it run as root and ther we go.
PLease someone closes this bug, it is a misconfiguration done by the user,
and has nothing to do with either Debuan/Ubuntu, nor with TeX Live
upstream. THere is nothing we can do on any of these sides.
Best wishes
Norbert
------
oy
Norbert
--------
Norbert Preiningpreining@{jaist.ac.jp, logic.at, debian.org}
JAIST, Japan TeX Live & Debian Developer
DSA: 0x09C5B094 fp: 14DF 2E6C 0307 BE6D AD76 A9C0 D2BF
singly ... since root does not read your $HOME/texmf
Bogus bug, should be closed.
Norbert
----
PREINING, Norbert http://www.preining.info
JAIST, Japan TeX Live &
e you need TeX to get a working pdfcrop. THe size from
the above webpage is only for the script itself, but without
a working TeX and Ghostscript nothing goes.
Please anyone close this bug.
Norbert
---
raring but are required for Piscript.
Then piscript should be fixed. dvipdfm is long gone, and in TL2013
there will be no reference to dvipdfm anymore at all.
Norbert
----
PREINING, Norbert http://ww
Chris, please let us know on top of what? On top of the bug55984 git
branch you created earlier, or is that one not necessary?
Thanks
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1081009
Title:
[a
Hi Chris,
> No news... Has the instadeath gone, but the slow lingering death
remains?
Well, I am running the latest patch on top of git and try to trigger the
bug, till now without success, though.
I cannot say more or less, at least the frequency has reduced.
Let me know if I can help more tha
Norbert
----
Norbert Preiningpreining@{jaist.ac.jp, logic.at, debian.org}
JAIST, Japan TeX Live & Debian Developer
DSA: 0x09C5B094 fp: 14DF 2E6C 0307 BE6D AD76 A9C0 D2BF 4A
annot be compiled with libkpathsea5 and upward.
We tried to get it working again, but there was not much of interest
of it.
Please purge jtex-bin and jtex-base.
Best wishes
Norbert
--------
Norbert Preiningpreining@{jaist
ry.
jtex has not been fixed and will probably not be fixed.
I wrote that already ... anyone reading my emails?
Best wishes
Norbert
----
Norbert Preiningpreining@{jaist.ac.jp, logic.at, debian.org}
JAI
Then also purge multex-bin
Norbert Preiningpreining@{jaist.ac.jp, logic.at, debian.org}
JAIST, Japan TeX Live & Debian Developer
DSA: 0x09C5B094 fp: 14DF 2E6C 0307 BE6D
Created attachment 70855
i915 error state, rc6=0, patch from comment 79
Hi Chris,
sorry to say it, but I got a hang today. In the background some
update.mlocate etc was running, plus some git checkout of a big
repository.
i915 error state uploaded.
Norbert
--
You received this bug notificatio
Hi Chris,
ok, will switch to SNA, although in one of the email threads predating
this bug report I switched to SNA and then was told not to.
Anyway, trying to recreate it with SNA.
Norbert
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubu
First report on SNA: I got a very very strange thing yesterday. After
resuming from suspend-to-ram I continued working with GIMP on some
graphics, and first it started with some blue flashes on the screen, and
finally the screen got completely blue, but I could in principle still
interact with the
I had the same problem and found the following working solution: shut
down, unplug power, take out battery, wait a few minutes, boot.
Seems to be a bios bug in lenovos.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.laun
Will be updated with the release of a new texinfo package which is in
testing phase.
Norbert Preiningpreining@{jaist.ac.jp, logic.at, debian.org}
JAIST, Japan TeX Live & De
un one document (Hellow World one) with -recorder and send the .fls
file
Best wishes
Norbert
--------
Norbert Preiningpreining@{jaist.ac.jp, logic.at, debian.org}
JAIST, Japan TeX Live & Debia
aded to Debian/unstable.
Ubuntu will probably pull the version from experimental soon.
Norbert
----
PREINING, Norbert http://www.preining.info
JAIST, Japan TeX Live & De
o INFO\n"
"\n"
" Questo (il nodo principale) fornisce un menù che contiene le voci "
"principali.\n"
Grazie
Norbert
PREINING, Norbert http://www.preining.info
kali anda memanggil Info anda berawal dari melihat titik ini.\n"
-"^_\n"
+" \n"
"%s\tIni adalah tingkat paling atas dari pohon INFO\n"
"\n"
" Ini (titik Direktori) memberik
(In reply to comment #126)
> Ok. seems to work very stable now. I am running now a few days with the
> patches xf86-intel driver and this patch (#122), and didn't have any hiccups
> at all.
Ok, I got one. It took a *long* time, and I (stupidly) didn't grab the
error state (too tired after 24 hours
come out in letter
without any problem.
Is it so hard to read the output?
Bug can be closed, misconfiguration of the user.
Best wishes
Norbert
--------
Norbert Preiningpreining@{jaist.ac.jp, logic.at, debian.org}
Hi Chris,
I am now running with
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/~ickle/linux-2.6/log/?h=for-imre pulled into
main linux git.
The first thing I realized that there are some very strange effects
happening: I have docky (a panel) running, and set to auto-hide. If it
is shown, then there are boxes around
(In reply to comment #72)
> Script to trigger the bug.
>
> This seems to be quickest way to repro the bug on Ville's ILK
I couldn't trigger anything with that, it just happily continued for
ages. Here it seems that big IO for read and write to be necessary,
while here is only read.
--
You recei
Running current linux HEAD with
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/~ickle/linux-2.6/commit/?h=bug55984 pulled
in I cannot trigger the crash, how hard I have tried now for some time.
Compared with the for-imre branch also the strange artifacts are gone,
so it looks much better now.
I have still the follo
Okay, I guess I have to recall my statement, I didn't realize it at
first. Due to the i915.enable_hangcheck=0 it seemss that not simply the
3d died and Gnome3 WM died, but with this the screen went black and
didn't react on anything. Interestingly there were no messages at all in
the log files.
I
(In reply to comment #115)
> (In reply to comment #114)
> > Yes, it is xf86-video-intel. I am running it with the current version of
> > Debian/sid + this patch now (2.20.14-1 + the patch)
> Is it a standalone patch or does it depend on the former DRM patch? Anyway,
> I have tested it with 3.7.1 +
(In reply to comment #122)
> It's just based on a slightly more recent tree. Meta-patch: s/__drm/drm/
Thanks, rebooting now with new kernel (and still patched intel xf86
driver)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://
Hi Daniel, hi Chris
(In reply to comment #107)
> Created attachment 71805 [details] [review]
> make the shrinker less aggressive
>
> Duct-tape solution if it is one, but imo very much worth a try.
There have been a lot of patches floating around, but I was running
3.7.0 plus this patch now for a
(In reply to comment #119)
> I saw that, but I have a symbol with a __ prefix.
Aren't these created by the compiler ???
> Looking at the comments, there are two versions of that patch. comment 105
> and comment 111 (v3). I guess you applied the earlier one? Chris, can you
Indeed ... indeed ... I
[/usr/src/git-kernel/linux-2.6] grep -rn drm_mm_hole_node_end
Binary file drivers/gpu/drm/drm.ko matches
...
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_mm.c:126: unsigned long hole_end =
drm_mm_hole_node_end(hole_node);
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_mm.c:210: unsigned long hole_end =
drm_mm_hole_node_end(hole_node);
...
--
Hi,
I will try the patch from 109 in combination with the patchwork patch
next. I think I *did* try the patchwork test recently.
So I will go silent now and report back in a few days if no problems
arose, or immediately if it freezes again.
Thanks
Norbert
--
You received this bug notification
(In reply to comment #113)
> [reply to comment 109]
> Do I need to apply this to xf86-video-intel? If yes, which version/commit?
Yes, it is xf86-video-intel. I am running it with the current version of
Debian/sid + this patch now (2.20.14-1 + the patch)
> [reply to comment 111]
> I tried to apply
(In reply to comment #120)
> > Looking at the comments, there are two versions of that patch. comment 105
> > and comment 111 (v3). I guess you applied the earlier one? Chris, can you
>
> Indeed ... indeed ... I don't know why, but checking not the git log I
> wrote, but the actual diff I see that
elease and let me know if the problem is fixed or
what else needs to be done?
Then I could inform upstream and ask them to do some changes, but
not with the current version in Ubuntu.
Thanks
Norbert
----
PREINING, N
iday without computer, can you please:
* go to https://savannah.gnu.org/projects/texinfo/
* select "Bugs"
and add a bug that refers to this?
In any case I will forward your emails to the bug texinfo mailing list,
too.
Norbert
---
hich currently aren't translating
> the above mentioned message, these locales are still affected from the
> bug:
>
> po/id.po
> po/it.po
> po/rw.po
> po/tr.po
>
> Since these files are not modified in the Debian patches, this is
> definitely an ups
(In reply to comment #122)
> Created attachment 72022 [details] [review]
> Only evict the blocks required to free the hole
>
> (In reply to comment #121)
> > Indeed, patchwork 1896161 from comment 111 does not compile.
>
> It's just based on a slightly more recent tree. Meta-patch: s/__drm/drm/
> Title:
> package install-info 4.13a.dfsg.1-8ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade:
> subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit
> status 127
Hahahahaha, funnny
You are removing an *essential* package with --force (bash) and
expect that this is a good idea
Hahahaha
U
rt offer, that is what is needed.
Best wishes
Norbert
----
Norbert Preiningpreining@{jaist.ac.jp, logic.at, debian.org}
JAIST, Japan TeX Live & Debian Developer
DSA: 0x09C5B094 f
> and I also need
> tlmgr.
And I have already said many many times that there will be no tlmgr in
the Debian/Ubuntu packages, because there is no need and no place.
If you want daily updates a la tlmgr install upstream TeX Live.
End of line.
--
You received this bug notification because you ar
> @preining
> Could you post the links to the preliminary 2011 packages here too? I would
> like to try.
There was nothing to try becausr they were not installable.
What we need is people with packaging ability and ability to check
packages, not dummies trying to get the latest packages.
Anyway
ish this?
No idea, 50, maybe 100? With decent testing more.
Best wishes
Norbert
--------
Norbert Preiningpreining@{jaist.ac.jp, logic.at, debian.org}
JAIST, Japan TeX Live & Debian Dev
if you are in great need
- pay someone to do it for you
- wait until someone does it for you
Enjoy.
Norbert
--------
Norbert Preiningpreining@{jaist.ac.jp, logic.at, debian.org}
JAIST, Japan
---
Best wishes
Norbert
----
Norbert Preiningprein...@{jaist.ac.jp, logic.at, debian.org}
JAIST, Japan TeX Live & Debian Developer
DSA: 0x09C5B094 fp: 14DF 2E6C 0307 BE6D A
Hi everyone,
> I should point out that, with the package manager tlmgr (new since the
> 2010 version), there's no real need to group individual TeX Live
> packages into debian ones, as was done with Live 2009. Instead, the
> user can maintain a Live package system orthogonal to Ubuntu's.
Wrong.
Hi
> This wasn't what I meant. I meant to package just one bit of TL, the
> installer, into it, and make it pretend to provide all the TL
> dependencies.
And, as I wrote in the last email, how would the build structure that
automatically install buil dependencies make sure that all the necessary
est wishes
Norbert
--------
Norbert Preiningpreining@{jaist.ac.jp, logic.at, debian.org}
JAIST, Japan TeX Live & Debian Developer
DSA: 0x09C5B094 fp: 14DF 2E6C 0307 BE6D AD76 A
of
the files shipped by texlive.
So it seems you have done something with the MinionPro package,
without knowing what to do.
Best wishes
Norbert
----
Norbert Preiningpreining@{jaist.ac.jp, logic.at, debian.org}
JAIS
> This is bad news! Is there anybody we can address concerning this?
Yes, me. But I currently don't have the time for rewritting everything
for the new release layout. Sorry.
Norbert
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
h
files you have changed.
Best wishes
Norbert
--------
Norbert Preiningprein...@{jaist.ac.jp, logic.at, debian.org}
JAIST, Japan TeX Live & Debian Developer
DSA: 0x09C5B094 fp: 14DF
ian)
are in freeze.
Funny how fast you draw conclusions.
Best wishes
Norbert
--------
Norbert Preiningprein...@{jaist.ac.jp, logic.at, debian.org}
JAIST, Japan TeX Live & Debian Developer
> If you want people to know about your repository, please document it in
> debian/control using the fields defined in 6.2.5.2 of the Debian developer's
> reference.
I will do that.
Still I expect people taking our work from Debian and using it in Ubuntu
to know without further ado where the r
> Is there some replacement / work-around?
Yes, drop the -Pcmz and you should be fine. Did you try that?
--
dvips -Pcmz broke down on 9.10->10.04
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/619201
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
> http://www.usenix.org/events/samples/latex_tips.html (last bullet)
BTW, quite outdated. Setting the right setting with updmap-sys is
enough, and the default is anyway to prefer postscript type1 fonts if
available, so all there is a bit outdated.
--
dvips -Pcmz broke down on 9.10->10.04
https:
*all* fonts are automatically
embedded in type1 format.
Norbert
--------
Norbert Preiningprein...@{jaist.ac.jp, logic.at, debian.org}
JAIST, Japan TeX Live & Debian Developer
DSA: 0x09C5
Best wishes
Norbert
----
Norbert Preiningprein...@{jaist.ac.jp, logic.at, debian.org}
JAIST, Japan TeX Live & Debian Developer
DSA: 0x09C5B094 fp: 14DF 2E6C 0307 BE6D AD76 A9C0
ant to do something else, they
are free to do wahtever they want. I keep to my rules, and I am not
inclined to make any further concessions trying to expand LPPL.
If Ubuntu packagers want to do that, they are free to do so.
Enjoy
Norbert
---
changing the
copyright statement there? No.
Best wishes
Norbert
----
Norbert Preiningprein...@{jaist.ac.jp, logic.at, debian.org}
JAIST, Japan TeX Live & Debian Developer
DSA
wishes
Norbert
--------
Norbert Preiningprein...@{jaist.ac.jp, logic.at, debian.org}
JAIST, Japan TeX Live & Debian Developer
DSA: 0x09C5B094 fp: 14DF 2E6C 0307 BE6D AD76 A9C0
ly for sepration of arch-indeop and arch-dep files.
On the Debian side this is wontfix bug, I have no intention to make
any changes in this area.
Best wishes
Norbert
----
Norbert Preiningprein...@{jaist.ac.jp, lo
provide the plain binaries build from the sourc.etar.gz
to separate arch-indep from arch-depend packages.
Hardly any of these programs will work in a normal way when only
texlive-binaries is installed.
Best wishes
Norbert
--------
Norbe
base instead ?
I don't know what these packages actually *need* or use. xdvik-ja probably
uses nothing, but I cannot check the other ones!
But jlatex209-base looks suspicious.
Best wishes
Norbert
----
Norbert Preining
former times, but it seems recent packages still contain
`rungs` instead of `gs` itself.
Best regards
Norbert
--
PREINING Norbert https://www.preining.info
arXiv / Cornell University + IFMGA Guide + TU Wien + TeX Live
GPG: 0x860CDC13 fp: F7D8 A928 26E3 16A1
301 - 364 of 364 matches
Mail list logo
