An update to the "ldapclient" abstraction has been merged upstream:
https://gitlab.com/apparmor/apparmor/merge_requests/153/diffs?commit_id=ac1d0545f458b11728f2bcb4a7de0567538fa94a
** Changed in: apparmor
Status: New => Fix Committed
** Changed in: apparmor (Ubuntu)
Status: New =>
I think we're going to need more information on how this plugin got in
there in the first place. Being able to map a library in a user-writable
directory doesn't sound terribly safe...
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
ht
I see that /etc/apparmor.d/abstractions/gnome in Ubuntu 18.04/bionic has
this line...
owner @{HOME}/.config/gtk-3.0/* r,
...which covers the settings.ini file. So this should no longer be an
issue.
** Changed in: firefox (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Released
--
You received thi
Bug persists in Ubuntu 18.04/bionic:
# ls /etc/cups
ls: cannot access '/etc/cups': No such file or directory
# apt-get install cups-client
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
The following additional packages will be installed:
cups-co
Public bug reported:
This concerns grub-pc 2.02-2ubuntu8.2 in Ubuntu 18.04/bionic.
I have GRUB configured to do a five-second countdown (no menu) on boot:
GRUB_TIMEOUT_STYLE=countdown
GRUB_TIMEOUT=5
Strangely enough, on a "Dell Precision Workstation" PC that I have here,
the "5" appears
Arrgh... this is not a great way of working (malware could write to that
location and then load in code), but as it is what we've got, I've added
the rule to a forthcoming Firefox profile update.
Incidentally, Olivier, if you've got a line on who's responsible for the
Firefox profile there, it wou
Public bug reported:
The package that Ubuntu calls "ubuntu-keyring" is present in Debian as
"ubuntu-archive-keyring".
Debian has separate "debian-keyring" and "debian-archive-keyring"
packages, described as follows:
d-k: GnuPG keys of Debian Developers and Maintainers
d-a-k: GnuPG archiv
This issue can be addressed with a manual action, but first you have to
dig into the scripts to diagnose the problem, and really if resolvconf
is installed then it should just work.
Part of this setup involves disabling systemd-resolved, in favor of a
"direct" /etc/resolv.conf, to match the networ
Dimitri, thank you for laying out the rationale behind the package name.
Since there is good reason for things to be the way they are here, I've
opened a bug on the Debian side for them to address the naming
inconsistency:
https://bugs.debian.org/904152
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker
Public bug reported:
This concerns xfce4-pulseaudio-plugin 0.4.1-0ubuntu1 in Ubuntu
18.04/bionic.
In an Xfce desktop session, when this package is installed, and
Pulseaudio is not active, I see a steady procession of these messages in
~/.xsession-errors:
(wrapper-2.0:2036): pulseaudio-p
Hello everyone,
There is a bug report similar to this one on the Debian side:
https://bugs.debian.org/902928
There, Colin Watson made an interesting comment:
> When I last looked into this, this wasn't possible with UEFI: the
> firmware doesn't tell us about held modifier keys. You'll prob
Public bug reported:
This concerns grub-efi-amd64 2.02-2ubuntu8.1 in Ubuntu 18.04/bionic.
When the grub-efi-amd64 package is initially installed on a system that
has not previously booted via the Ubuntu EFI bootloader (so /boot/efi/
is either empty, or at least does not have a /boot/efi/EFI/ubunt
I should point out that on the Debian side, the same conditional exists
in the postinst script, so this same issue occurs there as well. (Only
with the /boot/efi/EFI/debian/ directory, of course.)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed t
Public bug reported:
This concerns shim 13-0ubuntu2 in Ubuntu 18.04/bionic.
(Note: I am not entirely clear on whether this issue belongs to shim, or
to grub2; please redirect as appropriate.)
I am installing Ubuntu with EFI support with the following two
prerequisites:
1. No changes are made
For the record, Firefox 61 very much does continue to make use of
/proc//smaps (and /proc//statm) when using the about:memory
page.
I confirmed this by experimentally commenting out the AppArmor rules for
those two /proc files (motivated by comment #3 above), and subsequently
observed AppA
I think we could really use some kind of conditional construct (IF ...
THEN ...) in AppArmor syntax. Everything being talking about here
should, ideally, be adjustable using tunables. With a debconf
configuration option, even.
Between users who want strict access control to user files, and users
w
Does this issue still occur with Firefox 60 or later? I am unable to
reproduce it on 18.04/bionic.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/885211
Title:
firefox generates apparmor violations
The current Firefox AppArmor profile includes the "openssl" abstraction,
which allows access to /etc/ssl/openssl.cnf. This bug should no longer
be present in Ubuntu.
** Changed in: firefox (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a m
Has anyone observed any undesirable behavior from Firefox when access to
these mount-related DBus services is denied?
It's not clear to me why Firefox is even calling these in the first
place, and given that mounts can include NFS servers and the like, I'd
just as soon deny this access if there's
Hello Jean-Philippe, do you still see this issue if those AppArmor
permissions are commented out?
Are you using the fglrx driver?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1553708
Title:
usr.bi
The Firefox AppArmor profile shipped in Ubuntu 18.04/bionic includes a
rule for /usr/share/distro-info/*.csv, so this should no longer be an
issue.
** Changed in: firefox (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, wh
The Firefox AppArmor profile shipped in Ubuntu 18.04/bionic includes
this rule, so this should no longer be an issue.
** Changed in: firefox (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubu
I have an additional test case that is perhaps more immediate.
Attempting to view a roff file in NFS directly:
$ man ./zlib.3
man: ./zlib.3: Permission denied
No manual entry for ./zlib.3
This fails despite the permissive "/** mrixwlk" rule in the AppArmor
profile. Similar output in t
Public bug reported:
I am using AppArmor 2.12-4ubuntu5 on Ubuntu 18.04/bionic.
I have the usr.bin.man profile enforced, and home directories in NFS.
The log excerpt copied below is the result of a single invocation of
"man ls" by an unprivileged user. (The program did display the man page
correc
/etc/apparmor.d/abstractions/ubuntu-browsers.d/multimedia in Ubuntu
18.04/bionic contains the fix.
Marking the Firefox bug as Invalid, since the issue was fixed by
updating the AppArmor abstraction. (I.e. no change to the firefox
package was/is needed.)
** Changed in: firefox (Ubuntu)
Stat
Does this issue still arise with Firefox 60+? I've encountered various
DBus VFS-related denials with Firefox under AppArmor, but not this
particular one.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1
Hmmm, interesting!
I wouldn't hold out too long on giving the friendly tools smarts
vis-a-vis conditionals, since that kind of logic isn't necessarily
straightforward (i.e. can be hard/time-consuming to implement), it's not
necessary for power/paranoid users (we're happy resorting to a text
editor
Public bug reported:
When I install resolvconf on a minimal install of Ubuntu 18.04 (bionic),
I see this:
# apt-get install resolvconf
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
The following NEW packages will be installed:
resolvconf
0 upgra
Public bug reported:
I am setting up an Ubuntu 18.04 (bionic) system with ifupdown instead of
netplan, as the latter does not meet my needs. I am using resolvconf to
update /etc/resolv.conf from DHCP, as in earlier releases.
Unfortunately, I am not seeing /etc/resolv.conf (actually a symlink to
/
Update: This bug is NOT a duplicate of
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1607535
(Bug #1607535 is about unreliable SourceForge servers; this is about
warnings from the package scripts)
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 1607535
ttf-mscorefonts-installer 3.4+nmu1ubuntu2 fails to install
Hi Luigi,
This StackExchange posting should answer your question:
https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/3586/what-do-the-numbers-in-a
-man-page-mean
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1
Public bug reported:
This concerns linux-base 4.0ubuntu1 in Ubuntu Xenial.
Removing Linux kernel packages from the system leads to initrd
generation and causes /var/run/reboot-required to appear. Neither of
these side effects should occur if only kernel packages older than the
running one are rem
It's not clear that the chromium-browser package maintainers are
willing/interested in taking on the profile. As it is, this has been
almost entirely Jamie Strandboge's show, and he's a security guy, not a
Chromium dev.
That said, i do wonder why the profile doesn't exist in Ubuntu's
apparmor Baza
Marcelo: You could make /sbin/fsck a shell script that wraps the real
fsck binary, and logs the output as desired. Doing this with a dpkg
diversion might even keep things from breaking when the util-linux
package is upgraded
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ub
Jorge: Check in the upstream bugzilla to see if someone's already filed
a bug, but if not, then go for it. Very few Ubuntu package maintainers
take the initiative to file upstream bugs themselves.
If you do file a bug upstream, or a report already exists, please link
it here!
(As a possible worka
Er...
$ klist -v
klist: invalid option -- 'v'
Usage: klist [-e] [-V] [[-c] [-l] [-A] [-d] [-f] [-s] [-a [-n]]] [-k [-t]
[-K]] [name]
[...]
Remember, the segfault occurs with a user that is local-only. Kerberos
infrastructure is installed on the system, but the user has no Kerbero
Confirmed that this fixes the segfault for me when applied to version
3.20.0. Thanks :)
(Figured this would be easy to reproduce...)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1700468
Title:
"kr
Public bug reported:
I am seeing this on a Xenial minimal install with plymouth
0.9.2-3ubuntu13 (as well as 0.9.2-3ubuntu13.1).
After the text-mode boot logo ("Ubuntu 16.04" with the four dots) is
shown on start-up, the text-mode tty1 login prompt is sometimes printed
in brown/orange text instead
On a minimal install:
# update-initramfs -u
update-initramfs: Generating /boot/initrd.img-4.4.0-22-generic
W: plymouth: The plugin label.so is missing, the selected theme might not work
as expected.
W: plymouth: You might want to install the plymouth-themes and plymouth-label
package to fix this
Public bug reported:
This concerns unattended-upgrades 0.90 in Xenial.
Here is an excerpt from an e-mail report sent out by u-u after the
upgrade process is completed:
Package installation log:
Log started: 2016-07-06 17:24:21
Preconfiguring packages ...
(Reading
Thanks to systemd, I've had to update my setterm invocation in
/etc/rc.local to the following:
setterm --term linux --blank 0 --powerdown 0 >/dev/console
("--powersave off" fails with an "Inappropriate ioctl" error because
rc.local no longer runs directly on the Linux virtual console.)
--
Y
Generalized the title to include terminal devices (e.g. Linux virtual
terminals) as well.
I'd like to see a better way to set this up. Yes, you can add the syslog
user to the dialout and/or tty groups, but that grants access to *all*
serial/terminal devices respectively. This can have security
con
Public bug reported:
This concerns lightdm 1.18.1-0ubuntu1 in Xenial.
The /lib/systemd/system/lightdm.service file lacks an [Install] clause.
Meaning, that if you do
# systemctl disable display-manager
to prevent LightDM from starting, running
# systemctl enable lightdm
does not resto
This whole systemd thing is new to me, and I can't say I'm terribly
enamored of it, so I'm not the best person to ask. But by way of
example, I'll point out what a couple other .service files do:
/lib/systemd/system/rsyslog.service:
[Install]
WantedBy=multi-user.target
Alias=syslog.s
Public bug reported:
I have a Xenial system; gnupg-agent 2.1.11-6ubuntu2 is part of the
install.
In /etc/X11/Xsession.d/90gpg-agent , gpg-agent is started if either
~/.gnupg/gpg.conf or ~/.gnupg/options contains a "use-agent" directive.
This part is working fine, as far as I'm aware.
Now, the /u
Spurious dialog observed in remote X session on Xenial install with
accountservice 0.6.40-2ubuntu10.
Enabled xenial-proposed, installed accountservice 0.6.40-2ubuntu11, and
the dialog no longer appears.
I wasn't seeing this problem as badly as some other folks here, but for
my use case, the propo
Public bug reported:
I am using xfce4-session 4.12.1-3ubuntu1 on Xenial.
I am logging into a remote system via SSH with X11 forwarding, starting
the XFCE desktop with "startxfce4", and then exiting the session.
After logout, several processes remain visible, most notably dbus-launch
(which appe
Hello,
I, too, am seeing this issue of gpg-agent persisting after an XFCE
session ends. However, I think the problem may be outside of
xfce4-session proper.
In my investigation into https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1577562 , I
found two places where gpg-agent may be started at the beginning of an
This issue is no longer observable in a standard console X11 login on
Xenial.
There is still an issue with GVFS daemons hanging around after an XFCE
session that was launched from a terminal (as in a remote X11 session),
but that is actually due to dbus-launch not being killed at the end of
the se
Public bug reported:
I installed a minimal Xenial system. Whenever the initramfs is
regenerated, I see
W: plymouth: The plugin label.so is missing, the selected theme might not
work as expected.
W: plymouth: You might want to install the plymouth-themes and
plymouth-label package to fix
Seth, it seems you're absolutely right.
Denying dgram while the system is up is no big deal, because DNS lookups
go through nscd (or other similar infrastructure) instead of being sent
out directly.
But when the system is starting up, and nscd et al. aren't running yet,
the queries do need to go
Thank you Seth :-) Next rev in each release should have this, right?
No copyright line is needed; this was trivial to derive from the nscd
profile.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/15754
Public bug reported:
I am using apparmor-profiles in Xenial.
The AppArmor profiles, by default, are set to "complain" mode by way of
"flag=(complain)" directives written into the profiles themselves.
If I want these profiles to be enforced, then I have to edit each one
and manually delete the di
Public bug reported:
Installing ttf-mscorefonts-installer 3.4+nmu1ubuntu2 on Xenial, I see
the following in the output of apt-get(8):
[...]
ttf-mscorefonts-installer: downloading
http://downloads.sourceforge.net/corefonts/andale32.exe
Get:1 http://downloads.sourceforge.net/corefonts/andale32.exe
I've been working on a Kerberos system config lately, and have once more
run into the title question.
It's been six years. Debian bugs #330882 (no real shells for system
users) and #429692 (support include directives in krb5.conf) are done
and laid to rest.
Can we move minimum_uid= out from the "
Public bug reported:
I am usinc nscd with nslcd (LDAP lookup daemon) for NSS services via
LDAP.
It is typical to configure nslcd to connect to the actual LDAP server,
and then set up /etc/ldap.conf (which is what NSS/nscd uses for "ldap"
type lookups in /etc/nsswitch.conf) with a server URI of
ld
Public bug reported:
nslcd is a good program to be covered by an AppArmor profile, as it
communicates with an LDAP server and services queries from arbitrary
local applications.
This new profile used the existing usr.sbin.nscd profile as a starting
point.
** Affects: apparmor (Ubuntu)
Impor
> I don't think Heimdal supports including krb5.conf snippets, which
means we can't use the include functionality in kerberos-configs.
And even if it did, it would still be awkward (you have to add the
#include at any rate). It needs to be a standard expectation these days
that configs in /etc sup
Chromium continues to fail on Xenial with the title error message when
the currently-shipped AppArmor profile is enforced.
I've updated my profile adjustments to address some new issues that have
cropped up in recent builds of Chromium.
Everyone who wants to get things working again, please add t
For my part, I'm not seeing DNS issues, and I've got a hostname in my
LDAP server URI.
I'm not sure what goes on under the hood for normal DNS resolution these
days (maybe DNS over TCP is favored now?), but if there's any doubt in
your mind, feel free to drop those lines.
--
You received this bu
Minor addendum: It's conceivable that the new line should go into
rather than just the nscd profile. I do see
that the nscd socket is already mentioned there.
I don't know if/why anything else would need access to the nslcd socket,
but that may be a valid use case for other folks.
--
You receiv
Hi everyone. I've been setting up LDAP in Ubuntu lately, and have run
headlong into this issue again.
Arguably, the situation has gotten worse in the past three years, as the
dependency rat's nest has become more convoluted.
I've put together a new visual aid to illustrate the current situation;
Also, for those interested, here is the GraphViz source for the "visual
aid." The graphic can be regenerated with the command
$ dot -Tpng ldap-deps.dot >ldap-deps.png
(The dot(1) command is in the "graphviz" package.)
** Attachment added: "ldap-deps.dot"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu
Public bug reported:
I am using thunar version 1.6.10-2ubuntu1 in Xenial.
Thunar connects to SMB/CIFS shares just fine, even using current
Kerberos credentials to avoid any password prompt. That part's working
great.
However, if I enter a UNC path into the location bar like
"\\server\share\path\
Maybe make display-manager.service into an actual service file (rather
than a symlink), and have that start whatever /etc/X11/default-display-
manager points to?
What I want is to be able to disable and then re-enable the display
manager starting on boot using similar administrative commands, like
I should point out, the update-initramfs invocations should also not be
happening for kernel packages being removed.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1636701
Title:
Removing kernel pack
Public bug reported:
I'm filing this against dkms 2.2.0.3-2ubuntu11.2 in Ubuntu Xenial,
although the issue may come down to a different package.
I issued an "apt-get --purge autoremove" command to clear out some old
kernel packages, and the command took several minutes to complete due to
kernel m
Hi Alex, the failure to download is actually bug #1607535. This bug is
about the "Can't drop privileges" warnings, which are ultimately
harmless to package installation.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.laun
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1522675 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1522675
This appears to be a duplicate of bug #1522675, which more broadly
addresses the "_apt" user permissions issue.
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1522675
Can't drop privileges for downloadin
Benjamin, what you're seeing appears to be bug #1607535. (That bug
report doesn't quote the "/the fonts/" URL directly, but it links to a
comment that does.
I have a bug report (bug #1575408) against ttf-mscorefonts-installer due
to the "Can't drop privileges" warning, but am assuming that that wa
** Description changed:
I started a separate instance of Chromium in Incognito mode, and it
crashed an instant after the window came up.
ProblemType: Crash
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.10
Package: chromium-browser 18.0.1025.151~r130497-0ubuntu0.11.10.1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.0.0
Public bug reported:
I am using LightDM 1.0.6-0ubuntu1.2 on Oneiric.
I would like to pass the "-logdir /path/to/file" option to the X server.
In the old days, I would edit a file like /etc/X11/Xserver and add the
option in there. LightDM, however, constructs the X server invocation in
C code, spe
Technically, the 64MB-too-small bug is #785394, but whatever it takes to
get this done!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/710733
Title:
LKCD Not Executing kexec Properly
To manage notif
Public bug reported:
I have a Toshiba laptop (Satellite A65) with a built-in Ethernet
adapter, running Ubuntu Oneiric with the stock kernel 3.0.0-16.28. After
some time in operation, while the system is in use, the network
connection stops working and I find the following in /var/log/syslog:
Feb
** Attachment added: "Output of "lspci -vvnn""
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/934812/+attachment/2751955/+files/lspci-vvnn.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/934812
Title:
8139to
This is a minimal install running off a CompactFlash card, so I actually
don't have the apport-collect command. I can provide any telemetry that
is needed manually, however.
(Note that I've encountered this same error previously with a stock
install, so the bug is clearly independent of the minima
** Visibility changed to: Public
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/691803
Title:
parole-media-plugin crashed with SIGSEGV in __pthread_mutex_lock()
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: wine1.2
This concerns wine1.2 1.2.1-0ubuntu1 in Ubuntu Maverick.
I went to start up an application in Wine, one that I had used many
times in previous Ubuntu releases. Instead of taking a few seconds to
start up as usual, Wine hung, not even mapping a wi
** Attachment added: "wine-output.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/700895/+attachment/1789723/+files/wine-output.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/700895
Title:
Hangs on sta
** Visibility changed to: Public
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/700912
Title:
dosbox crashed with SIGSEGV
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubun
Can the patch be pushed to 3.6.x? (Just noticed it's not in 3.6.13.)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/585061
Title:
Segfaults in nsUrlClassifierDBService.cpp when homedir is inaccessibl
@Risto, I think you're seeing the same bug as Alexei in comment #44.
Have a look at
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31152
Please give the packages in the xorg-edgers/radeon PPA a try, as those
should have the fix:
https://launchpad.net/~xorg-edgers/+archive/radeon
--
You r
I've dug a bit into the issue, and put together a patch for the
upstream:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=3154782&group_id=52551&atid=467234
** Bug watch added: SourceForge.net Tracker #3154782
http://sourceforge.net/support/tracker.php?aid=3154782
** Changed in: dosbox (Ubun
Al: I'm presuming the ideal is to reproduce a crash with 3.6.13, and
observe the lack of one with 3.6.14pre. However, whichever of the two I
install, the auto-update installs the new 3.6.14pre nightly---which may
be affecting the behavior of the bug. How should I go about testing
this?
--
You rec
** Visibility changed to: Public
--
xfce4-panel crashed with signal 7 in FcFontMatch()
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/683753
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
http
Here is my view of the problem: On an up-to-date Maverick install, if
/etc/hosts looks like the following on bootup...
127.0.0.1 localhost
127.0.1.1 hostname.intra.example.com hostname
# The following lines are desirable for IPv6 capable hosts
::1 localhost ip6-local
The drivers for r200 have received a bit of work lately, both in Mesa
and in the kernel. I am currently running Maverick, plus the
2.6.37-020637rc3-generic mainline kernel and packages from the xorg-
edgers/radeon PPA, and am no longer having any GPU-crash problems (in
Wings3D or otherwise) of the
Okay, an update:
I'm still running Maverick, with current packages from xorg-
edgers/radeon (mesa @ git20101130), and the 2.6.37-020637rc3-generic
mainline kernel. Many improvements:
* The "drmRadeonCmdBuffer: -22" error is history, thanks to Alex
Deucher: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cg
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 683753 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/683753
** Visibility changed to: Public
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/686085
Title:
xfce4-panel cr
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 683753 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/683753
Nuts, I thought I had libfontconfig1-dbg installed.
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 683753
xfce4-panel crashed with signal 7 in FcFontMatch()
* You can subscribe to bug 683753 by following
** Visibility changed to: Public
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/686091
Title:
check-new-release-gtk crashed with IOError in _buildMetaReleaseFile()
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubun
Okay, it's pretty clear what's going on: update-manager fails to open
the meta-release file, so it presumes it's being run for the first time
and attempts to create ~/.cache/update-manager-core, which it can't.
Could the program fall back to a system-wide file (e.g. under /etc) in a
case like this?
Public bug reported:
This bug report concerns chromium-browser version
43.0.2357.81-0ubuntu0.14.04.1.1089 in Ubuntu Trusty.
Previously, this system had 41.0.2272.76-0ubuntu0.14.04.1.1076
installed, and it worked correctly. Now, after an update, the browser
crashes immediately upon startup with a
Correction: I have a .crash file, but cannot find what invocation of
apport-{bug,cli} will attach it to an existing bug report.
The crash in question may be found in the Ubuntu Error Tracker at
https://errors.ubuntu.com/problem/70617e44460c73fcc19361b37a0b38c02af9090e
--
You received this bug n
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1471645 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1471645
I have configured apport to submit crash traces to Launchpad and have
filed a new report that way.
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of private bug 1471645
--
You received this bug notification beca
The crash is due to AppArmor. Adding the following to the profile for
/usr/lib/chromium-browser/chromium-browser gets things working again:
capability sys_admin,
capability sys_chroot,
owner @{PROC}/[0-9]*/setgroups w,
owner @{PROC}/[0-9]*/gid_map w,
owner @{PROC}/[0-9]*/uid_m
Hi Stuart,
Note that Anacron is not a daemon; it needs to be executed at boot time
and intermittently thereafter (via that cron.d script).
It doesn't work to have Anacron run only at boot time and Cron
thereafter, because Anacron maintains state in /var/spool/anacron/ that
needs to be updated eac
Hello Brian,
This issue also manifests via accidental clicking (you're about to click
in a regular application window, then the dialog pops up, with the
"Restart Now" button right under the pointer). Changing the default
focus only addresses accidental rebooting via keyboard---and even then,
will
I think this bug is pretty serious from a usability perspective, given
that an unplanned reboot can result in lost data and pissed-off users. I
use Trusty, and would go for the SRU.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https
Bryan: Could you elaborate on how this issue appears to be fixed in
13.04? Was the memory reservation increased to 128MB, or is the kernel
now capable of booting in 64MB? Given the lack of any updates here, I'm
doubtful that any progress has been made at all.
Dave: Have you tried crash-booting a *
401 - 500 of 848 matches
Mail list logo
