[Bug 1582953] [NEW] nvidia-304-updates 304.131-0ubuntu0.15.10.1: nvidia-304-updates kernel module failed to build

Public bug reported: This might be related to compiling kernel 4.6.0+ ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 15.10 Package: nvidia-304-updates 304.131-0ubuntu0.15.10.1 Uname: Linux 4.6.0-040600rc3-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.19.1-0ubuntu5 Architecture: amd64 CompizPlugins: No value set fo

[Bug 1570663] Re: zfs-dkms 0.6.4.2-0ubuntu1.2: zfs kernel module failed to build

"DKMSKernelVersion: 4.6.0-rc3-custom" ? you're using a custom kernel? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1570663 Title: zfs-dkms 0.6.4.2-0ubuntu1.2: zfs kernel module failed to build To

[Bug 1582995] [NEW] spl-dkms 0.6.4.2-0ubuntu1.1: spl kernel module failed to build

Public bug reported: related to compiling a new kernel? ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 15.10 Package: spl-dkms 0.6.4.2-0ubuntu1.1 Uname: Linux 4.6.0-040600rc3-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.19.1-0ubuntu5 Architecture: amd64 DKMSKernelVersion: 4.6.0+ Date: Wed May 18 08:12:01 2016 Ins

[Bug 1543704] Re: Gparted crashed on loading

I'm using Ubuntu 15.10 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1543704 Title: Gparted crashed on loading To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+sourc

[Bug 1543704] Re: Gparted crashed on loading

Also, getting this error. fdisk output:- Disk /dev/sdb: 931.5 GiB, 1000170586112 bytes, 1953458176 sectors Units: sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes Disklabel type: dos Disk identifier: 0x00016dec

[Bug 1560420] Re: package linux-image-extra-4.2.0-33-generic (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: run-parts: /etc/kernel/postinst.d/initramfs-tools exited with return code 1

Also getting this, but for package linux-image-4.2.0-35-generic 4.2.0-35.40 failed to install/upgrade: run-parts: /etc/kernel/postinst.d /initramfs-tools exited with return code 1 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https:/

[Bug 1560420] Re: package linux-image-extra-4.2.0-33-generic (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: run-parts: /etc/kernel/postinst.d/initramfs-tools exited with return code 1

Just before it happened, a background job was trying to compile nvidia-364 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1560420 Title: package linux-image-extra-4.2.0-33-generic (not installed) fai

[Bug 1488719] Re: dmesg shows "[drm:gen8_irq_handler [i915]] *ERROR* The master control interrupt lied (SDE)!"

Getting this on: Linux UX303LNB 4.2.0-35-generic #40-Ubuntu SMP Tue Mar 15 22:15:45 UTC 2016 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux Also seeing these messages in tty1: [drm:intel_pipe_config_compare [i915]] *ERROR* mismatch in base.adjusted_mode.crtc_clock (expected 138780, found 91519) -- You received

[Bug 1520040] Re: [drm:gen8_irq_handler [i915_bpo]] *ERROR* The master control interrupt lied (SDE)!

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1488719 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1488719 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1488719 dmesg shows "[drm:gen8_irq_handler [i915]] *ERROR* The master control interrupt lied (SDE)!" -- You received this bug notification because you are

[Bug 1488719] Re: dmesg shows "[drm:gen8_irq_handler [i915]] *ERROR* The master control interrupt lied (SDE)!"

Also getting this on: Linux UX303LNB 4.2.6-040206-generic #201511091832 SMP Mon Nov 9 23:34:22 UTC 2015 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1488719 Title: dm

[Bug 1488719] Re: dmesg shows "[drm:gen8_irq_handler [i915]] *ERROR* The master control interrupt lied (SDE)!"

According to http://ubuntu-bugs.narkive.com/7Uy6zyls/bug-1488719-new- dmesg-shows-drm-gen8-irq-handler-i915-error-the-master-control- interrupt-lied-sde, it still happens on 4.5.0 kernels! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu

[Bug 1570663] [NEW] zfs-dkms 0.6.4.2-0ubuntu1.2: zfs kernel module failed to build

Public bug reported: not sure how to reproduce. ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 15.10 Package: zfs-dkms 0.6.4.2-0ubuntu1.2 Uname: Linux 4.2.6-040206-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: zfs zunicode zcommon znvpair zavl nvidia_uvm nvidia_drm nvidia_modeset nvidia ApportVersion: 2.19.1

[Bug 1488719] Re: dmesg shows "[drm:gen8_irq_handler [i915]] *ERROR* The master control interrupt lied (SDE)!"

No longer happening with the latest git build of: Linux UX303LNB 4.6.0-rc3-custom #1 SMP Fri Apr 15 00:59:30 BST 2016 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/148871

[Bug 1570167] Re: virtualbox-guest-dkms 5.0.14-dfsg-0ubuntu1.15.10.1: virtualbox-guest kernel module failed to build for kernel 4.6 [error: implicit declaration of function ‘page_cache_release’]

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1569989 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1569989 @LocutusOfBorg - where is that file to edit please? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1570167 Ti

[Bug 1570167] Re: virtualbox-guest-dkms 5.0.14-dfsg-0ubuntu1.15.10.1: virtualbox-guest kernel module failed to build for kernel 4.6 [error: implicit declaration of function ‘page_cache_release’]

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1569989 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1569989 *** /var/lib/dkms/vboxhost/5.0.16/build/vboxdrv/r0drv/linux/memobj-r0drv-linux.c 2016-04-18 18:46:51.095068389 +0100 --- /usr/share/virtualbox/src/vboxhost/vboxdrv/r0drv/linux/memobj-r0drv-linux.c

[Bug 1947121] [NEW] do-release-upgrade misidentifies boot disk

Public bug reported: I ran do-release-upgrade to update Ubuntu 18.04 to 20.04. This was done remotely, so it was important that the system could boot up again. At the point it tries to install grub to the MBR it fails as it incorrectly identifies a USB connected drive as the boot drive. The USB c

[Bug 1767501] Re: do-release-upgrade leaves the system in a unbootable state

I just raised a bug (https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu- release-upgrader/+bug/1947121) which might be similar to this one. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1767501 Title:

[Bug 2098362] [NEW] fsck.ntfs is missing from Ubuntu’s ntfs-3g package

Public bug reported: fsck.ntfs is missing from Ubuntu’s ntfs-3g package. This causes update-initramfs warnings. Other distros (Debian, etc.) might still include it. A symlink to ntfsfix may be a workaround. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 24.04 Package: ntfs-3g 1:2022.10.3-1.2ubuntu3 ProcV

[Bug 838091] Re: should not try to fsck ntfs volumes on boot

This still appear to be an issue as of Ubuntu 24.04.1 LTS. Did the bug go away and come back, or has this been an issue now for 14 years? Getting these errors:- update-initramfs: Generating /boot/initrd.img-6.8.0-53-generic W: /sbin/fsck.ntfs doesn't exist, can't install to initramfs (during a "

[Bug 838091] Re: should not try to fsck ntfs volumes on boot

If fsck.ntfs has been intentionally removed from ntfs-3g then please can someone confirm this, as a bug needs to be raised for initramfs-tools if so. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/83809

[Bug 2098364] [NEW] fsck.ntfs no longer exists so should not be called

Public bug reported: According to https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mountall/+bug/838091 the fsck.ntfs file has not existed since 2011, and although a bug report was raised, it was decided (in 2013) this would not be fixed. Therefore initramfs-tools should no longer be trying to use it. P