Thanks for trying but I don't think anyone is too surprised. There was
a time when the pride in the getting Domino perfect would have
guaranteed a fix - now I'm afraid these resources are so limited at IBM
there is little appetite to do anything beyond what is absolutely
necessary.
--
You rece
Another month, another kernel - 3-13.0-36 and the problem still exists.
I now have 12 servers that can't be updated past 3.13.0.24 - Time to
look for another distribution?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.la
Andy - can you clarify (or predict) which kernels will see the fix?
>From the above, it looks as if the fix will show up in 14.12 (vivid) but
there does not seem to be any status listed for 14.04. I know a lot of
clients want to stay with an LTS version.
--
You received this bug notification be
I've tested the kernel (3.13.0-44) from Trusty-Proposed and it solves
the bug. I cannot figure out where the tag "verification-needed-
utopic" resides and therefore I can't change the tag to "verification-
done"
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, whic
** Tags removed: verification-needed-utopic
** Tags added: verification-done-utopic
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1335478
Title:
A new instance of IBM Domino 'bindsock' cannot bind t
I wonder if it would make sense for someone to submit this again as a
new bug? After 6 months with no solution and not much even in the way
of acknowledgement, I wonder if it has somehow been forgotten. Perhaps
a new bug report might get someone's attention?
--
You received this bug notificat
Done - With the kernel loaded (in this case the 386 version) the problem
does not appear.Dmesg output attached. Thanks.?field.comment=Done
- With the kernel loaded (in this case the 386 version) the problem does
not appear.Dmesg output attached. Thanks.
Let me know if I can do anything
The bug now shows up in Trusty as of 3.13.0-30I know it was working
in 3.13.0-24
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1269053
Title:
IBM Domino 'bindsock' cannot bind to ports <1024 si
The bug is also present in 3.13.0-29 as well.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1269053
Title:
IBM Domino 'bindsock' cannot bind to ports <1024 since recent kernel
3.5.0-45.68
To mana
Public bug reported:
Starting with kernels 3.2.0-64 and 3.13.0-29 Something has changed to
once again that prevents IBM Domino's
"/opt/ibm/domino/notes/latest/linux/bindsock" binary that runs as root
(setuid) to get ports lower than 1024 for it's LDAP, SMTP, IMAP, POP3,
and HTTP processes.
The
Reported as bug #1335478
Thanks
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1269053
Title:
IBM Domino 'bindsock' cannot bind to ports <1024 since recent kernel
3.5.0-45.68
To manage notificati
Dmesg output attached.
** Attachment added: "25jul2014.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-lts-trusty/+bug/1335478/+attachment/4162867/+files/25jul2014.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://b
it seems that in the 12.04 stream, the error is no longer present in
3.2.0.67
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1335478
Title:
A new instance of IBM Domino 'bindsock' cannot bind to port
Update to 3.13.0.39 and still FAIL
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1335478
Title:
A new instance of IBM Domino 'bindsock' cannot bind to ports <1024
Kernel 3.13.0-29 and above
To m
Yes, even with the newest kernel (3.13.0-35) the problem exists. You
need to use 3.13.0-24
It has been two months and the status of the bug has not changed.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/
I'm not sure what the problem with getting a resolution is. The
original bug was fixed almost immediately - this one has persisted for
almost 4 months.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1
I reported this as a new bug back almost a month ago - but to date,
while the status has been changed to confirmed, the bug remains
unassigned. I have tested 3.13.0-32 and the bug remains in this new
version as well.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs,
The bug remains in 3.13.0-32
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1335478
Title:
A new instance of IBM Domino 'bindsock' cannot bind to ports <1024
Kernel 3.13.0-29 and above
To manage
18 matches
Mail list logo