Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: xorg
Hi,
I have noticed that since my upgrade to Jaunty I have a drastic drop of
my FPS reported by glxgears. To ensure that it was not the old driver
that was borked after the upgrade, I tested with Intrepid and Jaunty
Live CDs.
Here I attach the repor
** Attachment added: "report-intrepid.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/26203588/report-intrepid.txt
--
[Jaunty] Xorg FPS dropped down drastically
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/370214
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
** Attachment added: "report-jauty.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/26203598/report-jauty.txt
** Tags added: regression-release
** Description changed:
Binary package hint: xorg
Hi,
I have noticed that since my upgrade to Jaunty I have a drastic drop of
my FPS reported by glx
** Attachment added: "CoreDump.gz"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/23077908/CoreDump.gz
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/23077909/Dependencies.txt
** Attachment added: "Disassembly.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/23077910/Disassembly.txt
** Attachm
Hi Bryce,
Is it really a won't fix, just because I have not attached the required
information. I believe the status should be Incomplete and not Won't Fix
(unless you have some others reasons that I don't know).
Regards
** Changed in: xserver-xorg-video-intel (Ubuntu)
Status: Won't Fix =>
** Tags added: regression-release
--
xbmc not working with opensource radeon driver in jaunty
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/363139
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.co
Fixed in 0.2rc 7
** Changed in: nssbackup
Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released
--
Incremental backups should not appear incremental when restoring
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/176838
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubu
** Attachment added: "CoreDump.gz"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18551664/CoreDump.gz
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18551665/Dependencies.txt
** Attachment added: "Disassembly.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18551666/Disassembly.txt
** Attachm
I have the same problem on my Fujitsu SiEMENS Amilo Pa2548. On Apha 6
the WIFI was working fine and when I upgraded to the new kernel
2.6.27-7-generic I lost my connection.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ lspci | grep Ethernet
00:0a.0 Ethernet controller: nVidia Corporation MCP67 Ethernet (rev a2)
03:00.0 E
Moving status to confirm as there are 3 people to confirm it.
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
** Summary changed:
- wireless doesn't work in 8.10 beta
+ wireless (Atheros AR5007EG) doesn't work anymore in 8.10 beta
--
wireless (Atheros AR5007EG) doesn't work anymo
** Attachment added: "CoreDump.gz"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18889834/CoreDump.gz
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18889835/Dependencies.txt
** Attachment added: "Disassembly.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18889836/Disassembly.txt
** Attachm
** Also affects: nssbackup
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: nssbackup
Importance: Undecided => Wishlist
--
( wishlist )sbackup time to completion??
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/130856
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, whic
** Changed in: nssbackup
Status: Confirmed => Fix Committed
Target: None => release0.2
--
simple-backup-config does not check for validity of regex exclusion rules
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/191127
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, whic
atus: New
** Changed in: nssbackup
Importance: Undecided => Medium
Assignee: (unassigned) => Oumar Aziz OUATTARA (wattazoum)
Status: New => Confirmed
Target: None => release0.2
--
sbackup fills HDD when target is unmounted
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/291308
** Attachment added: "CoreDump.gz"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18005746/CoreDump.gz
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18005747/Dependencies.txt
** Attachment added: "ProcMaps.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18005748/ProcMaps.txt
** Attachment ad
** Attachment added: "CoreDump.gz"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18229207/CoreDump.gz
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18229208/Dependencies.txt
** Attachment added: "Disassembly.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18229209/Disassembly.txt
** Attachm
I can tell you without removing my TV card that XSANE doesn't recognize
my scanner. But that's another issue. I have opened this report because
it takes my TV card for a scanner, not because the scanner is not
recognized.
Both are different issues indeed.
** Changed in: xsane (Ubuntu)
Stat
0.2 beta 5
** Changed in: nssbackup
Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released
--
wish for multiple parallel backups
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/141002
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
u
0.2 beta 5
** Changed in: nssbackup
Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released
--
[Wishlist] Option not to gzip
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/149865
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu
** Changed in: nssbackup
Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released
--
Wishlist: Automatically split tar files at max size for filesystem
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/144295
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu
@francesco: One would say : "This is why the source code is open. If you
want to add something to the software, just do it (or find someone who
can do it for you".
I really hate this kind of comment. "and which is only excusable because of "
!!!
This software is made by developers on their free
n 0.2 beta . There is a ppa available for
NSsbackup which is NSsbackup team PPA.
I need to take time to work on NSsbackup 0.3/Sbackup 1.1 ...
** Also affects: nssbackup
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: nssbackup
Assignee: (unassigned) => Oumar Aziz OUATTA
This is still happening on Hardy :
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ dpkg-query --show xsane
xsane 0.995-1ubuntu1
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ lsb_release -a
No LSB modules are available.
Distributor ID: Ubuntu
Description:Ubuntu 8.04
Release:8.04
Codename: hardy
lspci gives the same output.
The
Here is the requested file
** Attachment added: "lspci-vvnn.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/21046711/lspci-vvnn.txt
** Changed in: nvidia-graphics-drivers-177 (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => New
--
glxinfo crashed with SIGSEGV
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/283580
You received this
** Changed in: dpkg (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => New
--
debuild doesn't take "*.a" file anymore in the sources
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/317761
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
u
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: devscripts
Hi,
I noticed on intrepid that debuild doesn't take the .a files in the sources
anymore. Thus I am not able to build my package which has some binaries inside
the sources.
The problem is not happening when using hardy. I was obliged to roll
Looking at the changelog in
http://changelogs.ubuntu.com/changelogs/pool/main/d/dpkg/dpkg_1.14.20ubuntu6/changelog
, I believe it version 1.14.17 that broke debuild.
Not including some binaries in the sources is IMO a good choice, but we should
at least have a way to tell dpkg-source to include
Hi,
I am not home for the moment so I can't provide a build.log right now
but I can give you a link to the sources I wanted to pack on intrepid.
https://edge.launchpad.net/~team-xbmc-svn/+archive
* xbmc_8.10final1svn17113-hardy1.diff.gz (6.6 KiB)
* xbmc_8.10final1svn17113-hardy1.dsc (1.
Oki,
Here is an example I have made. On intrepid, when running debuild -S
-sa, the orig file doesn't contain the .a files.
** Attachment added: "tests.zip"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/21270813/tests.zip
--
debuild doesn't take "*.a" file anymore in the sources
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bu
** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Oumar Aziz OUATTARA (wattazoum)
--
libsmbclient-dev missing smbc_urlencode in .a in intrepid
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/315774
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed
I tested and indeed, the smbc_urlencode symbol defined in the header is not
found in the libsmbclient.a file on intrepid but is found in hardy
(3.0.28a-1ubuntu4).
I am trying to figure out is this is due to the sources or to a wrong build.
** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Co
Quoting the developer commit:
==
[Bug 6022] smbc_urlencode and smbc_urldecode were not exported
- Since the revamp of libsmbclient, there has still been an external
declaration for smbc_urlencode and smbc_urldecode in libsmbclient.h, yet
those functions were renamed and made pr
** Attachment added: "This patch comes from the Upstream commit"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/21288671/recover_smbc_urlencode.patch
** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => In Progress
--
libsmbclient-dev missing smbc_urlencode in .a in intrepid
https://bugs.launchpad.net/b
Debdiff attached.
** Attachment added: "samba_3.2.3-1ubuntu4.debdiff"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/21290166/samba_3.2.3-1ubuntu4.debdiff
--
libsmbclient-dev missing smbc_urlencode in .a in intrepid
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/315774
You received this bug notification because you are a me
** Attachment removed: "samba_3.2.3-1ubuntu4.debdiff"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/21290166/samba_3.2.3-1ubuntu4.debdiff
** Attachment added: "samba_3.2.3-1ubuntu4.debdiff"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/21290586/samba_3.2.3-1ubuntu4.debdiff
--
libsmbclient-dev missing smbc_urlencode in
** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Oumar Aziz OUATTARA (wattazoum) => (unassigned)
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
--
libsmbclient-dev missing smbc_urlencode in .a in intrepid
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/315774
You received this bug notification because you are a
Here is my log file.
I don't have a .devscripts in my HOME directory.
By the way, are you using intrepid for your tests ?
** Attachment added: "test_1.0-1_source.build"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/21295728/test_1.0-1_source.build
--
debuild doesn't take "*.a" file anymore in the sources
h
** Attachment added: "CoreDump.gz"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/23557055/CoreDump.gz
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/23557056/Dependencies.txt
** Attachment added: "Disassembly.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/23557057/Disassembly.txt
** Attachm
I really don't think this problem is still present on 0.2 RC 6.
Currently, the full file list is shown from an incremental snapshot with the
precision is the file is included or not.
Then on can restore a non-included file using the "revert" and "revert as"
button, which will get the latest ver
Fixed on 0.2 branch.
** Changed in: nssbackup
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
--
Incremental backups should not appear incremental when restoring
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/176838
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
Public bug reported:
I got this warning at startup.
ProblemType: KernelOops
Annotation: Your system might become unstable now and might need to be
restarted.
Architecture: i386
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.04
Failure: oops
NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia
Package: linux-image-2.6.28-11-generic 2.6.28-11.
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24443278/Dependencies.txt
** Attachment added: "OopsText.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24443279/OopsText.txt
--
WARNING: at /build/buildd/linux-2.6.28/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c:719
check_for_bios_corruption+0xc8/0xd
This issue is happening to me every startup :-(
--
scim-bridge crashed with SIGSEGV in
scim::IMEngineInstanceBase::get_frontend_data()
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/243344
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bug
** Attachment added: "CoreDump.gz"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24443862/CoreDump.gz
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24443863/Dependencies.txt
** Attachment added: "ProcMaps.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24443864/ProcMaps.txt
** Attachment ad
@Anton: In fact, we are supposed to support Sbackup also. This is why
we receive the notification about Sbackup bugs. What I suggest it to
propose to Sbackup users to try to reproduce using NSsbackup (since it
will be the replacement of Sbackup).
@MrWoo: Are you sure you reported on the right bug
** Changed in: sbackup (Ubuntu)
Status: Invalid => New
--
sbackupd.py crashed with ValueError in ()
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/229218
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@li
** Also affects: nssbackup
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
sbackup fails silently when backup reaches maximum filesize for filesystem
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/155718
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubun
case.
If it's about the failure itself, this bug is a duplicate of the bug
#144295 .
** Changed in: nssbackup
Importance: Undecided => High
Assignee: (unassigned) => Oumar Aziz OUATTARA (wattazoum)
Status: New => Incomplete
Target: None => release0.2
--
Fixing it for NSsbackup on release0.1 branch
** Changed in: sbackup (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
** Also affects: nssbackup
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: nssbackup
Importance: Undecided => Medium
Assignee: (unassigned) => Oumar Aziz
Fixed
Thank you very much for your bug report
** Changed in: nssbackup
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
--
simple-backup-config has incorrect example exclusion regex
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/157250
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, whi
** Attachment added: "CoreDump.gz"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/10179917/CoreDump.gz
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/10179918/Dependencies.txt
** Attachment added: "Disassembly.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/10179919/Disassembly.txt
** Attachm
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: glade-3
I was editing a window in my software, and wanted to set a 2 columns
list
ProblemType: Crash
Architecture: i386
Date: Fri Oct 26 21:16:29 2007
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 7.10
ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/glade-3
NonfreeKernelModules: cdrom
Package: glade-
** Changed in: nssbackup
Target: None => release0.2
--
[Wishlist] Option not to gzip
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/149865
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubunt
This is invalid for NSsbackup.
Thank you for the details and the bug report.
** Changed in: nssbackup
Status: Incomplete => Invalid
--
sbackup fails silently when backup reaches maximum filesize for filesystem
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/155718
You received this bug notification beca
Implemented on NSsbackup 0.2 devel branch.
** Changed in: nssbackup
Assignee: (unassigned) => Oumar Aziz OUATTARA (wattazoum)
Status: Confirmed => Fix Committed
--
wish for multiple parallel backups
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/141002
You received this bug notification b
: (unassigned) => Oumar Aziz OUATTARA (wattazoum)
Status: Confirmed => Fix Committed
--
[Wishlist] Option not to gzip
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/149865
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailin
** Changed in: nssbackup
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
--
The file size limitation should not be a recommendation
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/146618
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs
** Changed in: nssbackup
Target: None => release0.2
--
Wishlist: Automatically split tar files at max size for filesystem
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/144295
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs
** Changed in: nssbackup
Target: None => release0.2
--
wish for multiple parallel backups
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/141002
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.
** Also affects: nssbackup
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: nssbackup
Importance: Undecided => Wishlist
Status: New => Confirmed
--
[Wishlist] Option not to gzip
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/149865
You received this bug notification because you are a member
** Changed in: nssbackup
Importance: Undecided => Medium
Assignee: (unassigned) => Oumar Aziz OUATTARA (wattazoum)
Status: New => Confirmed
** Summary changed:
- The file size limitation recommendation
+ The file size limitation should not be a recommendation
** Als
** Changed in: nssbackup
Status: Confirmed => In Progress
--
The file size limitation should not be a recommendation
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/146618
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mail
Bug #138749 has been opened to handle this issue .
** Changed in: nssbackup
Importance: Undecided => Medium
Assignee: (unassigned) => Oumar Aziz OUATTARA (wattazoum)
Status: New => Won't Fix
--
sbackup includes more folders than selected
https://bugs.launchpad.net/
A blueprint has been opened for this one :
https://blueprints.edge.launchpad.net/nssbackup/+spec/compress-opt-
support
--
[Wishlist] Option not to gzip
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/149865
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for U
As of the side-wish you made, see Bug #149865 .
--
wish for multiple parallel backups
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/141002
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
A blueprint has been created for this wish :
https://blueprints.edge.launchpad.net/nssbackup/+spec/multiple-conf-
support
This functionality shall be available on version 0.2 of nssbackup.
--
wish for multiple parallel backups
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/141002
You received this bug notifica
Hi,
I think that in fact , there is no problem .Just a lack of knowledge on
GTK API on our side :-( .
The popu you see should in fact contain the "Restoring ..." text and be there
to show that there are some processing . It should have been threaded but it's
not that why the UI freezes when res
** Also affects: nssbackup
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
emty dialog when restoring with sbackup
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/137293
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
u
** Changed in: sbackup (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
sbackup does not purge old backups logarithmically
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/126278
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing li
After getting your comment yesterday, I downloaded the GUTSY live cd from
September 25th.? I didn't have time to burn nor install it though.
Should I make the test with the LiveCD our should I install the whole distro ?
First case will be fast ,
Second one will require more time
Best regards
With both the CD and Full clean install, I got the same behaviour ( I
see just one drive )
--
New DVD Burner not appearing.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/90666
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs maili
Public bug reported:
Hello,
I have a fujitsu-siemens Amilo Pa2548 and the Volume keys doesn't work
on Gutsy and Hardy. So I made a patch to add the support of those keys
for it.
Can you review it and upload on Gutsy and Hardy ?
Best Regards
Aziz
** Affects: hotkey-setup (Ubuntu)
Importanc
** Attachment added: "Futjitsu-siemens-pa2548-support.patch"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12045610/Futjitsu-siemens-pa2548-support.patch
--
No support for fujitsu-siemens Amilo Pa2548
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/192571
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
** Changed in: hotkey-setup (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
** Attachment added: "hotkey-setup_0.1-17ubuntu21.debdiff"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12045742/hotkey-setup_0.1-17ubuntu21.debdiff
--
No support for fujitsu-siemens Amilo Pa2548
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/192571
You
Hello,
Thank you for your patch. I appreciate a lot your motivation and help.
I don't maintain Sbackup (at least for now) anymore but as you have submitted a
patch, it would be nice to have it included in Ubuntu for other users.
There is a plan to re-merge Sbackup and NSsbackup though. But tha
** Also affects: sbackup (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
Incremental backups should not appear incremental when restoring
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/176838
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
Hello,
I think this software is a great one, and, as recently I have learned
packaging I think I can devote myself to this task. I'll contact you for
further details.
Regards
wattazoum
--
[needs-packaging] Gladex
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/164924
You received this bug notification because
I confirm that it doesn't fix the issue.
--
curlftpfs-0.9.1 + libcurl/7.16.4 segfaults on removing files
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/150277
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@list
Hello,
Any inputs on this one ?
Regards
--
curlftpfs-0.9.1 + libcurl/7.16.4 segfaults on removing files
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/150277
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lis
Hello,
This looks like a configuration issue. Can you give the dirconfig part of your
configuration file?
I believe there is some entries that are invalid.
** Changed in: sbackup (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Oumar Aziz OUATTARA (wattazoum)
Status: New => Inco
Implemented and merged in NSsbackup devel branch .
Note: Split functionality will not be compatible with compression.
This functionality will certainly be used using the new implemented
Multi-profile functionality.
** Changed in: nssbackup
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
--
Wishlis
The code has been merged in the trunk branch. The packages shall be
available starting with gladgardsex 0.5.
Regards
** Changed in: gladex
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
--
[needs-packaging] Gladex
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/164924
You received this bug notification because yo
2008/2/6, Sebastien Bacher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Could you mail the nautilus-list to get their comments on the change?
Hello dear Nautilus masters :-)
I have recently opened a bug on Launchpad and Gnome Bug tracker which
is more a code organization issue than an improvement.
Here is the descrip
This mail is waiting for an approval cause I am not a member of the
list.
--
NautilusMenuItemDetails not defined in header file
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/188288
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs
I have subscribed to the list and resend the mail (and I have of course
cancel the last one)
--
NautilusMenuItemDetails not defined in header file
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/188288
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu
Well, actually, the piece of code that you gave works fine and well. But in my
case, i wanted to get the label of the NautilusMenuItem, and I didn't find a
way to do this. There is AFAIK no way to get the details of a menu once it's
set. If there is, this is the solution I am looking for and the
well
the patch has been rejected by the nautilus-list so , I am closing this bug .
** Changed in: nautilus (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged => Invalid
--
NautilusMenuItemDetails not defined in header file
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/188288
You received this bug notification because you are a
** Attachment added: "uname-a.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/11439218/uname-a.txt
--
[usplash] black screen during usplash. Ubuntu boots fine
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/68647
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubun
** Attachment added: "lscpi-grep-vga.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/11439220/lscpi-grep-vga.txt
--
[usplash] black screen during usplash. Ubuntu boots fine
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/68647
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug co
usplash.conf
# Usplash configuration file
xres=640
yres=480
** Changed in: usplash (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Confirmed
--
[usplash] black screen during usplash. Ubuntu boots fine
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/68647
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubu
Just for information , I have installed Hardy on my laptop. I didn't
have usplash on the live cd but I was releived to see that it was
working after rebooting. I'll try with the next official hardy LiveCD .
On Gutsy , the problem exists on the LiveCD and on the installed
Distribution..
--
[uspla
I can't unfortunately test with another screen, it's a laptop and I
don't have another screen.
--
[usplash] black screen during usplash. Ubuntu boots fine
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/68647
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for
Hello,
That's exactly what happened to me , I was trying with Ubuntu AMD64 and
having this issue, but when I tried, even Gutsy i386, no more problem. I
guess , I'll stick to i386 then.
Thank you for the information.
Regards
--
[usplash] black screen during usplash. Ubuntu boots fine
https://bug
ere.
Best regards
wattazoum
** Also affects: nssbackup
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: nssbackup
Importance: Undecided => High
Assignee: (unassigned) => Oumar Aziz OUATTARA (wattazoum)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
simple-backup-config does not check fo
I confirm the Bug for NSsbackup also.
** Changed in: sbackup (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
simple-backup-config does not check for validity of regex exclusion rules
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/191127
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, wh
oops, I meant Sbackup
** Also affects: sbackup
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: sbackup
Status: New => Confirmed
--
simple-backup-config does not check for validity of regex exclusion rules
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/191127
You received this bug notificatio
Public bug reported:
Hello,
I wanted to patch nautilus-action to add submenu support to it and I
noticed that the struct _NautilusMenuItemDetails is not available in any
of the nautilus extension headers. A search on the web showed me that it
has been defined in the nautilus-menu-item.c source fi
** Attachment added: "92_nautilusMenuItemDetails_in_header.patch"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/11727748/92_nautilusMenuItemDetails_in_header.patch
** Also affects: nautilus
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
NautilusMenuItemDetails not defined in header file
https://bugs.launch
Here is the associated debdiff.
** Attachment added: "nautilus_2.20.0-0ubuntu8.debdiff"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/11728786/nautilus_2.20.0-0ubuntu8.debdiff
--
NautilusMenuItemDetails not defined in header file
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/188288
You received this bug notification becau
I think I can confirm it since a patch is available.
Regards
** Changed in: nautilus (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
NautilusMenuItemDetails not defined in header file
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/188288
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs,
1 - 100 of 163 matches
Mail list logo
