[Bug 1035636] Re: several programs have warnings on /etc/fonts/conf.d/ fonts xml entries

2012-08-19 Thread Michael Neuffer
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1034928 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1034928 The problem can also be reproduced be starting emacs23 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1035636

[Bug 1039911] [NEW] Please upgrade Package to php5-imap_5.4.4

2012-08-22 Thread Michael Neuffer
Public bug reported: Please upgrade Package to php5-imap_5.4.4 (which is available on Debian) this version depends on phpapi-20100525+lfs which is currently beeing provided by php5-cgi, libphp5-embed, php5-fpm, php5-cli, libapache2-mod-php5,libapache2-mod-php5filter,... ProblemType: Bug Dis

[Bug 1039911] Re: Please upgrade Package to php5-imap_5.4.4

2012-08-22 Thread Michael Neuffer
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1039911 Title: Please upgrade Package to php5-imap_5.4.4 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/php-ima

[Bug 1041800] [NEW] Please update package to 304.37

2012-08-26 Thread Michael Neuffer
Public bug reported: Could you upgrade the package from 304.32 to 304.37 ? Until ABI 13 is enabled again, all X-server updates are blocked since current releases neither provide ABI 11 nor 12 anymore. Thanks. ** Affects: nvidia-graphics-drivers (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Statu

Re: [Bug 431177] Re: Dell 5520 Mobile Broadband card is again not beeing detected by NetworkManager 0.8 on Karmic

2012-07-01 Thread Michael Neuffer
On 01.07.2012 12:25, Thomas Hood wrote: > Has this been fixed in Ubuntu 12.04? > > ** Changed in: network-manager (Ubuntu) > Status: New => Incomplete > Yes. But the Network manager has developed another anoying problem: When the network connection fails (while beeing on the train for ex

[Bug 894141] Re: bug caused by gzip './usr/share/doc/libqt4-network/copyright' is different from the same file on the system

2011-11-23 Thread Michael Neuffer
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to qt4-x11 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/894141 Title: bug caused by gzip './usr/share/doc/libqt4-network/copyright' is different from the same file on the system To manage notifi

[Bug 894141] [NEW] bug caused by gzip './usr/share/doc/libqt4-network/copyright' is different from the same file on the system

2011-11-23 Thread Michael Neuffer
Public bug reported: package bug caused by gzip creating different output files from the same source file on different architectures. Preparing to replace libqt4-network:i386 4:4.7.4-0ubuntu8 (using .../libqt4-network_4%3a4.7.4-1ubuntu3_i386.deb) ... Unpacking replacement libqt4-network:i386 .

[Bug 576648] Re: package nvidia-* failed to install/upgrade: nvidia-* kernel module failed to build (Unable to determine the target kernel version.)

2013-04-09 Thread Michael Neuffer
root@kyle:/var/lib/dkms/nvidia-experimental-310/310.14/build# apt-get install --reinstall nvidia-experimental-310 Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done The following packages were automatically installed and are no longer required: linux-

[Bug 1085712] [NEW] pointopoint link configuration can not be entered

2012-12-02 Thread Michael Neuffer
Public bug reported: Even so netcfg contains code to configure pointopoint links the relevant dialog box never pops up in the netcfg module. Once only gets asked for IP Address Netmask Gateway Sometimes, by going back and forth, one can trigger a dialog box where all the variables to be filled

[Bug 1073062] Re: RR i386 : kmod_module_builtin failed

2012-12-08 Thread Michael Neuffer
I'm also still getting it. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1073062 Title: RR i386 : kmod_module_builtin failed To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net

[Bug 1078543] Re: Pulse audio failed to start; no audio present in raring

2012-11-15 Thread Michael Neuffer
Some modules seem indeed to be 32 bit, I have the same issue root@kyle:/usr/lib/pulse-2.1/modules# file *| grep -v 64-bit libprotocol-esound.so: ELF 32-bit LSB shared object, Intel 80386, version 1 (SYSV), dynamically linked, BuildID[sha1]=0xba465c853f9f4a756be3c5799004d5dad154d779,

[Bug 1078543] Re: Pulse audio failed to start; no audio present in raring

2012-11-15 Thread Michael Neuffer
replace pulseaudio-esound-compat:i386 with pulseaudio-esound-compat:amd64 and the pulseaudo server will be able to start again. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1078543 Title: Pulse a

[Bug 1078543] Re: Pulse audio failed to start; no audio present in raring

2012-11-15 Thread Michael Neuffer
remove pulseaudio-esound-compat:i386 and install pulseaudio-esound-compat:amd64 instead and the pulseaudio server will start again. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1078543 Title: Pul

[Bug 1096435] [NEW] Please update roundcube to 0.8.4

2013-01-05 Thread Michael Neuffer
Public bug reported: The package is several releases behind: October 05, 2012 Update 0.8.2 November 10, 2012 Update 0.8.3 November 14, 2012 Update 0.8.4 Please update to the current realease. ** Affects: roundcube (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this b

[Bug 1073062] Re: RR i386 : kmod_module_builtin failed

2012-11-22 Thread Michael Neuffer
Same here. root@kyle:/usr/src/debian# update-initramfs -u -k 3.7.0-3-generic update-initramfs: Generating /boot/initrd.img-3.7.0-3-generic modprobe: ../tools/modprobe.c:550: print_action: Assertion `kmod_module_get_initstate(m) == KMOD_MODULE_BUILTIN' failed. Aborted (core dumped) WARNING: could

[Bug 1073062] Re: RR i386 : kmod_module_builtin failed

2012-11-25 Thread Michael Neuffer
Could this be this error? http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=674110 ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #674110 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=674110 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu

[Bug 1073062] Re: RR i386 : kmod_module_builtin failed

2012-11-25 Thread Michael Neuffer
** Also affects: kmod (Debian) via http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=674110 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1073062 Title:

[Bug 811822] Re: gnome-session gets stuck utilizing 100% cpu time of one core

2011-08-08 Thread Michael Neuffer
Above I had already described a manual workaround. After killling -9 gnome-session one can use the terminal provided by the rescue session to start gnome-session (the new Ubuntu gui is even more unusable then Gnome-3) Killing gdm and running startx is not necessary. Cheers Mike -- You rec

[Bug 939364] Re: conffile './etc/java-6-openjdk/security/nss.cfg' is not in sync with other instances

2012-02-23 Thread Michael Neuffer
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/939364 Title: conffile './etc/java-6-openjdk/security/nss.cfg' is not in sync with other instances To manage notifications about this bug go to: https

[Bug 939364] [NEW] conffile './etc/java-6-openjdk/security/nss.cfg' is not in sync with other instances

2012-02-23 Thread Michael Neuffer
Public bug reported: Preparing to replace openjdk-6-jre-headless 6b24-1.11.1-0ubuntu1 (using .../openjdk-6-jre-headless_6b24-1.11.1-2ubuntu1_amd64.deb) ... Unpacking replacement openjdk-6-jre-headless ... dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/openjdk-6-jre-headless_6b24-1.11.1-2ubuntu1_

[Bug 939364] Re: conffile './etc/java-6-openjdk/security/nss.cfg' is not in sync with other instances

2012-02-23 Thread Michael Neuffer
root@kyle:~# dpkg -S /etc/java-6-openjdk/security/nss.cfg openjdk-6-jre-headless, openjdk-6-jre-headless:i386: /etc/java-6-openjdk/security/nss.cfg -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/939364

[Bug 939419] Re: package openjdk-6-jre-headless 6b24-1.11.1-2ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: conffile './etc/java-6-openjdk/security/nss.cfg' is not in sync with other instances of the same package

2012-02-25 Thread Michael Neuffer
The problem was not fixed with latest release, it still exists just as before. root@kyle:/tmp# dpkg -i openjdk-6-jre_6b24-1.11.1-2ubuntu2_amd64.deb openjdk-6-jre_6b24-1.11.1-2ubuntu2_i386.deb icedtea-6-jre-cacao_6b24-1.11.1-2ubuntu2_amd64.deb icedtea-6-jre-cacao_6b24-1.11.1-2ubuntu2_i386.deb i

[Bug 939364] Re: conffile './etc/java-6-openjdk/security/nss.cfg' is not in sync with other instances

2012-02-25 Thread Michael Neuffer
Even so https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openjdk-6/+bug/939419/comments/2 claims that the bug was fixed, it was not. It still exists as before. root@kyle:/tmp# dpkg -i openjdk-6-jre_6b24-1.11.1-2ubuntu2_amd64.deb openjdk-6-jre_6b24-1.11.1-2ubuntu2_i386.deb icedtea-6-jre-cacao_6b24-1.11.

[Bug 924628] Re: package libapt-pkg4.12 0.8.16~exp12ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: './usr/share/locale/ar/LC_MESSAGES/libapt-pkg4.12.mo' is different from the same file on the system

2012-02-01 Thread Michael Neuffer
I guess this is another variation of Bug #871083 "gzip -9n sometimes generates a different output file on different architectures" which still hasn't been fixed. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.n

Re: [Bug 933054] Re: '.../libapt-pkg4.12.mo' is different from the same file on the system

2012-02-28 Thread Michael Neuffer
Am Di, 28.02.2012, 14:38 schrieb Torsten Spindler: > It looks to me like the same underlying issue as bug 924628. Would you > agree it's a duplicate rather than a new issue? Most likely yes. The question is when will it be fixed? The last interation of the package libapt-pkg4.12_0.8.16~exp12ubunt

Re: [Bug 834438] Re: Please convert to Multiarch

2011-11-08 Thread Michael Neuffer
Hey harrington, A simple check during the last update of the package would have shown the following: Multiarch support has been added and the bug can be closed. Kind regards Michael Neuffer Package: libxaw7 Status: install ok installed Multi-Arch: same

Re: [Bug 834441] Re: Please convert to Multiarch

2011-11-08 Thread Michael Neuffer
Hey harrington, A simple check during the last update of the package would have shown the following: Multiarch support has been added and the bug can be closed. Kind regards Michael Neuffer Package: libxmu6 Status: install ok installed Multi-Arch: same

[Bug 864479] [NEW] System goes to hibernate or suspend even when set to "Don't suspend"

2011-10-02 Thread Michael Neuffer
Public bug reported: System goes to hibernate or suspend even when set to "Don't suspend" on the Suspend when inactive setting I use the affected Laptop additionally as a fileserver. The powermanagement in 11.10 changed in the last few days in a way so that I can't let the laptop sit without cons

[Bug 864479] Re: System goes to hibernate or suspend even when set to "Don't suspend"

2011-10-02 Thread Michael Neuffer
** Description changed: - System goes to hibernate or suspend even when set to "Don't suspend" on + System goes to hibernate or suspend even when set to "Don't suspend" on the Suspend when inactive setting - I use the affected Laptop additionally as a fileserver. The powermanagement in 11.1

Re: [Bug 864479] Re: System goes to hibernate or suspend even when set to "Don't suspend"

2011-10-03 Thread Michael Neuffer
On 10/03/2011 10:57 AM, Rodrigo Moya wrote: > Before setting it, can you please let us know what are the values for > "sleep-inactive-ac-timeout", "sleep-inactive-ac", "sleep-inactive- > battery-timeout" and "sleep-inactive-battery"? > > You can get the values fromt he command line with: > > gsetti

[Bug 835625] Re: apt may try to unpack a foreign-arch multiarch library before the native package is at a multiarch version, prohibited by dpkg

2011-11-13 Thread Michael Neuffer
@Steve comment #12: Most likely he didn't change the logfile. THis is a known (but unfixed) bug of gzip which produces different output on different platforms when gzipping the same file. A whole bunch of other packages are affected by this as well, one of them libtasn1-3 in version 2.10-1 C

[Bug 889749] [NEW] gzip produces different output on different architectures

2011-11-13 Thread Michael Neuffer
Public bug reported: Gzip produces different output when gzipping the same file on different architectures. This can for example be seen in the libtasn1-3 package in version 2.10-1 which can not be installed co-installed as AMD64 and i386 multiarch packages since dpkg detects differences in th

Re: [Bug 877912] Re: sshfs 2.2-1.1 depends on non-existing packet fuse

2011-10-19 Thread Michael Neuffer
What happened was an upgrade from oneiric to precise which in turn caused the availability of the Version: 2.2-1build1 --> 2.2-1.1 where the dependencies changed from: Depends: libc6 (>= 2.4), libfuse2 (>= 2.8.1), libglib2.0-0 (>= 2.12.0), fuse-utils (>= 2.7), openssh-client (>= 1:4.6p1-1) to: D

Re: [Bug 878020] Re: dependencies are not properly resolved

2011-10-20 Thread Michael Neuffer
On 10/20/2011 10:23 AM, Bowmore wrote: > Does the updated source package p11-kit 0.7-2 (libp11-kit0, > libp11-kit0:i386) solve your dependency issue? > Actually it causes the next problem I had to link neuffer@kyle:/etc/pkcs11/modules$ ls -la /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/pkcs11 total 32 drwxr-xr

[Bug 765735] [NEW] mountall should cause fsck to show progress on text console

2011-04-19 Thread Michael Neuffer
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: mountall mountall should cause fsck to show progress information (-C 0). Especially on large FS that take very long to fsck (sometimes many hours) it is very important to know that the fsck isn't actually hanging and still working. It is not possible t

[Bug 765735] Re: mountall should cause fsck to show progress on text console

2011-04-19 Thread Michael Neuffer
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/765735 Title: mountall should cause fsck to show progress on text console -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu

[Bug 795855] Re: nm-applet crashes when choosing a wireless network

2011-06-12 Thread Michael Neuffer
At least for me the network-manager version is 0.8.9997-1ubuntu2 network-manager-gnome is 0.8.9997+git.20110529t170033.9ec4c5d-0ubuntu1 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/795855 Title: nm

[Bug 811822] [NEW] gnome-session gets stuck utilizing 100% cpu time of one core

2011-07-17 Thread Michael Neuffer
Public bug reported: gnome-session gets stuck utilizing 100% cpu time of one core killing gnome-session manually will kill -9 (it doesn't react to a normal kill) leaves an unusable session behind. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.10 Package: gnome-session 3.1.3-0ubuntu3 ProcVersionSign

[Bug 811822] Re: gnome-session gets stuck utilizing 100% cpu time of one core

2011-07-17 Thread Michael Neuffer
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/811822 Title: gnome-session gets stuck utilizing 100% cpu time of one core To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubun

[Bug 794854] [NEW] metacity fails to start and causes "Oh no! Something has gone wrong" message

2011-06-08 Thread Michael Neuffer
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: metacity metacity fails to start and causes "Oh no! Something has gone wrong" message On a dual screen setup one can see that Nautilus is running fine, only one screen gets covered with the "Oh no!" message that forces the logout ProblemType: Bug Distro

[Bug 794854] Re: metacity fails to start and causes "Oh no! Something has gone wrong" message

2011-06-08 Thread Michael Neuffer
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/794854 Title: metacity fails to start and causes "Oh no! Something has gone wrong" message To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.

[Bug 794854] Re: metacity fails to start and causes "Oh no! Something has gone wrong" message

2011-06-08 Thread Michael Neuffer
The error message is metacity:ERROR:ui/ui.c:754:meta_ui_get_default_window_icon: assertion failed: (default icon) gnome-session[4259]: WARNING: Application 'metacity.desktop' killed by signal gnome-session[4259]: WARNING: App 'metacity.desktop' respawning too quickly -- You received this bug no

[Bug 794771] Re: metacity doesn't start, dies with "metacity:ERROR:ui/ui.c:754:meta_ui_get_default_window_icon: assertion failed: (default_icon)"

2011-06-09 Thread Michael Neuffer
I wonder if this might be related to bug 438274? Especially to the comment which Ross Alexander wrote on 2010-12-20: "The reason for this is the gnome-settings-daemon is not working so GTK does not pick up the correct icon theme so it defaults back to hicolor, which does not have icons for "win

[Bug 735381] [NEW] "Priority: normal" causes problems in available and status files (dpkg & apt)

2011-03-15 Thread Michael Neuffer
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: dpkg The Priority keyword "normal" doesn't seem to be supported. Replacing all its instances with "standard" fixes the problem until the next update Merging available information R

[Bug 735381] Re: "Priority: normal" causes problems in available and status files (dpkg & apt)

2011-03-15 Thread Michael Neuffer
** Description changed: Binary package hint: dpkg + The Priority keyword "normal" doesn't seem to be supported. Replacing + all its instances with "standard" fixes the problem until the next update + + Merging availa

Re: [Bug 735381] Re: "Priority: normal" causes problems in available and status files (dpkg & apt)

2011-03-15 Thread Michael Neuffer
Hi Raphaƫl thank you for the hint, you are indeed correct, the origin for all of those errors seems to be the GetDeb repository and they urgently need to fix their packages. I guess they FUBARed something in the last few days. I'm forwarding this to the GetDeb People. Cheers Mike On 03/1

[Bug 834438] [NEW] Please convert to Multiarch

2011-08-25 Thread Michael Neuffer
Public bug reported: Dears Maintainers, Could you support multiarch same for libxaw Multiarch Information can be found on this wiki http://wiki.debian.org/Multiarch/Implementation An example for a patch can be found in Debian bug #635252 Thank you. Cheers Mike ProblemType: Bug DistroReleas

[Bug 834438] Re: Please convert to Multiarch

2011-08-25 Thread Michael Neuffer
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/834438 Title: Please convert to Multiarch To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libxaw/+bug/834438/+su

[Bug 834441] Re: Please convert to Multiarch

2011-08-26 Thread Michael Neuffer
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/834441 Title: Please convert to Multiarch To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libxmu/+bug/834441/+su

[Bug 834444] [NEW] Please convert to Multiarch

2011-08-26 Thread Michael Neuffer
Public bug reported: Dear Maintainers, Could you support multiarch same for libxp Multiarch Information can be found on this wiki http://wiki.debian.org/Multiarch/Implementation An example for a patch can be found in Debian bug #635252 Thank you. Cheers Mike ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease

[Bug 834441] [NEW] Please convert to Multiarch

2011-08-26 Thread Michael Neuffer
Public bug reported: Dear Maintainers, Could you support multiarch same for libxmu Multiarch Information can be found on this wiki http://wiki.debian.org/Multiarch/Implementation An example for a patch can be found in Debian bug #635252 Thank you. Cheers Mike ProblemType: Bug DistroReleas

[Bug 834438] Re: Please convert to Multiarch

2011-08-27 Thread Michael Neuffer
Please try this patch. ** Patch added: "Patch" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libxaw/+bug/834438/+attachment/2322374/+files/libxaw-1.0.9.multiarch.diff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launch

[Bug 811822] Re: gnome-session gets stuck utilizing 100% cpu time of one core

2011-07-27 Thread Michael Neuffer
As additional data point: Starting a rescue session will leave a terminal behind even after killing -9 gnome-session from the console. >From within the terminal gnome-session can then successfully be restartet. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, whic

[Bug 853669] Re: liblcms1 has an "un-arched" Provides: liblcms

2011-09-18 Thread Michael Neuffer
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/853669 Title: liblcms1 has an "un-arched" Provides: liblcms To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lcms

[Bug 853669] [NEW] liblcms1 has an "un-arched" Provides: liblcms

2011-09-18 Thread Michael Neuffer
Public bug reported: liblcms1 has an "un-arched" Provides: liblcms this causes a confilict when 2 versions (i386/amd64) of libcms1 are installed ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.10 Package: liblcms1 1.19.dfsg-1ubuntu1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.0.0-11.18-generic 3.0.4 Uname: Linux 3

[Bug 853679] Re: dselect has an error in the "Provides: " multiarch case

2011-09-19 Thread Michael Neuffer
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/853679 Title: dselect has an error in the "Provides: " multiarch case To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+s

[Bug 853679] [NEW] dselect has an error in the "Provides: " multiarch case

2011-09-19 Thread Michael Neuffer
Public bug reported: When a package like libcms1 that has a Provides: field is installed for more then one architecture the resulting conflict is not resolved by internally distinguishing between the (two) architectures. Instead dselect tries to uninstall one of the two packages. This is not th

[Bug 690413] Re: nm-applet segfaults

2010-12-14 Thread Michael Neuffer
My nm-applet manages to briefly configure my wlan0 interface before crashing [44590.873295] nm-applet[5560]: segfault at 38 ip 0042dd4e sp 7fff0ab8d480 error 4 in nm-applet[40+62000] [44593.321190] wlan0: authenticate with 00:1f:3f:1a:75:67 (try 1) [44593.323506] wlan0: authentica

[Bug 728611] Re: [natty] text does not display in plymouth (disk check, passphrase prompts)

2011-03-27 Thread Michael Neuffer
Even with natty as of this morning (initramfs-tools 0.98.8ubuntu3, plymouth 0.8.2-2ubuntu20) the problem persists and no text is beeing displayed on the first boot just a blank screen. On the second boot (after Ctrl-Alt-Del'ing the first attempt), I get a text console after less then 5sec whic

[Bug 596611] Re: cups fails to print with backend permission problem

2010-06-21 Thread Michael Neuffer
** Description changed: Binary package hint: cups After upgrading cups it fails to print because of wrong permissions. This bug might be related to following problems: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=585153 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=586324

Re: [Bug 596611] Re: cups fails to print with backend permission problem

2010-06-21 Thread Michael Neuffer
Am Mo, 21.06.2010, 18:11 schrieb Till Kamppeter: > Can you reinstall the CUPS package with > > sudo apt-get install --reinstall cups > > in a terminal window, simply to see whether the package installation > sets the correct directory permissions for you? > > Check with > > ls -l /usr/lib/cups/back

Re: [Bug 596611] Re: cups fails to print with backend permission problem

2010-06-21 Thread Michael Neuffer
On 06/21/2010 06:52 PM, Thomas wrote: > The permissions keep as they have been before even with reinstall. So in > general the permissions will not touched by the installation. If I change > them to 0700 then they keep at this. If I change to 0755 and reinstall they > keep at this. > Unfortunate

[Bug 1891657] Re: systemd 100% cpu usage apport-autoreport.service: Failed with result 'start-limit-hit'

2020-09-02 Thread Michael Neuffer
I also had to purge apport in order to get this under control. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1891657 Title: systemd 100% cpu usage apport-autoreport.service: Failed with result 'st

[Bug 2061977] [NEW] t64 migration: libgtk-3-0t64 has unmet dependencies, blocks >200 packages

2024-04-17 Thread Michael Neuffer
Public bug reported: lsb_release -rd No LSB modules are available. Description:Ubuntu Noble Numbat (development branch) Release:24.04 This unresolved dependency seems to be the main t64 migration blocker for the last weeks. I've manually thinned out the dependencies that "apt upgrad

[Bug 2061977] Re: t64 migration: libgtk-3-0t64 has unmet dependencies, blocks >200 packages

2024-04-17 Thread Michael Neuffer
never underestimate the might of of trusty old dselect to help untangle even the most complex dependencies where all other tools fail... -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2061977 Title:

[Bug 2061977] Re: t64 migration: libgtk-3-0t64 has unmet dependencies, blocks >200 packages

2024-04-17 Thread Michael Neuffer
root@kyle:~# dpkg -l | egrep "^h" hi atril 1.26.2-1 amd64MATE document viewer hi evince 45.0-1 amd64Document (PostScript, PDF) viewe

[Bug 2056668] [NEW] Thunderbird Snap migration loses user profile

2024-03-10 Thread Michael Neuffer
Public bug reported: TL;DR: Snap implementation is FUBAR, how do I get back to a non-SNAP version? I consider this bug to be Grave since it not only affects thunderbid, but also a huge number of depending other services, bug-reporting amongst it. Thunderbird Snap migration loses user profile Wi

Re: [Bug 2056668] Re: Thunderbird Snap migration loses user profile

2024-03-11 Thread Michael Neuffer
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 2056434 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2056434 On 3/11/24 10:30, Skia wrote: > Here is how I worked around this: > * close thunderbird, make sure it's not running in the background > * `rsync -raxPHAX ~/.thunderbird/ ~/snap/thunderbird/common/.thunderbir

Re: [Bug 2056434] Re: Thunderbird profile not migrated to snap

2024-03-11 Thread Michael Neuffer
On 3/11/24 17:13, Patrik Lundquist wrote: > Close Thunderbird. > > Remove the new, empty profile. > rm -r ~/snap/thunderbird/common/.thunderbird > > > mv ~/.thunderbird ~/snap/thunderbird/common/ > That was my very first test. Unfortunately it does NOT work for me as described before and shown in

[Bug 2056668] Re: Thunderbird Snap migration loses user profile

2024-03-11 Thread Michael Neuffer
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 2056434 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2056434 @Patrik Lunquist Unfortunately this solution doesn't work for me. As already shown in my previous post. In the screenshot attached there you can see the "messenger window" that opens up when starting thun

[Bug 2056434] Re: Thunderbird profile not migrated to snap

2024-03-11 Thread Michael Neuffer
@Heinrich: Exactly ONE. The snapped profile manager doesn't see the profile in the proper place ~/.thunderbird Snap is causing nothing but trouble. DEB had been working fine since its inception. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed t

[Bug 2056434] Re: Thunderbird profile not migrated to snap

2024-03-12 Thread Michael Neuffer
@Sebastien: Your new push fixed the issue. After the new snap was installed, I started Thunderbird and it immediately imported the original profile and started to download the emails from all IMAP accounts. The locally cached mail folders didn't get copied. So far things seem to be working but I d

Re: [Bug 1535078] Re: xfce4-display-settings fails to configure 2 and 3 display setups

2022-03-10 Thread Michael Neuffer
On 3/11/22 00:40, Sean Davis wrote: > Are you still experiencing this issue with a currently supported release > (focal, impish, or jammy)? Yes. > ** Changed in: xfce4-settings (Ubuntu) > Status: New => Incomplete > This computer is currently on hirsute, but picking up focal updates as well

[Bug 2068920] [NEW] thunderbird snap IMAP storage grows at an incredible rate

2024-06-10 Thread Michael Neuffer
Public bug reported: I just had up grow the LV of my home directory by another 50GB. For the last 30 years I've collected roughly 9GB of old email. Since the enforced migration from a properly working non-snap Thunderbird to a snap-infested Thunderbird a few months ago its storage has grown

<    1   2