Hi - Tor (and incidentally a newly minted Debian) developer here - I'd
request that you upgrade the package because 0.2.4.x uses ECC which
reduces the load on the network. The Tor Network is under very heavy
load and older versions of Tor are being used by a botnet:
https://blog.torproject.org/b
What needs to be done to push this bug forward?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/697407
Title:
Please update Tor in older versions of Ubuntu
To manage notifications about this bug go t
*** This bug is a security vulnerability ***
Public security bug reported:
This is for Pidgin 2.7.11 (libpurple 2.7.11); the package is 'pidgin'
version '1:2.7.11-1ubuntu2.2' on Ubuntu Natty.
I originally reported this to the Pidgin developers but it appears to also be
related to GTK on Natty.
This bug appears to actually crash the X server - so it's probably a bug
in a few things. Please read the pidgin bug to better understand the
issue.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/104114
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1000363 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1000363
*** This bug is a security vulnerability ***
Public security bug reported:
intrigeri has discovered a format string bug in the most recently
packaged versions of pidgin-otr; I've tested the patch and built
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1000363 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1000363
This is also a debian bug:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=673154
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1000363 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1000363
It appears that this is a dupe but the bug system is crashing when i try to
mark it as such:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pidgin-otr/+bug/1000363
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug
Thanks to Ubuntu for not shipping an obviously exploitable component in
the face of an arrogant upstream author who puts his users at risk.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/885027
Title:
I've opened a new bug that is related as the situation has changed:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/879087
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/200109
Title:
DMA for firewire opens s
I found that IDA Pro 6.0 worked fine on the previous version of Ubuntu
but on 11.04, I had to write a wrapper to work around this bug:
cat idaq64.sh
#!/bin/bash
export GDK_PIXBUF_MODULE_FILE=/usr/lib32/gdk-pixbuf-2.0/2.10.0/loaders.cache
~/bin/ida/idaq64
This seems allow IDA Pro to launch but IDA
I've found that it's is simpler and more stable to build a 32bit
Maverick chroot with a few bind mounts for running IDA Pro.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/781870
Title:
32-bit librar
I'd like to confirm this bug too when using an SSH key with no
passphrase.
I'm able to override the issue by running "SSH_AUTH_SOCK=0 ssh -v
user@host"
Description:Ubuntu 10.04.1 LTS
Release:10.04
Codename: lucid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member o
I should note that this x86_64 and so clearly it's not a big endian bug
for my machine.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/201786
Title:
ssh Agent admitted failure to sign using the key o
If I install 'seahorse-plugins', I'm still not able to use this key and
account without modifying SSH_AUTH_SOCK.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/201786
Title:
ssh Agent admitted failur
** Changed in: tor (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
** Changed in: tor (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Jacob Appelbaum (jacob-appelbaum)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.ne
The debian/Ubuntu build should have their ulimit raised automatically.
** Changed in: tor (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Jacob Appelbaum (jacob-appelbaum)
** Changed in: tor (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
Tor should start by default unless Vidalia is configured to override it.
** Changed in: tor (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Jacob Appelbaum (jacob-appelbaum)
** Changed in: tor (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a mem
Is this bug still relevant?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/149679
Title:
package tor 0.1.2.17-1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-
installation script returned error exit s
This will happen if and only if the upstream package (debian) does this
by default.
** Changed in: tor (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Jacob Appelbaum (jacob-appelbaum)
** Changed in: tor (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because y
** Changed in: tor (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Jacob Appelbaum (jacob-appelbaum)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/134208
Title:
/etc/init.d/tor doesn't use log_da
How important is this? We're currently discussing the issues upstream.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/134208
Title:
/etc/init.d/tor doesn't use log_daemon_msg/log_end_msg
--
ubuntu-
ort = 8118
serverMaxSlots = 8
serverSlots = 2
socksParentProxy = "localhost:9050"
socksProxyType = socks5
tunnelAllowedPorts = 1-65535
I believe this should go in the privoxy package and not the Tor package.
** Changed in: tor (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Jacob Appelbaum (j
** Changed in: tor (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Jacob Appelbaum (jacob-appelbaum)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/697407
Title:
Please update Tor in older versions
Fix Released
** Changed in: tor (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Jacob Appelbaum (jacob-appelbaum)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/314585
Title:
tor 0.1.2.19-2 (amd64) crash in ge
** Changed in: tor (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Weems (leoville) => Jacob Appelbaum (jacob-appelbaum)
** Changed in: tor (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
I'm one of the upstream developers and the other upstream developer in
the discussion is the main Debian packager. :-)
If you want to write a patch and had a good reason, I think we might
accept it - otherwise, I suspect we'd rather not add a new dep (lsb-
base) just because it looks pretty Bu
** Changed in: tor (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/134208
Title:
/etc/init.d/tor doesn't use log_daemon_msg/log_end_msg
--
ubuntu-bug
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: tor
Tor synchronization from Debian is currently blocked. Kees suggested
that I should formally ask to have Tor unblocked.
The specific packages required from Debian are 'tor' and 'tor-geoipdb';
'torbutton' would also be nice but isn't as pressing.
We'd
The main blocker for bug #413657 was that we didn't have anyone inside
Tor that wanted to ensure that Ubuntu got the attention that it
deserved. That has now changed.
I'm a Tor developer and I'm also committed to seeing that our Ubuntu
support finally returns to a reasonable state of affairs. The
If I were to contribute a list of SSHFP DNS records - where should I do
that? Should I file them as bugs?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/689199
Title:
SSHFP DNS record for ppa.launchp
As I've stated in Bug #689188; I'm willing to take over Tor work on
Ubuntu.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/413657
Title:
Please sync tor 0.2.1.19-1 (universe) from Debian testing (mai
@Jelmer - exactly; it's either a bug in Twisted or a config issue.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/689213
Title:
PPA sshd configuration
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.
Is there a list of all Ubuntu SSH services? I'd be happy to scan some
netblocks and produce the required SSHFP records for you guys.
I'm not clear on the paramiko status on SSHFP; perhaps someone can ask
Robey?
DNSSEC is not required for SSHFP - it's merely a good idea if you want
to seriously tr
@andrew - I'm not clear on that either - what seems clear is that if
it's administratively prohibited, it should probably say so.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/689213
Title:
PPA sshd
In case it isn't clear, Peter has done a ton of work on the Debian and
consequently Ubuntu packaging. We're very grateful for his efforts and
we just want to normalize the process for many Ubuntu users. Advanced
users will still want to use his alpha builds in the Tor repo; we just
want to make it
@Andrew - probably so; I'm glad that you guys are on top of this.
Would it be prudent to log the error and the offending activity, perhaps
by user? That would at least give you an idea if people are poking at it
and decide if it's worth filing a bug upstream?
I agree that this is a lot better tha
Wonderful! Thank you!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/689188
Title:
Unblock Tor auto-syncing from Debian
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu
It probably makes sense to use the packages we have on
deb.torproject.org; are we cleared to push those even though they're
radically different versions?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/6
38 matches
Mail list logo
