[Bug 520996] Re: broken init script in sipwitch package

2010-02-12 Thread David Sugar
sipwitch_0.7.1-0ubuntu1.diff.gz Uses upstream ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/sipwitch/sipwitch-0.7.1.tar.gz for sipwitch_0.7.1.orig.tar.gz ** Attachment added: "sipwitch_0.7.1-0ubuntu1.diff.gz" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/39100910/sipwitch_0.7.1-0ubuntu1.diff.gz -- broken init script in sipwitch p

[Bug 520480] Re: pselect support (qemu: Unsupported syscall: 335)

2010-02-14 Thread David Sugar
We also need this mapped correctly in qemu-arm-static for building arm packages on x86 -- pselect support (qemu: Unsupported syscall: 335) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/520480 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubu

[Bug 391588] Re: banshee fails to run on arm

2009-10-05 Thread David Sugar
I believe this bug, or at least the version of it I was experiencing, could be related to the toolchain exception handling bug, and that hence mono needs to also be rebuilt with the new toolchain. -- banshee fails to run on arm https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/391588 You received this bug notifica

[Bug 391588] Re: banshee fails to run on arm

2009-09-09 Thread David Sugar
The problem as originally reported clearly no longer exists. The current segfault/crash I find is a new and different problem actually that occurs shortly after Banshee has started up. I also have had banshee simply freeze. Each seem tracable to low level mono runtime issues that are armel speci

[Bug 420513] Re: [needs packaging] lubuntu desktop meta

2009-09-11 Thread David Sugar
** Changed in: ubuntu Status: New => In Progress ** Changed in: ubuntu Assignee: (unassigned) => David Sugar (dyfet) -- [needs packaging] lubuntu desktop meta https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/420513 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, wh

[Bug 391588] Re: banshee fails to run on arm

2009-09-11 Thread David Sugar
Oliver, thats why I suggested splitting the bug into two bugs :). Paul, /usr/bin/banshee is of course a script that executes a banshee-1.exe through /usr/bin/mono. If you do run the command under gdb, you will get some native trace. Using udeb did not let me see any symbols in the callback excep

[Bug 420513] Re: [needs packaging] lubuntu desktop meta

2009-09-04 Thread David Sugar
This really did not get handled correctly at the start of the week as we were requested to have this in a hurry and then learned after it could not be sponsored prior to the ffe process. I have put it in revu to correct any outstanding issue so that it can at least be properly evaluated. http://r

[Bug 420513] Re: [needs packaging] lubuntu desktop meta

2009-09-04 Thread David Sugar
Scott, it was not anticipated there would be spins hosted on Launchpad for Lubuntu for Karmic, just the meta package. What happens Karmic +X though may become a different question. There is a launchpad team for Lubuntu, and there is a process for community input through the wiki, but not a formal

[Bug 420513] Re: [needs packaging] lubuntu desktop meta

2009-09-04 Thread David Sugar
Lol! While I appreciate the vote of confidence, the goal was NEVER to have a dictatorship, benevolent or otherwise! I think what Scott says about some form of formalizing governance is actually very correct. However, the meta package (any meta-package instance) has a "snapshot" instance of the s

[Bug 420513] Re: [needs packaging] lubuntu desktop meta

2009-09-04 Thread David Sugar
> Thanks for making this clear. The goal for lubuntu was from the start to > build a strong and broad > community, that can take care of tasks. For example Debian packages that > have been made > available during recent months by Andrew Lee and others were also planned and > released > to lay t

[Bug 480161] [NEW] Depends on gobject introspection, pulls lots of -dev packages

2009-11-10 Thread David Sugar
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: epiphany-browser sudo apt-get install epiphany-browser Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done The following extra packages will be installed: epiphany-browser-data gnome-js-common gobject-introspe

[Bug 458501] Re: screensaver hangs on unlock, eats cpu

2009-10-27 Thread David Sugar
This is my experience also with the rc candidate on my Dove Y0 board. The gnome-screensaver process goes to full cpu and (probably) never unlocks. It does not seem to matter which screensaver is selected, and it is my impression the forked instance of gnome-screensaver that unlocks the screen dies

[Bug 438433] [NEW] Cannot build on arm architecture

2009-09-28 Thread David Sugar
Public bug reported: This package is specifically not supported for arm. There are a limited set of architectures that are supported, and this is because the package uses some architecture specific assembly. While the binary packages list the explicit subset of supported architectures in the con

[Bug 438450] [NEW] On arm, at least, builds with libsqlite0 instead of libsqlite3

2009-09-28 Thread David Sugar
Public bug reported: This can build an odbc driver for the original sqlite library, or the newer sqlite3. The control file uses libsqllite-dev, which pulls in libqllite0-dev, and the older odbc driver does not build on gcc 4.4. I believe this should pull in libsqlite3-dev instead. There may be

[Bug 438450] Re: On arm, at least, builds with libsqlite0 instead of libsqlite3

2009-09-28 Thread David Sugar
) Status: New => In Progress ** Changed in: sqliteodbc (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => David Sugar (dyfet) -- On arm, at least, builds with libsqlite0 instead of libsqlite3 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/438450 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs,

[Bug 438450] Re: On arm, at least, builds with libsqlite0 instead of libsqlite3

2009-09-28 Thread David Sugar
Debdiff attached... ** Attachment added: "sqliteodbc.debdiff.gz" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/32661565/sqliteodbc.debdiff.gz -- On arm, at least, builds with libsqlite0 instead of libsqlite3 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/438450 You received this bug notification because you are a member o

[Bug 438450] Re: On arm, at least, builds with libsqlite0 instead of libsqlite3

2009-09-29 Thread David Sugar
This should be closable with the attached diff... -- On arm, at least, builds with libsqlite0 instead of libsqlite3 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/438450 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubunt

[Bug 434614] Re: No amd64 build

2009-09-30 Thread David Sugar
Also missing sparc and ia64...may as well add those as well... Fix attached as debdiff from 0.5 to 0.6 for sponsorship. ** Changed in: lubuntu-meta (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => David Sugar (dyfet) ** Changed in: lubuntu-meta (Ubuntu) Status: New => In Progress ** Atta

[Bug 434614] Re: No amd64 build

2009-09-30 Thread David Sugar
** Changed in: lubuntu-meta (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress => Confirmed -- No amd64 build https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/434614 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.c

[Bug 403286] Re: mini-httpd sysv init script now requires bash

2009-09-30 Thread David Sugar
A temporary fix for the init script issue for karmic, and a patch for a compile issue with latest gcc/glibc, attached for sponsorship. ** Changed in: mini-httpd (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => David Sugar (dyfet) ** Attachment added: "mini-httpd_1.19-9.to.ubuntu1.debdiff.gz&q

[Bug 438450] Re: On arm, at least, builds with libsqlite0 instead of libsqlite3

2009-09-30 Thread David Sugar
bc (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => David Sugar (dyfet) -- On arm, at least, builds with libsqlite0 instead of libsqlite3 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/438450 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 439589] [NEW] Fails to build on Karmic, tiny gcc 4.4 issue

2009-09-30 Thread David Sugar
Public bug reported: This bug is to report and fix an issue in syncevolution... ** Affects: syncevolution (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Assignee: David Sugar (dyfet) Status: Confirmed ** Changed in: syncevolution (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => David Sugar (dy

[Bug 439589] Re: Fails to build on Karmic, tiny gcc 4.4 issue

2009-09-30 Thread David Sugar
This is a debdiff to fix build failures for syncevolution. It is a tiny change for gcc 4.4 fussyness, and did not seem worth doing a patch system for, especially since it should be pushed upstream to the source maintainer... ** Attachment added: "syncevolution.debdiff.gz" http://launchpadlib

[Bug 439682] [NEW] remotefs fails to build karmic, gcc 4.4 strict aliasing

2009-09-30 Thread David Sugar
cided Assignee: David Sugar (dyfet) Status: In Progress ** Changed in: remotefs (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => David Sugar (dyfet) ** Changed in: remotefs (Ubuntu) Status: New => In Progress -- remotefs fails to build karmic, gcc 4.4 strict aliasing https://bugs.launchp

[Bug 439682] Re: remotefs fails to build karmic, gcc 4.4 strict aliasing

2009-09-30 Thread David Sugar
fix for gcc 4.4/karmic attached as a debdiff. Should also be pushed to upstream... ** Attachment added: "remotefs.debdiff.gz" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/32761215/remotefs.debdiff.gz ** Changed in: remotefs (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress => Confirmed -- remotefs fails to build karmi

[Bug 449984] [NEW] Empathy SIP Issues - karmic beta

2009-10-12 Thread David Sugar
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: empathy This bug actually covers some observations and issues with functionality in trying to make use of Empathy SIP with local SIP servers. First, empathy always binds locally to port 5060. This is actually rather inconvenient especially if needing to

[Bug 449984] Re: Empathy SIP Issues - karmic beta

2009-10-13 Thread David Sugar
After examining this with wireshark, what I find is that empathy sip never sends an "expiration" for SIP REGISTER, and hence also never refreshes registration prior to expiration. -- Empathy SIP Issues - karmic beta https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/449984 You received this bug notification because

[Bug 453159] [NEW] gcc 4.4 issue and casting of void * to va_list prevents armel build

2009-10-16 Thread David Sugar
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: isdnutils Like sqliteodbc, isdnutils depends on void * being able to be re-cast to a va_list, and on gcc 4.4/arm, this is not possible to do. I am preparing a patch for this. ** Affects: isdnutils (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Ne

[Bug 361827] Re: Obsolete version with broken zrtp support

2009-09-18 Thread David Sugar
The most current libzrtpcpp in Karmic is 1.4.5, which is correct. libccrtp is also up to date. And Twinkle is 1.4.2. Hence, I am marking this as fixed and closed. ** Changed in: twinkle (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress => Fix Released -- Obsolete version with broken zrtp support https://bu

[Bug 432664] [NEW] Minor Lubuntu meta package changes for Karmic beta

2009-09-18 Thread David Sugar
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: lubuntu-desktop This bug exists to track, attach an update for, and then close two minor issues raised originally by Loic in respect to the Lubuntu-desktop meta package. This includes the inclusion of ubiquity in the desktop seed (this is different from

[Bug 432664] Re: Minor Lubuntu meta package changes for Karmic beta

2009-09-18 Thread David Sugar
** Changed in: lubuntu-meta (Ubuntu) Status: New => In Progress ** Changed in: lubuntu-meta (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => David Sugar (dyfet) -- Minor Lubuntu meta package changes for Karmic beta https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/432664 You received this bug notification b

Re: [Lubuntu-desktop] [Bug 432664] Re: Minor Lubuntu meta package changes for Karmic beta

2009-09-18 Thread David Sugar
What is the timeframe for this to happen? Julien Lavergne wrote: > Next lxde-common upload will include a separate binary for the icon > theme. We need to add lxde-icon-theme to the seed after this. > -- Minor Lubuntu meta package changes for Karmic beta https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/432664 Yo

Re: [Lubuntu-desktop] [Bug 432664] Re: Minor Lubuntu meta package changes for Karmic beta

2009-09-18 Thread David Sugar
e with you relocating the seed and meta branches off +junk :). Julien Lavergne wrote: > Le vendredi 18 septembre 2009 à 18:01 -0400, David Sugar a écrit : >> What is the timeframe for this to happen? >> > Uploaded, you can make the change to the seed or I'll make it tomorrow

Re: [Lubuntu-desktop] [Bug 432664] Re: Minor Lubuntu meta package changes for Karmic beta

2009-09-18 Thread David Sugar
Oh, do we also add lxde-setting-daemon? Julien Lavergne wrote: > Le vendredi 18 septembre 2009 à 18:01 -0400, David Sugar a écrit : >> What is the timeframe for this to happen? >> > Uploaded, you can make the change to the seed or I'll make it tomorrow. > &g

[Bug 391588] Re: banshee fails to run on arm

2009-10-20 Thread David Sugar
@loic - I have to report I see the same on my b2.5 as I originally reported, too, with the most current updates. -- banshee fails to run on arm https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/391588 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ub

[Bug 438450] Re: On arm, at least, builds with libsqlite0 instead of libsqlite3

2009-10-20 Thread David Sugar
This is now in revu at http://revu.ubuntuwire.com/details.py?upid=6949 -- On arm, at least, builds with libsqlite0 instead of libsqlite3 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/438450 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bu

[Bug 458396] [NEW] uboot images do not support live persistance

2009-10-22 Thread David Sugar
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: uboot-mkimage Booting armel+dove live from u-boot, one cannot select the option to add mounting of casper_rw to enable persistant live images and does not detect it if one had been made. This is unfortunate, because arm is already normally installed from

[Bug 439589] Re: Fails to build on Karmic, tiny gcc 4.4 issue

2009-10-01 Thread David Sugar
It might be something strange I had on my end at the time I did a test build, or some more recent change in the type in one of the dependent libraries that also fixed this, because I think uri->scheme was not originally a const char *. I will re-confirm that it still breaks without this, otherwise

[Bug 439682] Re: remotefs fails to build karmic, gcc 4.4 strict aliasing

2009-10-01 Thread David Sugar
I had thought about that, but the actual type of client_address is conditionally determined from an #ifdef for IPV6, hence unless it is cast to a known type in advance, you do have to do the cast in line 240 because it might either be a struct sockaddr_storage * or a struct sockaddr_in *. Hence, I

[Bug 420145] [NEW] fftw3 fails to build for armel

2009-08-27 Thread David Sugar
patch for this later today, once I test building both for armel and x86. This bug report is hence I hope simply so I can attach the debdiff for my change and request sponsoring it when I am done. ** Affects: fftw3 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Assignee: David Sugar (dyfet

[Bug 303320] Re: [needs-packaging] lxubuntu-desktop

2009-08-28 Thread David Sugar
I have a working seed and meta package for "lubuntu-desktop", and I am going to try to upload this to revu later today. -- [needs-packaging] lxubuntu-desktop https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/303320 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to U

[Bug 420513] [NEW] [needs packaging] lubuntu desktop meta

2009-08-28 Thread David Sugar
Public bug reported: I have a preliminary seed and meta for this related to Karmic blueprint https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/mobile-karmic-lxde-ubuntu- desktop and this should get uploaded to revu later today. ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Assignee: David Sugar

[Bug 420145] Re: fftw3 fails to build for armel

2009-08-28 Thread David Sugar
I was delayed with a fs crash. This should be in today. -- fftw3 fails to build for armel https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/420145 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com h

[Bug 391588] Re: banshee fails to run on arm

2009-08-28 Thread David Sugar
I had not reproduced the original issue as reported here, as I had instead encountered a different issue that kills banshee startup before this point which appeared to be a race condition/locking issue. I also have not been able to test other than with xnest, which may be why I see this race. --

[Bug 391588] Re: banshee fails to run on arm

2009-08-28 Thread David Sugar
I have attached what I now get today during startup, which is also different... ** Attachment added: "bashee-debug.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/30938403/bashee-debug.txt -- banshee fails to run on arm https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/391588 You received this bug notification because you

[Bug 416522] Re: atomics, threading, and missing __gnu_cxx::__exchange_and_add(int*, int)

2009-08-28 Thread David Sugar
Yes, but explicitly linking -lgcc did not fix this, and I found it related to/while investigating several different issues where I was finding what seemed like race conditions that should have been protected by a mutex. Hence I think C++ exception handling with threading enabled is but one way of

Re: [Lubuntu-desktop] [Bug 303320] Re: [needs-packaging] lxubuntu-desktop

2009-08-28 Thread David Sugar
The one I looked at was the unr seed for Jaunty, which incidentally also builds MID, and has a common component support meta to seed for building both sets. That is the same idea and we can certainly restructure a lubuntu seed set this way also. Since it was my first attempt at a seed I simply wa

[Bug 420145] Re: fftw3 fails to build for armel

2009-08-28 Thread David Sugar
It took an incredibly long time for it to build to verify properly, but as expected the change was trivial. ** Attachment added: "fftw3_3.2.1-2ubuntu2.debdiff.gz" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/30950683/fftw3_3.2.1-2ubuntu2.debdiff.gz -- fftw3 fails to build for armel https://bugs.launchpad.

Re: [Lubuntu-desktop] [Bug 420513] Re: [needs packaging] lubuntu desktop meta

2009-08-30 Thread David Sugar
I had wanted to get feedback sooner and hence see this done earlier. Most if not all of these changes noted are certainly valid. Where we touch upon what the default apps should be, my only concern is that we do not have a lot of revs. If we are going to split the seed to produce variants of def

[Bug 342637] Re: [needs packaging] GNU SIP Witch

2009-12-19 Thread David Sugar
This package is now ready. The current upstream release, 0.5.12, has now been packaged, and it is also part of an active lucid blueprint. http://revu.ubuntuwire.com/details.py?upid=7250 -- [needs packaging] GNU SIP Witch https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/342637 You received this bug notification

[Bug 342637] Re: [needs packaging] GNU SIP Witch

2009-12-19 Thread David Sugar
** Attachment added: "sipwitch_0.5.12-0ubuntu1.diff.gz" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/36975473/sipwitch_0.5.12-0ubuntu1.diff.gz -- [needs packaging] GNU SIP Witch https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/342637 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscr

[Bug 503185] Re: fails to build on armel/lucid

2010-01-15 Thread David Sugar
There is another issue with the alternate code-path: /tmp/cckH6Lu5.s: Assembler messages: /tmp/cckH6Lu5.s:730: Error: only SUBS PC, LR, #const allowed -- `sub pc,r3,#(0x0fff-0x0fc0)' /tmp/cckH6Lu5.s:791: Error: only SUBS PC, LR, #const allowed -- `sub pc,r3,#(0x0fff-0x0fc0)' /tmp

[Bug 503182] Re: fails to build on armel/lucid

2010-01-12 Thread David Sugar
The attached debdiff makes use of proper ansi C varidac support for Svprintf. This is needed because gcc 4.4 (and later) no longer guarantee that void* can be re-cast into a va_args list, and in fact cannot be on arm (in fact, casting void * to a va_list was never appropriate...). It might be tru

[Bug 469752] Re: [karmic] final, when launching firefox, mouse cursor spins forever

2009-11-02 Thread David Sugar
I had experienced this today and looked into it a little when I found this bug report already here. Disabling all plugins and extensions, this behavior still happens, and I have seen it on every Karmic machine I have tried. To me, it seems to be an issue with startup notification, as eventually t

[Bug 635415] Re: armel build failure (uses internal outdated libffi)

2010-10-01 Thread David Sugar
Assignee: David Sugar (dyfet) => (unassigned) -- armel build failure (uses internal outdated libffi) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/635415 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubu

[Bug 635415] Re: armel build failure (uses internal outdated libffi)

2010-10-04 Thread David Sugar
There are specific reasons the patch was done the way it was: First, it did not make sense to modify in any way the build of plt- scheme on other architectures this close to release. We would have had to rebuild all packages dependent on it, and verify they were not broken as a result of such a c

[Bug 635199] Re: [armel] the ./H5detect test segfaults when built for armv7

2010-11-27 Thread David Sugar
You are correct in that the test is done at "runtime", but of course this actually only happens once at "configure" time for the package, which means it is using the runtime characteristics of a specific archive build machine, and at the time only. The behavior just happens to currently appear rel

[Bug 635199] Re: [armel] the ./H5detect test segfaults when built for armv7

2010-09-16 Thread David Sugar
I think we only want to do this for building h5detect itself, and not to use armv5t for the package as a whole. In fact, I was doing a small patch to do something similar for h5detect alone. -- [armel] the ./H5detect test segfaults when built for armv7 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/635199 You

[Bug 636977] Re: gcl currently not built on armel, needed as a build-dependency

2010-09-17 Thread David Sugar
. ** Patch added: "gcl.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gcl/+bug/636977/+attachment/1597148/+files/gcl.debdiff ** Changed in: gcl (Ubuntu) Assignee: David Sugar (dyfet) => (unassigned) ** Changed in: gcl (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress => New -- g

[Bug 636977] Re: gcl currently not built on armel, needed as a build-dependency

2010-09-17 Thread David Sugar
This was not my preferred fix, but what I ended up doing for armel for this, and no worse than what was done for hdf5. If it can be confirmed as release critical I will be happy to attach sponsors. -- gcl currently not built on armel, needed as a build-dependency https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/

[Bug 935443] Re: sipwitch version 1.0.3-1 FTBFS on i386 in precise

2013-01-17 Thread David Sugar
sipwitch 1.0.1 and later require a minimal version of ucommon 5.0, whereas the ubuntu (universe) archive only has a ucommon 3.2.x. A corrected libucommon-dev (>= 5.0) build dependency should be added to the control file for this package, and an appropriate ucommon release will need to be added fir

[Bug 868970] Re: User should be able to disable Akonaditray when akonadi/nepomuk is not used

2012-05-24 Thread David Sugar
I already start with an empty session by default, and I had tried the methods suggested for adding akonanditray to the ~/.config/autostart and then disabling it there, and this DID NOT work, even though indeed it shows up in the start up as "disabled". Clearly it seems like it should work. In fac

[Bug 636977] Re: gcl currently not built on armel, needed as a build-dependency

2010-09-27 Thread David Sugar
For Maverick and present release timelines, certainly disabling thumb2 is a valid temporary solution. But yes, we need to resolve this long term. I very much hate the idea of having a separate local fork of binutils inside a package as well. -- gcl currently not built on armel, needed as a buil

[Bug 599874] [NEW] apr cannot use shared process mutex on armv7

2010-06-29 Thread David Sugar
Public bug reported: On armv7/thumb on Maverick, apr fails to build because it deadlocks in testing shared (interprocess) mutex locking. This feature likely depends on atomics behavior in glibc pthread spinlocks that is broken in thumb2. I have a simple patch that disables shared process mutexes f

[Bug 599874] Re: apr cannot use shared process mutex on armv7

2010-06-29 Thread David Sugar
debdiff apr_1.4.2-3build1.dsc apr_1.4.2-3ubuntu1.dsc attached ** Patch added: "apr.debdiff" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/51124167/apr.debdiff -- apr cannot use shared process mutex on armv7 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/599874 You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Bug 600330] [NEW] ftbfs - casting issue in qreal on arm

2010-06-30 Thread David Sugar
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: diffpdf This package fails to build from source due to a simple casting issue, since on armel, qt's "qreal" is not the same as double. This was simple to fix. ** Affects: diffpdf (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- ftbfs - cast

[Bug 600330] Re: ftbfs - casting issue in qreal on arm

2010-06-30 Thread David Sugar
"debdiff diffpdf_1.1.2-1.dsc diffpdf_1.1.2-1ubuntu1.dsc" attached ** Patch added: "diffpdf.debdiff" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/51184753/diffpdf.debdiff -- ftbfs - casting issue in qreal on arm https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/600330 You received this bug notification because you are a memb

[Bug 600717] [NEW] ftbfs on armv7/thumb2

2010-07-01 Thread David Sugar
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: xsane Currently it fails to build in maverick on armel as it produces an internal compiler error on gcc 4.4. I have tested disabling optimization on arm, which seems to work. ** Affects: xsane (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New --

[Bug 600717] Re: ftbfs on armv7/thumb2

2010-07-01 Thread David Sugar
debdiff xsane_0.997-2ubuntu1.dsc xsane_0.997-2ubuntu2.dsc attached ** Patch added: "xsane.debdiff" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/51241791/xsane.debdiff -- ftbfs on armv7/thumb2 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/600717 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs,

[Bug 600820] [NEW] ftbfs on arm; casting error for doube vs qreal

2010-07-01 Thread David Sugar
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: ugene This package fails to build on arm because double is not same as qreal on arm (and perhaps other architectures), so I added an explicit cast. ** Affects: ugene (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- ftbfs on arm; casting erro

[Bug 600820] Re: ftbfs on arm; casting error for doube vs qreal

2010-07-01 Thread David Sugar
debdiff ugene_1.7.0+repack-0ubuntu1.dsc ugene_1.7.0+repack-0ubuntu2.dsc attached ** Patch added: "ugene.debdiff" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/51257477/ugene.debdiff -- ftbfs on arm; casting error for doube vs qreal https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/600820 You received this bug notification be

[Bug 601182] [NEW] ftbfs on maverick

2010-07-02 Thread David Sugar
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: atanks This is because #include is required for files.cpp ** Affects: atanks (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- ftbfs on maverick https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/601182 You received this bug notification because you are a memb

[Bug 601182] Re: ftbfs on maverick

2010-07-02 Thread David Sugar
debdiff atanks_4.6-1.dsc atanks_4.6-1ubuntu1.dsc attached?field.comment=debdiff atanks_4.6-1.dsc atanks_4.6-1ubuntu1.dsc attached ** Patch added: "atanks.debdiff" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/51302612/atanks.debdiff -- ftbfs on maverick https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/601182 You received thi

[Bug 601195] [NEW] ftbfs because of ambigous QString constructor

2010-07-02 Thread David Sugar
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: hydrogen Package fails to build with latest qt, at least on Maverick, from gcc becoming more picky about ambigous overloaded QString constructor. ** Affects: hydrogen (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- ftbfs because of ambigous

[Bug 601195] Re: ftbfs because of ambigous QString constructor

2010-07-02 Thread David Sugar
debdiff hydrogen_0.9.4.1-1.dsc hydrogen_0.9.4.1-1ubuntu1.dsc attached ** Patch added: "hydrogen.debdiff" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/51305153/hydrogen.debdiff -- ftbfs because of ambigous QString constructor https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/601195 You received this bug notification because y

[Bug 718150] Re: Newer Version Available

2011-02-13 Thread David Sugar
Technically, it should be libucommon4 (and libucommon4-dbg), not libucommon3. The library package name is numbered based on the API (linking) version. Anything built against a libucommon3 historically would expect to link against the libucommon3 instance of the package, and anything new or rebuil

[Bug 754618] Re: Failed to open encrypted home directory

2011-05-26 Thread David Sugar
Furthermore, I also get this: ls -alrt ~/.gvfs ls: cannot access .gvfs: Transport endpoint is not connected So clearly something is going on with gvfs...that's the error thunar shows also. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubun

[Bug 754618] Re: Failed to open encrypted home directory

2011-05-26 Thread David Sugar
I think I can reproduce this bug. It seems to happen explicitly after I log out (to gdm) and then log back in again. I could setup a user with a non-encrypted home on this same machine to see if the behavior is truly specific to encrypted homes only or is related to some session/login issue on it

[Bug 754618] Re: Failed to open encrypted home directory

2011-05-26 Thread David Sugar
I can now confirm it is also likely, as suspected, specific to encrypted homes. I have no problem with a standard user account with a non- encrypted home on this same machine. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bu

[Bug 754618] Re: Failed to open home directory

2011-05-26 Thread David Sugar
I have encountered this exact issue also, and also on a machine where I am using an encrypted home directory. Rebooting does also make it go away when it happens; simply logging out and back in is not sufficient to do so. It was also a newly installed system, so there was not much that yet had b

[Bug 673638] Re: registration missing contact header

2010-11-10 Thread David Sugar
Additional reference: http://www.gnutelephony.org/bugs/view.php?id=5 -- registration missing contact header https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/673638 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@l

[Bug 673638] [NEW] registration missing contact header

2010-11-10 Thread David Sugar
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: sipwitch This can be backported from 0.9.2. ** Affects: sipwitch (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Confirmed ** Changed in: sipwitch (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed ** Bug watch added: www.gnutelephony.org/bugs/ #5 http:/

[Bug 655024] Re: Using higher cpu usage

2010-10-06 Thread David Sugar
I do not see this behavior either. Is any of the bandwidth limiting options being selected and used? -- Using higher cpu usage https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/655024 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailin

[Bug 635764] Re: PLT Scheme is now Racket

2010-10-06 Thread David Sugar
This apparently is not yet even in SID, so it would not happen until 11.04 at minimum. Also, when the new/replacement is sync'd we will have to make sure that the dependent packages, and there are a number of them, are also correctly updated. Finally, there is a current issue with plt-scheme usin

[Bug 635764] Re: PLT Scheme is now Racket

2010-10-06 Thread David Sugar
Also relevant is http://racket-lang.org/new-name.html -- PLT Scheme is now Racket https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/635764 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://li

[Bug 635764] Re: PLT Scheme is now Racket

2010-10-06 Thread David Sugar
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #593614 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=593614 ** Also affects: plt-scheme via http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=593614 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- PLT Scheme is now Racket https://bugs.launchpad.ne

[Bug 642022] Re: armel build failure, configure check hangs

2010-10-07 Thread David Sugar
I cannot confirm this on my build against current repo...should this still be open? -- armel build failure, configure check hangs https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/642022 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mail

[Bug 656926] [NEW] ftbfs - on maverick fails on armel - sync openocd from debian unstable to universe

2010-10-08 Thread David Sugar
an package unmodified, the correct answer seems to be a sync. I am going to try a test build of the revised debian package in sid on maverick armel to see if it builds without change. ** Affects: openocd (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Assignee: David Sugar (dyfet) Status:

[Bug 656926] Re: ftbfs - on maverick fails on armel - sync openocd from debian unstable to universe

2010-10-08 Thread David Sugar
I can confirm Debian 0.4.0-1+nmu1 does build successfully on armel, and still builds on i386...is this an update candidate for Maverick, or to be punted to 11.04? ** Changed in: openocd (Ubuntu) Assignee: David Sugar (dyfet) => (unassigned) -- ftbfs - on maverick fails on armel - s

[Bug 640572] Re: Moodle needs to be updated to 1.9.9 (currently at 1.9.4)

2010-10-08 Thread David Sugar
Most relevant is that there is a well known cross-site scripting vulnerability in 1.9.x versions < 1.9.9 (per Debian bug #586280). Hence this is a security issue, not just a question of bugfixes. This has been updated in debian already. I see we do carry some ubuntu-specific patches which have t

[Bug 607896] Re: [lucid] griffith very unstable

2010-10-08 Thread David Sugar
This seems even more relevant to Maverick, where python-sqlalchemy has been updated to 0.6. We have to upgrade to 0.12-1 already for this reason, per http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=590463. I am going to do a test build to see if 0.12-1 from sid builds on Maverick... ** Bug wa

[Bug 607896] Re: [lucid] griffith very unstable

2010-10-08 Thread David Sugar
This is confirmed that it builds and runs on maverick from sid 0.12-1. I am renaming the bug appropriately and referencing so it can be triaged... ** Also affects: griffith Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Summary changed: - [lucid] griffith very unstable + Please sync Griffith 0

[Bug 67544] Re: Bootstrapping needed for fpc for armel

2010-10-08 Thread David Sugar
One of the reasons fpc may work/build well on Debian (per #16/17) or staged with Debian unstable binaries for fpc (#14), and not Ubuntu/Ubuntu built binaries is that Debian still uses armv4 while we are using thumb2. But I am stuck also trying to bootstrap this for Maverick/armel/thumb2 at the mom

[Bug 620128] [NEW] ftbfs - incompatible with current vala in maverick

2010-08-18 Thread David Sugar
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gnome-dvb-daemon While originally detected as failing on armel, it in fact fails to build on all platforms. It is written in Vala and is incompatible with current Vala releases, as per Maverick. The latest upstream, 0.1.20, is only updated to vala 0.9.

[Bug 391588] Re: banshee fails to run on arm

2010-08-19 Thread David Sugar
** Changed in: banshee (Ubuntu) Assignee: David Sugar (dyfet) => (unassigned) -- banshee fails to run on arm https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/391588 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubu

[Bug 657384] [NEW] kio corrupts zip files with certain characters

2010-10-09 Thread David Sugar
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: kdelibs This is a specific release critical bug reported and patched in Debian kdelibs. I have verified this specific patch builds fine on Ubuntu. The Debian reference is from http://bugs.debian.org/cgi- bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=563942 ** Affects: kdelibs

[Bug 657384] Re: kio corrupts zip files with certain characters

2010-10-09 Thread David Sugar
debdiff kdelibs_3.5.10.dfsg.1-3ubuntu2.dsc kdelibs_3.5.10.dfsg.1-3ubuntu3.dsc attached ** Patch added: "kdelibs.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/kdelibs/+bug/657384/+attachment/1680439/+files/kdelibs.debdiff -- kio corrupts zip files with certain characters https://bugs.launchpad.net/bug

[Bug 657384] Re: kio corrupts zip files with certain characters

2010-10-09 Thread David Sugar
I had thought it would end up a SRU... -- kio corrupts zip files with certain characters https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/657384 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com ht

[Bug 657947] [NEW] ftbfs - in maverick - linking issue

2010-10-10 Thread David Sugar
Public bug reported: This is probably going to be simple to fix. /bin/bash ../../libtool --tag=CXX --mode=link g++ -g -O2 -g -Wall -O2 -Wl,-Bsymbolic-functions -o cbc CoinSolve.o libCbcSolver.la libCbc.la /usr/lib/libCgl.la /usr/lib/libOsiClp.la /usr/lib/libOsi.la /usr/lib/libClp.la /usr/

[Bug 657947] Re: ftbfs - in maverick - linking issue

2010-10-10 Thread David Sugar
There is a loosely related debian bug which asserts that this version fails to build there, but only on amd64. This failed for me on both i386 and amd64. http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=595847 This to me looks MUCH simpler than the Debian issue, and anyway we cannot build 2.5.0 o

<    1   2   3   4   >