I am glad to see that the source code link above works, because
sourceforge no longer lists any source for the project. All I was able
to find was the svn trunk, listed from here:
http://www.powerfolder.com/about_us.html (click on "Access to the java
source code repository")
--
[needs-packaging]
>From the logfile, the error message was:
sun-dlj-v1-1 license could not be presented
try 'dpkg-reconfigure debconf' to select a frontend other than noninteractive
You need to accept Sun's license in order to install the sun-java*
packages. If you install sun-java6-jre interactively then y
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 288397 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/288397
Sorry, I didn't word that quite that way I really meant to. If the bug
was in the underlying JVM logic then in theory some bugs could be
duplicated between the packages.
But in this case the /tmp question is
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 288397 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/288397
This bug cannot be a duplicate of #288397, since this is for
openjdk6-plugin while that is for sun-java6-plugin. How do you remove
the duplicate status?
--
first applet load asks for temp dir (cancel freeze
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 288397 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/288397
To me this does not sound like a duplicate of #288397. For one thing,
this is a crash, where that is a hang.
--
Running Sun Java 6 plugin crashes Firefox 3
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/250601
You receive
Ubuntu 8.04 LTS (hardy) has 2 Java6 plugins that Firefox could use. If
you go to tools -> addons and go to the plugins tab which java plugin(s)
do you see listed?
** Changed in: sun-java6 (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Incomplete
--
[8.04] [hardy] Applets bail frequently in FF3 / JRE6
https://
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 85969 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/85969
$ sudo aptitude remove sun-java6-doc
(It seems unlikely that you will need this english documentation anyway.
See http://doc.java.sun.com/DocWeb/ for translated docs.)
** This bug has been marked a duplicate
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 85969 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/85969
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 85969
Java Docs Package Won't Install
--
package sun-java6-doc 6-10-0ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: le
sous-processus post-installation script a retourn?
Public bug reported:
Changes in 1.6.0_11
The full internal version number for this update release is 1.6.0_11-b03
(where "b" means "build"). The external version number is 6u11.
http://java.sun.com/javase/6/webnotes/6u11.html
http://blogs.sun.com/security/entry/advance_notification_of_security_
The last line in the log file:
dpkg: error processing
/var/cache/apt/archives/sun-java6-bin_6-10-0ubuntu2_i386.deb (--unpack):
failed in buffer_write(fd) (10, ret=-1): backend dpkg-deb during
`./usr/lib/jvm/java-6-sun-1.6.0.10/jre/lib/rt.jar': No space left on device
--
package sun-java6-bin
I agree this doesn't seem like a dup of #255681, especially since they
seem to be different JDK implementations.
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 255681
Intrepid, Firefox crashes when viewing Java applets. Segmatation fault core
dumped.
--
[8.04] [hardy] Applets bail frequently i
drsaid,
Please see your question here:
https://answers.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sun-java6/+question/52934
--
java6 rte was broken while installing , making synaptic package manager hang up
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/303421
You received this bug notification because you are a member of U
>From your log file:
Setting up openjdk-6-jre-headless (6b12-0ubuntu6) ...
Error occurred during initialization of VM
Could not reserve enough space for object heap
--
not eneough space for rhino?
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/303499
You received this bug notification because you are a membe
How much RAM does your machine have? What were you doing when this
occurred?
** Changed in: openjdk-6 (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Incomplete
--
not eneough space for rhino?
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/303499
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, whic
>From the logfile:
Unpacking sun-java6-jre (from .../sun-java6-jre_6-10-0ubuntu2_all.deb)
...
user did not accept the sun-dlj-v1-1 license
--
package sun-java6-jre None [modified: /var/lib/dpkg/info/sun-java6-jre.list]
failed to install/upgrade: subprocess pre-installation script returned erro
I unmarked this as a duplicate of the -jre installation bug. There is
probably a -doc installation bug that this should be marked a duplicate
of, but I don't have it handy right now.
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 376223
sun-java6-jre_6-10-0ubuntu2 failed to load
--
Sun Java doc
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 364984 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/364984
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 364984
couldn't install java docs
--
Sun Java documentation failed to get installed through synaptic package manager
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/386651
Y
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 364984 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/364984
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 376223
sun-java6-jre_6-10-0ubuntu2 failed to load
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 364984
couldn't install java docs
--
package sun-java6-doc
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 364984 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/364984
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 376223
sun-java6-jre_6-10-0ubuntu2 failed to load
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 364984
couldn't install java docs
--
package sun-java6-doc
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 364984 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/364984
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 376223
sun-java6-jre_6-10-0ubuntu2 failed to load
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 364984
couldn't install java docs
--
package sun-java6-doc
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 364984 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/364984
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 352086
package sun-java6-bin 6-13-1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess
pre-installation script returned error exit status 1
** This bug has been marked a dupl
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 364984 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/364984
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 352086
package sun-java6-bin 6-13-1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess
pre-installation script returned error exit status 1
** This bug has been marked a dupl
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 364984 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/364984
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 352086
package sun-java6-bin 6-13-1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess
pre-installation script returned error exit status 1
** This bug has been marked a dupl
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 364984 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/364984
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 352086
package sun-java6-bin 6-13-1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess
pre-installation script returned error exit status 1
** This bug has been marked a dupl
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 364984 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/364984
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 352086
package sun-java6-bin 6-13-1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess
pre-installation script returned error exit status 1
** This bug has been marked a dupl
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 364984 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/364984
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 352086
package sun-java6-bin 6-13-1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess
pre-installation script returned error exit status 1
** This bug has been marked a dupl
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 364984 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/364984
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 352086
package sun-java6-bin 6-13-1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess
pre-installation script returned error exit status 1
** This bug has been marked a dupl
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 364984 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/364984
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 352086
package sun-java6-bin 6-13-1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess
pre-installation script returned error exit status 1
** This bug has been marked a dupl
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 364984 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/364984
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 352086
package sun-java6-bin 6-13-1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess
pre-installation script returned error exit status 1
** This bug has been marked a dupl
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 364984 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/364984
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 364984
couldn't install java docs
--
package fontconfig 2.6.0-1ubuntu12 failed to install/upgrade:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/375374
You received this
The sun-java6-doc package is one that should not be installed without
planning for it. (Personally I never install it because of that
reason.)
--
package sun-java6-doc 6-10-0ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess
post-installation script returned error exit status 1
https://bugs.launchpa
>From the end of the log file you attached:
Unpacking sun-java6-jre (from .../sun-java6-jre_6-13-1_all.deb) ...
user did not accept the sun-dlj-v1-1 license
dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/sun-java6-jre_6-13-1_all.deb
(--unpack):
subprocess pre-installation script returned error e
Since Java6u10 the sun-java6-jre package has included 2 java plugins for
Firefox (and other compatible browsers.) To the best of my knowledge
none of the package installation or configuration procedures either
report which is being used or give you the option to choose which to
use. But to help o
Ken, the simplest (and most sensible, IMHO) action is to purge the sun-
java6-doc package from your system. You probably don't need it.
If you do want to use the java docs they're readily available online.
Or essentially the same information is available in the openjdk6 docs
package. And it does
Matt, beginning with java6u10 there are two java plugins. The old OJI
one and the new (incompatible with firefox 2.x) NPAPI one. The new one
may be less compatible with ancient applets.
I'm not positive but I think 9.04 may use the new plugin by default.
But you should be able to switch to the o
Yes, using the eikbank.dk link I can reproduce a hang.
The java console shows RMI warnings repeatedly.
I haven't tried the plugin2 version yet.
--
java applets freeze firefox in intrepid
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/288642
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
When I tried icedtea6-plugin the applet loaded and appeared to be
running ok. So Morten, that would be a possible work-around. Can you
give it a try?
--
java applets freeze firefox in intrepid
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/288642
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
Confirmed on
https://www.eikbank.dk/netbank/logon/tidligere_skandiabanken_kunde with
the classic plugin from sun-java{5,6}-plugin
** Changed in: sun-java6 (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
java applets freeze firefox in intrepid
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/288642
You received this
** Changed in: sun-java6 (Ubuntu)
Sourcepackagename: None => sun-java6
--
Out of date java 6 plugin installed
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/291135
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs
Morten - that's great to hear!
I just tried with the plugin2 java plugin, and it also appears to work.
--
java applets freeze firefox in intrepid
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/288642
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
"user did not accept the sun-dlj-v1-1 license"
You didn't accept the license, apparently.
(BTW, yes you are running a 64-bit version)
--
Installing Sun Java from Add/remove
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/294371
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which i
I am not positive but my guess is that the root of this problem is
related to the sun-java6-doc package. Please try again, marking sun-
java6-doc to be uninstalled.
--
package sun-java6-javadb 6-07-3ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: problemas de
dependencias - se deja sin configurar
https://bu
Hi Timothy,
I looked through your output and didn't see anything obviously wrong. I
did notice though that the applet tag had mayscript="" where I would
have expected that value to be set to true in order to use LiveConnect.
-james.
--
LiveConnect/javascript not yet implemented in icedtea-gcjw
Hi Elias,
Your suggestion is fine with me personally, but there are still a lot of
people who want to use sun-java6-plugin with Firefox 2, which can't use
the new plugin2 from 6u10.
Is there a bug open in Sun's bug parade for the regression of the
classic plugin?
-james.
--
The old plugin hang
"GNU Class path's security implementation is not complete." is not a
message from sun-java6-plugin. My guess would be the gcjwebplugin
package, which uses either cacao or jamvm for the java runtime.
It is easy (and generally good that it's possible) to have multiple java
runtimes installed at the
Is this a duplicate of Bug #288397?
--
java applets freeze firefox in intrepid
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/288642
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists
The packages are in the intrepid repository.
--
compiz & java windows always grey
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/118983
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://li
closing as requested
** Changed in: sun-java6 (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Fix Released
--
Can not access bank account
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/226113
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs maili
Alfas, the only java plugin available for 64-bit systems is icedtea-
gcjwebplugin. Some applets work, but it's not surprising if the ones
you are interested in don't work.
The only option currently available, as far as I know, is to run a
hybrid 32bit system. I haven't done that myself, but the
Technically the –enable-liveconnect is in the icedtea project, instead
of OpenJDK, but that's a nit. The reason it's not enabled is that it's
alpha-quality at best.
In the post from February that you referenced, Thomas mentioned Sun's
new Java plugin. That one actually has a lot of promise, if S
The reporter is questioning the fact that the package is a 'wrapper' to
operate on files that could not be packaged and included in the
repository.
** Changed in: sun-java6 (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
** bug changed to question:
https://answers.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sun-java6
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 85969 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/85969
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 85969
Java Docs Package Won't Install
--
E: sun-java6-doc: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit
status 1
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/31
Changing status per reporter's comment #2.
** Changed in: sun-java6 (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
--
package sun-java6-jre None [modified: /var/lib/dpkg/info/sun-java6-jre.list]
failed to install/upgrade: subprocess pre-installation script returned error
exit status 1
https://bugs.lau
The most recent security update was 6u11. A package has been created
for jaunty already.
--
Sun Java 6 package should be updated to 6u4
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/187570
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.
--
ubuntu-bug
>From the attached log file:
Setting up sun-java6-doc (6-10-0ubuntu2) ...
This package is an installer package, it does not actually contain the
JDK documentation. You will need to go download one of the
archives:
jdk-6-doc.zip jdk-6-doc-ja.zip
(choose the non-update version if this is the
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 85969 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/85969
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 85969
Java Docs Package Won't Install
--
java06 installation crash
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/321329
You received this bug notification because you are a
>From the end of the logfile you attached:
Selecting previously deselected package sun-java6-bin.
Unpacking sun-java6-bin (from .../sun-java6-bin_6-10-0ubuntu2_i386.deb) ...
user did not accept the sun-dlj-v1-1 license
--
Java wont install
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/317510
You received this
>From the attached log file:
Spacchetto sun-java6-bin (da .../sun-java6-bin_6-10-0ubuntu2_i386.deb) ...
user did not accept the sun-dlj-v1-1 license
--
not complete installation of java 6 runtime on ubuntu 8.10 operating system
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/318538
You received this bug notific
>From the end of the logfile:
javaldx: Could not find a Java Runtime Environment!
javaldx: Could not find a Java Runtime Environment!
done.
Setting up libstdc++6-4.3-dev (4.3.2-1ubuntu11) ...
Setting up openjdk-6-jre-lib (6b12-0ubuntu6) ...
Setting up libaccess-bridge-java (1.24.0-0ubuntu2) ..
The english translation is that this bug is fixed in jaunty, the ubuntu
development version which will eventually become the 9.04 release.
There is no released ubuntu version that includes the fix for this bug.
--
Java Applet Window cannot be closed.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/37330
You rece
There have been previous reports of problems opening libjli.so. If I
recall correctly that happened when booted from a live CD. Is that how
you were booted?
If so then I believe the problem was fixed in ubuntu 8.10 but probably
hasn't been backported yet to 8.04.
** Changed in: sun-java6 (Ubun
Just to be clear: the 6u12 download is still an 'early access' version.
The actual release is expected next February. By all means download it
and test it out if you don't mind being a guinea pig. Just realize that
it's not generally available yet.
--
[Package Request] sun-java6-plugin on AMD64
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 85969 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/85969
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 85969
Java Docs Package Won't Install
--
Installing Sun JDK docs with synaptic, details suggest Sun tarball(?) isn't
compatible with SPM install task
https://
Does the 64-bit Sun Java plugin work as expected?
--
64-bit icedtea plugin doesn't handle applets that sun6 plugin handles
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/344669
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing lis
I was reading eclipse release notes recently (probably the 3.5M5
release) and saw a warning about using a whole range of JVM versions. I
think something like 6u3 through 6u7 had problems.
It's possible to grab 6u11 or 6u12 from intrepid and/or jaunty and
install it on hardy (and even earlier than
@Michael, yes it would be a duplicate of this bug. (In my opinion the
bug is with the packaging system not having a way for the sun-java
package to not be installed without saying there was a bug.)
--
package sun-java6-jre None [modified: /var/lib/dpkg/info/sun-java6-jre.list]
failed to install
@Scott, it already is in jaunty.
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sun-java6
(BTW, the version from sun that debian/ubuntu requires in order to
create a package is described at the https://jdk-distros.dev.java.net/
page. It results in the same binaries as the download you linked to,
but is pr
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 85969 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/85969
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 85969
Java Docs Package Won't Install
--
package sun-java6-doc 6-10-0ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess
post-installation script returned error exi
@Stoker The sun-java packages can't be added to any distribution until
they are posted to the https://jdk-distros.dev.java.net/ group. For
Debian/Ubuntu doko often has the new packages out in 24-48 hours of that
event!
My personal gripe is that the updated packages (especially the security
releas
This report is really a question about which package provides the javac
command. The output listed in the report shows a list of packages, and
the sun-java6-plugin package is not in that list.
The javac command is used by programmers and administrators to compile java
programs.
For the inexperie
Closing since Markus said it's working now.
** Changed in: sun-java6 (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
--
package sun-java6-bin 6-10-0ubuntu2 [modified:
/var/lib/dpkg/info/sun-java6-bin.list] failed to install/upgrade: subprocess
pre-installation script returned error exit status 9
https:
>From the end of the log file:
Log started: 2009-03-27 23:37:30
(Reading database ... 128413 files and directories currently installed.)
Preparing to replace openjdk-6-jre-lib 6b12-0ubuntu6.1 (using
.../openjdk-6-jre-lib_6b12-0ubuntu6.4_all.deb) ...
Unpacking replacement openjdk-6-jre-lib ...
Pr
@Llanero76 you need to accept the license for the sun-java packages to
install. If you want to but don't know how then please ask a question
(or convert this bug to a question) or ask on irc#ubuntu or a forum.
>From the end of the log file:
Log started: 2009-03-28 22:15:08
Seleccionando el paqu
For anyone to trouble-shoot this issue they will need to know what the
java applet was. Is it on a public web page?
Also, can this be reproduced with any other applets?
--
java crashed with signal 5
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/411052
You received this bug notification because you are a memb
>From the attached logfile, this is the error:
dpkg-deb: `/var/cache/apt/archives/openjdk-6-jre-
headless_6b14-1.4.1-0ubuntu11_i386.deb' is not a debian format archive
Looks like a corrupted download?
--
openjdk-6 did not install
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/412077
You received this bug not
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 367063 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/367063
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 367063
Firefox 3.5 should be one of the dependency options
--
sun-java6-plugin depends on specific browsers
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/412296
You receiv
According to krysswolf, the reporter, he took administrative steps using
apt-get to resolve his issue.
** Changed in: openjdk-6 (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
--
PC freez in upgrade, cannot remove the package openjdk-6-jre-lib
6b14-1.4.1-0ubuntu10 (failed to install/upgrade/remove)
http
The log file is showing segmentation faults all over the place. Perhaps
related to dpkg? Perhaps faulty RAM?
To me it doesn't look like an openjdk problem.
--
package icedtea6-plugin 6b14-1.4.1-0ubuntu7 failed to install/upgrade:
subprocess new pre-removal script returned error exit status 13
6u14 was Published in jaunty-updates on 2009-07-15
** Changed in: sun-java6 (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Released
--
sun-java6-jdk 6-14-1 for jaunty
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/393913
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubu
>From the end of the log file:
Unpacking sun-java6-jre (from .../sun-java6-jre_6-14-0ubuntu1.9.04_all.deb) ...
user did not accept the sun-dlj-v1-1 license
--
package sun-java6-jre 6-14-0ubuntu1.9.04 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess
pre-installation script returned error exit status 1
http
@xor, I know it's a bit of a pain that the packages aren't in all the
repos, but since you're a dev you probably have the ability to grab them
from a different repo and use them. The bits are always identical
anyway, since they were actually compiled by Sun. I have frequently
installed the sun-ja
@vistaus, i think @irihapeti was agreeing with you
--
version 1.6.0_15 is available
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/409559
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https:/
** Tags added: mp3 vbr
--
MP3 track times are incorrect
https://launchpad.net/bugs/35112
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
I'm seeing this bug with 6.06.1 LTS. Track times are incorrect in
Rhythmbox, Serpentine and Cowbell. The first 2 showed exactly the same
"way off" duration, but Cowbell was only a little off.
Track times for Banshee, VLC, Totem and Nautilus properties seem fine.
(The command I used was audio/x-
I'm using 6.06.1 and that file will play (sounds like some guitar
plucking) in VLC and Audacity, but gstreamer-based programs won't play
it at all.
--
Can't play free format MP3
https://launchpad.net/bugs/49522
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/ma
Hi John,
Thank you very much for sorting this out!
Regarding feisty, to the best of my knowledge, everyone who has tried
the 2.5.0.0repack1-0ubuntu1.1~proposed1 deb has reported success, both
with feisty and edgy. But the package needs to be renamed in order to
make it into the archives. (I'm n
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: azureus
double-click on a torrent to open up its information tab. Then ctrl-
PgDn once or twice to get a crash. (should switch tabs instead)
** Affects: azureus (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
azureus crashes on ctrl-PgDn
On 10/27/07, Jamey Sharp wrote:
>
> you run broken applications, like Java before JDK7 beta 22.
>
> Furthermore, experimental packages of JDK7 are available for Ubuntu
> Gutsy ...
>
Ubuntu Gutsy repositories have the icedtea packages based on JDK7 beta 21.
The Hardy archives have the beta 22 pack
Note that Java 6u3 is available now, and fixes about 4 security issues
(I wish Sun would collect those all in a single list) and also makes the
javadb package available again.
The debs from gutsy install just fine on feisty, and I haven't noticed a
single problem with running them.
-james.
--
p
Yes, the java 6u3 package for gutsy has already been released. Note
that it has about 4 security fixes that Sun's ReleaseNotes file fails to
mention. They can be gleaned (for now) from
http://blogs.sun.com/security/
The request for a backport to feisty was made in Bug #115687, but that
recently
I went to the site and was able to get into the chat window. (I think
they might have rearranged their navigation a little bit.)
I was not able to reproduce any of the issues reported. That is I had
no problems at all with steps 7-10.
I'm running ubuntu 7.04 (feisty fawn) with the exception of
The current Gutsy version is Java 1.6.0_03 (java 6u3) but it hasn't been
added yet to the feisty repositories. However it is possible to
download the gutsy debs and install them on feisty.
--
beryl & java windows always grey
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/118983
You received this bug notificati
Sun's bug 4802695 (link above) is currently RFE #1 on the JDC:
Note that a possible interim workaround is the gcjwebplugin, although it
is not yet recommended for general use. It sounds, though, like the
icedtea project could change that, likely before Java 7 is released.
-james.
--
[Package R
Hi, I believe this is the reason for your failure to install:
"user did not accept the sun-dlj-v1-1 license"
sun-java6 is in the multiverse repository for several reasons,
including this "license acceptace nicety"
Please try to install again, and accept the license this time. I've
occasionally
Was this fixed by a recent change in the openjdk-6 package?
--
fontconfig.properties broken for chinese fonts
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/213925
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs
"-version:1.6+" is documented by Sun somewhere - I haven't looked at it
for a year or more now. Hmm -
http://java.sun.com/javase/6/docs/technotes/tools/solaris/java.html has
a little bit about it.
--
Installation of the package breaks automatic version detection
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1
Closing as invalid per the comment from estelm4 that the problem was
with not having the multiverse repository enabled.
** Changed in: sun-java6 (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Invalid
--
installation error for java
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/211754
You received this bug notification
> I've been following the JRE release notes, and nothing in there suggests
> that this issue has been fixed.
How about http://bugs.sun.com/view_bug.do?bug_id=6633656 and
http://blogs.sun.com/darcy/entry/openjdk_6_sources_for_b09 ?
Does openjdk-6 (6b09-0ubuntu2) correct this for you?
--
Printing
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 207064 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/207064
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 207064
LiveConnect/javascript not yet implemented in icedtea-gcjwebplugin
--
Java applets do not properly work with openjdk-6
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs
I hate to discourage anyone from reporting a bug, but this doesn't look
like a bug to me.
1) all the other -XX options seem to use syntax like -XX:PermSize=256m
2) is anyone really using XX:PermSize? Google only found it mentioned 3
times.
3) these -XX options are described as "not stable" and
1 - 100 of 182 matches
Mail list logo
