[Bug 176211] Re: [needs-packaging] coot

2008-01-16 Thread John Stokes
I might be wrong, but I'd imagine that the coot.patch and coot.info here: http://fink.cvs.sourceforge.net/fink/dists/10.4/stable/main/finkinfo/sci/ would be useful when packaging - even though the dependencies (as you say) will need to be corrected. -- [needs-packaging] coot https://bugs.launc

[Bug 176209] Re: [needs-packaging] gpp4

2008-01-16 Thread John Stokes
FYI: The copyright holder CCLRC has changed its name to the Science and Technology Facilities Council (STFC). http://www.scitech.ac.uk/ -- [needs-packaging] gpp4 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/176209 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug c

[Bug 176209] Re: [needs-packaging] gpp4

2008-01-02 Thread John Stokes
Somewhat usefully perhaps, ccp4 has been packaged for fink: http://pdb.finkproject.org/pdb/package.php/ccp4 It is my understanding that gpp4 covers a part of that ccp4 package, so it is not a drop in replacement. (Note that the licenses for ccp4 and gpp4 are different). -- [needs-packaging] gp

[Bug 176211] Re: [needs-packaging] coot

2008-01-02 Thread John Stokes
Coot has been packed by fink: http://pdb.finkproject.org/pdb/package.php/coot Does that help? -- [needs-packaging] coot https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/176211 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mai