[Bug 2078473] Re: Discovery of KRB5 ticket fails even if ticket is discoverable

2024-09-16 Thread Denison Barbosa
** Description changed: tracking bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/adsys/+bug/2078245 [ Impact ] Even if the krb5 ticket is discoverable, the discovery fails (but actually succeeded) So we cannot retrieve the policies or do any action with the controller. [ Test

[Bug 2078473] Re: Discovery of KRB5 ticket fails even if ticket is discoverable

2024-09-16 Thread Denison Barbosa
** Description changed: tracking bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/adsys/+bug/2078245 [ Impact ] Even if the krb5 ticket is discoverable, the discovery fails (but actually succeeded) So we cannot retrieve the policies or do any action with the controller. [ Test

[Bug 2078473] [NEW] Discovery of KRB5 ticket fails even if ticket is discoverable

2024-08-30 Thread Denison Barbosa
Public bug reported: [placeholder for https://github.com/ubuntu/adsys/pull/1065/commits/3d71626665b1560de9159b3b12c13bd5dc3d091a] ** Affects: adsys (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is su

[Bug 2079824] Re: [SRU] bug fix release of adsys 0.14.2

2024-09-06 Thread Denison Barbosa
This should fix the issues on Noble (24.04) ** Patch added: "Noble (24.04) diff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/adsys/+bug/2079824/+attachment/5813940/+files/sru_2404.diff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 2079824] Re: [SRU] bug fix release of adsys 0.14.2

2024-09-06 Thread Denison Barbosa
** Patch removed: "diff from 0.14.1 to 0.14.2 on 24.04" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/adsys/+bug/2079824/+attachment/5813928/+files/sru_2404.diff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.ne

[Bug 2079824] Re: [SRU] bug fix release of adsys 0.14.2

2024-09-06 Thread Denison Barbosa
This should fix the issues on Jammy (22.04) ** Patch added: "Jammy 22.04 diff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/adsys/+bug/2079824/+attachment/5813939/+files/sru_2204.diff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. h

[Bug 2079824] Re: [SRU] bug fix release of adsys 0.14.2

2024-09-06 Thread Denison Barbosa
** Patch added: "diff from 0.14.1 to 0.14.2" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/adsys/+bug/2079824/+attachment/5813928/+files/sru_2404.diff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2079

[Bug 2081966] Re: Timeout for listing GPOs is not enough in some cases

2024-10-09 Thread Denison Barbosa
** Description changed: + [SRU] + + [Impact] + Adsys has a fixed timeout for listing the GPOs. This can cause issues on slower machines or in cases with many policies to be listed. Adding a configurable timeout prevents the daemon from timing out the listing - process with no necessity. +

[Bug 2081968] Re: Add support for DCONF usb settings

2024-10-09 Thread Denison Barbosa
** Description changed: + [SRU] + + [Impact] + + adsys does not have support for some USB settings in DCONF + + [Test Plan] + + 1. Configure the administrative templates in the AD server: + - The templates can be generated through adsys with `adsysctl policy admx all` + + 2. Configure a GP

[Bug 2080390] Re: Adsys can't properly resolve registry.pol vs Regristry.pol

2024-10-09 Thread Denison Barbosa
** Description changed: + [SRU] + + [Impact] + + adsys is only able to parse .pol files exactly named "Registry.pol". + With this, it is now able to ignore casing on the registry file and + behave more similarly to what Windows machines do (as they ignore + casing). + + [Test Plan] + + 1. Conf

[Bug 2081968] Re: Add support for DCONF usb settings

2024-10-10 Thread Denison Barbosa
** Also affects: adsys (Ubuntu Noble) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: adsys (Ubuntu Jammy) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad

[Bug 2081968] Re: [SRU] Add support for DCONF usb settings

2024-10-11 Thread Denison Barbosa
** Summary changed: - Add support for DCONF usb settings + [SRU] Add support for DCONF usb settings ** Description changed: - [SRU] - [Impact] adsys does not have support for some USB settings in DCONF [Test Plan] 1. Configure the administrative templates in the AD server:   

[Bug 2080390] Re: [SRU] Adsys can't properly resolve registry.pol vs Regristry.pol

2024-10-11 Thread Denison Barbosa
** Summary changed: - Adsys can't properly resolve registry.pol vs Regristry.pol + [SRU] Adsys can't properly resolve registry.pol vs Regristry.pol ** Description changed: - [SRU] - [Impact] adsys is only able to parse .pol files exactly named "Registry.pol". With this, it is now able

[Bug 2081966] Re: [SRU] Timeout for listing GPOs is not enough in some cases

2024-10-11 Thread Denison Barbosa
** Summary changed: - Timeout for listing GPOs is not enough in some cases + [SRU] Timeout for listing GPOs is not enough in some cases ** Description changed: - [SRU] - [Impact] Adsys has a fixed timeout for listing the GPOs. This can cause issues on slower machines or in cases with m

[Bug 2080390] Re: Adsys can't properly resolve registry.pol vs Regristry.pol

2024-10-10 Thread Denison Barbosa
** Description changed: [SRU] [Impact] adsys is only able to parse .pol files exactly named "Registry.pol". With this, it is now able to ignore casing on the registry file and behave more similarly to what Windows machines do (as they ignore casing). [Test Plan] 1. Conf

[Bug 2081968] Re: Add support for DCONF usb settings

2024-10-10 Thread Denison Barbosa
** Description changed: [SRU] [Impact] adsys does not have support for some USB settings in DCONF [Test Plan] 1. Configure the administrative templates in the AD server: - - The templates can be generated through adsys with `adsysctl policy admx all` +   - The templates ca

[Bug 2081966] Re: Timeout for listing GPOs is not enough in some cases

2024-10-10 Thread Denison Barbosa
** Description changed: [SRU] [Impact] Adsys has a fixed timeout for listing the GPOs. This can cause issues on slower machines or in cases with many policies to be listed. Adding a configurable timeout prevents the daemon from timing out the listing process during its execution.

[Bug 2078245] Re: DCONF policy manager removes userdb on empty policy

2024-09-26 Thread Denison Barbosa
The test plan was executed for Noble (24.04) and I confirm it was successful. The package version used for the tests is the one proposed, as can be seen by the output of apt-cache policy: adsys: Installed: 0.14.2~24.04 Candidate: 0.14.2~24.04 Version table: *** 0.14.2~24.04 500 500

[Bug 2078473] Re: Discovery of KRB5 ticket fails even if ticket is discoverable

2024-09-26 Thread Denison Barbosa
I'm sorry for not commenting about the executed test plan. Let's fix this! The test plan was executed for Jammy (22.04) and I confirm it was successful. The package version used for the tests is the one proposed, as can be seen by the output of apt-cache policy: adsys: Installed: 0.14.2~22.04

[Bug 2078473] Re: Discovery of KRB5 ticket fails even if ticket is discoverable

2024-09-26 Thread Denison Barbosa
The test plan was executed for Noble (24.04) and I confirm it was successful. The package version used for the tests is the one proposed, as can be seen by the output of apt-cache policy: adsys: Installed: 0.14.2~24.04 Candidate: 0.14.2~24.04 Version table: *** 0.14.2~24.04 500 500

[Bug 2078245] Re: DCONF policy manager removes userdb on empty policy

2024-09-26 Thread Denison Barbosa
I'm sorry for not commenting about the executed test plan. Let's fix this! The test plan was executed and I confirm that it was successful. The package version used for the tests is the one proposed, as can be seen by the output of apt-cache policy: adsys: Installed: 0.14.2~22.04 Candidate:

[Bug 2078246] Re: Ignore casing in domain/ section of sssd.conf

2024-09-26 Thread Denison Barbosa
The test plan was executed for Noble (24.04) and I confirm it was successful. The package version used for the tests is the one proposed, as can be seen by the output of apt-cache policy: adsys: Installed: 0.14.2~24.04 Candidate: 0.14.2~24.04 Version table: *** 0.14.2~24.04 500 500

[Bug 2078247] Re: rewrite from / to @ formats overwrites usernames

2024-09-26 Thread Denison Barbosa
I'm sorry for not commenting about the executed test plan. Let's fix this! The test plan was executed for Jammy (22.04) and I confirm it was successful. The package version used for the tests is the one proposed, as can be seen by the output of apt-cache policy: adsys: Installed: 0.14.2~22.04

[Bug 2078247] Re: rewrite from / to @ formats overwrites usernames

2024-09-26 Thread Denison Barbosa
The test plan was executed for Noble (24.04) and I confirm it was successful. The package version used for the tests is the one proposed, as can be seen by the output of apt-cache policy: adsys: Installed: 0.14.2~24.04 Candidate: 0.14.2~24.04 Version table: *** 0.14.2~24.04 500 500

[Bug 2078246] Re: Ignore casing in domain/ section of sssd.conf

2024-09-26 Thread Denison Barbosa
** Tags removed: verification-needed-jammy verification-needed-noble ** Tags added: verification-done-jammy verification-done-noble -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2078246 Title: Ignor

[Bug 2078246] Re: Ignore casing in domain/ section of sssd.conf

2024-09-26 Thread Denison Barbosa
I'm sorry for not commenting about the executed test plan. Let's fix this! The test plan was executed for Jammy (22.04) and I confirm it was successful. The package version used for the tests is the one proposed, as can be seen by the output of apt-cache policy: adsys: Installed: 0.14.2~22.04

[Bug 2078473] Re: Discovery of KRB5 ticket fails even if ticket is discoverable

2024-09-20 Thread Denison Barbosa
** Tags removed: verification-needed verification-needed-jammy verification-needed-noble ** Tags added: verification-done verification-done-jammy verification-done-noble -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.lau

[Bug 2078246] Re: Ignore casing in domain/ section of sssd.conf

2024-09-20 Thread Denison Barbosa
** Tags removed: verification-needed verification-needed-jammy verification-needed-noble ** Tags added: verification-done verification-done-jammy verification-done-noble -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.lau

[Bug 2078245] Re: DCONF policy manager removes userdb on empty policy

2024-09-20 Thread Denison Barbosa
** Tags removed: verification-needed verification-needed-jammy verification-needed-noble ** Tags added: verification-done verification-done-jammy verification-done-noble -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.lau

[Bug 2078247] Re: rewrite from / to @ formats overwrites usernames

2024-09-20 Thread Denison Barbosa
** Tags removed: verification-needed verification-needed-jammy verification-needed-noble ** Tags added: verification-done verification-done-jammy verification-done-noble -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.lau

[Bug 2080390] Re: Adsys can't properly resolve registry.pol vs Regristry.pol

2024-09-30 Thread Denison Barbosa
** Also affects: adsys (Ubuntu Noble) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: adsys (Ubuntu Jammy) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad

[Bug 2081966] Re: Timeout for listing GPOs is not enough in some cases

2024-09-30 Thread Denison Barbosa
** Also affects: adsys (Ubuntu Noble) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: adsys (Ubuntu Jammy) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad

[Bug 2081966] [NEW] Timeout for listing GPOs is not enough in some cases

2024-09-25 Thread Denison Barbosa
Public bug reported: SRU placeholder for fix: https://github.com/ubuntu/adsys/pull/1097 ** Affects: adsys (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad

[Bug 2081968] [NEW] Add support for DCONF usb settings

2024-09-25 Thread Denison Barbosa
Public bug reported: SRU placeholder for fix: https://github.com/ubuntu/adsys/pull/1096 ** Affects: adsys (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad

[Bug 2081966] Re: Timeout for listing GPOs is not enough in some cases

2024-09-25 Thread Denison Barbosa
** Description changed: + Adsys has a fixed timeout for listing the GPOs. This can cause issues on + slower machines or in cases with many policies to be listed. Adding a + configurable timeout prevents the daemon from timing out the listing + process with no necessity. + SRU placeholder for fi

[Bug 2081968] Re: Add support for DCONF usb settings

2024-09-25 Thread Denison Barbosa
** Description changed: + Adds support for some DCONF usb related settings: Allows for usbguard + configuration and mounting removable media as read-only. + SRU placeholder for fix: https://github.com/ubuntu/adsys/pull/1096 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubu

[Bug 2081966] Re: [SRU] Timeout for listing GPOs is not enough in some cases

2024-11-27 Thread Denison Barbosa
The test plan was executed for Noble (24.04) and I confirm it was successful. The package version used for the tests is the one proposed, as can be seen by the output of apt-cache policy: adsys: Installed: 0.14.3~24.04 Candidate: 0.14.3~24.04 Version table: *** 0.14.3~24.04 100 100

[Bug 2080390] Re: [SRU] Adsys can't properly resolve registry.pol vs Regristry.pol

2024-11-27 Thread Denison Barbosa
The test plan was executed for Noble (24.04) and I confirm it was successful. The package version used for the tests is the one proposed, as can be seen by the output of apt-cache policy: adsys: Installed: 0.14.3~24.04 Candidate: 0.14.3~24.04 Version table: *** 0.14.3~24.04 100 100

[Bug 2081968] Re: [SRU] Add support for DCONF usb settings

2024-11-27 Thread Denison Barbosa
The test plan was executed for Noble (24.04) and I confirm it was successful. The package version used for the tests is the one proposed, as can be seen by the output of apt-cache policy: adsys: Installed: 0.14.3~24.04 Candidate: 0.14.3~24.04 Version table: *** 0.14.3~24.04 100 100

[Bug 2081968] Re: [SRU] Add support for DCONF usb settings

2024-11-27 Thread Denison Barbosa
** Tags removed: verification-needed verification-needed-jammy verification-needed-noble ** Tags added: verification-done verification-done-jammy verification-done-noble -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.lau

[Bug 2080390] Re: [SRU] Adsys can't properly resolve registry.pol vs Regristry.pol

2024-11-27 Thread Denison Barbosa
The test plan was executed for Jammy (22.04) and I confirm it was successful. The package version used for the tests is the one proposed, as can be seen by the output of apt-cache policy: adsys: Installed: 0.14.3~22.04 Candidate: 0.14.3~22.04 Version table: *** 0.14.3~22.04 500 500

[Bug 2081966] Re: [SRU] Timeout for listing GPOs is not enough in some cases

2024-11-27 Thread Denison Barbosa
The test plan was executed for Jammy (22.04) and I confirm it was successful. The package version used for the tests is the one proposed, as can be seen by the output of apt-cache policy: adsys: Installed: 0.14.3~22.04 Candidate: 0.14.3~22.04 Version table: *** 0.14.3~22.04 500 500

[Bug 2081968] Re: [SRU] Add support for DCONF usb settings

2024-11-27 Thread Denison Barbosa
The test plan was executed for Jammy (22.04) and I confirm it was successful. The package version used for the tests is the one proposed, as can be seen by the output of apt-cache policy: adsys: Installed: 0.14.3~22.04 Candidate: 0.14.3~22.04 Version table: *** 0.14.3~22.04 500 500

[Bug 2080390] Re: [SRU] Adsys can't properly resolve registry.pol vs Regristry.pol

2024-11-27 Thread Denison Barbosa
** Tags removed: verification-needed verification-needed-jammy verification-needed-noble ** Tags added: verification-done verification-done-jammy verification-done-noble -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.lau

[Bug 2081966] Re: [SRU] Timeout for listing GPOs is not enough in some cases

2024-11-27 Thread Denison Barbosa
** Tags removed: verification-needed verification-needed-jammy verification-needed-noble ** Tags added: verification-done verification-done-jammy verification-done-noble -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.lau

[Bug 2081968] Re: [SRU] Add support for DCONF usb settings

2024-11-25 Thread Denison Barbosa
Hey, Andreas! Thanks for the quick follow-up! Regarding the (a) question: Since DCONF is (in a short way) a register of key:value pairs, what matters is how other applications interact with it. If a key is added there but not used by any process or aplication, it does not affect the system at all

[Bug 2091940] Re: [SRU] Release adsys 0.16.2

2025-02-03 Thread Denison Barbosa
** Summary changed: - [SRU] Release adsys 0.16.1 to Oracular + [SRU] Release adsys 0.16.2 ** Also affects: adsys (Ubuntu Noble) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: adsys (Ubuntu Jammy) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification be

[Bug 2091940] Re: [SRU] Release adsys 0.16.2

2025-02-03 Thread Denison Barbosa
** Changed in: adsys (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Released => In Progress ** Description changed: [Impact] - Adsys 0.16.1 introduces dependency bumps, and updates to the privilege + Adsys 0.16.2 introduces dependency bumps, and updates to the privilege policy manager to support the newer Po

[Bug 2091940] Re: [SRU] Release adsys 0.16.0 to Oracular

2025-01-31 Thread Denison Barbosa
** Description changed: [Impact] - Adsys 0.16.0 introduces dependency bumps, and updates to the privilege - policy manager to support the newer Polkit versions (>= 124) and their - new syntax for defining system admins. We want to SRU this all the way - to Jammy, so we need to start at Oracul

[Bug 2091940] Re: [SRU] Release adsys 0.16.1 to Oracular

2025-01-31 Thread Denison Barbosa
** Description changed: [Impact] - Adsys 0.16.1 introduces dependency bumps, and (this relates to 0.16.0) - updates to the privilege policy manager to support the newer Polkit - versions (>= 124) and their new syntax for defining system admins. We - want to SRU this all the way to Jammy, so w

[Bug 2091940] [NEW] [SRU] Release adsys 0.16.0 to Oracular

2024-12-17 Thread Denison Barbosa
Public bug reported: [Impact] Adsys 0.16.0 introduces dependency bumps, and updates to the privilege policy manager to support the newer Polkit versions (>= 124) and their new syntax for defining system admins. We want to SRU this all the way to Jammy, so we need to start at Oracular. Since the

[Bug 2091940] Re: [SRU] Release adsys 0.16.3

2025-04-01 Thread Denison Barbosa
** Description changed: [Impact] - Adsys 0.16.2 introduces dependency bumps, and updates to the privilege + Adsys 0.16.3 introduces dependency bumps, and updates to the privilege policy manager to support the newer Polkit versions (>= 124) and their new syntax for defining system admins.

[Bug 2091940] Re: [SRU] Release adsys 0.16.3

2025-03-31 Thread Denison Barbosa
** Summary changed: - [SRU] Release adsys 0.16.2 + [SRU] Release adsys 0.16.3 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2091940 Title: [SRU] Release adsys 0.16.3 To manage notifications about

[Bug 2104369] [NEW] [FFE] Release adsys 0.16.3

2025-03-27 Thread Denison Barbosa
Public bug reported: ## FFE ## Version 0.16.3 of adsys contains bug fixes that customers requested and are already in use through PPAs. To avoid having users rely on PPAs as their source (and also avoid having multiple versions throughout PPAs), we'd like to request a FFE for this release. One o

[Bug 2104369] Re: [FFE] Release adsys 0.16.3

2025-03-27 Thread Denison Barbosa
** Description changed: ## FFE ## Version 0.16.3 of adsys contains bug fixes that customers requested and are already in use through PPAs. To avoid having users rely on PPAs as their source (and also avoid having multiple versions throughout PPAs), we'd like to request a FFE for this

[Bug 2091940] Re: [SRU] Release adsys 0.16.3

2025-05-12 Thread Denison Barbosa
Hey, Andreas! Thanks for looking into this (and sorry for the delayed answer)! Answering your questions: a) It does apply to the LTS releases. However, there are no changes to DCONF at all so, even though we could also test it in the LTS releases, it's not necessary. The reason I included the DCO

[Bug 2091940] Re: [SRU] Release adsys 0.16.3

2025-05-26 Thread Denison Barbosa
We had introduced the "purge" stenza for adsys in a previous update, but it had some issues managing the DCONF databases, so we decided to disable it entirely. AFAIK, it was only available on Noble and Mantic (we removed it before the Oracular release), so it's not present on Jammy and Oracular. -

[Bug 2091940] Re: [SRU] Release adsys 0.16.3

2025-05-29 Thread Denison Barbosa
> Do you have a bug about this change? No, we didn't open any bug regarding this change. The detailed explanation for this change can be seen in this commit message: https://github.com/ubuntu/adsys/commit/fb9ab42e6320e3904aa229ad859d67d7aa1b12ba > Is this change in the policy purge upon package r

[Bug 2091940] Re: [SRU] Release adsys 0.16.3

2025-06-24 Thread Denison Barbosa
The test plan was executed for Noble (24.04), and I confirm it was successful. The package version used for the tests is the one proposed, as can be seen by the output of apt-cache policy: adsys: Installed: 0.16.3~24.04.1 Candidate: 0.16.3~24.04.1 Version table: *** 0.16.3~24.04.1 100

[Bug 2091940] Re: [SRU] Release adsys 0.16.3

2025-06-09 Thread Denison Barbosa
The autopkgtests failures for Jammy and Noble were due to not properly adjusting the Go binary that should be used to run the tests. They are now fixed with the new uploads 0.16.3~22.04.1 and 0.16.3~24.04.1, for Jammy and Noble respectively, which are now waiting in the ~unnaproved queue. -- You

[Bug 2091940] Re: [SRU] Release adsys 0.16.3

2025-06-25 Thread Denison Barbosa
The test plan was executed for Oracular (24.10), and I confirm it was successful. The package version used for the tests is the one proposed, as can be seen by the output of apt-cache policy: adsys: Installed: 0.16.3~24.10 Candidate: 0.16.3~24.10 Version table: *** 0.16.3~24.10 100

[Bug 2091940] Re: [SRU] Release adsys 0.16.3

2025-06-25 Thread Denison Barbosa
The test plan was executed for Jammy (22.04), and I confirm it was successful. The package version used for the tests is the one proposed, as can be seen by the output of apt-cache policy: adsys: Installed: 0.16.3~22.04.1 Candidate: 0.16.3~22.04.1 Version table: *** 0.16.3~22.04.1 500