Thank you for making this bug report and making Ubuntu better theo!
I checked a few of my systems with Byobu and didn't notice this in my
journalctl output. Are you using the default byobu settings, or is there
a setting you changed?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member
Public bug reported:
This bug tracks an update for the rabbitmq-server package in Ubuntu.
This bug tracks an update to the following versions:
* Focal (20.04): rabbitmq-server 3.8.12
* Jammy (22.04): rabbitmq-server 3.9.27
** Affects: rabbitmq-server (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Thank you for the explanation kevin!
I'm marking this issue as Won't Fix because Trusty is EOL.
** Changed in: apache2 (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Won't Fix
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launch
This is easy to reproduce in a jammy lxd container.
$ lxc launch ubuntu:jammy j
$ lxc shell j
# sed -i 's#"$OUTFILE.key" 2>/dev/null#"$OUTFILE.key"#g'
/usr/sbin/mellon_create_metadata
# # mellon_create_metadata https://sp.10.5.100.3/mellon
https://sp.10.5.100.3/v3/OS-FEDERATION/identity_provider
Why was this changed to affect libhx? I don't see this failure in libhx.
I believe this is a duplicate to
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/hxtools/+bug/2060825.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.lau
Quickly testing Jammy/Mantic in a similar fashion as above I do not see
the buffer overflow.
** Changed in: rsync (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Triaged
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/
I was able to reproduce this in a noble LXD container.
$ lxc launch ubuntu-daily:noble n
$ lxc shell n
# ssh-keygen -t rsa
# cat ~/.ssh/id_rsa.pub >> ~/.ssh/authorized_keys
# touch testfile.txt
# rsync -F --delete-after --archive /root/testfile.txt 127.0.0.1:/tmp/
The authenticity of host '127.0.0
** Also affects: rsync (Ubuntu Focal)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: rsync (Ubuntu Jammy)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: rsync (Ubuntu Mantic)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: rsync (Ubuntu Focal)
Status
This looks like it could already be fixed in debian with
https://salsa.debian.org/debian/rsync/-/commit/d3a0eccf989175b096c10b6c42b02b1ee1306a00
I'll try an ubuntu build with this patch and report back.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subsc
** Changed in: rsync (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Mitchell Dzurick (mitchdz)
** Changed in: rsync (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged => In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchp
The debian patch looks promising in my local testing. I uploaded a test
package to run dep8 tests against. If those look green I'll submit my MP
and get it in ASAP.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad
Package is in proposed now. Testing in an LXC container shows a fix of
this behavior.
$ lxc launch ubuntu-daily:noble n
$ lxc shell n
# dpkg -s rsync | grep Version:
Version: 3.2.7-1build2
# rsync -F --delete-after --archive /etc/os-release /tmp/
*** buffer overflow detected ***: terminated
rsy
This seems to still be an issue in Jammy.
FWIW following[0] I installed a newer version of using
```
pip3 install --ignore-installed grpcio==1.44.0
```
And now it seems to work fine.
[0] - https://github.com/evilsocket/opensnitch/issues/647
--
You received this bug notification because you ar
I wonder if just a newer version of grpcio makes it work as well. I
upgraded grpcio to 1.44 from the Jammy 1.30, but it's not apples to
oranges as I had python3-grpcio 1.30.2-3build6 installed via the
archive, and upgraded to the one installed by pip.
Looking past grpc, I was curious if building o
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1935709 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1935709
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1935709
grpc++-dev doesn't install gRPCConfig.cmake
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to U
Only Jammy suffers from this, as Mantic+ contains the change to add the
cmake files. This does look like it could be remedied with a single line
change as alluded by Masanori in comment #4. The one line change is a
partial of the debian commit when doing a libary transition[0].
I'm building a test
This bug does specifically mention libgrpc++-dev, but I only see the
cmake files added in libgrpc-dev in the debian archives, so I assume
that's good enough to only include the cmake files in libgrpc-dev and
not libgrpc++-dev.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubun
Still waiting for movement in https://gitlab.com/qemu-
project/qemu/-/issues/2014
** Bug watch added: gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/issues #2014
https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/issues/2014
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscrib
Public bug reported:
ec2-api-tools is being removed[0], which this package depends upon.
Please remove both the source and the binaries from the Oracular
archive.
reverse-depends -r oracular --build-depends src:screenbin
No reverse dependencies found
reverse-depends -r oracular screenbin
Public bug reported:
Please remove both the source and binary of the following packages from the
Ubuntu archives:
- src:screenbin (oracular)
- src:ec2-api-tools (oracular)
ec2-api-tools has been deprecated for a while in favor of other AWS
tools, namely src:awscli. screenbin is a project wit
Setting to invalid, including this in the ec2-api-tools RM bug.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2073514
Title:
RM screenbin from Oracular
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
://git.launchpad.net/~mitchdz/ubuntu/+source/multipath-
tools/commit/?id=2cc27fc127e25ab766868163e29583ff573f9f2c
** Affects: multipath-tools (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Assignee: Mitchell Dzurick (mitchdz)
Status: New
** Changed in: multipath-tools (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned
Thanks Gianfranco! I made a LP bug[0] to track removing the delta for
downgrading dmsetup once lvm2 migrates :)
[0] - https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/multipath-
tools/+bug/2073622
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubun
Hello Magnus, thank you for making this bug report and making Ubuntu
better!
Could you please share a quick reproducer for this failure in your
environment?
** Changed in: libapache2-mod-perl2 (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a memb
Makoto, thanks for your comments.
Adam, Pedro, I'm curious if your situation could be improved like
Makotos from comment #12?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2020260
Title:
Samba seem
Hi, the libvirt merge for Oracular is under way and should come out
soon. I say let's just wait for the merge, and then we can process the
noble SRU.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/20726
Public bug reported:
Oracular is including pygml for the first time, but has no binaries on
any arch.
** Affects: pygml (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Tags: update-excuse
** Tags added: update-excuse
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member
** Merge proposal linked:
https://code.launchpad.net/~mitchdz/ubuntu/+source/multipath-tools/+git/multipath-tools/+merge/469963
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2073622
Title:
Drop
tus: New
** Also affects: rabbitmq-server (Ubuntu Focal)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: rabbitmq-server (Ubuntu Noble)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: rabbitmq-server (Ubuntu Oracular)
Importance: Wishlist
Assignee: Mitchell Dzur
Assignee: Mitchell Dzurick (mitchdz)
Status: New
** Tags: update-excuse
** Tags added: update-excuse
** Changed in: optee-os (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Mitchell Dzurick (mitchdz)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which
** Changed in: pygml (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2073794
Title:
pygml has no binaries on any arch
To manage notifications about this bug go
I think we need a newer binutils version, but I'm not sure right now.
Looking at the debian build logs[0] one large difference is that
LDFLAGS='' in debian, but is set to LDFLAGS='-Bsymbolic-functions
-specs=/usr/share/dpkg/elf-package-metadata.specs' for us.
Thankfully this is easy to reproduce o
Just installed binutils from -proposed and testing that build now.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2074012
Title:
arm64 build failure
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
htt
Tested a build with the new binutils currently in -proposed and still
seeing a failure.
$ apt-cache policy binutils-aarch64-linux-gnu
binutils-aarch64-linux-gnu:
Installed: 2.42.90.20240720-2ubuntu1
Candidate: 2.42.90.20240720-2ubuntu1
Version table:
*** 2.42.90.20240720-2ubuntu1 100
I got a local build working by just removing
"-specs=/usr/share/dpkg/elf-package-metadata.specs" from LDFLAGS. I'm
not sure at the moment if this is safe to do as I'm not very familiar
with this file, but I assume since the debian build does not, it could
be fine. Linked a MP on hold with the chang
The package builds, but I'm unsure if it's fine to just not link against
the elf-package-metadata.specs. I'm just not familiar enough with that
file and the effects of removing it. Some useful information seems to
come from[0] about this file, which leads me to believe it's okay to
remove, but can
Worth to note that I just decided to build 4.2.0 from source on arm64,
and it fails with the same exact issue. Therefore, this isn't due to a
change in the package itself, but a change in the build environment.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which i
This is fixed in -proposed now.
** Changed in: optee-os (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2074012
Title:
arm64 build failure
To manage noti
Public bug reported:
PICO compiler is pico_arm_gcc
-- The C compiler identification is GNU 13.2.1
-- The CXX compiler identification is GNU 13.2.1
-- The ASM compiler identification is GNU
-- Found assembler: /usr/bin/arm-none-eabi-gcc
-- Detecting C compiler ABI info
-- Detecting C compiler ABI i
I tried simply removing the flags via d/rules via:
override_dh_auto_configure:
# setting PICO_EXAMPLES_PATH=/dev/null to avoid requiring
# https://github.com/raspberrypi/pico-examples
Public bug reported:
Missing build dependencies: php-deepcopy (>= 1.12.0)
php-deepcopy currently is stuck in -proposed due to a circular
dependency on itself.
see https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/php8.3/+bug/2073801
** Affects: php-datto-json-rpc (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Public bug reported:
wine-development was removed from the archives. a Sync request is
made[0].
[0] - https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/wine-
development/+bug/2074116
** Affects: dxvk (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Tags: update-excuse
** Tags added: update
Public bug reported:
src:wine-development
version:8.21~repack-1
from Debian Sid
This is a dependency for dxvk[0].
[0] - https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dxvk/+bug/2074119
** Affects: wine-development (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Bug watch added: Debian B
This was originally removed from our archives due to [0], but I think we
should keep it in, otherwise we can't build dxvk.
[0] - https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=988246
** Description changed:
src:wine-development
version:8.21~repack-1
from Debian Sid
- This is a depen
Great point, for some reason I thought they were slightly different at
the time, I'll try a build pointing to libwine-dev which we already
have.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2074116
T
Great point. Kicked off a test build at [0].
[0] - https://launchpad.net/~mitchdz/+archive/ubuntu/dxvk-build
** Merge proposal linked:
https://code.launchpad.net/~mitchdz/ubuntu/+source/dxvk/+git/dxvk/+merge/470178
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bug
Already failed to build :(
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #1029811
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1029811
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #982159
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=982159
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #1077188
ht
FWIW, there is [0][1] as open bugs in Debian mentioning to not use wine-
development already.
I decided to add more noise with a little bit newer bug report
requesting wine-development now that it is ahead [2].
[0] - https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1029811
[1] - https://bugs.deb
Oracular has synced 1.0.10-2 so this should be fixed in devel release,
although I haven't tested it myself yet.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2039594
Title:
sgdisk - Unexpected Behav
** Tags added: server-todo
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2074073
Title:
RTC access broken in microvm
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/
The upstream bug is not loading for me so I can't check the status of
it.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1915095
Title:
clamscan modifies atime during scheduled scans
To manage notif
Is there a cheap module that connects with arduino or similar
microcontrollers? I won't commit to anything but I might be interested
in purchasing one and playing around :)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.l
Hello, This bug has stayed open for a little bit because of it being
tagged affecting linux.
To me it looks like this should be fixed for all our supported releases
at the moment (Oracular,Noble,Jammy,Focal) since the earliest version in
Focal is 8.0.37-0ubuntu0.20.04.3.
I'm tagging Linux as inva
Apologies on delay, been busy with +1.
** Description changed:
+ [ Impact ]
This bug tracks an update for the rabbitmq-server package in Ubuntu.
-
This bug tracks an update to the following versions:
-
* Focal (20.04): rabbitmq-server 3.8.3
* Jammy (22.04): rabbitmq-server 3.9.27
-
Hi Dominik, do be aware of https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-
bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1077190
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #1077190
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1077190
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
I think this is the new location of the upstream bug?
https://github.com/Cisco-Talos/clamav/issues/1261
** Bug watch added: github.com/Cisco-Talos/clamav/issues #1261
https://github.com/Cisco-Talos/clamav/issues/1261
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bug
FYI I'll probably close this. I think for dxvk the right path forward is
to use libwine-dev, but that is dependent on how easy it is to build
with that version.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net
Thank you for reporting this bug and even following up on it Hadmut!
This sounds like something that could potentially be fixed in the Noble
maintainer scripts.
I'd want to find the exact flags we need and enable just those, since
you can't disable feature flags once they are enabled.
--
You re
** Description changed:
[ Impact ]
This bug tracks an update for the rabbitmq-server package in Ubuntu.
This bug tracks an update to the following versions:
- * Focal (20.04): rabbitmq-server 3.8.3
- * Jammy (22.04): rabbitmq-server 3.9.27
+ * Focal (20.04): rabbitmq-server 3.8.3
+ * Jam
Are you running rabbitmq-server on the host, or in some container?
I just ran a quick test in an LXD container doing do-release-upgrade and
it seems to work fine to me after upgrading to Noble.
Were there any special configuration options you had enabled in Jammy
before the upgrade?
--
You rece
To more explicitly say what I tested:
I ran the following commands to create a Jammy container and run the upgrade
process:
lxc launch ubuntu:jammy j-n-upgrade
lxc shell j-n-upgrade
apt update -y
apt install -y rabbitmq-server
apt install -y ubuntu-release-upgrader-core
sed -i 's/Prompt=lts/Promp
** Also affects: rabbitmq-server (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2046665
Title:
Upgrade to mantic: RabbitMQ upgrade 3.10.8 -> 3.12
Jammy:
root@j:~# rabbitmqctl list_feature_flags
Listing feature flags ...
namestate
implicit_default_bindings enabled
maintenance_mode_status enabled
quorum_queueenabled
stream_queueenabled
user_limits enabled
virtual_host_metadata enabled
Noble (after upgrading from Jammy
Thanks for posting the other bugs, I tracked 2046665 to rabbitmq-server.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2074309
Title:
rabbitmq-server upgrade 22.04 -> 24.04 completely broken
To man
** Changed in: rabbitmq-server (Ubuntu Oracular)
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1679386
Title:
Missing dep8 tests
To manage notifications
Do you have kpartx-boot installed?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2075442
Title:
RAID partitions not auto detected at boot
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.
** Changed in: multipath-tools (Ubuntu)
Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064380
Title:
Merge multipath-tools from Debian unstable for oracu
Feel free to dig around as much as you want. I'll fully digest this bug
soon. The kpartx stuff should be mostly the same, I don't recall
anything that should've broke this between Focal->Noble.
Ben, are you able to run experiments on this system, or is it a shared
system that you have limited acce
If you can play around, would you mind checking a fresh install of
Ubuntu Jammy and seeing what those results looks like?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2075442
Title:
RAID partitions
> I tried 20.04 (with zero updates) and 20.04.4 (with and without
updates) and both of them exhibit the same result as 24.04.
Do you mean 22.04 and 22.04.4?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bu
Selfishly, could you also test 24.10? That's the current development
release - I recently dropped kpartx-boot from that package so would love
to see how things are working there for you.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
I'm curious if for some reason your udev rules aren't being triggered,
or triggered incorrectly.
In your /var/log/syslog do you happen to see an error such as:
systemd-udevd[3302364]: sdrg: Process '/usr/sbin/partx -d --nr 1-1024
/dev/sdrg' failed with exit code 1.
--
You received this bug noti
Thanks, let me look through the syslog to see if I can spot anything
interesting.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2075442
Title:
RAID partitions not auto detected at boot
To manage no
Thank you for making this bug report Eric.
This is very easy to reproduce.
In the meantime, try using the python3-boto3 package instead, which is
the newer version of python3-boto.
** Changed in: python-boto (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because
Hello, thank you for making this bug report.
I see a security release was just released for this package. Is this
issue happening frequently for you, or was it just a one time thing?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
htt
Hello, and thank you for this bug report.
This is an unfortunate situation where a security update to a new major
version caused breaking changes. Although I’m not aware of the
specifics, I have contacted the team to explore potential solutions.
The symlinks between /usr/bin /usr/sbin are easy e
Hi, I'm actually planning to release an MRE for rabbitmq-server soon
[0].
I just happened to see this during my bug triage rotation.
To avoid needing 2 SRUs, would we like to include this patch in my MRE?
[0] - https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rabbitmq-
server/+bug/2060248
--
You rece
I did an inspection of the code for my MRE, which is upgrading to
3.9.27, and it does not include this fix currently.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2073932
Title:
rabbitmq_global_pub
There was one more testbed failure for arm64 balsa. I reran that.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060666
Title:
[SRU] Memory leak in krb5 version 1.17
To manage notifications about t
Public bug reported:
Hello, reading https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/sshd-now-uses-socket-
based-activation-ubuntu-22-10-and-later/30189/44 a great point is made
here.
Can we put some comments in the default config explaining the deltas we
make? This would be the most visible place for end-users.
** Changed in: networkx (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2065757
Title:
Merge networkx from Debian Unstable for Oracular
To manage notificat
Public bug reported:
s390x has an autopkgtest regression.
This looks like a testbed failure, but is probably not. This test does
fail for Debian, and is marked as flaky, so maybe disable it for s390x?
** Affects: nftables (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Tags: update
This isn't as simple as just changing udev rule numbers, because
multipath-tools create the links with the daemon after all the udev
rules load.
Unfortunately upstream bcache-tools is dead in favor of bcachefs-tools,
so I don't imagine there would be any help from upstream there, but I
can still m
Had a quick chat with Jorge - I will include this in my MRE[0].
[0] - https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rabbitmq-
server/+bug/2060248
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2073932
Tit
Works for me, I just wanted to make this bug since I've seen some
complaints (see the discourse link) to help raise awareness.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2075988
Title:
Add commen
Focal to invalid because the patch does not apply cleanly, and does not
even have maybe_decrease_global_publishers.
** Also affects: rabbitmq-server (Ubuntu Focal)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: rabbitmq-server (Ubuntu Noble)
Importance: Undecided
Status: N
** Merge proposal linked:
https://code.launchpad.net/~mitchdz/ubuntu/+source/rabbitmq-server/+git/rabbitmq-server/+merge/470751
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2073932
Title:
rabbi
** Merge proposal linked:
https://code.launchpad.net/~mitchdz/ubuntu/+source/rabbitmq-server/+git/rabbitmq-server/+merge/470751
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060248
Title:
MRE u
There is a github issue mentioning this[0]. There is potential plans to
improve feature flags[1], but they do not help us right now, and will
not help users that encounter this situation.
It seems the properly supported upgrade path is indeed installing 3.10
-> 3.11.
[0] - https://github.com/rabb
Thank you for reporting this Carson. Do you have an affected system that
you will be willing to help test out a new package for us?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2076012
Title:
noble
Apologies on delay, just got back from the weekend.
Just saw this come in[0], maybe related?
[0] - https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/multipath-
tools/+bug/2076012
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.l
I will build a package for LP#2076012 if you are willing to try that one
out for your case too, Ben.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2075442
Title:
RAID partitions not auto detected at
Hmm, I see /lib is a symlink to /usr/lib - so the udev rules should be
accessible. Is the symlink not there during initramfs for some reason
maybe?
Do you have an error message handy?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
h
Yeah, LP#2076012 is looking like not a real bug, it was just
tangentially related so figured there could be some correlation.
It's interesting that 24.10 is also not working, since there was some
work cleaning the kpartx boot stuff up.
I might spend a little time to see if I can setup a reproduce
nevermind, you gave enough info in the description already.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2075442
Title:
RAID partitions not auto detected at boot
To manage notifications about this
Happen to have what lsblk looks like on boot?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2075442
Title:
RAID partitions not auto detected at boot
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
ht
BTW the whole reason we have this kpartx-boot package was to support
dmraid on fakeraid blocks[0]. Let me read through that old bug again to
see if there's any hints.
[0] - https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dmraid/+bug/941874
** Also affects: multipath-tools (Ubuntu Jammy)
Importance:
I made an upstream bug report directly asking for support doing these
major version hops[0].
[0] - https://github.com/rabbitmq/rabbitmq-server/discussions/11938
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.ne
Carson, could you please share some more information on what failure you
are seeing? For now I'll set this to incomplete.
** Changed in: multipath-tools (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
I agree Dave.
** Description changed:
- Upstream: 3.26.1
- Debian: 1:3.26.1-2~exp2
- Ubuntu: 1:3.26.1-1build1
+ Debian: 1:3.26.1-4
+ Ubuntu: 1:3.26.1-1ubuntu1
+
+ The one patch we hold is from https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060745
+ which is included in the debian package since 1:3.26.1-2~exp0
101 - 200 of 473 matches
Mail list logo
