.so.1.2
/usr/lib/dri/fglrx_dri.so
/usr/lib32/libGL.so.1.2
/usr/lib32/dri/fglrx_dri.so
I used "execstack -c" to remove the executable stac
This bug is about GDM breaking when a user remove system directories
that they should never remove. Importance Critical would be
ridiculous, I actually think even Medium is too much.
It is an incorrect assumption that it is OK to "tidy up" by running
"rm -rf /var/log/*". Doing that is never correc
The debconf files that handles this is missing from the source package
in karmic. The code is still there in gdm.postinst and gdm.prerm, but
gdm.config and gdm.template is gone.
Rebuilding 2.27.90, with those two files taken unmodified from 2.20.10
seems to work.
--
Installing GDM 2.26 doesn't u
Michael Sandford writes:
> I'm getting this error on boot and it is rendering my two SATA drives
> unusable.
No, this bug did not cause any hard resets of the sata link or any
SStatus 100, SControl 300 errors. It only flooded this type of messages:
ata4: EH complete
ata4: EH pending after 5 trie
This bug is still present with xserver-xorg-input-evdev 1:2.2.5-1ubuntu5
in Karmic. For me the bug started after bug 345397 was fixed in Jaunty
(as I commented on that bug at the time).
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xserver-xorg-input-
evdev/+bug/345397/comments/9
** Tags added: karm
"oliver.g...@gmail.com" writes:
> There is a bug in LBM - it is based on comapt-wireless 2.6.32-rc4..
> Ubuntu needs to change this immediately.. Kernel oops's are common in
> that release across many wireless drivers.. It has been fixed in
> rc5.. I cannot use lbm because of it..
This bug is
Public bug reported:
/lib/firmware/2.6.31-14-generic/lbm-iwlwifi-5000-1.ucode is API v2 and
should be named lbm-iwlwifi-5000-2.ucode. As you see the -1 LBM
package matches the -2 file in linux-firmware:
$ sha1sum /lib/firmware/{,"2.6.31-14-generic/"}*iwlwifi-5000-*
f06ff86c8baa8616de584f8b0fff072
1 - 100 of 115 matches
Mail list logo
