[Bug 398316] Re: cant decompress files with ü

2009-12-11 Thread Hernán
I must say, it is not fixed. I'm using karmik and with the Test provided by "cbrmichi" i have encountered the (Codificación No Valida) message. This has happend to me as well with certain (private) files of my own. It's odd, since I have never had to do any worarrounds for this matter with Jaunt

[Bug 403135] Re: Notification area icon wrongly rendered/has a black background (multiple apps)

2009-12-07 Thread Hernán
Have the same problem with some icons like the JDownloader and Amarok (1.41). But worst is with the network manager, that doesn't work in the notification area, it's just a grey square. I'm using Karmic. ** Attachment added: "Notification area icons problem.png" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/3

[Bug 398316] Re: cant decompress files with ü

2009-12-21 Thread Hernán
I'm sorry I wouldn't like to change the Status on this Bug since nobody has replied my post. Is anybody else having this problem? I've tested on two machines with different Iso Images and the result is the same with 9.10. I cannot decompress nor open files with characters like "º" or "ü". If any

[Bug 1579783] [NEW] Compilation error when CCSDTQ is enabled

2016-05-09 Thread Hernán
rch] Error 2 make[1]: se sale del directorio '/datos/nwchem/nwchem-6.6+r27746' debian/rules:68: fallo en las instrucciones para el objetivo 'build' make: *** [build] Error 2 dpkg-buildpackage: fallo: debian/rules build devolvió un estado de salida de error 2 Regards, Hernán

[Bug 753642] Re: impossible to type message or reply

2011-09-27 Thread Hernán
This issue still goes on for Oneiric, both dev and stable channels -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/753642 Title: impossible to type message or reply To manage notifications about this

[Bug 648838] [NEW] package python-virtkey 0.60 .0-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: el subproceso s cript post-installation instalado devolvió el có digo de salida de error 1

2010-09-27 Thread Hernán
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 648695 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/648695 Public bug reported: Just run a system update in Ubuntu 10.10 beta 64bits and received this error. ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.10 Package: python-virtkey 0.60.0-0ubuntu1 ProcVersionSignatur

[Bug 648838] Re: package python-virtkey 0.60.0 -0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: el subproceso scrip t post-installation instalado devolvió el código de salida de error 1

2010-09-27 Thread Hernán
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 648695 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/648695 ** Attachment added: "AptOrdering.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/648838/+attachment/1643348/+files/AptOrdering.txt ** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/648838

[Bug 648836] [NEW] package onboard 0.94.0-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: problemas de dependencias - se deja sin configurar

2010-09-27 Thread Hernán
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 648695 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/648695 Public bug reported: Binary package hint: onboard Just run a system update in Ubuntu 10.10 beta 64bits, and received this error. ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.10 Package: onboard 0.94.0-0ubu

[Bug 648836] Re: package onboard 0.94.0-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: problemas de dependencias - se deja sin configurar

2010-09-27 Thread Hernán
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 648695 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/648695 ** Attachment added: "AptOrdering.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/648836/+attachment/1643343/+files/AptOrdering.txt ** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/648836

[Bug 753642] Re: impossible to write the message body

2011-05-03 Thread Hernán
Hi Timo, I was wondering if the webkit daily PPA was getting done or if some fix is underway for Natty. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/753642 Title: impossible to write the message bo

[Bug 66797] aoss don't work correctly with Sound Blaster Live! 24-bit

2006-10-18 Thread Hernán Alvarez
Public bug reported: I detected that aoss wrapper don't work correctly with my SB Live 24-bit: * Firefox workaround for audio/video sync don't work, instead Flash videos don't output sound. * Applications using aoss crash more frequently than using other cards with aoss. Other user has the sam

[Bug 66448] Bad volume control config when Sound Blaster Live 24-bit is used

2006-10-16 Thread Hernán Alvarez
Public bug reported: When you install Ubuntu Dapper or Edgy, the volume control on the GNOME panel comes pre-configured to set the volume of center/LFE channel, only used on 5.1 setups, when it should control the front L/R channel. It's easy to resolve (going to volume control settings and modify

[Bug 66448] Re: Bad volume control config when Sound Blaster Live 24-bit is used

2006-10-16 Thread Hernán Alvarez
** Description changed: - When you install Ubuntu Dapper or Edgy, the volume control on the GNOME - panel comes pre-configured to set the volume of center/LFE channel, only - used on 5.1 setups, when it should control the front L/R channel. + When you install Ubuntu Dapper or Edgy on a system whic

[Bug 115698] LG L1740PQ monitor resolution not correctly detected

2007-05-19 Thread Hernán Alvarez
Public bug reported: The LG L1740PQ monitor (17" LCD, 1280x1024) is not identified (Ubuntu configures it as "Generic Monitor") and defaults it to a non-native resolution of 1024x768. Videocard is a nVidia GeForce 7300LE made by MSI. Current workaround is edit manually the /etc/X11/xorg.conf file

[Bug 115698] Re: LG L1740PQ monitor resolution not correctly detected

2007-06-04 Thread Hernán Alvarez
** Description changed: The LG L1740PQ monitor (17" LCD, 1280x1024) is not identified (Ubuntu configures it as "Generic Monitor") and defaults it to a non-native resolution of 1024x768. Videocard is a nVidia GeForce 7300LE made by MSI. Current workaround is edit manually the /etc/X11/

[Bug 115698] Re: LG L1740PQ monitor resolution not correctly detected

2007-06-04 Thread Hernán Alvarez
And Xorg.0.log in this one :D ** Attachment added: "Xorg.0.log" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/7962644/Xorg.0.log -- LG L1740PQ monitor resolution not correctly detected https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/115698 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 115698] Re: LG L1740PQ monitor resolution not correctly detected

2007-06-04 Thread Hernán Alvarez
Thanks for your comments. Bryce, displayconfig-gtk list doesn't contain an entry for my monitor. Brian, I'm attaching xorg.conf in this comment. ** Description changed: The LG L1740PQ monitor (17" LCD, 1280x1024) is not identified (Ubuntu configures it as "Generic Monitor") and defaults it

[Bug 66448] Re: Bad volume control config when Sound Blaster Live 24-bit is used

2007-06-04 Thread Hernán Alvarez
Brian, unfortunately I've changed my computer and I don't have that card anymore. -- Bad volume control config when Sound Blaster Live 24-bit is used https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/66448 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubun

[Bug 66448] Re: Bad volume control config when Sound Blaster Live 24-bit is used

2007-01-12 Thread Hernán Alvarez
I've just downloaded 7.04 Herd-2 and tested it. The bug remains the same. -- Bad volume control config when Sound Blaster Live 24-bit is used https://launchpad.net/bugs/66448 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1734147] Re: Ubuntu 17.10 corrupting BIOS - many LENOVO laptops models

2017-12-30 Thread Hernán Alvarez
Hi, I have a Baytrail-based Compal ZAW70 (sold under the brand "Kelyx" in Argentina) which was affected by this bug. I installed using ukuu both 4.14.9 and 4.14.10 kernels without resolving the issue, the UEFI settings remain read only. Just loading the updated SPI driver resolves the issue or the

[Bug 1734147] Re: Ubuntu 17.10 corrupting BIOS - many LENOVO laptops models

2018-01-01 Thread Hernán Alvarez
Just installed 4.15-rc6 and it doesn't even have the intel-spi driver compiled... -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1734147 Title: Ubuntu 17.10 corrupting BIOS - many LENOVO laptops mode

[Bug 1734147] Re: Ubuntu 17.10 corrupting BIOS - many LENOVO laptops models

2018-01-01 Thread Hernán Alvarez
I have the one that ukuu installed, I'm now downloading the Ubuntu- compiled ones. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1734147 Title: Ubuntu 17.10 corrupting BIOS - many LENOVO laptops mod

[Bug 1734147] Re: corrupted BIOS due to Intel SPI bug in kernel

2018-01-04 Thread Hernán Alvarez
Kernel from step 8 unlocked the BIOS on my Compal ZAW70 with Insyde UEFI. Thanks to everybody involved on fixing this! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1734147 Title: corrupted BIOS du

[Bug 1068341] Re: No way to specify correct dependencies for dkms packages

2012-10-24 Thread Hernán Alvarez
What Chris said in #8 is incorrect, as I got this issue on a clean installed 64-bit Ubuntu 12.10, installing the nVidia drivers through the Restricted Drivers control panel. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.

[Bug 1053266] Re: unity-lens-photos crashed with AttributeError in shotwell(): 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'cursor'

2012-09-23 Thread Hernán Ramírez
I did a fresh install in Ubuntu 12.10 Beta 2, updated the system with Synaptic and after i restart my laptop, i did an "sudo apt-get autoclean" and it showed me this bug. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.lau

[Bug 673724] [NEW] package linux-image-2.6.32-25-generic-pae 2.6.32-25.45 failed to install/upgrade: run-parts: /etc/kernel/postinst.d/nvidia-common exited with return code 10

2010-11-10 Thread Hernán Moya
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: nvidia-common Not installing ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 Package: linux-image-2.6.32-25-generic-pae 2.6.32-25.45 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-25.45-generic-pae 2.6.32.21+drm33.7 Uname: Linux 2.6.32-25-generic-pae i686 Architec

[Bug 673724] Re: package linux-image-2.6.32-25-generic-pae 2.6.32-25.45 failed to install/upgrade: run-parts: /etc/kernel/postinst.d/nvidia-common exited with return code 10

2010-11-10 Thread Hernán Moya
-- package linux-image-2.6.32-25-generic-pae 2.6.32-25.45 failed to install/upgrade: run-parts: /etc/kernel/postinst.d/nvidia-common exited with return code 10 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/673724 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed

[Bug 1910412] [NEW] virtualbox-dkms 6.1.10-dfsg-1~ubuntu1.20.04.1: virtualbox kernel module failed to build when running dist-upgrade

2021-01-06 Thread Hernán Lucas Pereira
Public bug reported: This happened during an "apt dist-upgrade". Just in case error log is not part of the bug report here it goes: $ cat /var/lib/dkms/virtualbox/6.1.10/build/make.log DKMS make.log for virtualbox-6.1.10 for kernel 5.8.0-34-generic (x86_64) mié 06 ene 2021 12:31:28 -03 make: Ent

[Bug 1910412] Re: virtualbox-dkms 6.1.10-dfsg-1~ubuntu1.20.04.1: virtualbox kernel module failed to build when running dist-upgrade

2021-01-07 Thread Hernán Lucas Pereira
Thank you gwel! With your message I realized I did not have VirtualBox installed from the expected source because I installed "virtualbox" instead of "virtualbox-6.1": $ apt-cache policy virtualbox virtualbox: Installed: 6.1.10-dfsg-1~ubuntu1.20.04.1 Candidate: 6.1.10-dfsg-1~ubuntu1.20.04.1

[Bug 1556511] [NEW] package ibus 1.5.5-1ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: el subproceso script pre-removal nuevo devolvió el código de salida de error 127

2016-03-12 Thread Javier Hernán Quiroz
Public bug reported: ok ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 14.04 Package: ibus 1.5.5-1ubuntu3 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.19.0-49.55~14.04.1-generic 3.19.8-ckt12 Uname: Linux 3.19.0-49-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.14.1-0ubuntu3.19 AptOrdering: ibus: Install update-notifier-common:

[Bug 654048] [NEW] package firmware-b43-installer 4.150.10.5-4 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2010-10-03 Thread Hernán Giovanni Ramírez Segura
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: b43-fwcutter Tengo un lenovo s10-2 , me dice que no instalo el b43 ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.10 Package: firmware-b43-installer 4.150.10.5-4 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.35-22.33-generic 2.6.35.4 Uname: Linux 2.6.35-22-generic i68

[Bug 654048] Re: package firmware-b43-installer 4.150.10.5-4 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2010-10-03 Thread Hernán Giovanni Ramírez Segura
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/654048/+attachment/1669004/+files/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: "Df.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/654048/+attachment/1669005/+files/Df.txt ** Attachment added: "Dmesg.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/