Public bug reported:
$ lsb_release -rd
Description:Ubuntu karmic (development branch)
Release:9.10
2)
3) I expected that ubuntu go to hibernate...
4) Got a blank screen.
I was removing some programs using "bum" then I pressed Hibernate (it's
a mistake) then the system don't go to h
** Attachment added: "dmesg.log"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/32132637/dmesg.log
** Attachment added: "AlsaDevices.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/32132638/AlsaDevices.txt
** Attachment added: "AplayDevices.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/32132639/AplayDevices.txt
** Attachment
** Attachment added: "CoreDump.gz"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/31517232/CoreDump.gz
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/31517233/Dependencies.txt
** Attachment added: "Disassembly.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/31517234/Disassembly.txt
** Attachm
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 432089 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/432089
Hi, I tried what you said the bootcharts is in attachment. Now I get 60s
boot time, before do this I had 69s. But if I use a chronometer from
Grub window to Login window I got 22s. To desktop 42s. Then I open
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 432089 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/432089
** Attachment added: "x-warrior-desktop-karmic-20091109-5.png"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35436567/x-warrior-desktop-karmic-20091109-5.png
--
[Karmic] Boot time has a huge regression (~1.5 min agains
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 432089 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/432089
PS: I'm not using a SSD. Just a SATA harddisk.
Maybe a Bootchart problem? The boottime seems to be fast so bootchart is
wrong?
--
[Karmic] Boot time has a huge regression (~1.5 min against ~40 sec for Jaunt
I don't agree. I'm using a core 2 duo system and after remove some
things from it. I still get 1:13.
My conf is:
C2D E6700 @ 2.4 - 2GB RAM DDR2 - HD 40GB IDE (MASTER) / SATA-II 1TB / SATA-II
200GB
** Attachment added: "x-warrior-desktop-karmic-20091002-1.png"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/3
** Attachment added: "CoreDump.gz"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/31999817/CoreDump.gz
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/31999818/Dependencies.txt
** Attachment added: "Disassembly.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/31999819/Disassembly.txt
** Attachm
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/31999868/Dependencies.txt
** Attachment added: "ProcMaps.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/31999870/ProcMaps.txt
** Attachment added: "ProcStatus.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/31999871/ProcStatus.txt
** Attachm
** Attachment added: "CoreDump.gz"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/32002236/CoreDump.gz
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/32002237/Dependencies.txt
** Attachment added: "Disassembly.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/32002238/Disassembly.txt
** Attachm
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/32002583/Dependencies.txt
** Attachment added: "ProcMaps.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/32002584/ProcMaps.txt
** Attachment added: "ProcStatus.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/32002585/ProcStatus.txt
** Visibil
ok, there is no problem, but just wondering, it's a security issue? I
don't understand why to keep it private. But if you said this there is
problem, I just want to know more about this., and learn and help.
--
firefox crashed with signal 5 in _XError()
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/432265
You
"there is no problem"*
--
firefox crashed with signal 5 in _XError()
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/432265
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com
AMD64 affected too.
--
package ttf-mscorefonts-installer 3.0 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess
installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/431096
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribe
14 matches
Mail list logo
