SGTM. The POC doesn't even work due to https://developer.mozilla.org/en-
US/docs/Web/API/Document/onfullscreenerror and unless there's existing
Window managers that still allow this behavior I have no idea how to
even investigate.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
>Can you please clarify what does fix-optional status for firefox 100
mean for this bug?
It means that if there is a simple fix for the issue, release management
would've considered taking that fix into Firefox 100. As is hopefully
rather obvious, there isn't going to be a simple fix for this. It
Bug 1719279 suggests this fix never worked.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1870827
Title:
Firefox hangs after simultaneously opening Chrome/Electron-based
applications
To manage no
jld, you said you had a patch for the warnings, and this is getting a
lot of dupes, so I'm increasing severity/priority.
This will be just about stopping the warnings which are confusing
people: it's basically some video decoder external to Firefox poking
around to know the exact CPU configuration
*** Bug 1934273 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1983010
Title:
Sandbox: attempt to open unexpected file
/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/c
*** Bug 1923781 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1983010
Title:
Sandbox: attempt to open unexpected file
/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/c
Don't see how this can be an S2.
>Being on Ubuntu 22.04, the .deb package has been removed
We publish official .deb now: https://support.mozilla.org/en-
US/kb/install-firefox-linux#w_install-firefox-deb-package-for-debian-
based-distributions-recommended
--
You received this bug notification be
Well, clearly keeping those warning messages just means people keep
posting bugs like this. I'm not convinced including a bit more
explanation will change anything about that. Also, if it's the
relatively harmless operation of probing at the cache config or
potential NUMA config of a system, what g
To correct myself: according to
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1639531#c14 at least H264
video should now work even without installing those packages, but you do
get better performance with them installed, as ffmpeg is more optimized
than OpenH264.
--
You received this bug notificat
