Public bug reported:
Ubuntu Release 8.10
Kernel 2.6.27-11-generic
GNOME 2.24.1
Brasero 0.8.2
Steps to reproduce
1. Insert Source CD
2. Select Disk Copy option
3. Wait for the Source CD to be copied and the tray to open
4. Replace the Source CD with a blank CD-R
5. An error indicating insufficient
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24705405/Dependencies.txt
** Attachment added: "ExtensionSummary.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24705406/ExtensionSummary.txt
** Attachment added: "profiles.ini.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24705408/profiles
BUG appears to have be fixed in Brasero 2.26.0 (jaunty 9.04 beta).
Thanks
--
Brasero disk burning software fails disk copy complaining that the blank target
CD is FULL
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/354029
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subs
Hi There,
This bug appears to have been fixed in Brasero 2.26.0 (Jaunty 9.04 beta).
Thanks
Ernie
On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 11:47 AM, Pedro Villavicencio
wrote:
> Thanks for your report, could you run brasero from the command line as:
> brasero --debug &> brasero-debug.txt perform the operation to
Public bug reported:
Ubuntu Release 8.10
Kernel 2.6.27-11 (generic)
GNOME 2.24.1
Power Management FAILS to perform as expected MOST of the time because
it is overly concerned about CPU cycles. It would be quite useful to
have a check box which would instruct both screensaver and power
management
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24851748/Dependencies.txt
** Attachment added: "ProcMaps.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24851749/ProcMaps.txt
** Attachment added: "ProcStatus.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24851750/ProcStatus.txt
--
Power
Public bug reported:
Ubuntu Release 8.10
Kernel 2.6.27-11
GNOME 2.24.1
I have not been able to find a way to specify DEFAULT (no user logged
on) screen saver or power management options. Either the functionality
existed and is POORLY documents or it should be provided. Eliminating
this issue wo
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24536089/Dependencies.txt
** Attachment added: "ExtensionSummary.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24536090/ExtensionSummary.txt
** Attachment added: "profiles.ini.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24536093/profiles
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24584040/Dependencies.txt
** Attachment added: "ExtensionSummary.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24584041/ExtensionSummary.txt
** Attachment added: "profiles.ini.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24584042/profiles
Public bug reported:
VLC media player 0.9.4 Grishenko
Unbuntu Release 8.10
Linux Kernel 2.6.27-11
GNOME 2.24.1
Launch VLC to play a wmv movie, then pause it. VLC continues to suck up
so many cpu cycles that the power manager is tricked into believing the
the system is not idle and does not perfo
Once I execute VLC, the problem starts. In my case, VLC did NOT crash,
but was terminated by the user.
--
vlc disabled sleep mode and don't enabled it back
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/484392
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ub
** Attachment added: ".etc.fstab.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35989158/.etc.fstab.txt
** Attachment added: "BootDmesg.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35989160/BootDmesg.txt
** Attachment added: "CurrentDmesg.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35989162/CurrentDmesg.txt
** Attac
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: devicekit-disks
Triple boot system (XP, 9.10-rtm, 9.04-rtm) all contained on the first SATA
drive
9.04-rtm recognizes second and third SATA drives, displays proper label for
each and allows me to mount following authorization. This problem did not
man
** Attachment added: ".etc.fstab.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35989140/.etc.fstab.txt
** Attachment added: "BootDmesg.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35989141/BootDmesg.txt
** Attachment added: "CurrentDmesg.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35989142/CurrentDmesg.txt
** Attac
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: devicekit-disks
Triple boot system (XP, 9.10-rtm, 9.04-rtm) all contained on the first SATA
drive
9.04-rtm recognizes second and third SATA drives, displays proper label for
each and allows me to mount following authorization. This problem did not
man
Although I have 3 SATA drives which are attached to the same controller,
the third is in a separate drive enclosure and may have been powered
down when I reported this bug. The problem with the third drive was
included because a bug had been reported in 8.04, I think, that affected
ONLY the second
The problem reported above of not being able to mount/access the second or
third SATA hard drives which are attached to the same controller has been
resolved via the following procedure:
1.Remove all partitions from the first SATA drive.
2.Set BIOS to Enhanced IDE.
3.Install XP-sp2. The instal
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: yelp
Triple boot system (XP, 9.10-rtm, 9.04-rtm) all contained on the first SATA
drive.
Hibernate 9.10 via menu option then wait for a complete shutdown.
Push power button.
During power-up observe message concerning waking up.
Select 9.04 from the Grub m
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35551282/Dependencies.txt
** Attachment added: "ProcMaps.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35551283/ProcMaps.txt
** Attachment added: "ProcStatus.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35551284/ProcStatus.txt
--
Ubuntu
FYI - This should not matter, but the PC manifesting the failure is a
desktop.
--
Ubuntu 9.10 Return From Hibernation Problem 2009-11-11
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/480969
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bu
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: yelp
Triple boot system (XP, 9.10-rtm, 9.04-rtm) all contained on the first SATA
drive.
NVIDIA 9500gt video card.
Screensaver fails to activate although test modes operate correctly.
Either Suspend and Hibenate can each be successfully executed via the p
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35553005/Dependencies.txt
** Attachment added: "ProcMaps.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35553007/ProcMaps.txt
** Attachment added: "ProcStatus.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35553008/ProcStatus.txt
** Attachm
After a reboot, the screensaver did activate.
However, the LCD display did not appear to fully turn off when it should have.
I expected it to enter the no-signal low power state where the power light
would turn amber.
It never reached this state although it did go blank.
In addition, 9.10 was ne
Nvidia 9500gt card will NOT function properly with generic Ubuntu
drivers.
Having been spoiled because Ubuntu has done such a great job with
hardware interaction, I failed to notice that this problem was
associated with use of generic drivers.
Executed a clean reinstall of 9.10
Upgraded to Kernel
Nvidia 9500gt card will NOT function properly with generic Ubuntu
drivers.
Having been spoiled because Ubuntu has done such a great job with
hardware interaction, I failed to notice that this problem was
associated with use of generic drivers.
Executed a clean reinstall of 9.10
Upgraded to Kernel
This is still and issue with 9.10 and 10.04 b2 (lucid-
desktop-i386_2010-04-12_0812). The screensaver should care about USER
inactivity while powersave should also be concerned with system
activity.
A diff of two hard drives that contain more than 200 GBs each will take
quite some time. Powersav
Public bug reported:
Left-click on power icon and select Hibernate.
Respond to confirmation prompt.
After PC powers down, turn power on.
No indication of returning from hibernation, just a blinking cursor that can be
moved down a line via the enter key.
Following full return from hibernation, the
Public bug reported:
Shutdown, NOT suspend should be the Default action when the power button
is pushed. There are many cases when a hung system can only be
addressed by removing power or forcing a shutdown. Shutting a hung
system down via the power button will do less harm that simply removing
Public bug reported:
The screensaver should care about USER
inactivity while powersave should ALSO be concerned with system
activity.
A diff of two hard drives that contain more than 200 GBs each will take
quite some time. Powersave should not kick in during this process but
the Screen-Saver sho
Please CLOSE this bug report. This problem was associated with some corruption
of the filesystems on my hard drive.
Removing and recreating partitions caused the problem reported to vanish. My
Bad!
--
cannot mount second or third SATA hard drive
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/460201
You rece
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/44121333/Dependencies.txt
--
VLC Inhibits power management daemon when option UNCHECKED
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/562807
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: vlc
Change VLC power management interaction from default by unchecking
Inhibit the power management daemon during playback.
Observe that power management is inhibited although it should NOT be
This problem has been reported but unaddressed since at leas
Unconditionally disabling the privacy/security provided by the Screen-
Saver simply because VLC has been invoked, but is not being used to show
a video, will GUARANTEE that Ubuntu will NEVER be accepted for use in
the EXPLODING health-care industry. Hasn't anyone heard of HIPAA?
--
VLC Inhibits
My hardware is Intel-based (e8500). Traceroute works OK.
--
gnome-nettool crashed with SIGSEGV in on_ping_graph_expose()
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/548952
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
Preparation
1.Set Screen-Save timeout to one minute.
2.Uncheck default inhibit Power Management in VLC.
3.Play media.
4.Pause playback.
5.Screen-Save and perhaps Power Management will be inhibited. Unexpected
behavior.
6.Note, normal behavior when VLC playback is stopped or VLC is terminated.
C
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: yelp
Triple boot system (XP, 9.10-rtm, 9.04-rtm) all contained on the first SATA
drive
9.04-rtm recognizes second and third SATA drives, displays proper label for
each and allows me to mount following authorization. This problem did not
manifest in 8.
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35310366/Dependencies.txt
** Attachment added: "ProcMaps.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35310367/ProcMaps.txt
** Attachment added: "ProcStatus.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35310371/ProcStatus.txt
--
Proble
After executing the try Ubuntu-9.10 option from the LiveCD, I cannot
access a second or third SATA drive. Symptoms seem identical to those
described above. Functionality that worked correctly in 8.10 and 9.04
got broken in 9.10.
--
Problems mounting second or third SATA hard drive
https://bugs
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: yelp
This failure can occur if Firefox has windows open, even if the user is
not directly interacting with any of them. One failure occurred while
interacting with Places, but it usually occurs during interaction with a
Firefox window. This failure has
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35330414/Dependencies.txt
** Attachment added: "ProcMaps.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35330415/ProcMaps.txt
** Attachment added: "ProcStatus.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35330416/ProcStatus.txt
--
Ubuntu
FYI Just reproduced this problem via Kernel Linux 2.6.31-15-generic-pae
GNOME 2.28.1
--
Problems mounting second or third SATA hard drive
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/477425
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu
FYI The problem also occurs after installing karmic-desktop-i386
2009-10-26_1409.
I forgot to mention that the Removable Media menu entry disappears following
the upgrade from the initial install and all partitions are listed under places.
--
cannot mount second or third SATA hard drive
https:/
Do you REALLY want the windoze groupies to point out this problem AFTER
9.10 is released?
--
cannot mount second or third SATA hard drive
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/460201
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-b
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: yelp
1.VLC Inhibits Power Management even when the CHECKBOX, Inhibit the power
management daemon during playback, is unchecked.
2.A reboot is required to get power management to again function properly.
VLC 1.0.2-1ubuntu2.1
ProblemType: Bug
Architectur
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/37402981/Dependencies.txt
** Attachment added: "ProcMaps.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/37402982/ProcMaps.txt
** Attachment added: "ProcStatus.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/37402983/ProcStatus.txt
--
Ubuntu
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: yelp
Triple boot desktop system (XP, 9.10-rtm, 9.04-rtm) all contained on the first
SATA drive.
Ubuntu 9.10 was installed via LiveCD with BIOS set to AHCI.
Hibernate 9.10 via menu option then wait for power-down.
Push power button.
During power-up, obser
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35699380/Dependencies.txt
** Attachment added: "ProcMaps.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35699381/ProcMaps.txt
** Attachment added: "ProcStatus.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35699382/ProcStatus.txt
--
Ubuntu
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: yelp
Triple boot system (XP, 9.10-Beta, 9.04-rtm) all contained on the first SATA
drive
9.04-rtm recognizes second and third SATA drives, displays proper label for
each and allows me to mount following authorization.
9.10-Beta incorrectly displays drive
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34346084/Dependencies.txt
** Attachment added: "ProcMaps.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34346085/ProcMaps.txt
** Attachment added: "ProcStatus.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34346086/ProcStatus.txt
** Attachm
Shades of VISTA! After executing the try Ubuntu-9.10 option from the
LiveCD, I cannot access a second or third SATA drive. This VISTA-like
quality could do a lot to alienate someone who tries to install 9.10 on
a second hard drive. Looks like I will have to hang onto 9.04 for a
while.
--
canno
** Attachment added: "file-roller 3.8.4 changes.png"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/file-roller/+bug/1133663/+attachment/3801755/+files/file-roller%203.8.4%20changes.png
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
ht
Please re-open this bug. I tested using a recent 13.10 and file-roller
3.9.90 and observed that extract here fails to delay directory restore
causing EVERY non-empty extracted folder to assume the date/time of
extraction.
I will attempt to attach a screenshot of the relevant portion of the
GNOME f
** Attachment added: "file-roller 3.9.90.png"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/file-roller/+bug/1133663/+attachment/3801754/+files/file-roller%203.9.90.png
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launc
Another data point.
In addition to failing via the right click extract here menu, the CLI
file-roller -h command produces the same failure.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1133663
Title
Public bug reported:
Installation from 2013-09_05 amd64 iso failed to install a bootloader on a GPT
disk.
grub-install /dev/sdc works correctly from installed 12.04 and 13.04
Perhaps the installation process has failed to detect a GPT disk and is
attempting to function as it would with MBR forma
BROKEN in 64-bit 1310 3.11.0-5-generic #11-Ubuntu SMP Fri Sep 6
19:01:31 UTC 2013
Question mark is displayed in the launcher but the installation
"appears" to be hung.
Someone unfamiliar with Unity might miss the question mark due to the ABUNDANCE
of clutter.
EVERY partition on the drive cont
** Attachment added: "BUG_SoftwareCenter_ChromeInstall_2014-03-25 21:41:05.png"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/software-center/+bug/1298188/+attachment/4045973/+files/BUG_SoftwareCenter_ChromeInstall_2014-03-25%2021%3A41%3A05.png
--
You received this bug notification because you ar
** Attachment added: "BUG_SoftwareCenter_UbuntuRestrictedInstall_After failed
Chrome_2014-03-25 21:56:32.png"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/software-center/+bug/1298188/+attachment/4045975/+files/BUG_SoftwareCenter_UbuntuRestrictedInstall_After%20failed%20Chrome_2014-03-25%2021%3A5
** Attachment added: "BUG_SoftwareCenter_GpartedInstall_After failed
Chrome_2014-03-25 21:53:52.png"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/software-center/+bug/1298188/+attachment/4045976/+files/BUG_SoftwareCenter_GpartedInstall_After%20failed%20Chrome_2014-03-25%2021%3A53%3A52.png
--
Yo
Public bug reported:
Software Center correctly installed the following programs when executed
following the 64-bit 2014-03_11.iso Desktop Installation
(3.13.0-16-generic #36-Ubuntu SMP Tue Mar 4 23:02:40 UTC 2014):
1. Ubuntu Restricted Extras
2. Google Chrome Debian install
3. GParted
4. VLC
5. U
** Attachment added: "BUG_SofwareCenter_OnlyInstall_UbuntuRestricted_2014-03-25
22:08:08.png"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/software-center/+bug/1298188/+attachment/4045972/+files/BUG_SofwareCenter_OnlyInstall_UbuntuRestricted_2014-03-25%2022%3A08%3A08.png
--
You received this bu
Software Center correctly installed the following programs when executed
following the 64-bit 2014-03_11.iso Desktop Installation
(3.13.0-16-generic #36-Ubuntu SMP Tue Mar 4 23:02:40 UTC 2014):
1. Ubuntu Restricted Extras
2. Google Chrome Debian install
3. GParted
4. VLC
5. Unetbootin
Software Ce
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1290228 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1290228
Software Center correctly installed the following programs when executed
following the 64-bit 2014-03_11.iso Desktop Installation
(3.13.0-16-generic #36-Ubuntu SMP Tue Mar 4 23:02:40 UTC 2014):
1. Ubuntu Re
Public bug reported:
The effect of this bug is quite similar to the one the was reported via
bug 1133663 ”Extract Here fails to preserve timestamps for non-empty
folders”. Directions to reproduce follow:
1. Create a tar.bz2 archive of a directory containing a fragmented file. One
such file might
Public bug reported:
The Login screen will be displayed and the screen will never go blank
under any of the following conditions:
1. Following a cold (power on) boot.
2. Following a warm (restart) boot.
3. Following detection of mouse movement or keyboard input when the screen was
locked.
This
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1196063 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1196063
??? Could not find related bug 1196063. Was the bug number mistyped?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.ne
Is it too early in the development cycle to expect to be able to execute
an installation without experiencing errors?
How can a Beta be released in a few days when I get this error at the
beginning of a USB install of the amd 64-bit desktop timestamped
2013-09-02 08:17?
1. I could NOT get the CD
Missed a step in the prior post, setting the timezone to usa Los Angeles
This time:
1. Booted USB
2. Set timezone
3. Selected Install Unbuntu
4. ERROR
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs
Could not figure out how to add multiple screenshots, so here is another
one.
** Attachment added: "BUG_Google Chrome 64bit Debian install_A03g1404-0402
3.13.0-21-generic #43-Ubuntu SMP Mon Mar 31 22:52:24 UTC 2014__2014-04-03
01:36:18.png"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/software-
This "Critical" but "Unassigned" bug continues to manifest as described
in comment #19. I will add the first screenshot here.
** Attachment added: "BUG_Ubuntu Restricted Extras_A03g1404-0402
3.13.0-21-generic #43-Ubuntu SMP Mon Mar 31 22:52:24 UTC 2014_2014-04-03
01:25:50.png"
https://bugs.
Just a little addition for Comment #21
If you intend to use the Software Center to install "GDebi Package
Installer", do it BEFORE attempting to install "Ubuntu Restricted
Extras" via the Software Center. Once you enter the failed state
associated with "Ubuntu Restricted Extras" installation, you
Public bug reported:
1. Create an ext4 partition on a GPT disk using gparted (v16 or v18) but do
not format it
2. Install 64-bit Ubuntu-14.04 desktop via 2014-03_09 07:49 iso from a USB
stick checking the format box
3. Back up the newly created installation using Acronis True Home build 6673
** Package changed: ubuntu => ubiquity (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1290236
Title:
ubiquity gpt ext4 format error
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bug
My concern was raised because Acronis True Image only exhibited the
forced sector-by-sector behavior after 14.04 had been installed in a
target partition that had been formatted by Ubiquity during the
installation. If the target partition had been formatted by gparted v18
prior to the 14.04 install
I too cannot always enter my password.
64-bit Desktop 14.04 2014-03-10 07:49 iso
Fiddling with right-click, etc. enabled password input
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/128
Title:
C
A non-technical person managed to cause a system to crash a few minutes
after she entered a certain sequence of keystrokes on a terminal that
was NOT logged on. The programmer failed to flush the buffer and
accepted contamination as well as logon commands. So I have attempted to
use her non-technic
I am experiencing the same failure. The 64-bit deb file that I downloaded
recently has internal date time stamps on 2014-03_05.
It installed correctly following installation of the 64-bit daily build iso
(2014-03_12 07:50) but failed using daily build (2014-03_13 07:46).
Since the installation w
For the record, 64-bit 14.04 (trusty-desktop-
amd64_2014-03_14_07:45_.iso) also fails to install google-chrome-stable
from a KNOWN good deb file.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1292099
The following link (Install Google Chrome in Ubuntu 14.04 / 13.10 /
13.04 / 12.04 using PPA) provides a workaround
http://www.howopensource.com/2011/10/install-google-chrome-in-
ubuntu-11-10-11-04-10-10-10-04/
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which
Did you use the following quoted string?
"deb http://dl.google.com/linux/chrome/deb/ stable main"
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1292099
Title:
Ubuntu 14.04 will not install Google
When I can reboot into a different copy of 14.04, I will follow the
instructions again. The string portion of the instructions can also be
found under the Other Software tab of Software & Updates in a version of
14.04 prior to the one built from the 2014-03_13 iso.
--
You received this bug notifi
I copied, pasted and chrome installed correctly. The lines are longer
than the size of the display box so I had to carefully copy.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1292099
Title:
Ubuntu
Public bug reported:
64-bit 14.04 iso (2014-03_17_07:46)
1. Launch Software Center.
2. Select Ubuntu Restricted Extras, begin install, supply credentials.
3. In the past, the installation would appear to hang while actually
waiting for user response to a Eula dialog that was not visible. If the
Nvidia can't/won't release drivers that will work with Ubuntu. Now What?
1. Deny that a problem exists.
2. Wait until Nvidia gets it act together, perhaps during this decade.
3. Massage Ubuntu to compensate for POORLY tested Nvidia products.
--
You received this bug notification because you are
This bug STILL occurs in 64 bit 1304 (Raring) with kernel 3.8.0-0-generic.
Downloaded and tested today 2013-01_14
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1076716
Title:
Extract Here fails to p
This bug STILL occurs in 64 bit 1304 (Raring) with kernel 3.8.0-0-generic.
Downloaded and tested today 2013-01_14
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1061639
Title:
Upstartification of /et
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1060484 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1060484
This bug STILL occurs in 64 bit 1304 (Raring) with kernel 3.8.0-0-generic.
Downloaded and tested today 2013-01_14
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is sub
This bug STILL occurs in 64 bit 1304 (Raring) with kernel 3.8.0-0-generic.
Downloaded and tested today 2013-01_14
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1068341
Title:
No way to specify corre
This bug STILL occurs in 64 bit 1304 (Raring) with kernel 3.8.0-0-generic.
Downloaded and tested today 2013-01_14
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1060484
Title:
When using gparted com
This bug STILL occurs in 64 bit 1304 (Raring) with kernel 3.8.0-0-generic.
Downloaded and tested today 2013-01_14
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1087496
Title:
Screenshot FORGETS to p
This bug STILL occurs in 64 bit 1304 (Raring) with kernel 3.8.0-0-generic.
Downloaded and tested yesterday 2013-01_14
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1073433
Title:
Ext4 corruption ass
I launched Screenshot to perform a screen capture.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1087496
Title:
Screenshot FORGETS to place the focus on the highlighted default text
To manage notif
1. Launch Screenshot
2. Click Take Screenshot
3. After Save Screenshot dialog appears, start typing.
The input text box does not have the focus and ignores user input until
after the text box is MANUALLY selected.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, whi
Will this BUG be fixed before 13.04 or should I AVOID 12.10 and continue
to use 12.04?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1060484
Title:
When using gparted com.canonical.Unity.Devices bl
Will this BUG be fixed before 13.04 or should I AVOID 12.10 and continue
to use 12.04?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1076716
Title:
Extract Here fails to preserve timestamps (non-emp
The workaround of disabling networking becomes unavailable EACH time
POORLY maintained Nvidia drivers randomly cause 12.10 to crash requiring
a power cycle to recover.
Will this BUG be fixed before 13.04 or should I AVOID 12.10 and continue
to use 12.04?
--
You received this bug notification bec
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1060484 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1060484
This bug STILL occurs in 64 bit 1210 (Quantal) with kernel
3.5.0-21-generic
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launch
This bug STILL occurs in 64 bit 1210 (Quantal) with kernel
3.5.0-21-generic
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1076716
Title:
Extract Here fails to preserve timestamps (non-empty folders)
This bug STILL occurs in 64 bit 1210 (Quantal) with kernel
3.5.0-21-generic
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1060484
Title:
When using gparted com.canonical.Unity.Devices blacklist is
This bug STILL occurs in 64 bit 1304 (Raring) with kernel 3.8.0-2-generic.
Downloaded and tested today 2013-01_27
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1076716
Title:
Extract Here fails to p
1 - 100 of 212 matches
Mail list logo
