[Bug 511050] Re: kubuntu daily lucid-desktop-i368 installer crashed

2010-01-21 Thread oli
** Attachment added: "this attachment was recommended to be included in bug report" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/38211707/syslog -- kubuntu daily lucid-desktop-i368 installer crashed https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/511050 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Bug 469506] Re: firmware for freecom dvb-t usb missing in karmic

2009-11-22 Thread Oli
Same problem here with almost exactly the same hardware (64bit arch, freecom stick, nvidia graphics). Have you found any way to get it working without recompiling the kernel with the firmware built in? -- firmware for freecom dvb-t usb missing in karmic https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/469506 You

[Bug 469506] Re: firmware for freecom dvb-t usb missing in karmic

2009-11-22 Thread Oli
Install linux-firmware-nonfree - All working for me now. -- firmware for freecom dvb-t usb missing in karmic https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/469506 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@

[Bug 459393] Re: lsusb lists nothing after upgrade to karmic (9.10)

2009-11-23 Thread Oli
Is there any way to restart the USB subsystem? Sometimes lsusb hangs and new devices are not initialised. -- lsusb lists nothing after upgrade to karmic (9.10) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/459393 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed t

[Bug 408615] Re: libasound_module_conf_pulse.so is missing from lib32asound-plugins

2009-09-01 Thread Oli
I have noticed that in the past week (possibly just a few days) this has become significantly worse. Before (with copied 32bit pulse libs) I could play 64bit applications could play directly through pulseaudio and 32bit apps could via alsa at the same time. Strangely this appears to also effect 64

[Bug 411962] Re: Pulse audio queues audio and gets locked to the app PID

2009-09-02 Thread Oli
I ran into this issue and did mac_v's #6 workaround. After a small battle trying to get pulseaudio to restart, I can play things from multiple source at once. It doesn't appear to have had any negative impact and as requested, I'm attaching my .pulse directory as it was before I deleted it. ** At

Re: [Bug 153204] Re: [MASTER] Applications are flickering/flashing in full screen mode

2009-09-21 Thread Oli
On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 6:36 PM, Travis Watkins wrote: > I am sorry nvidia users, you should pester nvidia until they fix their > driver or vote with your wallet and switch to a Radeon. > Did I blink and miss something? Since when was AMD/ATI considered a better hardware/driver than nvidia? Thro

Re: [Bug 425080] Re: Kein Audio

2010-04-10 Thread Oli
Brad Figg schrieb: Hallo Brad Figg Activire Ubuntu Backports Module It will Help sorry for my Bad Englisch > This bug was reported a while ago and there hasn't been any activity in > it recently. We were wondering if this is still an issue? Can you try > with the latest development release of U

[Bug 532633] Re: [Master] Window Control buttons: position/order/alignment

2010-04-01 Thread Oli
@ Mark Shuttleworth You sure that's not an April Fools joke wrapped in another one? I mean it certain looks like an extended prank; switching the buttons around and letting us think you'd leave it in an LTS just as the world was starting to take Ubuntu and Linux seriously... And I've still not se

[Bug 491451] Re: OpenOffice menus still have icons which should be removed

2010-02-15 Thread Oli
Please only apply this if it respects the gconf entry. Lots of people turned icons back on (because context icons make a lot of sense to us!) so it's going to be very annoying if some applications (like OO) start having no icons while all the other apps do. -- OpenOffice menus still have icons wh

Re: [Bug 437749] Re: Ubuntu should ship wine with the wine-pulse patches

2009-10-08 Thread Oli
On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 1:29 PM, Ernst wrote: > Furthermore, wine > developers don't want to include the patch because pulse audio is wrong > by design: http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10495. It looks like > the developers do not care at all that the audio part of wine is > unusable in dist

Re: [Bug 437749] Re: Ubuntu should ship wine with the wine-pulse patches

2009-10-08 Thread Oli
*I *don't think it should be the default selection. I've sung its praises but I'm sure it doesn't work for everybody in all circumstances. But It does help *some* people *some* times. We should give them the option without them having to use an outdated PPA or making them compile it in themselves.

[Bug 398826] Re: run application broken when setting background color set to "solid color"

2009-09-06 Thread Oli
w00t. Commit da00e171e7ac1ed3354f2aa81c8f69faaffc9421 fixes this. -- run application broken when setting background color set to "solid color" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/398826 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubu

[Bug 437749] [NEW] Ubuntu should ship wine with the wine-pulse patches

2009-09-27 Thread Oli
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: wine1.2 As Ubuntu wants to push Pulseaudio so hard, it makes sense to ship wine with the option to use Pulseaudio directly. As it stands, there is a collection of patches which adds another audio- driver: http://art.ified.ca/?page_id=40 I'm suggesting t

[Bug 437749] Re: Ubuntu should ship wine with the wine-pulse patches

2009-09-27 Thread Oli
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/32527724/Dependencies.txt -- Ubuntu should ship wine with the wine-pulse patches https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/437749 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubun

[Bug 437749] Re: Ubuntu should ship wine with the wine-pulse patches

2009-09-27 Thread Oli
** Attachment added: "winepulse-0.30.patch" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/32527741/winepulse-0.30.patch -- Ubuntu should ship wine with the wine-pulse patches https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/437749 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed

[Bug 437749] Re: Ubuntu should ship wine with the wine-pulse patches

2009-09-27 Thread Oli
** Attachment added: "winepulse-0.31-configure.ac.patch" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/32527750/winepulse-0.31-configure.ac.patch -- Ubuntu should ship wine with the wine-pulse patches https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/437749 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Bug 437749] Re: Ubuntu should ship wine with the wine-pulse patches

2009-09-27 Thread Oli
** Attachment added: "winepulse-winecfg-0.6.patch" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/32527753/winepulse-winecfg-0.6.patch -- Ubuntu should ship wine with the wine-pulse patches https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/437749 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which

[Bug 405208] Re: Pidgin program icon not transparent (Karmic)

2009-09-23 Thread Oli
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 403135 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/403135 Caspar: Sorry, I didn't notice this was a duplicate. I added what also effected me and changed the title before realising there's another bug with all these attached! I would change it back but it makes no di

[Bug 403135] Re: Notification area icon wrongly rendered/has a black background (multiple apps)

2009-09-23 Thread Oli
liferea, banshee and pidgin all show as grey backgrounds on my semi- transparent panel. Looks very unpolished. This is something that has happened in previous alphas and has subsequently been fixed. I'd be tempted to point the finger at gnome (and the way it handles icons) rather than the individu

[Bug 435988] [NEW] Main menu icon is too big

2009-09-24 Thread Oli
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: tangerine-icon-theme When using the Human icon theme, the panel is the correct height. When I switch to Tangerine, it is forced to grow to accommodate the menu applet icon. It looks especially bad as I have two screens, each with a panel but only one has

[Bug 448346] Re: OpenMP "feature" causes massive performance issues on multi-cores

2009-11-02 Thread Oli
Using an i7 here and yes, it's deathly slow. Strange thing is, a few weeks ago this was flying along at a nice speed. Was the OpenMP patch that recent? -- OpenMP "feature" causes massive performance issues on multi-cores https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/448346 You received this bug notification b

[Bug 1823058] [NEW] package cpufrequtils 008-1.1 failed to install/upgrade: »installiertes cpufrequtils-Skript des Paketes post-installation«-Unterprozess gab den Fehlerwert 1 zurück

2019-04-03 Thread Oli
Public bug reported: i was upgrading from 18.10 to 19.04 ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 19.04 Package: cpufrequtils 008-1.1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.18.0-16.17-generic 4.18.20 Uname: Linux 4.18.0-16-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.20.10-0ubuntu23 Architecture: amd64 Date: Wed Ap

[Bug 1550779] Re: [i915]] *ERROR* CPU pipe A FIFO underrun - Xorg glitches

2018-04-28 Thread Oli
I am running Ubuntu 18.04 since about a month. No problems so far, until i made an update 2 or 3 days ago. Since then i have the same problem. Messages in dmesg with underrun, flickering screen etc. It happens all the time. This happens on my htpc so i am not able to watch TV longer than 5-10 mi

[Bug 1754371] [NEW] package plymouth-theme-ubuntu-text 0.9.2-3ubuntu17 failed to install/upgrade: dependency problems - leaving triggers unprocessed

2018-03-08 Thread Oli
Public bug reported: i was just trying to upgrade from 17.10 to 18.04 with do-release-upgrade -d ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 18.04 Package: plymouth-theme-ubuntu-text 0.9.2-3ubuntu17 Uname: Linux 4.16.0-041600rc3-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.20.7-0ubuntu3.7 Architecture: amd64 B

[Bug 1552216] Re: Laptop hangs during second time it suspends

2016-03-29 Thread Oli
I see the same behaviour on a 16.04 desktop with a Nvidia 970. Before this I was successfully suspending many times per session using 14.04 with a Wily HWE stack so I think that excludes 4.2 from directly being the problem. I have since disabled timed suspend but if the monitor has been turned off

[Bug 1552216] Re: Laptop hangs during second time it suspends

2016-03-29 Thread Oli
Sorry, Christopher, I disagree with that assessment of the situation. This when the Jan said the Live image worked. That isn't an indication that this is now fixed, it's an indication that the Live image works. It works for me too. On a technical level, that in itself is a clear indication this is

[Bug 974084] [NEW] Center speaker incorrectly mapped

2012-04-05 Thread Oli
Public bug reported: My onboard sound device: 00:1b.0 Audio device [0403]: Intel Corporation 82801JI (ICH10 Family) HD Audio Controller [8086:3a3e] As of an upgrade to Precise I've noticed that the center channel tries to come out of the subwoofer and vice versa. In my 5.1 setup these are both o

[Bug 974084] Re: Center speaker incorrectly mapped

2012-04-05 Thread Oli
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/974084 Title: Center speaker incorrectly mapped To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/alsa-driver/+bug

[Bug 974242] Re: Compiz moving windows against my will

2012-04-05 Thread Oli
** Summary changed: - Compiz moving windows against my will + Compiz edge detection code is moving windows against my will ** Description changed: My screen is Nvidia Twinview setup and I'm using Gnome Classic with Compiz. I have found that since updating to 12.04 windows have two detri

[Bug 974242] [NEW] Compiz edge detection code is moving windows against my will

2012-04-05 Thread Oli
Public bug reported: My screen is Nvidia Twinview setup and I'm using Gnome Classic with Compiz. I have found that since updating to 12.04 windows have two detrimental regressions.  1. If I place a window between the first and second monitor (so it overlaps both), the window is forced back over.

[Bug 973201] [NEW] Scroll bars have no contrast in some windows

2012-04-04 Thread Oli
Public bug reported: I am not using the overlay scrollbars. They are disabled. The scrollbars on some windows (Nautilus, Update Manager, Image Viewer, USC, palimpsest, etc) seem to have very little contrast. In Firefox the scrollbar track (aka trough) has a dark line on both sides. The slider fit

[Bug 973201] Re: Scroll bars have no contrast in some windows

2012-04-04 Thread Oli
** Attachment added: "A visual comparison between Nautilus and Firefox scrollbars" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/973201/+attachment/3001370/+files/nautilus-vs-firefox.png -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://b

[Bug 973221] [NEW] Lock screen breaks wallpaper on dual head

2012-04-04 Thread Oli
Public bug reported: I have two screens in a Nvidia/Twinview setup. There is a single-image wallpaper centered over the joined screens. When the lock screen shows, the wallpaper only shows on one screen (but the date/user information at the top shows on both). The aspect is preserved so this look

[Bug 973221] Re: Lock screen breaks wallpaper on dual head

2012-04-04 Thread Oli
** Attachment added: "lock.jpg" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/973221/+attachment/3001449/+files/lock.jpg ** Description changed: I have two screens in a Nvidia/Twinview setup. There is a single-image wallpaper centered over the joined screens. When the lock screen shows, the wallpap

[Bug 973201] Re: Scroll bars have no contrast in some windows

2012-04-04 Thread Oli
Apologies Bernd! I haven't had my coffee today. I meant light-themes. ** Package changed: ubuntu => light-themes (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/973201 Title: Scroll bars ha

[Bug 973366] [NEW] Minimising applications go to the wrong window list (with Compiz)

2012-04-04 Thread Oli
Public bug reported: I have two screens in Twinview. On each screen there is a Gnome-Panel at the bottom, each with its own window-list applet. Simple enough. If I open a window and move it over the second screen, the window list (correctly) updates. But if I then minimise the application, it and

[Bug 973366] Re: Minimising applications go to the wrong window list (with Compiz)

2012-04-04 Thread Oli
** Also affects: compiz (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/973366 Title: Minimising applications go to the wrong window list (with Com

[Bug 973366] Re: Minimising applications go to the wrong window list (with Compiz)

2012-04-04 Thread Oli
There's a lot of jargon around the window-applet/WMs so I've drawn a very simple explanation of what's going on. ** Attachment added: "rawr.png" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/compiz/+bug/973366/+attachment/3002800/+files/rawr.png -- You received this bug notification because you

[Bug 973437] Re: Some applications showing up under wrong (and non-existent) package name

2012-04-04 Thread Oli
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/973437 Title: Some applications showing up under wrong (and non-existent) package name To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.laun

[Bug 973437] [NEW] Some applications showing up under wrong (and non-existent) package name

2012-04-04 Thread Oli
Public bug reported: I searched for Dia today in the Ubuntu Software Center. The top two results were: - Diagram Editor (no icon, subtitled "dia", with stars) - Dia (proper icon, subtitled "Edit your Diagrams", no stars). The first works fine (apart from there being no icon). The second gives

[Bug 642792] Re: ALT+PrtSc not recognised: breaks built-in screenshot function

2010-10-04 Thread Oli
If alt+prscr is really rendering a sysrq event, it would appear that sysrq is not a bindable event. I can't get it to show up in anything (including xev). While I can see the technical argument for making alt trigger the alternate key, the solution in the latest kernel is at least 10 years too lat

[Bug 642792] Re: ALT+PrtSc not recognised: breaks built-in screenshot function

2010-10-04 Thread Oli
Martin Pitt: > Do you have proof (or a patch) which would actually identify this as a kernel change? The only proof I had was anecdotal: I started using 2.6.35 on Lucid long before upgrading to Maverick. Alt-PrintScreen was broken back then, before any of Maverick's X changes were near my system.

[Bug 1500768] Re: python3.4.3 SRU break requests

2015-10-07 Thread Oli
The update and reversion has left people beached on 3.4.3. Apt doesn't automatically downgrade people back down. They're just orphaned on an obsolete version. I understand that this is a WiP and this has been done to stop more people hitting this issue, but is there a good way to downgrade to the

[Bug 1500768] Re: python3.4.3 SRU break requests

2015-10-07 Thread Oli
Additionally, 3.4.3 seems to be missing the pyvenv script and documentation that routes through to python -m venv. It's not the end of the world, but certainly a regression. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.

[Bug 1503774] [NEW] SRU version (3.4.3-1ubuntu1~14.04.1) missing pyvenv scripts

2015-10-07 Thread Oli
Public bug reported: pyvenv is a script that 3.4.0 ships. It's just a convenience wrapper and documentation around `python3 -m venv` but it's still something that people use. Removing it mid-LTS is a regression. ** Affects: python3.4 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New **

[Bug 1503774] Re: SRU version (3.4.3-1ubuntu1~14.04.1) missing pyvenv scripts

2015-10-07 Thread Oli
** Tags added: trusty -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1503774 Title: SRU version (3.4.3-1ubuntu1~14.04.1) missing pyvenv scripts To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://

[Bug 1348954] Re: update Python3 for trusty

2015-10-07 Thread Oli
Bug #1503774 is another regression for this. It's missing the pyvenv scripts and docs that 3.2.0 shipped. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1348954 Title: update Python3 for trusty To

[Bug 1503774] Re: SRU version (3.4.3-1ubuntu1~14.04.1) missing pyvenv scripts

2015-10-07 Thread Oli
Here's the result from a server that's behind a slow mirror (so didn't get auto-updated to the broken version). $ dpkg -S /usr/bin/pyvenv-3.4 python3.4: /usr/bin/pyvenv-3.4 $ apt-cache policy python3 python3: Installed: 3.4.0-0ubuntu2 Candidate: 3.4.0-0ubuntu2 Version table: *** 3.4.0-0ub

[Bug 1503774] Re: SRU version (3.4.3-1ubuntu1~14.04.1) missing pyvenv scripts

2015-10-07 Thread Oli
Except that it did. Check on an installation with 3.2.0, I did. http://packages.ubuntu.com/search?searchon=contents&keywords=pyvenv-3.4&mode=exactfilename&suite=trusty&arch=any ** Changed in: python3.4 (Ubuntu) Status: Invalid => New -- You received this bug notification because you are

[Bug 1503774] Re: SRU version (3.4.3-1ubuntu1~14.04.1) missing pyvenv scripts

2015-10-08 Thread Oli
** Description changed: - pyvenv is a script that 3.4.0 ships. It's just a convenience wrapper and - documentation around `python3 -m venv` but it's still something that - people use. + pyvenv-3.4 is a script that 3.4.0 ships. It's just a convenience wrapper + and documentation around the venv mod

[Bug 973366] Re: Minimising applications go to the wrong window list (with Compiz)

2012-04-16 Thread Oli
I have found that enabling the "Keep previews of minimized windows"-workaround in CCSM fixes this. I'm not sure if that should be turned on by default or if my configuration was just *that* non-standard. Either way, this is enough for me. -- You received this bug notification because you are a m

[Bug 1525735] Re: X server fails to start under regular user in Xenial

2015-12-20 Thread Oli
Unless I'm hitting a separate issue that happens to throw up the same errors, this isn't just virtualbox. I'm on Nvidia. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1525735 Title: X server fails t

[Bug 1550923] [NEW] 16.04's virtualenv uses Python 3 but python executable is Python 2

2016-02-28 Thread Oli
Public bug reported: So we're drifting into complicated territory.  - Python 2 is still the default?  - Package: python-virtualenv is Python2  - Package: virtualenv is Python 3 and replaces python-virtualenv  - Therefore you can't install both The Ubuntu-Python packaging team needs to decide wha

[Bug 1550923] Re: 16.04's virtualenv uses Python 3 but python executable is Python 2

2016-02-29 Thread Oli
Oh if it were that easy. `python -m virtualenv` does not work. Python2's virtualenv couldn't be called as a module. And that's the problem. I don't disagree with a want to move away from Python 2, but there are many developers and organisations that are still managing their upgrades from 2-to-3, w

[Bug 1550923] Re: 16.04's virtualenv uses Python 3 but python executable is Python 2

2016-02-29 Thread Oli
Sidebar: /usr/bin/python seems to be the implicit default too, even for this Python3-based version. Thanks for staying with me in such a calm manner, Barry. I can get on board with that but I'm still seeing real-world problems with the outcome. It's probably something unrelated to Python 3. When i

[Bug 1240848] Re: ~/.cache/upstart takes up around 70GB of space due to unity and mediascanner

2014-08-03 Thread Oli
This isn't limited to Unity. Just found my start-kde.log had swollen to several gigabytes because of a V4L bug that VLC had been spewing out for several minutes. Upstart needs to be more clever about repeated messages. syslog can, for example, munch quick duplicates and say "Line repeated x times"

[Bug 992166] [NEW] package manpages-dev 3.27-1ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: package manpages-dev is already installed and configured

2012-04-30 Thread Oli
Public bug reported: I don't know ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04 Package: manpages-dev ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-24.37-generic 3.2.14 Uname: Linux 3.2.0-24-generic i686 ApportVersion: 2.0.1-0ubuntu7 Architecture: i386 Date: Mon Apr 30 20:42:45 2012 Dependencies: manpage

[Bug 992166] Re: package manpages-dev 3.27-1ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: package manpages-dev is already installed and configured

2012-04-30 Thread Oli
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/992166 Title: package manpages-dev 3.27-1ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: package manpages-dev is already installed and configured To

[Bug 974242] Re: Compiz edge detection code is moving windows against my will

2012-04-30 Thread Oli
I have tracked this down to the Place Window plugin. Disabling the plugin releases a window from its edge-captivity and while it's turned off future border clashes don't ensnare windows. That would be great if it wasn't so necessary. Compiz is near-unusable without it so that's only ever a temporar

[Bug 993443] [NEW] Wireless takes a lot longer to come up (BCM4313) since kernel update

2012-05-02 Thread Oli
Public bug reported: Been using 12.04 on this laptop for a while and the most recent Kernel update (3.2.0-24.37) now means it takes about a minute before the wireless turns on (AKA starts looking for access points and auto- connecting). Before, this would be happening as the laptop booted. The de

[Bug 993443] Re: Wireless takes a lot longer to come up (BCM4313) since kernel update

2012-05-02 Thread Oli
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/993443 Title: Wireless takes a lot longer to come up (BCM4313) since kernel update To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.

[Bug 993443] Re: Wireless takes a lot longer to come up (BCM4313) since kernel update

2012-05-02 Thread Oli
Why didn't I think of that?! No, on 3.2.0-23-generic it's also connecting slowly. Does that mean bcmwl-kernel-source is responsible? ** Package changed: linux (Ubuntu) => bcmwl (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

Re: [Bug 974242] Re: Compiz is moving windows against my will

2012-08-23 Thread Oli
Terence I'd suggest running `sudo apt-get update` from the command line to get a better picture. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/974242 Title: Compiz is moving windows against my will

[Bug 976032] Re: Place plugin problem with panel in fullscreen and gnome classic

2012-06-10 Thread Oli
Hi all, I created a PPA based on Rock's patch for my bug report (#974242): sudo add-apt-repository ppa:oli/compiz-place-patch sudo apt-get update sudo apt-get upgrade I was also suffering from this bug and the patch seems to deal with both problems at once. Give it a test and let me know if you h

[Bug 974242] Re: Compiz edge detection code is moving windows against my will

2012-06-07 Thread Oli
Just to echo the others: an hour of testing in, and I've nothing but joy to report. This patch makes Compiz/Gnome-Fallback usable. Things behave as you would expect: windows aren't jumping all over the place or getting stuck, and, per the other bug, the panel isn't getting in the way of fullscreen

[Bug 974242] Re: Compiz edge detection code is moving windows against my will

2012-06-07 Thread Oli
Urgh, obviously the line `patch -p1 < ~/Desktop/fix-974242.patch` isn't supposed to look for your desktop - If you're following my instructions to the letter, just use `patch -p1 < ../fix-974242.patch` (or fix the path yourself). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of U

[Bug 974242] Re: Compiz edge detection code is moving windows against my will

2012-06-08 Thread Oli
Seeing how easy it is to create a PPA, I have just done this: https://launchpad.net/~oli/+archive/compiz-place-patch It has built for 32bit Precise but there's a 4-hour wait for 64bit Precise. When it's ready you can install the PPA and just upgrade to the package like so: su

[Bug 938587] [NEW] Remove dependency on gir1.2-unity-4.0

2012-02-22 Thread Oli
Public bug reported: I'm trying to remove Unity. I won't go too far into it other than to say it's interfering with the "classic" desktop. Anyway, while trying to remove gir1.2-unity-4.0, it took usb-creator with it. This seems like a rather strange dependency. What's going on? Can this dependenc

[Bug 776067] Re: Applications fail to get correct geometry when hidden/shown with Compiz

2012-02-22 Thread Oli
Appears fixed in Oneiric ** Changed in: compiz (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Fix Released ** Changed in: compiz-core Status: Incomplete => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launc

[Bug 938587] Re: Remove dependency on gir1.2-unity-4.0

2012-02-22 Thread Oli
** Description changed: I'm trying to remove Unity. I won't go too far into it other than to say it's interfering with the "classic" desktop. Anyway, while trying to remove gir1.2-unity-4.0, it took usb-creator with it. This seems like a rather strange dependency. What's going on? Can

[Bug 765794] [NEW] Many "standard" panel applets not available

2011-04-19 Thread Oli
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gnome-panel Just upgraded to Natty from a Maverick install. On setting it to Classic Mode (I want the old Panel/Applet setup for now), things kick off. I get several "Do you want to delete the applet from your configuration?" dialogues for very standard a

[Bug 765794] Re: Many "standard" panel applets not available

2011-04-19 Thread Oli
** Description changed: Binary package hint: gnome-panel Just upgraded to Natty from a Maverick install. On setting it to Classic Mode (I want the old Panel/Applet setup for now), things kick off. I get several "Do you want to delete the applet from your configuration?" dialogues for

[Bug 766452] [NEW] Gnome Panel shows resize handle

2011-04-19 Thread Oli
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gnome-panel Related: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome- panel/+bug/702879 This bug appears to be back. I'm getting ugly little resize handles on my Gnome 2 panels. Normally I'd be a little more verbose when adding a bug but I really don't

[Bug 766452] Re: Gnome Panel shows resize handle

2011-04-19 Thread Oli
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/766452 Title: Gnome Panel shows resize handle -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu

[Bug 785901] Re: motd(5) mentions motd.tail which isn't avaialble anymore

2011-06-17 Thread Oli
/etc/update-motd.d/99-footer will still pull in /etc/motd.tail if it exists. I don't see any reason why this would change or why this requires documentation to be removed and/or changed. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 733314] [NEW] Dozens of software-center processes running

2011-03-11 Thread Oli
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: software-center Over time a number of Sofware Centre processes are observed sitting there zombified. Each consumes 2% of my RAM (that's over 100M per process). The worst I've seen is 46 processes running at once without a single Software Centre window loa

[Bug 733314] Re: Dozens of software-center processes running

2011-03-11 Thread Oli
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/733314 Title: Dozens of software-center processes running -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/lis

[Bug 776067] [NEW] Applications fail to get correct geometry when hidden/shown with Compiz

2011-05-02 Thread Oli
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: compiz I apologise for the cryptic title. I'll try to explain. I use the "Classic" gnome-panels desktop with Compiz. Several applications provide Notification area icons that if clicked will toggle the visibility of the application (gwibber, banshee, life

[Bug 776067] Re: Applications fail to get correct geometry when hidden/shown with Compiz

2011-05-02 Thread Oli
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/776067 Title: Applications fail to get correct geometry when hidden/shown with Compiz -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https:

[Bug 765794] Re: Many "standard" panel applets not available

2011-04-30 Thread Oli
I found that the bonobo configuration files for the applets weren't being loaded (hence they weren't available in the add-to-panel dialogue). I edited bonobo-activation-config.xml to look something like this: /usr/lib/bonobo/servers /usr/local/lib/bonobo/servers And

[Bug 765794] Re: Many "standard" panel applets not available

2011-04-28 Thread Oli
** Changed in: gnome-panel (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/765794 Title: Many "standard" panel applets not available -- ubuntu-bugs mailing

[Bug 766452] Re: Gnome Panel shows resize handle

2011-04-28 Thread Oli
** Changed in: gnome-panel (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/766452 Title: Gnome Panel shows resize handle -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-

[Bug 767142] Re: Resize handles spoil almost every application

2011-04-20 Thread Oli
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/767142 Title: Resize handles spoil almost every application -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/l

[Bug 767142] [NEW] Resize handles spoil almost every application

2011-04-20 Thread Oli
Public bug reported: I'm using Natty in Classic mode with Clearlooks. The new overlaid resize grip ruins the finish on about every single application I have. Here's Terminato above Nautilus, above Liferea: http://imgur.com/AJsmJ.png But it also hits Gwibber, Firefox... Basically anything without

[Bug 767142] Re: Resize handles spoil almost every application

2011-04-20 Thread Oli
** Description changed: I'm using Natty in Classic mode with Clearlooks. The new overlaid resize grip ruins the finish on about every single application I have. Here's - Terminato above Nautilus, above Liferea: http://imgur.com/AJsmJ.png + Terminator above Nautilus, above Liferea: http://imgur

[Bug 766452] Re: Gnome Panel shows resize handle

2011-04-20 Thread Oli
I flipped out and filed another bug because these handles really ruin Ubuntu. They're almost *everywhere* and they look awful. Here's the other bug showing three different applications: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-meta/+bug/767142 http://imgur.com/AJsmJ.png And here's the pan

[Bug 766452] Re: Gnome Panel shows resize handle

2011-04-20 Thread Oli
To answer your question though, this is with a Clearlooks theme but it's apparent (just slightly more subtle) with both "standard" Radiance and Ambiance themes. This is an upgrade so I can't say how standard standard is. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bug

[Bug 765794] Re: Many "standard" panel applets not available

2011-04-20 Thread Oli
Sorry the output isn't that useful. I'm attaching the log per request but it's not very informative (to my untrained eye). Here's a summary. ** (gnome-panel:1686): WARNING **: panel-applet-frame.c:1273: failed to load applet OAFIID:GNOME_ShowDesktopApplet: (null) ** (gnome-panel:1686): WARNING *

[Bug 705593] Re: package virtualbox-ose-dkms 3.2.8-dfsg-2ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: virtualbox-ose kernel module failed to build

2011-01-21 Thread Oli
Confirmed.This appears to effect both the closed-source and open source versions' DKMS modules. (I'm also on Maverick with .38-rc1 using the PPA of Virtualbox). I've tried stepping through the DKMS script but it's a nightmare to follow if, like me, you're not really sure what you're looking at. -

[Bug 705593] Re: vboxdrv module fails to build with kernel 2.6.38

2011-01-23 Thread Oli
For the lazies: sudo find /usr/share/virtualbox/src/vboxhost -name *.h -exec perl -pi -w -e 's/linux\/autoconf/generated\/autoconf/g;' {} \; sudo /etc/init.d/vboxdrv setup -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.

[Bug 642792] Re: ALT+PrtSc not recognised: breaks built-in screenshot function

2010-11-10 Thread Oli
@Fibonacci It has nothing to do with the window manager (metacity, compiz, whatever) because it's the kernel. It's blocking the sysrq key permeating to the rest of the system. You can prove this very easily in xev. -- ALT+PrtSc not recognised: breaks built-in screenshot function https://bugs.lau

[Bug 524179] Re: Left-clicking on taskbar icon for transmission brings up the right-click menu

2010-10-14 Thread Oli
I can't believe some of these comments. Every other application that has both Notification-Area and Indicator- Applet icons (Banshee, Liferea, Gwibber, Pidgin, etc) still support left/right clicking. Left click should toggle visibility. Right click should show the menu. If you want to give it In

[Bug 609827] Re: Tray icon doesn't show anymore in 1.6.3

2010-07-28 Thread Oli
I'm fed up of Ubuntu patches just wiping out perfectly good Notification Area icons. Notification Area is currently more functional and easier to use than the "space saving" Indicator Applet. I've got 3840px of screen width; I don't need to save space! In short, can this patchset (that is from Ubu

[Bug 589063] Re: Windows Server 2008 won't boot with more than 4 vCPUs

2010-08-13 Thread oli
I have this exact same problem. I read of something very similar on this forum that it was a bug in the KVM BIOS and that a fix was coming, but I haven't seen a fix yet. http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.emulators.kvm.devel/46671 It occurred to me that perhaps it is a Windows 2008 Standard l

[Bug 611276] Re: [Regression]Mouse wheel scrolling doesn't work

2010-08-08 Thread Oli
** Changed in: gwibber Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released -- [Regression]Mouse wheel scrolling doesn't work https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/611276 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubu

[Bug 568241] Re: Rhythmbox does not see my Ipodtouch 32go

2010-08-09 Thread Oli
Was having this same problem for a while on my 64 bit system. It worked fine on my netbook and on someone else's 32 bit ubuntu setup. It seems to have started working after reinstalling "gvfs-backends" I'm not sure if that is what fixed it as I was trying many things, including trying other progr

[Bug 568241] Re: Rhythmbox does not see my Ipodtouch 32go

2010-08-09 Thread Oli
(Sorry for the double post) This was on a clean install, using the alternate 64 bit .iso -- Rhythmbox does not see my Ipodtouch 32go https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/568241 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 153152] Re: [Gutsy SRU request] Fax utility not adding files to job.

2008-06-30 Thread Oli Wade
This is still broken for me on Hardy (2.8.2-0ubuntu8). The "Processing fax file" dialog takes forever. -- [Gutsy SRU request] Fax utility not adding files to job. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/153152 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed

[Bug 90587] Re: via unichrome pro (0x1106, 0x3344) unsupported

2008-06-30 Thread Oli Wade
I also had this problem when using the same (1106:3344) graphics device. 8.04 and openchrome now seem to work great though. Additionally there is a similar bug in RH: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=389011 -- via unichrome pro (0x1106, 0x3344) unsupported https://bugs.launchpad.net

<    1   2   3   4   >