[Bug 160203] Re: ghostscript's bbox driver gives wrong result

2008-10-09 Thread Jaime Villate
** Changed in: ghostscript (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Released => New -- ghostscript's bbox driver gives wrong result https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/160203 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ub

[Bug 160203] Re: ghostscript's bbox driver gives wrong result

2008-10-09 Thread Jaime Villate
This bug has reappeared in more recent versions that I have tested in i386 and AMD64: 8.61.dfsg.1-1ubuntu3 and the one that comes with the beta release of Intrepid: 8.63.dfsg.1-0ubuntu4 I have compiled version 8.63 from the upstream sources, and it does not have this bug. The problem is

[Bug 160203] Re: ghostscript's bbox driver gives wrong result

2007-11-14 Thread Jaime Villate
Here is another PostScript file that shows better the bug. The command "gs -sDEVICE=bbox -dNOPAUSE -dBATCH example2.ps" gives an empty bounding box, which is wrong: GPL Ghostscript SVN PRE-RELEASE 8.61 (2007-08-02) Copyright (C) 2007 Artifex Software, Inc. All rights reserved. This software come

[Bug 160203] ghostscript's bbox driver gives wrong result

2007-11-05 Thread Jaime Villate
Public bug reported: Ghostscript in Gutsy (and Hardy) gives wrong results for the Bounding Box for most EPS files I've tried. It used to work fine with gs-gpl in Feisty. One simple example of the failure is the following (using the example.ps file attached): gs -sDEVICE=bbox -dNOPAUSE -dBATC

[Bug 160203] Re: ghostscript's bbox driver gives wrong result

2007-11-23 Thread Jaime Villate
I have just notice something strange. If in the test file example2.ps I remove the line that says "%!PS-Adobe-2.0", the bug appears again: the file (see example3.ps attached) is recognized as PostScript, but the bounding box is wrong: > ghostscript -sDEVICE=bbox -dNOPAUSE -dBATCH example3.ps GP

Re: [Bug 160203] Re: ghostscript's bbox driver gives wrong result

2007-11-23 Thread Jaime Villate
it because I have lots of figures in my lecture notes that use ghostscript to calculate the bbox before they can be converted into PDF and added to the notes (http://fisica.fe.up.pt/eic0014/fisica2.pdf). Regards, Jaime Villate University of Porto, Portugal -- ghostscript's bbox d

[Bug 160203] Re: ghostscript's bbox driver gives wrong result

2007-11-23 Thread Jaime Villate
One more thing. This PS file also gives an error: %!PS 210 490 moveto 120 60 rlineto -10 10 rlineto -120 -60 rlineto closepath clip newpath 195 495 moveto 125 65 rlineto -10 10 rlineto -125 -65 rlineto closepath fill showpage while this one works fine: %!PS-Adobe 210 490 moveto 120 60 rlineto -1

[Bug 435808] Re: ath5k phy0: noise floor calibration *failed* (not *timeout*)

2010-02-18 Thread Jaime Villate
Hi ^_Pepe_^, I've just installed the linux-backports-modules-wireless-karmic-generic package and the ath5k phy0: noise... messages still keep popping up in dmesg. I'm using UNR-karmic on a Toshiba NB100 (Linux 2.6.31-19-generic, Atheros AR5001 Wireless Network Adapter). Thanks for looking into

[Bug 435808] Re: ath5k phy0: noise floor calibration *failed* (not *timeout*)

2010-02-18 Thread Jaime Villate
Oops, sorry for the noise. I had not realized that you had recommended to use kernel 2.6.32. After updating to Linux 2-6-32-020632, I'm getting the ath5k messages less often, but they still persist: [ 209.311282] ath5k phy0: noise floor calibration timeout (2462MHz) [ 220.197227] ath5k phy0: n

[Bug 435808] Re: ath5k phy0: noise floor calibration *failed* (not *timeout*)

2010-02-19 Thread Jaime Villate
Well, in bug #427439 sent me to this bug page, and I'm glad they did because the fix recommend by ^_Pepe_^ in #20 solved my problem :) -- ath5k phy0: noise floor calibration *failed* (not *timeout*) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/435808 You received this bug notification because you are a member

[Bug 429015] Re: python-visual seg faults even in simple test cases

2010-02-21 Thread Jaime Villate
Thanks Florian and linuxcub. I had to do both #2 and #3 to make VPython work in my Ubuntu 9.10 amd64 system. -- python-visual seg faults even in simple test cases https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/429015 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed

[Bug 904469] [NEW] tcl-vtk fails to import vtk into wish8.5

2011-12-14 Thread Jaime Villate
Public bug reported: vtk cannot be used in wish8.5. I get the following error: % package require vtk couldn't load file "/usr/lib/vtk-5.6/libvtkRenderingTCL.so": /usr/lib/vtk-5.6/libvtkRenderingTCL.so: undefined symbol: _Z23vtkTclVoidFuncArgDeletePv attempt to provide package vtkRenderingTCL 5