This is likely a duplicate of #304969
--
Can't install flashpligin-nonfree.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/307369
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.u
This is likely a duplicate of #304969
--
Cannot install flashplugin-nonfree
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/306841
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ub
This is likely a duplicate of #304969
--
Package fails to download binary without warning
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/307488
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
ht
I just verified that sysstat will build in a clean intrepid chroot with
no source changes. Assuming the backport team approves I think this will
be fairly easy. I'll see if I can upload an initial build to my PPA
while once I finish reading through the backport documentation.
--
backport sysstat
The real issue here is:
http://software.complete.org/software/issues/show/110
The patch sent in by Greg about two weeks ago fixes the ssl-deprecation
warning and prevents the nasty side effect ignoring Ctrl-C. IMO this
patch should be included in Jaunty to make offlineimap usable. I created
t
I apologize, i have a different patch to fix Ctrl-C, the above posting
just fixes the ssl-deprecation warning. Sorry! Once I've cleaned the
patch up a bit I'll submit it for consideration.
--
python 2.6 transition breaks Ctrl-C to abort offlineimap
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/339932
You rece
After trying my patch in a clean jaunty chroot, it appears I haven't
fixed the Ctrl-C issue. There are quite a few differences between my dev
installation and Curses.py vs. what's currently in Jaunty. I've been
exchanging emails with Jim Pryor, who had contributed several patches to
the project, an
I've uploaded a backported version of sysstat to my ppa
(https://launchpad.net/~jbernard/+archive/ppa). Give it a try and let me
know if you have any feedback. If all goes well I can make a request to
the backport team and I believe they will make the final decision.
--
backport sysstat 8.1.7-1 f
Hello Balbir, I'm interesting in getting this packaged up for Karmic (if
possible). I'm very interested to see what work you've already completed
and hopefully collaborate on the packaging completion. Can you post your
current work somewhere public? I'll be happy to fixup any issues still
remaining
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #536167
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=536167
** Also affects: debian via
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=536167
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
[needs-packaging] libcgroup
https://bugs.launchpad.net
Attached is a diff that will fix the manpage warnings for the existing
manpages. I don't have a Fedora box to test on, but I suspect these
changes will work across the board. If the tests look good it would be
cool to get this into the next upstream release.
** Attachment added: "manpage-warning-f
Hey Balbir, quick update:
I've added chrpath to my build routine to strip the RPATH from all the
ELF files. So at this point, I've got everything I need to complete the
package (assuming I get enough free time this week ;) ) A more proper
RPATH solution would probably be good, but it's not necessa
Hey Balbir, I just wanted to give this bug a nudge. I'm happy to write
lsb-compliant init scripts and fix up the manpage lintian issues, but
the rpath issue is something you guys will need to address directly.
That is all that's really holding me up so let me know how to proceed
when you get a mome
No problem Balbir, I apologize, I did not mean to suggest you were
holding me up, just wondering what the next steps where and how I can
help. I shall beging working on the initscripts and manpage issues. I've
used chrpath before and I believe (but not positive) that it only allows
you to change a
I've finished the packaging for this and I've filed an ITP in debian as
well. I'm not sure if I should upload to debian and then wait for the
sync or upload to both... I'll find out the answer shortly and let you
know.
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #540298
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bi
Ok, I've nearly got it. Here's the only show-stopper issue I've found:
The cgred initscript looks for /etc/sysconfig/cgred.conf. The
sysconfig directory is not standard in Debian/Ubuntu as far as I know,
so we'll need to either provide our own initscript or make the location
of cgred.conf conf
Here's the lintian summary
** Attachment added: "libcgroup_0.34-1_amd64.lintian-summary"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/29167573/libcgroup_0.34-1_amd64.lintian-summary
--
[needs-packaging] libcgroup
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/268714
You received this bug notification because you are a mem
And here's the extended lintian summary with explainations
** Attachment added: "libcgroup_0.34-1_amd64.lintian-extended"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/29167577/libcgroup_0.34-1_amd64.lintian-extended
--
[needs-packaging] libcgroup
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/268714
You received this bug
Also, in the release tarballs it's probably a good idea to not include
config.sub, config.guess, and dist/libcgroup.spec since they're all
autogenerated at build-time.
--
[needs-packaging] libcgroup
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/268714
You received this bug notification because you are a member
I'll be happy to work on this. I should be able to take a close look
this afternoon and hopefully should have something review-able by week's
end.
--
[needs-packaging] liblua5.1-iconv
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/396287
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs
Package is in REVU: http://revu.ubuntuwire.com/p/lua-iconv
--
[needs-packaging] liblua5.1-iconv
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/396287
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.
Confirmed. 'dpkg --license' shows the license for dpkg (the debian
package manager) itself, not for packages installed on the system. To
verify the copyright of libcgroup, if you have the source you can look
into debian/copyright, or if you have the package installed on your
system you can look int
Attached is a patch that fixes this, seems to work for me but please
test and verify
** Attachment added: "freetalk_3.2-1ubuntu1.debdiff"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33037385/freetalk_3.2-1ubuntu1.debdiff
--
freetalk FTBFS
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/443241
You received this bug notific
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: freetalk
freetalk is failing to build from source:
callbacks.cc: In function 'LmHandlerResult
ft_msg_msg_handler(LmMessageHandler*, LmConnection*, LmMessage*, void*)':
callbacks.cc:156: error: assignment of read-only location '* strchr(from, 47)'
Full
Here's a much better version of the above patch
** Attachment added: "freetalk_3.2-1ubuntu1.debdiff"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33084969/freetalk_3.2-1ubuntu1.debdiff
--
freetalk FTBFS
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/443241
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubu
New diff attached.
** Attachment added: "freetalk_3.2-1ubuntu1.debdiff"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33118163/freetalk_3.2-1ubuntu1.debdiff
** Changed in: freetalk (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => New
--
freetalk FTBFS
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/443241
You received this bug notifi
Attached is a debdiff that fixes this issue.
** Attachment added: "meta-gnome2_2.22.2~4ubuntu7.debdiff"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/31610628/meta-gnome2_2.22.2%7E4ubuntu7.debdiff
--
[karmic] gnome-core-devel depens on libeel2-dev, which was removed
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/393834
You
Here's a debdiff that includes a more proper changelog entry.
** Attachment added: "meta-gnome2_2.22.2~4ubuntu7.debdiff"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/31615960/meta-gnome2_2.22.2%7E4ubuntu7.debdiff
--
[karmic] gnome-core-devel depens on libeel2-dev, which was removed
https://bugs.launchpad.ne
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: gbdfed
gbdfed is failing to build from source, see:
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+archive/test-
rebuild-20090909/+build/1215098
I have a patch for this that I'll attach shortly.
** Affects: gbdfed (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status:
Here's a debdiff that fixes the FTBFS
** Attachment added: "gbdfed_1.5-1ubuntu1.debdiff"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33232295/gbdfed_1.5-1ubuntu1.debdiff
--
gbdfed FTBFS
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/445501
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: gbgoffice
gbgoffice if failing to build from source in Karmic, see:
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+archive/test-
rebuild-20090909/+build/1215102
** Affects: gbgoffice (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
gbgoffice FTBFS
https:/
Public bug reported:
libgems-ruby is failing to build from source due to a typo in
debian/rules. See:
https://edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+archive/test-
rebuild-20090909/+build/1221530/+files/buildlog_ubuntu-karmic-i386
.libgems-ruby_1.3.5-1ubuntu1_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz
I'll have a debdiff that fix
Here's a patch that fixes this
** Attachment added: "libgems-ruby_1.3.5-1ubuntu2.debdiff"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33382746/libgems-ruby_1.3.5-1ubuntu2.debdiff
--
libgems-ruby FTBFS, typo in debian/rules
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/447677
You received this bug notification because yo
I've just finished the last changes to the initscripts and the package
is now complete. I'll upload to REVU in the morning and work on getting
it reviewed and advocated. I'll post the REVU link here when the upload
is complete.
--
[needs-packaging] libcgroup
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/268714
Package is in REVU: http://revu.ubuntuwire.com/p/libcgroup
--
[needs-packaging] libcgroup
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/268714
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
ht
All of the source files are licensed under the LGPL (2.1) with 3
exceptions: src/parse.c, src/parse.h, and src/pam/pam_cgroup.c
Those files have licenses in the comment header, parse.[ch] specifies
GPL and pam_cgroup.c specifies BSD-3 (or GPL)
The discussion on REVU revolves around properly docum
Ok, I'm now clear on the licensing after discussing [1] with Dhaval.
[1]: http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/259851/
--
[needs-packaging] libcgroup
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/268714
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubunt
I've uploaded Debian Sid's version [1] to my PPA [2], this version seems
to fix the issue. It's for jaunty, but you should be able to pull the
dsc and rebuild for karmic -- I'd be happy to do this if it would help.
If this package works for you then we can request a sync. I'm happy to
help out on t
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: ubuntu-dev-tools
The launchpad API has changed causing pull-lp-source to file to parse
the dsc file from the url contents. It's a one-liner, I've pushed a
branch here:
lp:~jbernard/+junk/ubuntu-dev-tools
** Affects: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu)
Impo
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: ksymoops
ksymoops is failing to build from source, see [1]. There is a bug in
Debian already that addresses this [2]. I've attached a debdiff that
implements the suggested fix attached to this report.
[1]: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+archive/test-rebui
** Attachment added: "ksymoops_2.4.11-1ubuntu1.debdiff"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/32936766/ksymoops_2.4.11-1ubuntu1.debdiff
--
ksymoops FTBFS
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/441395
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
Here's a debdiff that changes to Maintainer field since I've introduced
an ubuntu epoch to the version string
** Attachment added: "ksymoops_2.4.11-1ubuntu1.debdiff"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/32937331/ksymoops_2.4.11-1ubuntu1.debdiff
--
ksymoops FTBFS
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/44139
Yes, I will revisit this in the next day or so and get this all
straightened out.
--
[needs-packaging] libcgroup
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/268714
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-b
Public bug reported:
libcgroup should be split apart into smaller subpackages so that the PAM
module is in it's own package and the binaries are not tied to the
libcgroup soname.
** Affects: libcgroup (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
libcgroup should be broken up into
debdiff attached! This should be very close to what we're looking for.
Pay special attention to two files: debian/copyright and debian/control.
Make sure I got the wording correct in debian/copyright and it includes
the pieces left out previously. Also, the package descriptions in
debian/control, I
This is very similar to bug
https://bugs.launchpad.net/cinder/+bug/1280367
A patch to allow backend hostname configuration was posted:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/95022/
I think this may address your concern here.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bug
** Changed in: libcgroup (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Jon Bernard (jbernard) => (unassigned)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/827279
Title:
Several problems in cgclear
To man
** Changed in: libcgroup (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Jon Bernard (jbernard) => (unassigned)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/693594
Title:
cgroup-bin should not move kthreadd int
You're absolutely right, I will allocate time this week to put together
a new upstream release.
Serge, would have have time to help me test and provide feedback?
Jon
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.la
@Serge I see your nomination, but it's unclear to me how to accept it.
Can you give me a pointer?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1188850
Title:
cgrulesengd cannot process symlinked ex
I just uploaded the newest upstream to debian that includes the
pkgconfig files.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1203591
Title:
[MIR] liburcu
To manage notifications about this bug go
I've just pushed a branch that's been sync'd with Debian's version
0.37.1-1. This sync pulls in two security fixes that should be included
in Natty if possible. I've rebased Serge Hallyn's patches on top of this
branch, so they are included as well.
Branch is at lp:~jbernard/ubuntu/lucid/libcgroup
Sorry! Branch is really at: lp:~jbernard/ubuntu/natty/libcgroup/upstart
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/644669
Title:
cgred should be started before libvirt-bin
--
ubuntu-bugs mailin
This sounds a lot like Debian bug #555711 [1]. Can you take a look at
that and see if the proposed fix solves your problem?
[1]: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=555711
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #555711
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=555711
--
Y
Hey guys, thanks for the bug report and detailed explanation, I will
take a close look at this as soon as my workload eases up; In the mean
time, I've prepared a PPA (ppa:jbernard/libcgroup) that contains
backports of the latest stable version of libcgroup. If we could verify
that this behaviour ex
Hi Serge, thanks for the report. I'll test your change and if things
look good (I expect so), I'll upload this patch to Debian. Then we
should be able to file a sync-request to get it into maverick.
J
--
cgroup-bin stops libvirt from starting domains
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/607849
You re
Philippe, no worries. Thanks for the update.
--
cgroup-bin stops libvirt from starting domains
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/607849
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.c
Ok, I just uploaded version 0.36.2-3 to Debian. It should be in the
archive within a few hours and a sync request can be filed to have it
pulled into Maverick. In the mean time, I've uploaded backports of that
version to my ppa:
ppa:jbernard/libcgroup
(https://launchpad.net/~jbernard/+archive/
58 matches
Mail list logo
