[Bug 1915828] Re: pacemaker fails to release clustered filesystem dlm locks on failover

2021-02-23 Thread Dariusz Gadomski
** Changed in: pacemaker (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Dariusz Gadomski (dgadomski) ** Changed in: pacemaker (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Medium -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1917288] Re: Missing to package ceph-kvstore-tool, ceph-monstore-tool, ceph-osdomap-tool in bionic-train UCA release

2021-03-03 Thread Dariusz Gadomski
** Changed in: ceph (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Dariusz Gadomski (dgadomski) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1917288 Title: Missing to package ceph-kvstore-tool, c

[Bug 1917288] Re: Missing to package ceph-kvstore-tool, ceph-monstore-tool, ceph-osdomap-tool in bionic-train UCA release

2021-03-03 Thread Dariusz Gadomski
I have prepared and tested a build targetting this (available in ppa:dgadomski/ceph-lp1917288). During the tests I was mainly focusing on the following upgrade paths to make sure everything works as expected: 1. stein -> train - no issues, but old ceph-test was left installed leaving garbage und

[Bug 1914372] Re: Ubuntu packages affected by CVE-2020-24553

2021-03-03 Thread Dariusz Gadomski
Thank you Avital. I have just tested golang-1.10 for Xenial and Bionic and the behavior is exactly as expected for a fixed version. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1914372 Title: Ubun

[Bug 1914372] Re: Ubuntu packages affected by CVE-2020-24553

2021-03-03 Thread Dariusz Gadomski
I have just repeated the testing procedure for golang-1.14 on Focal, Groovy and Hirsute. The test results look correct and consistent with what is expected according to the test case. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. h

[Bug 1908375] Re: ceph-volume lvm list calls blkid numerous times for differrent devices

2021-06-09 Thread Dariusz Gadomski
I have reuploaded the patch removing unnecessary entries (debdiff attached for reference). ** Patch added: "bionic.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ceph/+bug/1908375/+attachment/5503781/+files/bionic.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Bug 1908375] Re: ceph-volume lvm list calls blkid numerous times for differrent devices

2021-06-10 Thread Dariusz Gadomski
** Description changed: [Impact]  * Every ceph-volume list lvm call invokes blkid for numerous PARTUUIDs. For some setups with many slower IO devices this can make this call to run for minutes without any actual justification for that. In fact, the upstream ceph approach changed in thi

[Bug 1931603] [NEW] [apparmor] Unable to show Downloads with apparmor enabled

2021-06-10 Thread Dariusz Gadomski
Public bug reported: Impact] * After a finished download (or opening the downloads list) it is impossible to "Open Containing Folder" for a downloaded file - pressing the button does nothing visible. [Test Plan] * sudo aa-enforce /etc/apparmor.d/usr.bin.firefox * launch Firefox * Download

[Bug 1931602] [NEW] [apparmor] Segfault in logss with apparmor enabled

2021-06-10 Thread Dariusz Gadomski
Public bug reported: [Impact] * With apparmor enabled (and usr.bin.firefox in enforce mode) there is a crash happening every time right after launching Firefox. [Test Plan] * sudo aa-enforce /etc/apparmor.d/usr.bin.firefox * launch Firefox * See a similar segfault reported in the syslog:

[Bug 1931602] Re: [apparmor] Segfault in logs with apparmor enabled

2021-06-10 Thread Dariusz Gadomski
** Summary changed: - [apparmor] Segfault in logss with apparmor enabled + [apparmor] Segfault in logs with apparmor enabled -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1931602 Title: [apparmor]

[Bug 1908375] Re: ceph-volume lvm list calls blkid numerous times for differrent devices

2021-06-19 Thread Dariusz Gadomski
I have verified the package in 2 ways: * manually (no traces of blkid calls in the log) * automated - by using juju charms to set up a ceph deployment In both cases there were no issues, no regressions noticed. Verification is successful. ** Tags removed: verification-needed verification-needed-

[Bug 1908375] Re: ceph-volume lvm list calls blkid numerous times for differrent devices

2021-06-21 Thread Dariusz Gadomski
Sorry for not stating that explicitly - yes, I have tested the -proposed version ( 12.2.13-0ubuntu0.18.04.8). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1908375 Title: ceph-volume lvm list call

[Bug 1930359] Re: glib2.0: Uninitialised memory is written to gschema.compiled, failure to parse this file leads to gdm, gnome-shell failing to start

2021-07-12 Thread Dariusz Gadomski
Thanks Iain. Looks like both of us sponsored it for the queue. I'd appreciate rejecting either one of them. Thanks! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1930359 Title: glib2.0: Uninitialis

[Bug 1908375] Re: ceph-volume lvm list calls blkid numerous times for differrent devices

2021-04-15 Thread Dariusz Gadomski
** Description changed: [Impact] - * Every ceph-volume list lvm call invokes blkid for numerous PARTUUIDs. For some setups with many slower IO devices this can make this call to run for minutes without any actual justification for that. +  * Every ceph-volume list lvm call invokes blkid

[Bug 1908375] Re: ceph-volume lvm list calls blkid numerous times for differrent devices

2021-04-15 Thread Dariusz Gadomski
** Description changed: [Impact]  * Every ceph-volume list lvm call invokes blkid for numerous PARTUUIDs. For some setups with many slower IO devices this can make this call to run for minutes without any actual justification for that. In fact, the upstream ceph approach changed in thi

[Bug 1923661] Re: [sos41][networking] May invoke devlink module when not loaded depending on how the kernel is configured

2021-07-16 Thread Dariusz Gadomski
** Changed in: sosreport (Ubuntu Groovy) Status: In Progress => Won't Fix -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1923661 Title: [sos41][networking] May invoke devlink module when not l

[Bug 1923661] Re: [sos41][networking] May invoke devlink module when not loaded depending on how the kernel is configured

2021-07-20 Thread Dariusz Gadomski
There are regressions reported in autopkgtests for amd64, arm64 and ppc64el: Failures within each test: test_mask: IP address not obfuscated in all places I'm not sure if that's caused by the change. I'd appreciate an opinion from Eric or Heitor. Thanks! -- You received th

[Bug 1908219] [NEW] [drm:qxl_enc_commit [qxl]] *ERROR* head number too large or missing monitors config:

2020-12-15 Thread Dariusz Gadomski
Public bug reported: [Impact] * Ubuntu 18.04 used as a guest in KVM with Spice/QXL in use may lead to a DRM error displayed during xorg launch: [drm:qxl_enc_commit [qxl]] *ERROR* head number too large or missing monitors config: (ptrval), 0 [Fix] * 00e5d217fa19bcbec13135898e1b9ca2c1c3

[Bug 1908219] Re: [drm:qxl_enc_commit [qxl]] *ERROR* head number too large or missing monitors config:

2020-12-15 Thread Dariusz Gadomski
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Bionic) Assignee: (unassigned) => Dariusz Gadomski (dgadomski) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1908219 Title: [drm:qxl_enc_commit [qxl]] *ERROR* h

[Bug 1908375] [NEW] ceph-volume lvm list calls blkid numerous times for differrent devices

2020-12-16 Thread Dariusz Gadomski
) Importance: Undecided Status: Fix Released ** Affects: ceph (Ubuntu Bionic) Importance: Medium Assignee: Dariusz Gadomski (dgadomski) Status: In Progress ** Tags: sts -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed

[Bug 1908375] Re: ceph-volume lvm list calls blkid numerous times for differrent devices

2020-12-16 Thread Dariusz Gadomski
New => Fix Released ** Changed in: ceph (Ubuntu Bionic) Status: New => In Progress ** Changed in: ceph (Ubuntu Bionic) Importance: Undecided => Medium ** Changed in: ceph (Ubuntu Bionic) Assignee: (unassigned) => Dariusz Gadomski (dgadomski) ** Changed in: ceph (Ubuntu)

[Bug 1908219] Re: [drm:qxl_enc_commit [qxl]] *ERROR* head number too large or missing monitors config:

2020-12-16 Thread Dariusz Gadomski
Patches posted to the kernel-team list: https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/kernel-team/2020-December/115620.html -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1908219 Title: [drm:qxl_enc_commit [qxl]

[Bug 1755490] Re: Incorrect information about display shown in gnome/unity-control-center

2018-11-27 Thread Dariusz Gadomski
hwdata SRU proposal for bionic. ** Patch added: "bionic_hwdata_0.290-1ubuntu1.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/hwdata/+bug/1755490/+attachment/5216710/+files/bionic_hwdata_0.290-1ubuntu1.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs,

[Bug 1755490] Re: Incorrect information about display shown in gnome/unity-control-center

2018-11-27 Thread Dariusz Gadomski
hwdata SRU proposal for xenial. ** Patch added: "xenial_hwdata_0.267-1ubuntu1.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/hwdata/+bug/1755490/+attachment/5216711/+files/xenial_hwdata_0.267-1ubuntu1.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs,

[Bug 1755490] Re: Incorrect information about display shown in gnome/unity-control-center

2018-11-27 Thread Dariusz Gadomski
hwdata SRU proposal for cosmic. ** Patch added: "cosmic_hwdata_0.290-1ubuntu1.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/hwdata/+bug/1755490/+attachment/5216709/+files/cosmic_hwdata_0.290-1ubuntu1.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs,

[Bug 1755490] Re: Incorrect information about display shown in gnome/unity-control-center

2018-11-27 Thread Dariusz Gadomski
I've just verified it on xenial (15.04.1+16.04.20160701-0ubuntu3). Works as expected. Thanks! ** Tags removed: verification-needed verification-needed-xenial ** Tags added: verification-done verification-done-xenial -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, w

[Bug 1755490] Re: Incorrect information about display shown in gnome/unity-control-center

2018-11-27 Thread Dariusz Gadomski
I have also provided debdiffs for hwdata (disco is already synced with upstream) so that LG devices are not shown under Goldstar label. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1755490 Title: I

[Bug 1755490] Re: Incorrect information about display shown in gnome/unity-control-center

2018-11-28 Thread Dariusz Gadomski
Brian: afaik disco version of hwdata has been synced with latest upstream by Sebastien. Upstream has this change already applied. With the disco package source: grep GSM hwdata-0.317/pnp.ids* hwdata-0.317/pnp.ids:GSMLG Electronics hwdata-0.317/pnp.ids.patch:-GSM Goldstar Company Ltd hwdata

[Bug 1755490] Re: Incorrect information about display shown in gnome/unity-control-center

2018-11-28 Thread Dariusz Gadomski
Looks like the latest hwdata update (0.267-1ubuntu1) doesn't have full debdiff applied. The change to hwdata-0.267/pnp.ids is missing, it contains only changes to hwdata-0.267/pnp.ids.patch. It doesn't fix the issue this way. ** Tags removed: verification-needed-xenial ** Tags added: verification

[Bug 1755490] Re: Incorrect information about display shown in gnome/unity-control-center

2018-11-29 Thread Dariusz Gadomski
Run the verifications for: hwdata | 0.267-1ubuntu2 | xenial-proposed hwdata | 0.290-1ubuntu0.18.04.1 | bionic-proposed hwdata | 0.290-1ubuntu0.18.10.1 | cosmic-proposed ** Tags removed: verification-needed-bionic verification-needed-cosmic verification-needed-xenial ** Tags added: verifi

[Bug 1755490] Re: Incorrect information about display shown in gnome/unity-control-center

2018-11-29 Thread Dariusz Gadomski
I checked hwdata output in Unity Settings Displays menu with 2 different devices (vendors: LG and Dell) on LiveCDs for xenial, bionic, cosmic with the proposed patch installed (and with ubuntu-unity-desktop installed from universe in case of bionic and comsmic). Worked as expected (i.e. in the Tes

[Bug 1755490] Re: Incorrect information about display shown in gnome/unity-control-center

2018-11-30 Thread Dariusz Gadomski
hwdata SRU proposal for trusty ** Patch added: "trusty_hwdata_0.249-1ubuntu1.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/hwdata/+bug/1755490/+attachment/5217607/+files/trusty_hwdata_0.249-1ubuntu1.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, w

[Bug 1755490] Re: Incorrect information about display shown in gnome/unity-control-center

2018-11-30 Thread Dariusz Gadomski
It was brought to my attention by Dan that trusty is also worth fixing. The patch to hwdata is identical, however somewhere between trusty and xenial the make_display_name implementation has been moved from gnome- desktop to u-s-d. Hence, despite display-name.c being almost identical in both cases

[Bug 1755490] Re: Incorrect information about display shown in gnome/unity-control-center

2018-11-30 Thread Dariusz Gadomski
gnome-desktop SRU proposal for trusty. ** Patch added: "trusty_gnome-desktop3_3.8.4-0ubuntu3.3.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/hwdata/+bug/1755490/+attachment/5217608/+files/trusty_gnome-desktop3_3.8.4-0ubuntu3.3.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you ar

[Bug 1755490] Re: Incorrect information about display shown in gnome/unity-control-center

2018-11-30 Thread Dariusz Gadomski
gnome-desktop SRU proposal for trusty ** Patch removed: "trusty_gnome-desktop3_3.8.4-0ubuntu3.3.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/hwdata/+bug/1755490/+attachment/5217608/+files/trusty_gnome-desktop3_3.8.4-0ubuntu3.3.debdiff ** Patch added: "trusty_gnome-desktop3_3.8.4-0ubuntu

[Bug 1755490] Re: Incorrect information about display shown in gnome/unity-control-center

2018-11-30 Thread Dariusz Gadomski
** Also affects: gnome-desktop3 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1755490 Title: Incorrect information about display shown in gnome/u

[Bug 1755490] Re: Incorrect information about display shown in gnome/unity-control-center

2018-11-30 Thread Dariusz Gadomski
unity-settings-daemon should NOT be nominated for trusty, but I can't fix that. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1755490 Title: Incorrect information about display shown in gnome/unity-

[Bug 1755490] Re: Incorrect information about display shown in gnome/unity-control-center

2018-11-30 Thread Dariusz Gadomski
I have also verified unity-settings-daemon 15.04.1+16.04.20160701-0ubuntu3 for Xenial. After connecting a faulty-EDID display - I saw the product name. With a display device with correct dimensions in EDID - screen diagonal in inches was displayed. -- You received this bug notification because y

[Bug 1755490] Re: Incorrect information about display shown in gnome/unity-control-center

2018-12-05 Thread Dariusz Gadomski
I have verified the following packages on Trusty: hwdata - 0.249-1ubuntu1 gnome-desktop-3 - 3.8.4-0ubuntu3.3 With the above packages installed from -proposed the labels presented in the 'Displays' panel of u-c-c are correct: when real size is available in EDID data diagonal is displayed, otherwise

[Bug 1804576] Re: MaxJobTime=0 results in jobs being cancelled immediately instead of never

2018-12-06 Thread Dariusz Gadomski
SRU proposal for xenial. ** Patch added: "xenial_cups_2.1.3-4ubuntu0.6.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cups/+bug/1804576/+attachment/5219667/+files/xenial_cups_2.1.3-4ubuntu0.6.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 1804576] Re: MaxJobTime=0 results in jobs being cancelled immediately instead of never

2018-12-06 Thread Dariusz Gadomski
SRU proposal for Cosmic. ** Patch added: "cosmic_cups_2.2.8-5ubuntu2.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cups/+bug/1804576/+attachment/5219665/+files/cosmic_cups_2.2.8-5ubuntu2.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subs

[Bug 1804576] Re: MaxJobTime=0 results in jobs being cancelled immediately instead of never

2018-12-06 Thread Dariusz Gadomski
SRU proposal for disco. ** Description changed: + [Impact] + + Setting the cupsd option MaxJobTime to 0 should make the server wait indefinitely for the job to be ready for print. Instead, after updating job-cancel-after option with MaxJobTime=0 value it results in immediate cancelling. + Th

[Bug 1804576] Re: MaxJobTime=0 results in jobs being cancelled immediately instead of never

2018-12-06 Thread Dariusz Gadomski
SRU proposal for bionic. ** Patch added: "bionic_cups_2.2.7-1ubuntu2.2.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cups/+bug/1804576/+attachment/5219666/+files/bionic_cups_2.2.7-1ubuntu2.2.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 1804576] Re: MaxJobTime=0 results in jobs being cancelled immediately instead of never

2018-12-06 Thread Dariusz Gadomski
imagetopdf filter wrapper I've used for the reproducer: #!/usr/bin/env python import sys import time import subprocess def main(): time.sleep(5) args = ["/usr/lib/cups/filter/imagetopdf.bkp"] + sys.argv[1:] subprocess.call(args, stdin=sys.stdin, stdout=sys.stdout, stderr=sys.stderr)

[Bug 1804576] Re: MaxJobTime=0 results in jobs being cancelled immediately instead of never

2018-12-06 Thread Dariusz Gadomski
SRU proposal for disco (fixed) ** Patch removed: "disco_cups_2.2.9-3ubuntu1.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cups/+bug/1804576/+attachment/5219664/+files/disco_cups_2.2.9-3ubuntu1.debdiff ** Patch added: "disco_cups_2.2.9-3ubuntu1.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubun

[Bug 1789920] Re: Installation in OEM mode broken on bionic

2018-09-11 Thread Dariusz Gadomski
** Attachment added: "partman" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1789920/+attachment/5187537/+files/partman -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1789920 Title: Ins

[Bug 1789920] Re: Installation in OEM mode broken on bionic

2018-09-11 Thread Dariusz Gadomski
** Attachment added: "hardware-summary" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1789920/+attachment/5187541/+files/hardware-summary -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/178

[Bug 1789920] Re: Installation in OEM mode broken on bionic

2018-09-11 Thread Dariusz Gadomski
** Attachment added: "syslog" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1789920/+attachment/5187535/+files/syslog -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1789920 Title: Insta

[Bug 1789920] Re: Installation in OEM mode broken on bionic

2018-09-11 Thread Dariusz Gadomski
As advised by xnox I have retried the installation with adding apt- setup/proposed=true. The result was identical - after rebooting to perform the oem configuration the boot process stucks. Attaching installer logs. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs,

[Bug 1789920] Re: Installation in OEM mode broken on bionic

2018-09-11 Thread Dariusz Gadomski
** Attachment added: "lsb-release" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1789920/+attachment/5187539/+files/lsb-release -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1789920 Titl

[Bug 1789920] Re: Installation in OEM mode broken on bionic

2018-09-11 Thread Dariusz Gadomski
** Attachment added: "questions.dat" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1789920/+attachment/5187542/+files/questions.dat -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1789920

[Bug 1789920] Re: Installation in OEM mode broken on bionic

2018-09-11 Thread Dariusz Gadomski
** Attachment added: "templates.dat" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1789920/+attachment/5187543/+files/templates.dat -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1789920

[Bug 1789920] Re: Installation in OEM mode broken on bionic

2018-09-11 Thread Dariusz Gadomski
** Attachment added: "initial-status.gz" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1789920/+attachment/5187540/+files/initial-status.gz -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1

[Bug 1789920] Re: Installation in OEM mode broken on bionic

2018-09-11 Thread Dariusz Gadomski
** Attachment added: "status" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1789920/+attachment/5187536/+files/status -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1789920 Title: Insta

[Bug 1789920] Re: Installation in OEM mode broken on bionic

2018-09-11 Thread Dariusz Gadomski
** Attachment added: "media-info" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1789920/+attachment/5187538/+files/media-info -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1789920 Title:

[Bug 1749289] Re: Installer stops after pressing Cancel on Select a language screen during OEM install

2018-10-12 Thread Dariusz Gadomski
SRU proposal for Xenial. ** Patch added: "xenial_ubiquity_2.21.63.9.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1749289/+attachment/5200383/+files/xenial_ubiquity_2.21.63.9.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is su

[Bug 1749289] Re: Installer stops after pressing Cancel on Select a language screen during OEM install

2018-10-05 Thread Dariusz Gadomski
Michael, is there a release coming for Xenial that could include also a fix for this bug? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1749289 Title: Installer stops after pressing Cancel on Select

[Bug 1755490] Re: Incorrect information about display shown in unity-control-center

2018-11-20 Thread Dariusz Gadomski
** Description changed: + [Impact] + + * There is a number of display devices that misuse the width & height field in EDID. Instead of real size in centimeters it contains encoded aspect ratio (e.g. 1600x900, 16x10, 160x90). + This leads to incorrect calculation of diagonal for the purpose of

[Bug 1755490] Re: Incorrect information about display shown in unity-control-center

2018-11-20 Thread Dariusz Gadomski
** Description changed: [Impact] - * There is a number of display devices that misuse the width & height field in EDID. Instead of real size in centimeters it contains encoded aspect ratio (e.g. 1600x900, 16x10, 160x90). +  * There is a number of display devices that misuse the width & hei

[Bug 1755490] Re: Incorrect information about display shown in unity-control-center

2018-11-20 Thread Dariusz Gadomski
seb128: it's also fixed in hwdb upstream (https://github.com/systemd/systemd/pull/10051). I need to check if that's already present in Bionic. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1755490 Tit

[Bug 1755490] Re: Incorrect information about display shown in unity-control-center

2018-11-21 Thread Dariusz Gadomski
seb128: I checked and sadly none of the releases (including disco) contains the hwdb fix - looks like it hasn't been released yet upstream - latest systemd release (239) has been published before the fix has been comitted. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu B

[Bug 1755490] Re: Incorrect information about display shown in unity-control-center

2018-11-21 Thread Dariusz Gadomski
** Description changed: [Impact]  * There is a number of display devices that misuse the width & height field in EDID. Instead of real size in centimeters it contains encoded aspect ratio (e.g. 1600x900, 16x10, 160x90). This leads to incorrect calculation of diagonal for the purpose of

[Bug 1755490] Re: Incorrect information about display shown in gnome/unity-control-center

2018-11-22 Thread Dariusz Gadomski
I have just verified both: bionic (15.04.1+18.04.20180413-0ubuntu1.2) and cosmic (15.04.1+18.04.20180413-0ubuntu3) u-s-d packages. In both cases it calculates the diagonal correctly or puts the model name if the real dimensions are not available. However, there is a problem I didn't see coming: h

[Bug 1755490] Re: Incorrect information about display shown in gnome/unity-control-center

2018-11-23 Thread Dariusz Gadomski
Alright, thanks Seb. It makes it verified then. ** Tags removed: verification-needed-bionic ** Tags added: verification-done-bionic ** Tags removed: verification-needed ** Tags added: verification-done ** Tags removed: verification-needed-cosmic ** Tags added: verification-done-cosmic -- You r

[Bug 1755490] Re: Incorrect information about display shown in unity-control-center

2018-11-05 Thread Dariusz Gadomski
It's still valid. hwdata fixed the "vendor name" part of the issue. u-s-d needs to be patched to fix the "nonsense diagonal calculation" part. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1755490 Tit

[Bug 1598183] Re: Operation not permitted while writing to symlinked fuse locations

2018-11-07 Thread Dariusz Gadomski
There is an upstream patch under consideration to be merged into master. Despite not being the perfect solution for the problem it fixes the issue. Let's wait for it to be merged. https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gvfs/issues/249 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ub

[Bug 1789920] Re: Installation in OEM mode broken on bionic

2018-09-17 Thread Dariusz Gadomski
Michael, I've just tried again today. I have up waiting after 60 minutes. How long does it take in your case? FWIW I used a vm (kvm) for testing. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1789920

[Bug 1786933] Re: New upstream release 3.28.x

2018-09-20 Thread Dariusz Gadomski
** Tags removed: verification-needed verification-needed-bionic ** Tags added: verification-done verification-done-bionic -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1786933 Title: New upstream re

[Bug 1786933] Re: New upstream release 3.28.x

2018-09-20 Thread Dariusz Gadomski
I have just verified it and don't see any issues. I tested all use cases listed in the description on metal and in a VM (VirtualBox). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1786933 Title: Ne

[Bug 1793485] [NEW] segfault in png to gif conversion

2018-09-20 Thread Dariusz Gadomski
Public bug reported: Regression between 8:6.8.9.9-7ubuntu5.9 and 8:6.8.9.9-7ubuntu5.12. Test case: 1. Download the attached pngs. 2. Run: /usr/bin/convert -limit memory 512MiB -limit map 0MiB -limit file 10 -delay 16 -loop 0 -coalesce -deconstruct ./*.png ./output.gif Expected result: Process f

[Bug 1793485] Re: segfault in png to gif conversion

2018-09-20 Thread Dariusz Gadomski
** Attachment added: "SH_HL_08_Step1_F029.png" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/imagemagick/+bug/1793485/+attachment/5190922/+files/SH_HL_08_Step1_F029.png ** Description changed: Regression between 8:6.8.9.9-7ubuntu5.9 and 8:6.8.9.9-7ubuntu5.12. Test case: 1. Download the a

[Bug 1749289] Re: Installer stops after pressing Cancel on Select a language screen during OEM install

2018-09-24 Thread Dariusz Gadomski
Micheal: yes, that is expected after the patch has been applied. I just filled the gaps the installer was expecting. Before the config just died with AttributeError caused by calling a unimplemented method. Hence, my understanding was that this is the original intention. Simply hiding the cancel b

[Bug 1749289] Re: Installer stops after pressing Cancel on Select a language screen during OEM install

2018-09-25 Thread Dariusz Gadomski
Yes, definitely. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1749289 Title: Installer stops after pressing Cancel on Select a language screen during OEM install To manage notifications about th

[Bug 1863232] Re: daemon rotates socket on restart

2020-02-20 Thread Dariusz Gadomski
Bionic verification: After installing libapache2-mod-wsgi 4.5.17-1ubuntu1 and setting WSGISocketRotation Off in /etc/apache2/mods-available/wsgi.conf I confirm there is no socket rotation after reload: $ ls -1 /var/run/apache2/wsgi.*.sock /var/run/apache2/wsgi.4963.u33.1.sock $ sudo systemctl rel

[Bug 1863232] Re: daemon rotates socket on restart

2020-02-20 Thread Dariusz Gadomski
Xenial verification: Similarly to bionic with Xenial version of libapache2-mod-wsgi 4.3.0-1.1ubuntu1 and setting WSGISocketRotation Off in /etc/apache2/conf-enabled/wsgi.conf there's no socket rotation: $ ls -1 /var/run/apache2/wsgi.*.sock /var/run/apache2/wsgi.3170.u33.1.sock $ sudo systemctl rel

[Bug 1862226] Re: /usr/sbin/sss_obfuscate fails to run: ImportError: No module named pysss

2020-02-21 Thread Dariusz Gadomski
I've just run a test against the modified version built in a ppa: === >8 # apt upgrade Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done Calculating upgrade... Done The following NEW packages will be installed: python-sss The following packages

[Bug 1754671] Re: Full-tunnel VPN DNS leakage regression

2019-10-10 Thread Dariusz Gadomski
I have backported what was listed as nm-1-10 fix for the bug in the upstream bugzilla [1]. I have also applied fixes for bug #1825946 and bug #1790098 to it. [1] https://cgit.freedesktop.org/NetworkManager/NetworkManager/commit/?id=1e486a721de1fec76c81bfc461671a7fbdae531b After testing this buil

[Bug 1762391] Re: pam_group.so is not evaluated by gnome-terminal

2020-01-28 Thread Dariusz Gadomski
systemd in Xenial differs to much to cleanly apply the upstream fix. It would require reimplementing it and may be more risky than useful. Marking Won't fix. ** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu Xenial) Status: New => Won't Fix -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Bug 1762391] Re: pam_group.so is not evaluated by gnome-terminal

2020-02-05 Thread Dariusz Gadomski
I have just verified bionic. With version 237-3ubuntu10.34 after replaying test case from the description I see the groups from /etc/security/group.conf (dialout, users) added: ubuntu@bionic:~$ groups ubuntu adm dialout cdrom sudo dip plugdev users lpadmin sambashare vboxsf ** Tags removed: verif

[Bug 1762391] Re: pam_group.so is not evaluated by gnome-terminal

2020-02-05 Thread Dariusz Gadomski
With identical setup and testcase for eoan I have managed to successfully verify the patch with version 242-7ubuntu3.3: ubuntu@eoan:~$ groups ubuntu adm dialout cdrom sudo dip plugdev users lpadmin lxd sambashare ubuntu@eoan:~$ ** Tags removed: verification-needed-eoan ** Tags added: verificati

[Bug 1762391] Re: pam_group.so is not evaluated by gnome-terminal

2020-01-14 Thread Dariusz Gadomski
u) Assignee: (unassigned) => Dariusz Gadomski (dgadomski) ** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu Bionic) Assignee: (unassigned) => Dariusz Gadomski (dgadomski) ** Also affects: gnome-terminal (Ubuntu Eoan) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: systemd (Ubuntu Eoan)

[Bug 1762391] Re: pam_group.so is not evaluated by gnome-terminal

2020-01-14 Thread Dariusz Gadomski
SRU proposal for Focal (upstream backport). ** Patch added: "focal_systemd_244-3ubuntu4.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-terminal/+bug/1762391/+attachment/5320077/+files/focal_systemd_244-3ubuntu4.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member

[Bug 1762391] Re: pam_group.so is not evaluated by gnome-terminal

2020-01-14 Thread Dariusz Gadomski
Please hold on with uploading until https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/14567 is resolved. ** Bug watch added: github.com/systemd/systemd/issues #14567 https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/14567 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 1762391] Re: pam_group.so is not evaluated by gnome-terminal

2020-01-14 Thread Dariusz Gadomski
** No longer affects: gnome-terminal (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1762391 Title: pam_group.so is not evaluated by gnome-terminal To manage notifications about this bug go

[Bug 1850754] Re: ceph-volume lvm list is O(n^2)

2020-01-14 Thread Dariusz Gadomski
I have just verified bionic on an OSD with 20x10G disks with minimal load. ceph-osd 12.2.12-0ubuntu0.18.04.3 $ time ceph-volume lvm list ... real0m21.900s 12.2.12-0ubuntu0.18.04.4 $ time ceph-volume lvm list ... real0m2.580s ** Tags removed: verification-needed-bionic ** Tags added: verif

[Bug 1850754] Re: ceph-volume lvm list is O(n^2)

2020-01-14 Thread Dariusz Gadomski
I have verified eoan: ceph-osd 14.2.2-0ubuntu3 $ time ceph-volume list ... real 0m4.788s ceph-osd 14.2.4-0ubuntu0.19.10.1 $ time ceph-volume list ... real 0m1.189s ** Tags removed: verification-needed-eoan ** Tags added: verification-eoan-eoan ** Tags removed: verification-eoan-eoan ** Tags adde

[Bug 1850754] Re: ceph-volume lvm list is O(n^2)

2020-01-15 Thread Dariusz Gadomski
I've just verified disco. ceph-osd 13.2.6-0ubuntu0.19.04.4 $ time ceph-volume lvm list ... real 0m12.893s ceph-osd 13.2.7-0ubuntu0.19.04.1 $ time ceph-volume lvm list ... real 0m1.775s ** Tags removed: verification-needed-disco ** Tags added: verification-done-disco -- You received this bug not

[Bug 1850754] Re: ceph-volume lvm list is O(n^2)

2020-01-15 Thread Dariusz Gadomski
Queens verification successful: 12.2.12-0ubuntu0.18.04.3~cloud0 $ time ceph-volume lvm list ... real0m12.613s 12.2.12-0ubuntu0.18.04.4~cloud0 $ time ceph-volume lvm list ... real0m1.647s ** Tags removed: verification-queens-needed ** Tags added: verification-queens-done -- You received

[Bug 1850754] Re: ceph-volume lvm list is O(n^2)

2020-01-15 Thread Dariusz Gadomski
Rocky verification successful: 13.2.6-0ubuntu0.18.10.3~cloud0 $ time ceph-volume lvm list ... real0m10.061s 13.2.7-0ubuntu0.18.10.1~cloud0 $ time ceph-volume lvm list ... real0m1.952s ** Tags removed: verification-rocky-needed ** Tags added: verification-rocky-done -- You received thi

[Bug 1850754] Re: ceph-volume lvm list is O(n^2)

2020-01-15 Thread Dariusz Gadomski
Stein verification successful: 13.2.6-0ubuntu0.19.04.4~cloud0 $ time ceph-volume lvm list ... real 0m10.533s 13.2.7-0ubuntu0.19.04.1~cloud0 $ time ceph-volume lvm list ... real 0m2.048s ** Tags removed: verification-stein-needed ** Tags added: verification-stein-done -- You received this bug n

[Bug 1850754] Re: ceph-volume lvm list is O(n^2)

2020-01-15 Thread Dariusz Gadomski
Train verification successful: 14.2.2-0ubuntu3~cloud0 $ time ceph-volume lvm list ... real0m14.446s 14.2.4-0ubuntu0.19.10.1~cloud0 $ time ceph-volume lvm list ... real0m2.400s ** Tags removed: verification-train-needed ** Tags added: verification-train-done ** Tags removed: verification

[Bug 1762391] Re: pam_group.so is not evaluated by gnome-terminal

2020-01-16 Thread Dariusz Gadomski
SRU proposal for focal. Upstream regression has been resolved and the fix is integrated in the patch. ** No longer affects: gnome-terminal (Ubuntu Eoan) ** Patch removed: "focal_systemd_244-3ubuntu4.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/systemd/+bug/1762391/+attachment/5320077/+files/focal_sys

[Bug 1762391] Re: pam_group.so is not evaluated by gnome-terminal

2020-01-17 Thread Dariusz Gadomski
** Description changed: + [Impact] + + pam_setcred call was missing in systemd making it's implementation of the PAM protocol problematic. It could manifest in different ways, but one particularly problematic for enterprise environments was the fact that + processes were never getting group mem

[Bug 1762391] Re: pam_group.so is not evaluated by gnome-terminal

2020-01-17 Thread Dariusz Gadomski
SRU proposal for eoan. ** Patch added: "eoan_systemd_242-7ubuntu3.3.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/systemd/+bug/1762391/+attachment/5321139/+files/eoan_systemd_242-7ubuntu3.3.debdiff ** Description changed: [Impact] - pam_setcred call was missing in systemd making it's implementati

[Bug 1762391] Re: pam_group.so is not evaluated by gnome-terminal

2020-01-17 Thread Dariusz Gadomski
SRU proposal for bionic. ** Patch added: "bionic_systemd_237-3ubuntu10.34.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/systemd/+bug/1762391/+attachment/5321138/+files/bionic_systemd_237-3ubuntu10.34.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscr

[Bug 1762391] Re: pam_group.so is not evaluated by gnome-terminal

2020-01-20 Thread Dariusz Gadomski
SRU proposal for eoan (patches split) ** Patch removed: "eoan_systemd_242-7ubuntu3.3.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/systemd/+bug/1762391/+attachment/5321139/+files/eoan_systemd_242-7ubuntu3.3.debdiff ** Patch added: "eoan_systemd_242-7ubuntu3.3.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/sys

[Bug 1762391] Re: pam_group.so is not evaluated by gnome-terminal

2020-01-20 Thread Dariusz Gadomski
SRU proposal for bionic (patches split) ** Patch removed: "bionic_systemd_237-3ubuntu10.34.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/systemd/+bug/1762391/+attachment/5321138/+files/bionic_systemd_237-3ubuntu10.34.debdiff ** Patch added: "bionic_systemd_237-3ubuntu10.34.debdiff" https://bugs.lau

[Bug 1733321] Re: network-manager ADT tests fail with on ppc64el with artful/linux 4.13.0.17.18

2020-03-30 Thread Dariusz Gadomski
** Changed in: network-manager (Ubuntu Eoan) Assignee: (unassigned) => Dariusz Gadomski (dgadomski) ** Changed in: network-manager (Ubuntu Focal) Assignee: (unassigned) => Dariusz Gadomski (dgadomski) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs,

[Bug 1733321] Re: network-manager ADT tests fail with on ppc64el with artful/linux 4.13.0.17.18

2020-03-30 Thread Dariusz Gadomski
Sure Dan, I'm looking into it. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1733321 Title: network-manager ADT tests fail with on ppc64el with artful/linux 4.13.0.17.18 To manage notifications a

[Bug 1733321] Re: network-manager ADT tests fail with on ppc64el with artful/linux 4.13.0.17.18

2020-03-30 Thread Dariusz Gadomski
** Changed in: network-manager (Ubuntu Eoan) Assignee: Dariusz Gadomski (dgadomski) => (unassigned) ** Changed in: network-manager (Ubuntu Focal) Assignee: Dariusz Gadomski (dgadomski) => (unassigned) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs,

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   >