I got in touch with Mohammad and asked him to join the upstream Debian
fonts team. I've added him as uploader on the package. Probably the best
solution to reduce the delta and have the best quality packaging.
--
Please sync ttf-sil-scheherazade 1.001-2 (main) from Debian unstable (main).
https:/
I've done some initial tests with merging our various branches. I will
get in touch with the authors of the branches to get merges back into
trunk and do a updated release.
--
Swedish letters åäö (and som more) are absent in ttf-ubuntu-title
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/147146
You received thi
Well, Mohammad got his package into universe before the team-maintained
package went into Debian main.
The .zip sources are intended for other platforms, I've always redone a
.tar.gz.
There is a updated package on mentors:
http://mentors.debian.net/cgi-bin/sponsor-pkglist?action=details;package=
AFAICT upstream is leaning towards having a separate utility to handle fonts.
There was a fonts vfs patch but it wasn't complete and has now been dropped.
Hopefully something like gnome-specimen can be extended to provide the
needed fonctionalities.
There's some discussion at the end of
http://b
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: ubuntu-dev-tools
suspicious-source currently flags up various formats although they are
in reality font sources, it should whitelist them instead. Attaching a
patch which also takes into account the FONTLOG
(http://openfontlibrary.org/wiki/Fontlog) found
** Attachment added: "Adding various source font formats"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/25857149/suspicious-source-whitelisting-font-formats.diff
--
suspicious-source should whitelist font source formats
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/365147
You received this bug notification because you ar
Apparently it hasn't. Resetting to NEW.
** Changed in: ubuntu
Status: Invalid => New
--
sync ttf-lg-aboriginal from Debian unstable (main)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/220771
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
Oops, you're right it *is* there. I was looking at packages.ubuntu.com
which apparently hasn't synced.
--
sync ttf-lg-aboriginal from Debian unstable (main)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/220771
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ub
superseded by newer version of the package
** Changed in: ttf-gentium (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Released
--
package ttf-gentium 1.02-2ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocesso
pre-removal script morto por sinal (Interromper)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/145040
You received this
Updated source packages are available on
http://yosch.org/packages/ubuntu
--
Please backport ttf-gentium to dapper-backports from edgy (fixes broken defoma
hints)
https://launchpad.net/bugs/50802
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo
The updated package also has reportbug scripts
--
broken defoma hints
https://launchpad.net/bugs/50802
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
mako, anything else needed for this update?
--
Please backport ttf-gentium to dapper-backports from edgy (fixes broken defoma
hints)
https://launchpad.net/bugs/50802
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
yes, in Paris and then also later on at the GUADEC in Vilanova where
there was a font BoF, we agreed that we need to set up a review process
for each locale to define the most appropriate font (the criteria being
quality of glyphs, Unicode coverage and freeness) to optimize the
overall font set and
the updated package also moves maintainership to the Alioth team
--
Please backport ttf-gentium to dapper-backports from edgy (fixes broken defoma
hints)
https://launchpad.net/bugs/50802
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bu
Installing the cmaps-adobe-* packages gets rid of the warning.
Apparently the gs.defoma file needs these maps.
--
Use of uninitialized value in print at /var/lib/defoma/scripts/gs.defoma line
108
https://launchpad.net/bugs/6614
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://li
the trouble is that these packages are non-free (in multiverse)
--
Use of uninitialized value in print at /var/lib/defoma/scripts/gs.defoma line
108
https://launchpad.net/bugs/6614
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: ttf-sil-abyssinica
Hi,
Please sync ttf-sil-abyssinica 1.0-1 from Debian Sid. There are
currently no Ubuntu changes.
Package builds cleanly in an Edgy pbuilder.
Thanks.
** Affects: Ubuntu
Importance: Untriaged
Status: Unconfirmed
--
Ple
crimsun? what is the status on this? Any help I can give?
--
Please backport ttf-gentium to dapper-backports from edgy (fixes broken defoma
hints)
https://launchpad.net/bugs/50802
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
The bug is still present for font installs/uninstalls in Edgy
--
Use of uninitialized value in print at /var/lib/defoma/scripts/gs.defoma line
108
https://launchpad.net/bugs/6614
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Arne, we should really update this out-of-date package.
This bug has been ignored for a long time:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ttf-gentium/+bug/50802
The updated package is in REVU:
http://revu.tauware.de/details.py?upid=196
Thanks.
--
package ttf-gentium 1.02-2ubuntu2 failed to
Ping again.
--
Please backport ttf-gentium to dapper-backports from edgy (fixes broken defoma
hints)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/50802
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@li
OK, I'm a little unclear on what still needs to happen here. I
subscribed motu-uvf.
--
[sync request] sync ttf-sil-andika from Debian unstable (main)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/133373
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubu
The following changes are underway after feedback from #ubuntu-motu
- mention the new LP upstream in debian/copyright
- sync the debian/changelog
this one is problematic since we're rebasing without the accents and will merge
with the other LP branches later on.
Must probably do a version bum
Indeed the more sources we can have the better. Also the licensing
compliance is accompanied with new hosting of the project on launchpad
and the packaging has to reflect that.
I'm made the needed changes as indicated on #ubuntu-motu.
I've uploaded a new package to revu which seems to be working:
resetting to new as per #ubuntu-motu request
** Changed in: ttf-ubuntu-title (Ubuntu Hardy)
Status: In Progress => New
--
Lack of SFD source file breaks LGPL license and makes file unredistributable!
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/180011
You received this bug notification because you are
Public bug reported:
Please sync ttf-lg-aboriginal from Debian unstable
It is co-maintained by Neskie Manuel (https://launchpad.net/~neskiem) from the
Debian pkg-fonts team.
There are currently no Ubuntu changes. (There is a superseded package on REVU).
ttf-lg-aboriginal (1.0-1) unstable; ur
Various community branches are now available on
https://launchpad.net/ubuntutitle
--
Swedish letters åäö (and som more) are absent in ttf-ubuntu-title
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/147146
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
The package is available on http://revu.tauware.de/details.py?package
=ttf-ubuntu-title
--
Lack of SFD source file breaks LGPL license and makes file unredistributable!
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/180011
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subs
Still happening with Gutsy.
--
New fonts are not visible in the font-folder
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/10545
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubun
Public bug reported:
Please sync ttf-sil-padauk 2.1-2 from Debian Unstable. It is co-
maintained by the pkg-fonts team.
There are currently no Ubuntu changes.
Thanks.
** Affects: Ubuntu
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
[sync request] sync ttf-sil-padauk from Debian
https://b
Public bug reported:
Please sync ttf-sil-yi 1.2-1 from Debian Unstable. It is co-maintained
by the pkg-fonts team.
There are currently no Ubuntu changes.
** Affects: Ubuntu
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
[sync request] sync ttf-sil-yi from Debian
https://bugs.launchpad.net
Public bug reported:
Please sync ttf-sil-ezra 2.50-1 from Debian Unstable. It is co-
maintained by the pkg-fonts team.
There are currently no Ubuntu changes.
** Affects: Ubuntu
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
[sync request] sync ttf-sil-ezra from Debian
https://bugs.launchp
Public bug reported:
Please sync ttf-inconsolata 001.006-2 from Debian Unstable. It is co-
maintained by the pkg-fonts team.
There are currently no Ubuntu changes (so no need for the
debian/changelog entries as indicated in
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SyncRequestProcess).
Thanks.
** Affects: Ubuntu
versioning
* Added VCS fields
-- Nicolas Spalinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sun, 5 Aug 2007
14:01:25 +0200
ttf-sil-andika (0.001.desrev-3) unstable; urgency=low
* Bumped up to debhelper version 5
* Dropped the unnecessary suggests (the open-font-design-toolkit metapackage
will
handl
Yeah, I was anticipating a bit here. I'm hoping it will not be in the
NEW queue too long. (Thanks for the quick reaction though!).
--
[sync request] sync ttf-sil-andika from Debian unstable (main)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/133373
You received this bug notification because you are a member o
The package is now in unstable. Testing is underway.
--
[sync request] sync ttf-sil-andika from Debian unstable (main)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/133373
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing l
Builds, installs and works fine on current Gusty.
--
[sync request] sync ttf-sil-andika from Debian unstable (main)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/133373
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
setting status back to New
** Changed in: ubuntu
Status: Invalid => New
--
[sync request] sync ttf-sil-andika from Debian unstable (main)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/133373
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
it now boots and installs with a 2.6.22-9-generic gutsy kernel (taken from a
daily snapshot before tribe4 freeze)
--
install fails: busybox (initramfs): can't access tty: (/dev/sda trouble?)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/129817
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ub
forgot to mention it was the alternate install cd.
--
install fails: busybox (initramfs): can't access tty: (/dev/sda trouble?)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/129817
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs
The complete sources of ubuntu-title are now hosted on
https://launchpad.net/ubuntutitle/ along with other branches. This font
will be maintained by the Ubuntu fonts team.
** Changed in: ttf-ubuntu-title (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => font packaging, infrastructure and review team
(fonts
Abyssinica SIL is already available in Ubuntu :
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ttf-sil-abyssinica
The other fonts should go into separate packages.
GF Zemen Unicode seems to have problems with the licensing as described
in the metadata. Could you contact upstream for clarification about
lic
The sync from Debian unstable has now happened.
** Changed in: ubuntu
Status: Invalid => Fix Released
--
[sync request] sync ttf-sil-andika from Debian unstable (main)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/133373
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which
I'm working with the Debian maintainer to resolve these bugs. And I hope
the backports don't have to wait another cycle.
--
Please backport ttf-gentium to dapper-backports from edgy (fixes broken defoma
hints)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/50802
You received this bug notification because you a
As suggested in #4454 simply adding a "print ;" removes the warning
about the uninitialized value. It doesn't seem to break CJK font lists.
Can CJK font specialists test this further?
--
Use of uninitialized value in print at /var/lib/defoma/scripts/gs.defoma line
108
https://launchpad.net/b
There is an upstream bug in gucharmap to add a tab that allows the user
to compare all fonts that implement the chosen codepoint:
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=509075
** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #509075
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=509075
--
gucharmap show
yes my partition scheme was the problem.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1641330
Title:
UEFI install failing on 16.04 Dell Precision m3800
To manage notifications about this bug go to
Public bug reported:
grub-efi-amd64-signed failed to install into /target/
ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 16.04
Package: ubiquity 2.21.63.2
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.4.0-31.50-generic 4.4.13
Uname: Linux 4.4.0-31-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.20.1-0ubuntu2.1
Architecture: amd64
Cas
Public bug reported:
the python fontforge module in /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/ does
not start:
Python 2.7.6 (default, Mar 22 2014, 22:59:38)
[GCC 4.8.2] on linux2
Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information.
>>> import fontforge
Traceback (most recent call last):
I have now sent feedback to Mark on licensing issues.
--
MIR+FFE: Inclusion of Ubuntu Font Family ~0.70 in Maverick (10.10)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/629622
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing li
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 435183 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/435183
Hi Matthew, thank you for your work.
You seem to be missing the point here. I'm well aware of the paid-for apps in
the Software Center.
Yet, "Free" in English is way too ambiguous and you are certainly not
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: software-center
The software centre has a Fonts section but entries in that section
indicate they are "free": please do not use this term as it has strongly
negative connotation in the typeface design community and corresponds to
maybe-distribute-but-don'
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: software-center
To allow users across the multilingual Ubuntu community to find the
appropriate font for their needs, font entries in the Software center
should include Unicode coverage information and relationships to
language-support-* packages.
** Aff
For fonts with Unicode coverage beyond Latin, the previews should show a
sentence of pangram in the appropriate language.
--
Show Font Previews/Thumbnails
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/561882
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubun
About webfonts deployment, I'd recommend you consider doing both Google
Font Directory hosting and a dedicated Ubuntu-specific subdomain under
the control of Canonical. The Ubuntu-specific subdomain would also allow
for useful statistics to be gathered and shared publically.
It's worth noting tha
fixed in upstream Debian.
** Changed in: ttf-inconsolata (Ubuntu)
Status: New => In Progress
--
Defoma hints file incorrectly specifies as variable width
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/245258
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed
various ttf-* packages synced from Debian
--
suspicious-source should whitelist font source formats
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/365147
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubu
What are these longer-terms licensing issues?
--
MIR+FFE: Inclusion of Ubuntu Font Family ~0.70 in Maverick (10.10)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/629622
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubunt
Here's the patch for support for the various font source formats again
the latest version of suspicious-source.
** Patch added: "suspicious-source-whitelist-font-source-formats.diff"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/53434471/suspicious-source-whitelist-font-source-formats.diff
--
suspicious-sou
59 matches
Mail list logo
