[Bug 1558621] [NEW] package fglrx 2:15.201-0ubuntu0.14.04.1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-removal script returned error exit status 1

2016-03-19 Thread Nishihama Kenkowo
Public bug reported: none ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 14.04 Package: fglrx 2:15.201-0ubuntu0.14.04.1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.19.0-32.37~14.04.1-generic 3.19.8-ckt7 Uname: Linux 3.19.0-32-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: fglrx ApportVersion: 2.14.1-0ubuntu3.19 AptOrdering

[Bug 1543704] Re: Gparted crashed on loading

2016-04-14 Thread Nishihama Kenkowo
I had similar, before 4Weeks, in ubuntu 16.04 beta. Assertion (metadata_length > 0) at ../../../libparted/labels/dos.c:2313 in function add_logical_part_metadata() failed. libparted : 3.2 == Backtrace has 15 calls on stack: 15: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libparted.so.2(ped_a

[Bug 971839] Re: aptd crashed with UnboundLocalError in _emit_acquire_item(): local variable 'lang' referenced before assignment

2012-04-05 Thread Nishihama Kenkowo
i dont know. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/971839 Title: aptd crashed with UnboundLocalError in _emit_acquire_item(): local variable 'lang' referenced before assignment To manage

[Bug 971839] Re: aptd crashed with UnboundLocalError in _emit_acquire_item(): local variable 'lang' referenced before assignment

2012-04-10 Thread Nishihama Kenkowo
i dont know. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/971839 Title: aptd crashed with UnboundLocalError in _emit_acquire_item(): local variable 'lang' referenced before assignment To manage

[Bug 973088] Re: tracker-miner-fs crashed with SIGABRT in g_assertion_message()

2012-04-15 Thread Nishihama Kenkowo
when atached iPhone. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/973088 Title: tracker-miner-fs crashed with SIGABRT in g_assertion_message() To manage notifications about this bug go to: https:/

[Bug 1553803] [NEW] fglrx-updates-core 2:15.201-0ubuntu0.14.04.1: fglrx-updates-core kernel module failed to build

2016-03-06 Thread Nishihama Kenkowo
Public bug reported: no decoration windows. ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 14.04 Package: fglrx-updates-core 2:15.201-0ubuntu0.14.04.1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.19.0-32.37~14.04.1-generic 3.19.8-ckt7 Uname: Linux 3.19.0-32-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: fglrx ApportVersion:

[Bug 993258] [NEW] package clamav-daemon (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2012-05-02 Thread Nishihama Kenkowo
Public bug reported: I don't know ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04 Package: clamav-daemon (not installed) ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-23.36-generic 3.2.14 Uname: Linux 3.2.0-23-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: fglrx ApportVersion: 2.0.1-0ubuntu7 Architecture: amd64 Date

[Bug 993258] Re: package clamav-daemon (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2012-05-02 Thread Nishihama Kenkowo
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/993258 Title: package clamav-daemon (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit stat

[Bug 1041966] [NEW] package libsensors4 1:3.3.1-2ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: conffile './etc/sensors.d/.placeholder' is not in sync with other instances of the same package

2012-08-26 Thread Nishihama Kenkowo
Public bug reported: dpkgselect ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04 Package: libsensors4 1:3.3.1-2ubuntu1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-29.46-generic 3.2.24 Uname: Linux 3.2.0-29-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.0.1-0ubuntu12 Architecture: amd64 Date: Mon Aug 27 07:07:28 2012 Err

[Bug 1041966] Re: package libsensors4 1:3.3.1-2ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: conffile './etc/sensors.d/.placeholder' is not in sync with other instances of the same package

2012-08-26 Thread Nishihama Kenkowo
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1041966 Title: package libsensors4 1:3.3.1-2ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: conffile './etc/sensors.d/.placeholder' is not in sync with other inst

[Bug 921523] [NEW] package libomxil-bellagio0 0.9.3-1ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 127

2012-01-25 Thread Nishihama Kenkowo
Public bug reported: when sudo apt-get upgrade ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04 Package: libomxil-bellagio0 0.9.3-1ubuntu1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-10.18-generic 3.2.1 Uname: Linux 3.2.0-10-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 1.91-0ubuntu1 Architecture: amd64 Date: Wed Jan 25

[Bug 921523] Re: package libomxil-bellagio0 0.9.3-1ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 127

2012-01-25 Thread Nishihama Kenkowo
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/921523 Title: package libomxil-bellagio0 0.9.3-1ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned

[Bug 1080711] [NEW] package bluez 4.101-0ubuntu6 failed to install/upgrade: サブプロセス インストール済みの post-installation スクリプト はエラー終了ステータス 1 を返しました

2012-11-19 Thread Nishihama Kenkowo
Public bug reported: i dont know. ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.10 Package: bluez 4.101-0ubuntu6 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.5.0-19.30-generic 3.5.7 Uname: Linux 3.5.0-19-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: fglrx ApportVersion: 2.6.1-0ubuntu6 Architecture: amd64 Date: Mon Nov

[Bug 927043] [NEW] when installling

2012-02-05 Thread Nishihama Kenkowo
Public bug reported: btrfs ? ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.10 Package: ubiquity 2.8.7 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.0.0-12.20-generic 3.0.4 Uname: Linux 3.0.0-12-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 1.23-0ubuntu3 Architecture: amd64 CasperVersion: 1.287 Date: Sun Feb 5 16:48:20 2012 LiveMe

[Bug 927043] Re: when installling

2012-02-05 Thread Nishihama Kenkowo
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/927043 Title: when installling To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/927043/+subscriptio

[Bug 599255] Re: dmraid cannot use over 2TB raid0

2010-06-29 Thread Nishihama Kenkowo
I done . I tryed 1 raid array last week. In this case, Linux(fedora/ubuntu) couod not regognize ALL capacity. so I spilitted 2 arrays. thanks. -- dmraid cannot use over 2TB raid0 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/599255 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, wh

[Bug 599255] Re: dmraid cannot use over 2TB raid0

2010-06-30 Thread Nishihama Kenkowo
Additional test: I tryed another distro,yesterday. In CentOS 5.5 DVD, all capacity was recognized to the second array. 2.5TB . [CentOS inst ]said me "initialize this 2.5TB? so. you will use" but i did not. because. there are 2.5TB NTFS made by windows XP. i need backup before I was glad to liste

[Bug 599255] Re: dmraid cannot use over 2TB raid0

2010-07-01 Thread Nishihama Kenkowo
I backuped ALL , almost 3TB. I tryed test on CentOS again. Oh, sorry > everyone. on CentOS . I misread message size. CentOS had initialized only 0.3GB (2nd array 2.5TB). CentOS initialized only 286079MB on 2.5TB. every linux have same situations for me. I paste dmraid -ay -vvv -d pdc_cdfjcjh

[Bug 599255] Re: dmraid cannot use over 2TB raid0

2010-07-01 Thread Nishihama Kenkowo
it is a snapshot of AMD RAID expert software on XP. http://dl.dropbox.com/u/7882415/raid-amd.JPG I'll be very happy if I can serve you -- dmraid cannot use over 2TB raid0 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/599255 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 599255] Re: dmraid cannot use over 2TB raid0

2010-07-01 Thread Nishihama Kenkowo
>What software are you trying to partition with? On Linux, fundamentally I use "gparted" or "ubuntu installer" for resize,create,delete. >And how are you working out how much disk they are seeing? how to see my partition. on Fedora, just type. $gparted on Ubuntu $gparted /dev/mapper/pdc_rai

[Bug 599255] Re: dmraid cannot use over 2TB raid0

2010-07-01 Thread Nishihama Kenkowo
I tested acronis disk director 10.0. linuxCDROM boot kernel 2.4.34 DD not support GPT. So, I partitioned as 2TB EXT2 for 2nd array on DD. XP & Win7 can read/write this EXT2 partition. but ,ubuntu can not see. -- dmraid cannot use over 2TB raid0 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/599255 You recei

[Bug 599255] Re: dmraid cannot use over 2TB raid0

2010-07-01 Thread Nishihama Kenkowo
thank you danny r...@phantom:~# sudo dmraid -rD /dev/sdc: pdc, "pdc_cdfjcjhfhe", stripe, ok, 1302083328 sectors, data@ 0 /dev/sdb: pdc, "pdc_cdfjcjhfhe", stripe, ok, 1302083328 sectors, data@ 0 /dev/sda: pdc, "pdc_cdfjcjhfhe", stripe, ok, 1302083328 sectors, data@ 0 r...@phantom:~# cannot dump?

[Bug 599255] Re: dmraid cannot use over 2TB raid0

2010-07-01 Thread Nishihama Kenkowo
I make out. thank you. ** Attachment added: "dmraid-pdc.tar" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/51239860/dmraid-pdc.tar ** Also affects: dmraid (Fedora) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- dmraid cannot use over 2TB raid0 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/599255 You received this bug not

[Bug 599255] Re: dmraid cannot use over 2TB raid0

2010-07-02 Thread Nishihama Kenkowo
** Attachment added: "dmraid-ay-d-vvv.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/51297982/dmraid-ay-d-vvv.txt -- dmraid cannot use over 2TB raid0 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/599255 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubun

[Bug 599255] Re: dmraid cannot use over 2TB raid0

2010-07-02 Thread Nishihama Kenkowo
>patch < dmraid_1.0.0.rc16-3ubuntu2ppa3~lucid1.diff >patching file README.source > >patching file dmraid-activate >patch: File dmraid is not a regular file -- can't patch where I mistaked? dmraid -V dmraid version: 1.0.0.rc16 (2009.09.16) dmraid library version: 1.0.0.rc1

[Bug 599255] Re: dmraid cannot use over 2TB raid0

2010-07-02 Thread Nishihama Kenkowo
I can not find dmraid_1.0.0.rc16.orig.tar.gz in your ppa page. -- dmraid cannot use over 2TB raid0 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/599255 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubun

[Bug 599255] Re: dmraid cannot use over 2TB raid0

2010-07-02 Thread Nishihama Kenkowo
r...@phantom:/sbin# ls -l dmraid -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 26891 2010-07-03 03:15 dmraid I do not understand well because I rarely use it(patch). It is difficult for me to patch. Possible deb.form. or (patched)source code..wholly.. get.. I will be glad. The following can be done if it does so. ./

[Bug 599255] Re: dmraid cannot use over 2TB raid0

2010-07-02 Thread Nishihama Kenkowo
maybe, it is ok? I coud upgrade. ls -l dmraid -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 21272 2010-05-30 17:58 dmraid ** Attachment added: "dbg.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/51314663/dbg.txt -- dmraid cannot use over 2TB raid0 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/599255 You received this bug notification beca

[Bug 599255] Re: dmraid cannot use over 2TB raid0

2010-07-02 Thread Nishihama Kenkowo
oh, I think that I must wait for building. dmraid -V dmraid version: 1.0.0.rc16 (2009.09.16) shared dmraid library version: 1.0.0.rc16 (2009.09.16) device-mapper version: 4.15.0 -- dmraid cannot use over 2TB raid0 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/599255 You received this bug notificatio

[Bug 599255] Re: dmraid cannot use over 2TB raid0

2010-07-03 Thread Nishihama Kenkowo
# dpkg -p dmraid | grep Ver Version: 1.0.0.rc16-3ubuntu2ppa3~lucid1 r...@phantom:/home/ehhen# dmraid -ay -d -vvv >dmraid-ay-d-vvv.txt ** Attachment added: "dmraid-ay-d-vvv.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/51327549/dmraid-ay-d-vvv.txt -- dmraid cannot use over 2TB raid0 https://bugs.launchp

[Bug 599255] Re: dmraid cannot use over 2TB raid0

2010-07-03 Thread Nishihama Kenkowo
how to treat *.udev files? there(2files) could not install by dependency. another 3 .deb could be install. ** Attachment added: "2nd.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/51356328/2nd.txt -- dmraid cannot use over 2TB raid0 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/599255 You received this bug notifica

[Bug 599255] Re: dmraid cannot use over 2TB raid0

2010-07-03 Thread Nishihama Kenkowo
Awareness: Current, Only just type gpated. I can see /dev/mapper/pdc. it's good . Current my partition: 1st array(2TB) /dev/mapper/pdc_cdfjcjhfhe1 * 16646533839637 HPFS/NTFS /primary /dev/mapper/pdc_cdfjcjhfhe26647 13276532474427 HPFS

[Bug 599255] [NEW] fakeraid cannot use over 2TB raid0

2010-06-28 Thread Nishihama Kenkowo
Public bug reported: I have two amd sb7*** motherbord. I use raid0(1.5TB x 3=4.5TB) by bios(SB7*0). I partitioned two array. 2.0TB(A) & 2.5TB(B). win7-64 winxp32ubuntu10.4x64/fedora13 x64

[Bug 599255] Re: dmraid cannot use over 2TB raid0

2010-06-28 Thread Nishihama Kenkowo
** Summary changed: - fakeraid cannot use over 2TB raid0 + dmraid cannot use over 2TB raid0 ** Description changed: - I have two amd sb7*** motherbord. - I use raid0(1.5TB x 3=4.5TB) by bios(SB7*0). + I have two amd sb7*** motherbord. I tryed two case. - I partitioned two array. 2.0TB(A) &

[Bug 599255] Re: dmraid fails to read promise RAID sector count larger than 32-bits

2010-07-09 Thread Nishihama Kenkowo
add information: I swaped motherboard from asus M4A78-EM/1394 to asus M3A78-T. There have almost compatible raid chip SB7xx. asus M4A78-EM/1394 AMD790GX +SB750 raidbios 3.0.1540.59 and 3.0.1540.39(both I tested). asus M3A78-T AMD780G+SB710 raidbios now,I can not see. I get sa

[Bug 599255] Re: dmraid fails to read promise RAID sector count larger than 32-bits

2010-07-10 Thread Nishihama Kenkowo
I swaped motherboard, again.restored to and Correction RAIDBIOS VERSION M4A78-EM/1394 AMD790GX +SB750 raidbios 3.0.1540.39 M3A78-TAMD780G +SB710 raidbios 3.0.1540.39 3.0.1540.59 -- dmraid fails to read promise RAID sector count larger than 32-bits https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/5

[Bug 599255] Re: dmraid cannot use over 2TB raid0

2010-07-04 Thread Nishihama Kenkowo
is this ok? metadata.tar.gz ** Attachment added: "metadata.tar.gz" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/51368604/metadata.tar.gz -- dmraid cannot use over 2TB raid0 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/599255 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed

[Bug 599255] Re: dmraid cannot use over 2TB raid0

2010-07-04 Thread Nishihama Kenkowo
I'm relieved. Slowly, I'll wait. Thank you,all. -- dmraid cannot use over 2TB raid0 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/599255 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://

[Bug 599255] Re: dmraid cannot use over 2TB raid0

2010-07-05 Thread Nishihama Kenkowo
Hi Danny, raid0-1st array: Using /dev/mapper/pdc_cdfjcjhfhe Disk /dev/mapper/pdc_cdfjcjhfhe: 1999 GB, 193282560 bytes 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 243152 cylinders Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes →It is the same as former. It is good in this. raid0-2nd array: Using /dev/mapp

[Bug 599255] Re: dmraid fails to read promise RAID sector count larger than 32-bits

2010-07-06 Thread Nishihama Kenkowo
I initialized 2 pattern, guid , mbr on 2.5TB 2nd array. by Gparted. on Gparted. A)Case of GUIDed , ubuntu could not partation. it failed. B)Case of MBR, ubutn could partition. it was success. case a: there are no files pdc_cdgjdcefic1,2. so gparted failed. # dmraid -s *** Active Set name : pd

[Bug 599255] Re: dmraid fails to read promise RAID sector count larger than 32-bits

2010-07-06 Thread Nishihama Kenkowo
On guided partition, ubuntu can not partition. -- a) disk utility Error creating partition: helper exited with exit code 1: In part_add_partition: device_file=/dev/mapper/pdc_cdgjdcefic, start=0, size=1000, type=EBD0A0A2-B9E5-4433-87C0-68B6B72699C7 Entering MS-DOS parser (offset=0, size=2

[Bug 599255] Re: dmraid fails to read promise RAID sector count larger than 32-bits

2010-07-06 Thread Nishihama Kenkowo
So, I initilized GPT, I useed fdisk to partitioning. 3partitons, EXT4,EXT4,swap. But these partitions were not recognize on Windows7x64. not comaptible?! Windows7 Diskmanager tell me . Which type do you initialize GPT. or MBR? -- dmraid fails to read promise RAID sector count larger than 32-b

[Bug 599255] Re: dmraid fails to read promise RAID sector count larger than 32-bits

2010-07-06 Thread Nishihama Kenkowo
And, onWin4x64. I initilized GPT, I partitioned 2 NTFS part. But these partitions are not recognize on Ubuntu, too. GPT was not compatible. DiskUtility shows me, not formatted 2.5TB. not GPT, not MBR. add: Disk utility could not format GPT/MBR to 2.5TB. it failed. Gparted could format partation

[Bug 599255] Re: dmraid fails to read promise RAID sector count larger than 32-bits

2010-07-06 Thread Nishihama Kenkowo
>Are you sure the partitions you created in windows did not exist in Ubuntu? >Could you recreate them and then do a print screen of gparted looking at the >drive? Yes, in ubuntu, There are no partition. (Perhaps, I could not see partition table). -- dmraid fails to read promise RAID sector coun

[Bug 599255] Re: dmraid fails to read promise RAID sector count larger than 32-bits

2010-07-06 Thread Nishihama Kenkowo
this snapshot which createed mbr on win7x64. now, I can see this partation table . but size are misread. I made 2048GB NTFS and other 279.37GB(not partationed). but ubuntu gparted show me that 1024GB and blank 1.27TiB. ** Attachment added: "win7x64.png" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/514925

[Bug 599255] Re: dmraid fails to read promise RAID sector count larger than 32-bits

2010-07-06 Thread Nishihama Kenkowo
Seeing in Ubuntu ** Attachment added: "Screenshot--dev-mapper-pdc_cdgjdcefic - GParted-1.png" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/51492571/Screenshot--dev-mapper-pdc_cdgjdcefic%20-%20GParted-1.png -- dmraid fails to read promise RAID sector count larger than 32-bits https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs

[Bug 599255] Re: dmraid fails to read promise RAID sector count larger than 32-bits

2010-07-07 Thread Nishihama Kenkowo
Thanks , about my 2nd 2.5TB RAID0. 1st , boot Win7x64, and created NTFS limit(automatic 2048GB). next boot ubuntu, I created manulaly 2TB NTFS(and other blank 239GB(286079MiB)) by Gparted. and next, boot Win7x64 again. In disk management shows me , 1 partition as 2.5TB RAW disk(not formated). B

[Bug 599255] Re: dmraid fails to read promise RAID sector count larger than 32-bits

2010-07-07 Thread Nishihama Kenkowo
I had Miscalculation. 2097149MiB to 2097152MiB. The latter setting the new. I recreated partition. and recreated mbr. Disk /dev/mapper/pdc_cdgjdcefic: 2498 GB, 2498996344320 bytes 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 303819 cylinders Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes

[Bug 599255] Re: dmraid fails to read promise RAID sector count larger than 32-bits

2010-07-08 Thread Nishihama Kenkowo
>With the NTFS partition you created in Ubuntu is the same partition then >visible in windows? Previously, as written. on Raid array1, Visible,I can use/read/write NTFS which was created by ubuntu in windows. no problem.Interoperability,each other,ubuntu and windows/XP/7. on Raid array2, I can

[Bug 599255] Re: dmraid fails to read promise RAID sector count larger than 32-bits

2010-07-08 Thread Nishihama Kenkowo
>Anyway you do need to use gpt partitioning to use large volumes like this. Previously, as written. ubuntu can not create GUID partition in my 2nd array. gparted . and diskutility too. the other ubuntu can make guid partition table. (parted) p

[Bug 599255] Re: dmraid fails to read promise RAID sector count larger than 32-bits

2010-07-08 Thread Nishihama Kenkowo
(using kpartx which your procedure) ubutu can create partition on GPT disk(2nd) by gparted. Disk /dev/mapper/pdc_befgjjibfc: 2300 GB, 2300997404160 bytes 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 279747 cylinders Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes Device Boot Start

[Bug 599255] Re: dmraid fails to read promise RAID sector count larger than 32-bits

2010-07-08 Thread Nishihama Kenkowo
And reboot, swicth to win7x64. Diskmanager told me. Which type initialize GPT or MBR. there are no partition table. #46 same situation.I try again and again. And Going around in circles. -- dmraid fails to read promise RAID sector count larger than 32-bits https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/5992

[Bug 599255] Re: dmraid fails to read promise RAID sector count larger than 32-bits

2010-07-08 Thread Nishihama Kenkowo
And, I initilized as windows told me. MBR. I created A 2TiB partiation. I decided to throw away the fraction. 0.09TiB. and reboot, swich to ubuntu. #gpated Strange phenomenon occurs. There are GPT partiton. http://dl.dropbox.com/u/6626165/Screenshot--dev-mapper-pdc_befgjjibfc%20-%20GParted.png E

[Bug 599255] Re: dmraid fails to read promise RAID sector count larger than 32-bits

2010-07-08 Thread Nishihama Kenkowo
I boot WinXP32. on management of computer. there are 2nd raid array. basic, norml.4095.99GB. <---Abnormal value. -- dmraid fails to read promise RAID sector count larger than 32-bits https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/599255 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs,

[Bug 599255] Re: dmraid fails to read promise RAID sector count larger than 32-bits

2010-07-08 Thread Nishihama Kenkowo
Next ,I boot Win7x64. on management of computer. there anre 2nd raid array. basic.normal 2142.97GB RAW DISK. not ntfs. so I can not see my pictures which put on ubuntu. -- World Cup TV but also watch because, abacus it, I should go back to its core business, next monday. Very grateful to Danny.

[Bug 599255] Re: dmraid fails to read promise RAID sector count larger than 32-bits

2010-07-08 Thread Nishihama Kenkowo
thanks. >So you have 2 x 2TB and 1 x 500GB drives. Yes, that is good your idea. However,I tryed last week. I Can create two array, can not create three array. It is limitatations of this raid-bios. only two array. (this asus motherboard) Maybe I saw hope. I initialized 2.09TiB as mbr. and create

[Bug 599255] Re: dmraid fails to read promise RAID sector count larger than 32-bits

2010-07-08 Thread Nishihama Kenkowo
On ubuntu.gparted . http://dl.dropbox.com/u/6626165/Screenshot--dev-mapper-pdc_befgjjibfc%20-%20GParted.png Numbers are just half the number originally to be presented. This is simply a miscalculation. MBR is correct. -- dmraid fails to read promise RAID sector count larger than 32-bits https://

[Bug 599255] Re: dmraid fails to read promise RAID sector count larger than 32-bits

2010-07-09 Thread Nishihama Kenkowo
I wonder that "MBR is correct." is my opnion. sudo dd if=/dev/mapper/pdc_befgjjibfc of=linmbr2.img bs=512 count=1 In this my environment , Sometimes strange phenomenon occurs nearly 1st july . The command(sudo grub-install /dev/mappaer/myraid1 ) may be viable, sometimes not. The operation is

[Bug 599255] Re: dmraid fails to read promise RAID sector count larger than 32-bits

2010-07-14 Thread Nishihama Kenkowo
I had seen SB7*0 debelopment guide. it was difficult for me to undaerstand. http://support.amd.com/us/Embedded_TechDocs/43366_sb7xx_bdg_pub_1.00.pdf By the way. These bugs are in All Linux distro(CentOS,Redhat6.0 beta&Current,Fedora). And like Acronis products. if No one would do the bug fix. C

[Bug 642799] [NEW] fglrx kernel module failed to build

2010-09-19 Thread Nishihama Kenkowo
Public bug reported: what shall i do. ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 Package: fglrx (not installed) ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-24.43-generic 2.6.32.15+drm33.5 Uname: Linux 2.6.32-24-generic x86_64 Architecture: amd64 Date: Sun Sep 19 22:28:47 2010 DkmsStatus: vboxdrv,

[Bug 642799] Re: fglrx kernel module failed to build

2010-09-19 Thread Nishihama Kenkowo
** Attachment added: "BootDmesg.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/642799/+attachment/1608367/+files/BootDmesg.txt ** Attachment added: "CurrentDmesg.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/642799/+attachment/1608368/+files/CurrentDmesg.txt ** Attachment added: "DKMSBuildLog.txt" http