[Bug 1335478] Re: A new instance of IBM Domino 'bindsock' cannot bind to ports <1024 Kernel 3.13.0-29 and above

2015-01-06 Thread Kit Davis
Thanks for trying but I don't think anyone is too surprised. There was a time when the pride in the getting Domino perfect would have guaranteed a fix - now I'm afraid these resources are so limited at IBM there is little appetite to do anything beyond what is absolutely necessary. -- You rece

[Bug 1335478] Re: A new instance of IBM Domino 'bindsock' cannot bind to ports <1024 Kernel 3.13.0-29 and above

2014-10-02 Thread Kit Davis
Another month, another kernel - 3-13.0-36 and the problem still exists. I now have 12 servers that can't be updated past 3.13.0.24 - Time to look for another distribution? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.la

[Bug 1335478] Re: A new instance of IBM Domino 'bindsock' cannot bind to ports <1024 Kernel 3.13.0-29 and above

2014-12-15 Thread Kit Davis
Andy - can you clarify (or predict) which kernels will see the fix? >From the above, it looks as if the fix will show up in 14.12 (vivid) but there does not seem to be any status listed for 14.04. I know a lot of clients want to stay with an LTS version. -- You received this bug notification be

[Bug 1335478] Re: A new instance of IBM Domino 'bindsock' cannot bind to ports <1024 Kernel 3.13.0-29 and above

2014-12-19 Thread Kit Davis
I've tested the kernel (3.13.0-44) from Trusty-Proposed and it solves the bug. I cannot figure out where the tag "verification-needed- utopic" resides and therefore I can't change the tag to "verification- done" -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, whic

[Bug 1335478] Re: A new instance of IBM Domino 'bindsock' cannot bind to ports <1024 Kernel 3.13.0-29 and above

2014-12-19 Thread Kit Davis
** Tags removed: verification-needed-utopic ** Tags added: verification-done-utopic -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1335478 Title: A new instance of IBM Domino 'bindsock' cannot bind t

[Bug 1335478] Re: A new instance of IBM Domino 'bindsock' cannot bind to ports <1024 Kernel 3.13.0-29 and above

2014-12-07 Thread Kit Davis
I wonder if it would make sense for someone to submit this again as a new bug? After 6 months with no solution and not much even in the way of acknowledgement, I wonder if it has somehow been forgotten. Perhaps a new bug report might get someone's attention? -- You received this bug notificat

[Bug 1335478] Re: A new instance of IBM Domino 'bindsock' cannot bind to ports <1024 Kernel 3.13.0-29 and above

2014-12-08 Thread Kit Davis
Done - With the kernel loaded (in this case the 386 version) the problem does not appear.Dmesg output attached. Thanks.?field.comment=Done - With the kernel loaded (in this case the 386 version) the problem does not appear.Dmesg output attached. Thanks. Let me know if I can do anything

[Bug 1269053] Re: IBM Domino 'bindsock' cannot bind to ports <1024 since recent kernel 3.5.0-45.68

2014-06-26 Thread Kit Davis
The bug now shows up in Trusty as of 3.13.0-30I know it was working in 3.13.0-24 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1269053 Title: IBM Domino 'bindsock' cannot bind to ports <1024 si

[Bug 1269053] Re: IBM Domino 'bindsock' cannot bind to ports <1024 since recent kernel 3.5.0-45.68

2014-06-26 Thread Kit Davis
The bug is also present in 3.13.0-29 as well. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1269053 Title: IBM Domino 'bindsock' cannot bind to ports <1024 since recent kernel 3.5.0-45.68 To mana

[Bug 1335478] [NEW] A new instance of IBM Domino 'bindsock' cannot bind to ports <1024 Kernel 3.13.0-29 and above

2014-06-28 Thread Kit Davis
Public bug reported: Starting with kernels 3.2.0-64 and 3.13.0-29 Something has changed to once again that prevents IBM Domino's "/opt/ibm/domino/notes/latest/linux/bindsock" binary that runs as root (setuid) to get ports lower than 1024 for it's LDAP, SMTP, IMAP, POP3, and HTTP processes. The

[Bug 1269053] Re: IBM Domino 'bindsock' cannot bind to ports <1024 since recent kernel 3.5.0-45.68

2014-06-28 Thread Kit Davis
Reported as bug #1335478 Thanks -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1269053 Title: IBM Domino 'bindsock' cannot bind to ports <1024 since recent kernel 3.5.0-45.68 To manage notificati

[Bug 1335478] Re: A new instance of IBM Domino 'bindsock' cannot bind to ports <1024 Kernel 3.13.0-29 and above

2014-07-25 Thread Kit Davis
Dmesg output attached. ** Attachment added: "25jul2014.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-lts-trusty/+bug/1335478/+attachment/4162867/+files/25jul2014.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://b

[Bug 1335478] Re: A new instance of IBM Domino 'bindsock' cannot bind to ports <1024 Kernel 3.13.0-29 and above

2014-08-07 Thread Kit Davis
it seems that in the 12.04 stream, the error is no longer present in 3.2.0.67 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1335478 Title: A new instance of IBM Domino 'bindsock' cannot bind to port

[Bug 1335478] Re: A new instance of IBM Domino 'bindsock' cannot bind to ports <1024 Kernel 3.13.0-29 and above

2014-11-17 Thread Kit Davis
Update to 3.13.0.39 and still FAIL -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1335478 Title: A new instance of IBM Domino 'bindsock' cannot bind to ports <1024 Kernel 3.13.0-29 and above To m

[Bug 1335478] Re: A new instance of IBM Domino 'bindsock' cannot bind to ports <1024 Kernel 3.13.0-29 and above

2014-09-05 Thread Kit Davis
Yes, even with the newest kernel (3.13.0-35) the problem exists. You need to use 3.13.0-24 It has been two months and the status of the bug has not changed. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/

[Bug 1335478] Re: A new instance of IBM Domino 'bindsock' cannot bind to ports <1024 Kernel 3.13.0-29 and above

2014-10-21 Thread Kit Davis
I'm not sure what the problem with getting a resolution is. The original bug was fixed almost immediately - this one has persisted for almost 4 months. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1

[Bug 1269053] Re: IBM Domino 'bindsock' cannot bind to ports <1024 since recent kernel 3.5.0-45.68

2014-07-24 Thread Kit Davis
I reported this as a new bug back almost a month ago - but to date, while the status has been changed to confirmed, the bug remains unassigned. I have tested 3.13.0-32 and the bug remains in this new version as well. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs,

[Bug 1335478] Re: A new instance of IBM Domino 'bindsock' cannot bind to ports <1024 Kernel 3.13.0-29 and above

2014-07-24 Thread Kit Davis
The bug remains in 3.13.0-32 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1335478 Title: A new instance of IBM Domino 'bindsock' cannot bind to ports <1024 Kernel 3.13.0-29 and above To manage