[Bug 2075442] Re: RAID partitions not auto detected at boot

2024-08-07 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
Great work Ben. It seems like a duplicate. We would need this to first get fixed in the devel release (24.10) and then patched into Noble. Would you be willing to help test out an updated dmraid package in both Ubuntu releases (24.10 && 24.04)? I'll look more into the patch to try and find any

[Bug 2047303] Re: Partitions on dmriad managed array are not mounted, system cannot boot

2024-08-07 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
This bug seems to be what's causing an issue with [0]. I'm planning to make a PPA with the updated patch to dmraid. If I could get some help testing the PPA, that would be great and will help with validating the patch. [0] - https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/multipath- tools/+bug/2075442

[Bug 2075442] Re: RAID partitions not auto detected at boot

2024-08-07 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
Thanks Ben, I appreciate your help :) I've kicked off a build for oracular, noble, jammy at https://launchpad.net/~mitchdz/+archive/ubuntu/lp2047303-dmraid-kpartx- boot They should be available to retrieve in ~2hours (assuming the riscv64 build is happy). -- You received this bug notification b

[Bug 2047303] Re: Partitions on dmriad managed array are not mounted, system cannot boot

2024-08-07 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
** Also affects: dmraid (Ubuntu Noble) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: dmraid (Ubuntu Oracular) Importance: Undecided Status: Confirmed ** Also affects: dmraid (Ubuntu Jammy) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Summary changed: - Partitions on d

[Bug 2075442] Re: RAID partitions not auto detected at boot

2024-08-07 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
I forgot our ARM builders aren't happy right now. If you want to test immediately you can grab the .deb files from my PPA immediately. Unfortunately the package won't publish until arm64/armhf are built. For example, you can find the jammy debs at https://launchpad.net/~mitchdz/+archive/ubuntu/lp2

[Bug 2075442] Re: RAID partitions not auto detected at boot

2024-08-07 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
Or, you can just wait for arm{64,hf} to finish building :) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2075442 Title: RAID partitions not auto detected at boot To manage notifications about this

[Bug 2076012] Re: noble: kpartx-boot initramfs hook references wrong path

2024-08-07 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
Interesting point. Let me spin up a VM and do a jammy->noble dist- upgrade with kpartx-boot installed and see what happens. With this failure, it should show up without any special hardware. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubun

[Bug 2076012] Re: noble: kpartx-boot initramfs hook references wrong path

2024-08-07 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
the dist-upgrade did fine in my VM. $ lxc launch ubuntu:jammy j-n-upgrade --vm $ lxc shell j-n-upgrade $ apt update -y $ apt install -y kpartx-boot $ apt install -y ubuntu-release-upgrader-core # sed -i 's/Prompt=lts/Prompt=normal/' /etc/update-manager/release-upgrades # do-release-upgrade -f Dist

[Bug 2076012] Re: noble: kpartx-boot initramfs hook references wrong path

2024-08-07 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
Carson, thanks for your quick responses. One further question - did this error message happen only during upgrade and is fixed now, or are you still seeing this error message somewhere? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. h

[Bug 2061911] [NEW] check if new addresses for b.root-servers.net is needed

2024-04-16 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
Public bug reported: During the noble merge and Jammy/Mantic MRE, a functional change was spotted for the root servers to be updated. This notice is at - https://b.root-servers.org/news/2023/05/16/new- addresses.html From the page:Our new IPv4 address will be 170.247.170.2 and our new IPv6 addre

[Bug 1935709] Re: grpc++-dev doesn't install gRPCConfig.cmake

2024-04-16 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
** Changed in: grpc (Ubuntu) Status: Invalid => Triaged -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1935709 Title: grpc++-dev doesn't install gRPCConfig.cmake To manage notifications about

[Bug 2049901] Re: php-symfony-polyfill FTBFS on noble

2024-04-18 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
This is probably an issue with building against php8.3. I see the debian version is building against php8.2 right now. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2049901 Title: php-symfony-polyfi

[Bug 2049901] Re: php-symfony-polyfill FTBFS on noble

2024-04-18 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
There was an upstream commit[0] which looked promising. I tried applying that and the test still fails the same. The results are in my PPA[1]. [0] - https://github.com/symfony/polyfill/commit/1100c075b44595802401a0c9d6505bc1e8fd299a [1] - https://launchpad.net/~mitchdz/+archive/ubuntu/php-symfo

[Bug 2058417] Re: hibernation not working on m5.large instance first boot

2024-04-18 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
Just tested this again with ami-02cc3ff919a972d83 in us-east-1 and hibernation is working as intended upon first boot. I am closing this bug now, but will reopen if this issue comes back. ** Changed in: ec2-hibinit-agent (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notificatio

[Bug 2049901] Re: php-symfony-polyfill FTBFS on noble

2024-04-18 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
This package looks like it'll take quite a bit more digging to get to build properly. Since this is a leaf package and in universe I'll stop working on this due to FF looming. I submitted a bug report to debian to give them a heads up that they may hit this when updating php to 8.3 as well[0]. [

[Bug 2052610] Re: value too great for base error with locale fr_FR

2024-04-19 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
Hi Egil, thanks for the update. The changes look reasonable enough to me, but unfortunately I don't think we will get them in immediately due to feature freeze just happening. It'd also be nice to get these changes in upstream so it's an official backport. In the meantime I built a byobu with the c

[Bug 2062058] Re: Add a UFW firewall config to support QUIC

2024-04-19 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
Hi Marcus, Thanks for making this bug report! To answer your question[0] on why we have version 1.24 instead of 1.25, we stay up to date with debian for this package. Since debian is still on 1.24 that's what we have. I'm curious if you were able to test the patch and if it worked for you, consi

[Bug 2062084] Re: sessions should be nested with care warning

2024-04-19 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
This is easy to reproduce the error message itself, and I think it's happening just because tmux is nested. I'm not sure why it's getting nested in your environment though. Do you have byobu to automatically start up when you login? How do you have that set up? $ lxc launch ubuntu-daily:noble n $

[Bug 1887558] Re: Multipath JBOD storage devices are not shown via /dev/mapper but each path as a single device.

2024-04-22 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
I attempted to reproduce this issue in a VM and wasn't succesful. I essentially copied the tgtbasedmpaths test but made the backing disk bcache cache before setting up the targets. 1) create vm $ lxc launch ubuntu-daily:noble --vm n-vm $ lxc shell n-vm # apt install -y lsscsi multipath-tools open-

[Bug 1887558] Re: Multipath JBOD storage devices are not shown via /dev/mapper but each path as a single device.

2024-04-23 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
Fundamentally my setup is different than the scenario set up in the bug. I was initially confused why multipathing was even happening, so I will explain the scenario here. In case someone else is also confused. The hardware is a JBOD enclosure where each disk has redundant I/O, hence the multipath

[Bug 1887558] Re: Multipath JBOD storage devices are not shown via /dev/mapper but each path as a single device.

2024-04-23 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
I have successfully created a kvm based reproducer. 1) get an image $ wget https://cdimage.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-server/daily-live/pending/noble-live-server-amd64.iso 2) Create bcache disk $ fallocate -l 20G image.img $ make-bcache -C image.img 3) Boot into iso with multipathed bcache disk $ kvm -m

[Bug 1887558] Re: Multipath JBOD storage devices are not shown via /dev/mapper but each path as a single device.

2024-04-24 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
Any objection to renaming this bug title to something more accurate such as "multipathd bcache disks do not get picked up by multipath-tools during boot"? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/

[Bug 2060745] Re: nbd-client fails to connect when using /etc/nbdtab on Ubuntu 24.04 (Noble)

2024-04-24 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
** Also affects: nbd (Ubuntu Noble) Importance: Undecided Assignee: Mitchell Dzurick (mitchdz) Status: Triaged -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060745 Title: nbd-client

[Bug 1887558] Re: multipathd bcache disks do not get picked up by multipath-tools during boot

2024-04-24 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
** Summary changed: - Multipath JBOD storage devices are not shown via /dev/mapper but each path as a single device. + multipathd bcache disks do not get picked up by multipath-tools during boot ** Description changed: - As in the title, if machine has multipath storage device connected e.g. -

[Bug 2043002] Re: merge from upstream for Noble

2024-04-25 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
Closing this, decided not do to the merge for an LTS. ** Changed in: ec2-hibinit-agent (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2043002 Title: merge from

[Bug 2060745] Re: nbd-client fails to connect when using /etc/nbdtab on Ubuntu 24.04 (Noble)

2024-04-25 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
** Description changed: [ Impact ] - NBD users who want to use /etc/nbdtab will face issues when trying to - start the NBD Client. Trying to use the `systemd` service also doesn't - work. + nbdtab uses a port of 0 by default which is not sensible. This means + that if you do not set a default

[Bug 2060745] Re: nbd-client fails to connect Error: Socket failed: Connection refused

2024-04-25 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
** Description changed: [ Impact ] nbdtab uses a port of 0 by default which is not sensible. This means that if you do not set a default port in nbdtab, it will fail. You will see an error such as: Error: Socket failed: Connection refused - [ Test Plan ] $ lxc launch ubunt

[Bug 2060745] Re: nbd-client fails to connect Error: Socket failed: Connection refused

2024-04-25 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
** Changed in: nbd (Ubuntu Noble) Status: Triaged => In Progress ** Changed in: nbd (Ubuntu Noble) Importance: Undecided => High -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060745 Title:

[Bug 2063400] Re: package unixodbc-common 2.3.9-5 failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite '/etc/odbc.ini', which is also in package odbcinst 2.3.11-1

2024-04-26 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
Hello Yosua, Thank you for making this bug report! Where did you get the odbcinst 2.3.11-1 package? I do not see that in our archives for Jammy. ** Changed in: unixodbc (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, whic

[Bug 2061911] Re: check if new addresses for b.root-servers.net is needed

2024-04-26 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 2045297 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2045297 Thanks Sergio, looks like that does cover it :) ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 2045297 file root.hints needs update -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubu

[Bug 1935709] Re: grpc++-dev doesn't install gRPCConfig.cmake

2024-04-29 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
I haven't updated this for a bit, but I tried the aforementioned change in comment #7 in this PPA and it did not build - https://launchpad.net/~mitchdz/+archive/ubuntu/lp1935709-grpc-cmake-dev- files/+packages -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 2064139] [NEW] not building for arm64, armhf, ppc64el, riscv64, s390x

2024-04-29 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
Public bug reported: All architectures except amd64 are not building due to: debian/rules binary-arch dh binary-arch --buildsystem=golang --with=golang --builddirectory=_build dpkg-genbuildinfo --build=any -O../runc_1.1.12+ds1-2ubuntu1_arm64.buildinfo dpkg-genbuildinfo: error: binary build wit

[Bug 2064139] Re: not building for arm64, armhf, ppc64el, riscv64, s390x

2024-04-29 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
It may be nice to remove the !amd64 builds since the build failures look like an issue, but maybe that's just me. ** Changed in: runc (Ubuntu Noble) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https:/

[Bug 2064139] Re: not building for arm64, armhf, ppc64el, riscv64, s390x

2024-04-29 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
Thanks Lucas, that makes sense. I'll set this to invalid then :) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064139 Title: not building for arm64, armhf, ppc64el, riscv64, s390x To manage notifi

[Bug 2024019] Re: Add GCC atomic support (-moutline-atomics) for arm64 on Focal

2024-04-30 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
** Merge proposal linked: https://code.launchpad.net/~mitchdz/ubuntu/+source/nginx/+git/nginx/+merge/465301 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2024019 Title: Add GCC atomic support (-

[Bug 2024019] Re: Add GCC atomic support (-moutline-atomics) for arm64 on Focal

2024-04-30 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
** Description changed: - Hi, - we recorded more than 30% performance regression on Ubuntu Focal for AWS Graviton instances since Nginx package is not compiled with "-moutline-atomics" cflag for arm64 architecture (337548 rps with default package and 484453 rps using the proposed flag). + [ Im

[Bug 2064380] Re: Merge multipath-tools from Debian unstable for oracular

2024-05-01 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
** Changed in: multipath-tools (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Mitchell Dzurick (mitchdz) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064380 Title: Merge multipath-tools from Deb

[Bug 2064457] Re: Merge rsync from Debian unstable for oracular

2024-05-01 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
** Changed in: rsync (Ubuntu) Assignee: Sergio Durigan Junior (sergiodj) => Mitchell Dzurick (mitchdz) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064457 Title: Merge rsync from Deb

[Bug 2060248] Re: MRE updates of rabbitmq-server for Jammy,Focal

2024-05-01 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
** Description changed: This bug tracks an update for the rabbitmq-server package in Ubuntu. This bug tracks an update to the following versions: - * Focal (20.04): rabbitmq-server 3.8.12 - * Jammy (22.04): rabbitmq-server 3.9.27 +  * Focal (20.04): rabbitmq-server 3.8.3 +  * Jammy (22

[Bug 2040360] Re: [FFE ] Merge multipath-tools from Debian unstable for noble

2024-03-11 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
Thanks Utkarsh! I will re-do the merge today if I have time, but most likely tomorrow. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2040360 Title: [FFE ] Merge multipath-tools from Debian unstable

[Bug 2026757] Re: dnsmasq on Ubuntu Jammy crashes on neutron-dhcp-agent updates

2024-03-11 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
I wonder if the latest update to Jammy has fixed the issue? Is this issue still occurring for you when upgrading to the Jammy package version 2.90-0ubuntu0.22.04.1 Julia? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.lau

[Bug 2056372] Re: Enabling SPF checks with CHECK_RCPT_SPF doesn't work

2024-03-11 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
Hi Dominic, Thanks for taking the time to submit this bug report and make Ubuntu better! Where are you setting the variable CHECK_RCPT_SPF = true ? Doing a quick google search I found[0] which looks like it may be useful. It says to do the following - 1) Add `CHECK_RCPT_SPF = true` to the top o

[Bug 2056443] Re: CHECK_RCPT_SPF SPF check fails if inbound IP address is IPv6

2024-03-11 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
Thanks for making this bug report! This could be related to your other bug[0], but just in-case can you show how you are configuring exim4, and if you have simple steps to reproduce this issue, that would be helpful. [0] - https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/exim4/+bug/2056372 -- You rece

[Bug 1993081] Re: Installing samba-dev:i386 breaks Ubuntu 22.04.1.

2024-03-11 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
Officially closing as Won't Fix since i386 is not an officially supported arch, and it seems there is not any more desire for this. Please let me know if this should stay open. ** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Won't Fix ** Changed in: python3.10 (Ubuntu) Status:

[Bug 1993837] Re: apparmor profile libvirt-qemu is too permissive

2024-03-12 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
** Tags added: server-triage-discuss -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1993837 Title: apparmor profile libvirt-qemu is too permissive To manage notifications about this bug go to: https

[Bug 1993837] Re: apparmor profile libvirt-qemu is too permissive

2024-03-12 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
This bug seems to have been unfortunately lost to time, or there is discussion I am not aware of about it. Gionatan, if there's still desire for this, I suggest making an upstream bug report[0], as these options are not changed by Ubuntu, but rather come from upstream. I'm setting the bug to Opin

[Bug 1970455] Re: AppArmor profile prevents DNS Servers from being added to resolv.conf

2024-03-12 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
@server-triage-discuss - looks like there may have been some discussion on this when I wasn't around. Did this mean to get dropped? If so, let's set as Won't Fix. ** Tags added: server-triage-discuss -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscrib

[Bug 1508131] Re: Impossible to login once libpam-smbpass got installed

2024-03-12 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
I'm going through old open bugs. I assume this bug is not a problem anymore, mostly due to the package libpam-smbpass not being available since Xenial, and the lack of discussion here. Closing this bug, but please comment if it should be reopened. ** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu) Status: New

[Bug 1992339] Re: package nginx-core 1.18.0-6ubuntu14.2: nginx: [emerg] dlopen() "/usr/share/nginx/modules/ngx_stream_geoip2_module.so" failed (/usr/share/nginx/modules/ngx_stream_geoip2_module.so: un

2024-03-12 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
I'm going through some old bugs. I'm also unable to reproduce this. If we could get some more information such as what your /etc/nginx/nginx.conf looks like, that may be helpful in reproduction. Looking online I see a few different reports which seem similar, where each have differing solutions.

[Bug 2008463] Re: package clamav-daemon 0.103.6+dfsg-0ubuntu0.22.04.1 failed to install/upgrade: installed clamav-daemon package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 2

2024-03-12 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
This failed because of the following line: /var/lib/dpkg/info/clamav-daemon.postinst: 428: cannot create /var/lib/clamav/clamav.conf: Directory nonexistent I guess /var/lib/clamav/ directory did not exist during install. I'm not sure how this case occurs. Was there anything interesting you did be

[Bug 2002043] Re: Python extension modules get built using wrong compiler flags with python2

2024-03-12 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
The only focal autopkgtest that really has me confused in the python2.7 failure. This is due to a unit test that fails. The strange thing is that this unit test actually fails in the Jammy autopkgtest, but the Jammy autopkgtest passes anyways. It has always been like this. You will see 1643s FAIL

[Bug 2040367] Re: Merge at from Debian unstable for noble

2024-03-12 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
at is blocked in proposed at/riscv64 has unsatisfiable dependency at/s390x has unsatisfiable dependency -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2040367 Title: Merge at from Debian unstable fo

[Bug 2002043] Re: Python extension modules get built using wrong compiler flags with python2

2024-03-13 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
Ran the autopkgtest on a new PPA with my changes enabled by default and the test still fails[0]. I believe this is fine enough to ignore simply because this test has always been failing like this. [0] - https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-jammy-mitchdz- python2.7-opt-test-enabled- d

[Bug 2040367] Re: Merge at from Debian unstable for noble

2024-03-14 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
I don't have time to look into why it is blocked right now, but will take a look next week if I can't get to it tomorrow. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2040367 Title: Merge at from D

[Bug 1993837] Re: apparmor profile libvirt-qemu is too permissive

2024-03-18 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
Thanks John. I'll leave this bug as is, feel free to add any tags/subscriptions to help track it. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1993837 Title: apparmor profile libvirt-qemu is too pe

[Bug 2058417] [NEW] hibernation not working on m5.large instance first boot

2024-03-19 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
Public bug reported: I noticed that when creating an m5.large noble instance, hibernation is not resuming properly after first creation. I haven't had a ton of time to look into it yet, but I did see 2 observations: * hibinit-resume is not being ran * re-running the unit file makes things work as

[Bug 2024019] Re: Add GCC atomic support (-moutline-atomics) for arm64 on Focal

2024-03-20 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
: Mitchell Dzurick (mitchdz) => (unassigned) ** Changed in: haproxy (Ubuntu Focal) Assignee: (unassigned) => Mitchell Dzurick (mitchdz) ** Changed in: nginx (Ubuntu Focal) Assignee: (unassigned) => Mitchell Dzurick (mitchdz) ** Changed in: postgresql-12 (Ubuntu Focal) Assignee: (u

[Bug 2024019] Re: Add GCC atomic support (-moutline-atomics) for arm64 on Focal

2024-03-20 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
** Changed in: nginx (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress => New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2024019 Title: Add GCC atomic support (-moutline-atomics) for arm64 on Focal To manage

[Bug 2046994] Re: Spotlight search function broken with macOS Ventura and later client

2024-03-22 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
I see gvfs is still failing even with migration-reference/0. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2046994 Title: Spotlight search function broken with macOS Ventura and later client To man

[Bug 2046994] Re: Spotlight search function broken with macOS Ventura and later client

2024-03-22 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
Can we still call 9 autopkgtest run failures and 2 migration-refrence/0 failures flaky? I see gvfs failed in the past, but not this much. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2046994 Title:

[Bug 2055776] Re: After updating ubuntu, the network to which the subnet address is assigned does not become active in KVM.

2024-03-22 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
Thanks Tim! With more people having a seemingly similar issue I re- opened it as New and subscribed ubuntu-server to take a look at this again. ** Changed in: dnsmasq (Ubuntu) Status: Invalid => New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is su

[Bug 2040360] Re: [FFE ] Merge multipath-tools from Debian unstable for noble

2024-03-25 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
This merge may want to be not done for Noble. After doing the merge again I noticed a seg fault in multipathd when starting the service during my testing. This is easily repeatable in Ubuntu by uninstalling multipath-tools and then doing a fresh install. This is not reproducible in Debian during my

[Bug 2040657] Re: bluez does not detect Logitech Pebble M350, no option to connect

2024-03-25 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
Just want to update this bug - I have not found a fix for this. Instead I've been relying on the Logitech universal receiver which is working great in my experience. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpa

[Bug 2040360] Re: [FFE ] Merge multipath-tools from Debian unstable for noble

2024-03-25 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
Looking at upstream, there's not a ton that I worry about missing in noble. The only one is a fix for a memory leak that I think would make sense to cherrypick[0]. Otherwise, I don't think it is worth the risk to upgrade the package this late in the cycle, and instead effort would be better utiliz

[Bug 2040360] Re: [FFE ] Merge multipath-tools from Debian unstable for noble

2024-03-25 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
Plus, there are changes to how the systemd units interact that is a work in progress, which I think makes more sense for a **.10 release than an LTS. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/20403

[Bug 2040367] Re: Merge at from Debian unstable for noble

2024-03-28 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
So sorry for letting this one linger a bit. Finally looked into it. https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/noble/riscv64/libpam0t64 has been deleted which is a dhlibs:Depends for at. This package was actually deleted the same day of the upload the -proposed so I wonder if there was just weird linking going

[Bug 2037437] Re: Include amazon-ec2-net-utils in Jammy/Focal archive

2024-02-25 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
** Changed in: amazon-ec2-net-utils (Ubuntu Jammy) Status: Fix Committed => Won't Fix ** Changed in: amazon-ec2-net-utils (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid ** Also affects: amazon-ec2-net-utils (Ubuntu Focal) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: amazon-ec2-net-u

[Bug 2003756] Re: Cannot configure krb5-kdc on Ubuntu Jammy 22.04.01, "Could not execute systemctl: at /usr/bin/deb-systemd-invoke line 142."

2024-02-26 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
netvicious or Dan, do you have the AMI that you used to produce that error with proftpd-core? I also tried reproduction on ami-0dffe9017aa8424a2 in eu-north-1 and was not able to reproduce that failure. I just booted a fresh t3.micro instance with the above AMI, then proceeded to run `apt update

[Bug 2003756] Re: Cannot configure krb5-kdc on Ubuntu Jammy 22.04.01, "Could not execute systemctl: at /usr/bin/deb-systemd-invoke line 142."

2024-02-26 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
Also, the various packages here have a similar error message but the error is probably caused by different things. This is a generic error message from init-system-helpers. Now, with that said, I agree init-system-helpers should be more verbose when this error happens. -- You received this bug n

[Bug 2054301] Re: [worker/event] Some child processes aren't killed on reload (graceful), being stuck in state "Sending Reply", leaving old logfiles open, disk fills up, server stops responding after

2024-02-26 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
Thanks for the additional info! Is there a reason you need to use ondrej's PHP package? I'd be curious if this could be reproduced using php 8.1.2-1ubuntu2.14 from the Ubuntu archives. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. h

[Bug 720638] Re: snmpd crashes with segfault (libnetsnmpmibs.so.15.1.2)

2024-02-27 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
Thanks for the crash report! Looking into the crash report I do think this is related to https://github.com/net-snmp/net-snmp/issues/107. I tried applying the patch to our Jammy version and unfortunately it does not apply completely due to differences in the codebase. I did apply the lines I could

[Bug 2054616] Re: The systemd service for NBD Client doesn't come up on boot

2024-02-27 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
Thiago, Apologies if I missed it somewhere, but which Ubuntu release are you using for your tests? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2054616 Title: The systemd service for NBD Client do

[Bug 2054616] Re: The systemd service for NBD Client doesn't come up on boot

2024-02-27 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
I've been playing around with noble and I've noticed that sometimes if I try to restart the service right after boot it will fail root@n-vm:~# systemctl restart nbd@nbd0 Job for nbd@nbd0.service failed because the control process exited with error code. See "systemctl status nbd@nbd0.service" and

[Bug 2054616] Re: The systemd service for NBD Client doesn't come up on boot

2024-02-27 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
Wouter, is my assumption correct that ideally we should see the devices available on boot if we enable nbd@nbd0? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2054616 Title: The systemd service for

[Bug 2055462] [NEW] make initramfs dep8 test work both on debian/ubuntu

2024-02-29 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
Public bug reported: During the noble merge cycle, 2 deltas were made so the initramfs test works on both debian/ubuntu: diff --git a/debian/tests/control b/debian/tests/control index 42eab9e..81901cb 100644 --- a/debian/tests/control +++ b/debian/tests/control @@ -19,6 +19,6 @@ Architecture: amd

[Bug 2054826] Re: screen log filename length is capped at 70 characters

2024-03-01 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
This can be reproduced in noble. I don't particularly think this is a bug either but rather an undocumented design decision. Imre, I think the best action here is to ask upstream to change the value higher, or to document the max character length better. -- You received this bug notification bec

[Bug 2055436] Re: Package recommends nonexistent "bind-doc" package

2024-03-01 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
Thanks for making this bug report and making Ubuntu better Bradley! This is very easy to reproduce. There was some history around renaming in the debian commit history that I was reading, and I think this was accidentally changed up in Debian. I submitted a MR to update this in debian[0] so we wil

[Bug 2055455] Re: dnsmasq-base causes network device virbr0 to shut down

2024-03-01 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
I must've opened this bug up in the morning before Marc commented and just got back around to posting the question. Apologies for asking for the same information! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.n

[Bug 2055455] Re: dnsmasq-base causes network device virbr0 to shut down

2024-03-01 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
Thanks for taking the time to make this bug report to make Ubuntu better! I tried reproducing your failure and unfortunately am not able to in a VM/container setup. I think this may need some extra configuration to reproduce the failure. Starting with something basic, would you mind sharing these

[Bug 2002043] Re: Python extension modules get built using wrong compiler flags with python2

2024-03-05 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
mfo: thanks for catching the ctrlc+ctrlv error! It sounds like we are just waiting to re-run the autopkgtest then. Let me know if you would like any additional testing from me! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://b

[Bug 2040360] Re: Merge multipath-tools from Debian unstable for noble

2024-03-05 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
revent an upgrade/install failure for users in a certain scenario. The - removal of the conf file was not included in the merge, but should be - included in-case users upgrade release and carry-over the conf file. - (See LP: 2000186 for reference) - - -- Mitchell Dzurick Wed, 02

[Bug 2002043] Re: Python extension modules get built using wrong compiler flags with python2

2024-03-06 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
Thanks a ton Mauricio! Would we be good to start phasing the Jammy package then while I investigate the Focal failures? I'll start taking a look at Focal today. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net

[Bug 2040360] Re: [FFE ] Merge multipath-tools from Debian unstable for noble

2024-03-06 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
Hi Utkarsh! 902a13b2 Rely on newly un-broken dmsetup There was a patch in Debian[0] to handle a mismatched variable name, which was finally updated >= 2:1.02.196-1~, so the patch was removed and now multipath-tools relies on that version. Here we unfortunately have a slightly older version[1] 2

[Bug 2040360] Re: [FFE ] Merge multipath-tools from Debian unstable for noble

2024-03-06 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
Actually some of our changes[0] to try and enable socket based activation are still present. Let me do a little digging and confirm these changes are still good to have. I thought I recalled these changes being dropped. I think these changes are still fine to bring in, but let me do a little inves

[Bug 2040360] Re: [FFE ] Merge multipath-tools from Debian unstable for noble

2024-03-06 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
Yeah I confirmed with Sergio - some of the changes are still present, but it should not be harmful. Thankfully these changes are easy to test, and as long as the service is enabled and working at boot, and after a package installation it will be fine. I will manually test booting from a multipath

[Bug 2002043] Re: Python extension modules get built using wrong compiler flags with python2

2024-03-07 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
Hi Andreas, the test_customize_compiler flag test has always failed. I'm curious about why it's failing but the autopkgtest as a whole is passing. In fact, the same failures occur for both jammy/focal since forever - yet they seem to be the reason w hy the Focal autopkgtest fails, whereas Jammy ha

[Bug 2002043] Re: Python extension modules get built using wrong compiler flags with python2

2024-03-07 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
i took a look at the other focal packages and put my thoughts. RELEASE=focal TRIGGER=python2.7/2.7.18-1~20.04.4 release arch packageversion exitcode triggersrequester --- --- - ---

[Bug 2075442] Re: RAID partitions not auto detected at boot

2024-08-08 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
Which are done building now! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2075442 Title: RAID partitions not auto detected at boot To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launch

[Bug 2047303] Re: Partitions on dmraid managed array are not mounted, system cannot boot

2024-08-08 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
my PPA for testing is here[0]. I made a debian bug report at[1]. [0] - https://launchpad.net/~mitchdz/+archive/ubuntu/lp2047303-dmraid-kpartx-boot [1] - https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1078223 ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #1078223 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/b

[Bug 2075442] Re: RAID partitions not auto detected at boot

2024-08-08 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
Thanks for your help Ben, I really appreciate it. I will begin the SRU process shortly on the dmraid bug, and continue the discussion over there. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2075442

[Bug 2075442] Re: RAID partitions not auto detected at boot

2024-08-08 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
the dmraid bug == https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dmraid/+bug/2047303 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2075442 Title: RAID partitions not auto detected at boot To manage noti

[Bug 2076191] Re: gpsmon crashes (segfault)

2024-08-08 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
Hi, I've kicked off a build in my PPA here[0]. Mario, feel free to test the package in my PPA once it finishes building (should hopefully take about 4-5 hours from the time I'm making this comment. This is different from the -proposed pocket validation, I'm just making sure it builds in LP :) [0

[Bug 2075442] Re: RAID partitions not auto detected at boot

2024-08-08 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 2047303 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2047303 Ben, apologies. I'll be marking this bug as a duplicate now. If you would like to copy your #30 comment to the dmraid bug that would be great, just so the verification is in one bug. ** This bug has been ma

[Bug 2047303] Re: Partitions on dmraid managed array are not mounted, system cannot boot

2024-08-08 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
** Merge proposal linked: https://code.launchpad.net/~mitchdz/ubuntu/+source/dmraid/+git/dmraid/+merge/470911 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2047303 Title: Partitions on dmraid ma

[Bug 1887558] Re: multipathd bcache disks do not get picked up by multipath-tools during boot

2024-08-08 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
made an upstream bug report to bcache-tools[0]. [0] - https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-bcache/msg13179.html -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1887558 Title: multipathd bcache disks d

[Bug 2074309] Re: upgrade 22.04 -> 24.04 won't start due to feature flags

2024-08-09 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
I just want to update on my upgrade test. First and foremost - a direct upgrade from Jammy to Noble is not possible. It only is if you have it installed and have not used rabbitmq-server, thus no metadata is made yet. If you use the server in Jammy and then attempt to upgrade to Noble right now

[Bug 2074309] Re: upgrade 22.04 -> 24.04 won't start due to feature flags

2024-08-09 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
Hadmut, thanks again for bringing this to our attention. With 24.04.1 coming out soon we may expect more upgrades from Jammy -> Noble. Therefore I am looking to block the upgrade (22.04 -> 24.04) if rabbitmq-server is installed. This is unfortunate, but I think is a fair to not make rabbitmq-serv

[Bug 2074309] Re: upgrade 22.04 -> 24.04 won't start due to feature flags

2024-08-09 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
Great points Hadmut. It is unfortunate how far behind we are in versions. We follow debian which hasn't been updated in a bit. I was thinking about updating the package there, but I need to fix the fires here first (and if I update debian to the latest without handling this bug's issue, I will bre

[Bug 2073677] Re: Remove from oracular?

2024-08-09 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
I am helping fix bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dmraid/+bug/2047303 which made me think about dropping this too. My concern is that even if it's dead, people are still very clearly using dmraid, and need it to boot in certain scenarios. It would suck uru from Noble->PP and not be ab

[Bug 2073677] Re: Remove from oracular?

2024-08-09 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
Also, this may be a duplicate of [0]. [0] - https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dmraid/+bug/2048766 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2073677 Title: Remove from oracular? To mana

<    1   2   3   4   5   >