I get the following error, which I do not know if it is related to this
thread or not. Anyways, here is the error when I attempt to use deja-dup
and backup to my external hard drive:
BackendException: Could not copy /tmp/duplicity-ZFmsLE-tempdir/mktemp-
hknSVV-2 to/media/af2dd1ed-2b55-40eb-879d-51
I successfully was able to use deja-dup to make a backup of a test file
and save it internally. Hopes this gives you more information.
--
deja-dup fails on backup to external drive with g_file_get_uri: assertion
`G_IS_FILE (file)' failed
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/569418
You received this b
well I am disappointed in that 14.1 was released on may 01 to fix
errors including not being able to back up to external HD's and I am not
able to do this. I wonder if I should post a question in the Questions
for Deja-Dup Section. I fear this bug is not being monitored now that
the fix was relea
Thank you Michael, I continue to receive similar errors as above and
cannot use deja-dub for backups to either of my two external HD's, or to
a separate partition on the same internal drive. None are full. As
others are reporting that the PPA fix corrects their issues with these,
mine must be relat
It is working fine for me now. All my wrong.I had a professional in. He
had to make a new directory for the ext. HD, correct the mount, change
ownership and perms, and add the new mount point in /etc/fstab.
--
deja-dup fails on backup to external drive with g_file_get_uri: assertion
`G_IS_FILE
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: update-manager
Error report when trying to use update manager.
Reads: E:Type 'restricted' is not known on line 9 in source list
/etc/apt/sources.list.d/ddebs.list, E:The list of sources could not be
read.'
This action also stopped me from being abl
I am sorry this so incomplete as I have no time to give you any further
information
--
E:Type 'restricted' is not known on line 9 in source list
/etc/apt/sources.list.d/ddebs.list, E:The list of sources could not be read.'
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/521837
You received this bug notification
This activity has continued since the new kernel update of Linux
2.6.31-20 - generic-pae received today.
--
E:Type 'restricted' is not known on line 9 in source list
/etc/apt/sources.list.d/ddebs.list, E:The list of sources could not be read.'
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/521837
You received
** Tags added: update-manager
--
E:Type 'restricted' is not known on line 9 in source list
/etc/apt/sources.list.d/ddebs.list, E:The list of sources could not be read.'
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/521837
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is sub
I went into ubuntu forums and was told to edit my
/etc/apt/sources.list.d/ddebs.list. After doing the requested "repair"
the problem was resolved. It seems one of my sources was on paritally on
two different lines and after including them in one line (Line 9), the
updates are working as before (cor
Thanks Bubba,
Eventually the panels do come back after a new kernel update; (by the
next day at longest). At the next kernel update, if again the same
behaviour happens I'll try your "fix" and report back here with results.
--
After "Karmic" kernel updates, the panels are unresponsive.
https://b
Please follow the link to a discussion about this problem in Ubuntu
Forums. http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1353223 Maybe
some of the work arounds suggested in the thread may be helpful to
others with similar problems.
This kind of problem seems common for different reasons. Some ha
And yet another link to Ubuntu Forums discussing this behaviour, with
some solutions. http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1293789
--
After "Karmic" kernel updates, the panels are unresponsive.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/500958
You received this bug notification because you are a mem
I received a new kernel update ~ 11 hours ago, (to 2.6.31-18-generic-
pae), and have NOT had any problems with the panels in any way. This is
unlike what I experienced, after the last to updates. I'll report here,
if any problems surface after this writing.
--
After "Karmic" kernel updates, the p
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: firefox-3.5
Last week, after receiving a kernel update (2.6.31-16-generic-pae), the
panels became unresponsive. After doing a terminal un-install of gdm,
panels, and desktop and re-installing them a fix was not acquired. Upon
restarting the computer in th
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/37239610/Dependencies.txt
** Attachment added: "ExtensionSummary.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/37239611/ExtensionSummary.txt
** Attachment added: "profile_default_pluginreg.dat.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/
if I boot into older kernels of Karmic ie. 2.6.31-14 or 15
-generic-pae, the panels remain unresponsive.
Mike O'Donnell
--
After "Karmic" kernel updates, the panels are unresponsive.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/500958
You received this bug notification because you are a member o
Public bug reported:
My upgrade from Xubuntu Studio Artful Aardvark to Bionic Beaver failed
early in the configuration stage, with no explanation. I repaired with
""apt --fix-broken installation" and seem to have a working system now.
A lot of automatic problem reports were generated, and I have n
Today, I haven't been able to re-produce this behaviour. No Crashes. I
am able to open a similar OOo document from hard-disk, in Abiword using
the same live CD of Xubuntu 12.04 Daily Build Alpha from Jan 24, 2012.
So, maybe the Crashing behaviour and unability to re-open the document
is now longer
Public bug reported:
I would like to see a feature that allowed Unity8, to easily inverse the
desktop colors. To be able to easily turn on and off a negative
(inverse) display of the desktop. For now, it can be done with X
(xcalib). It would be nice to see Unity8 do this natively, instead of
Ubun
Hello Michael Terry
I ran your test in my lucid system after enabling duplicity-proposed and
found no errors. I still have Lucid's Duplicity with no PPA.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/
Michael Terry,
This script (manual-ctrl-c-test.sh) hung expecting a second argument.
mikodo@mikodo-desktop:~$ #!/bin/bash
mikodo@mikodo-desktop:~$
mikodo@mikodo-desktop:~$ cd /tmp
mikodo@mikodo-desktop:/tmp$ rm -rf backup* restore*
~/.cache/duplicity/test-backup1
mikodo@mikodo-desktop:/tmp$
mi
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 618189 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/618189
Oh, it was an .iso of xubuntu-11.10-beta2-desktop-amd64. I run natively
Ubuntu 10.04 -i386.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https
Precise, live CD (daily build Jan 24/12). When setting up printer, this
crash reported. I only use B&W printing and when in properties, that was
selected and printing was fine...
HP 1310 (15) inkjet. ~5 years old.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, whi
I get similar behavior with Ubuntu 10.04; with duplicity PPA; which
would have brought in the newer duplicity code.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/881727
Title:
duplicity 0.6.16 lists
Oh, I use Deja-dup and get the recurring full-backups and cannot do
Restores with message "Restore Failed"
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/881727
Title:
duplicity 0.6.16 lists all back
Similar behavior on Ubuntu 10.04 and Deja-dup with Duplicity PPA
enabled. Also, if I do succeed in getting a message of a complete
backup; I am not able to do any restores; message is always "Restore
Failed".
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
Ok, my 2 cents worth, from an new, casual user's perspective. I agree
this is a bug.
History:
I bought my first computer 3 years ago, and struggled along with Vista
for six months, until I was infested with the "conficker worm"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conficker after going on an online banki
@manny
My concern is not having the aps needed for security or stability of the
system a newbie has configured, or in the case I made, the ability to be
sure a backup app (is/are) available in the newest and functional
format, for a LTS; without having to jump through unknown and possibly
impossib
Sorry Michael, I don't know how to do that.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/613244
Title:
silent data corruption with checkpoint/restore
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
30 matches
Mail list logo
