Excerpts from walec51's message of 2014-03-01 23:53:04 UTC:
> Yep. It's a bug with the ligthgm setup. Replacing it with gdm solves the
> problem
>
Thanks for the data, that should help a bit.
However, all that proves is that gdm does not have the symptom. It does
not indicate that "the problem"
subair, Can you open a new bug with a full description of the problem
you are having, including the steps you took to get there so we can
reproduce? This one is pretty specific to booting the deploy ramdisk on
machines with less than 1GB of RAM.
THANKS!
** Changed in: diskimage-builder
Assig
Doesn't ifupdown still bring up lo?
Excerpts from Martin Pitt's message of 2014-09-23 06:17:10 UTC:
> ubuntu-minimal depends on upstart and ifupdown, so supposedly you
> removed that. This is really not a supported configuration.
>
> As for upstart: Debian has a new essential package "init" which
Nice find, and confirmed on trusty.
** Changed in: ifupdown (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Triaged
** Changed in: ifupdown (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => High
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchp
API breaks are bad, mmmkay. Setting to Critical.
** Changed in: python3.4 (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Triaged
** Changed in: python3.4 (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Critical
** Also affects: python3.4 (Ubuntu Utopic)
Importance: Critical
Status: Triaged
** Also affects: pyth
Forgetting myself, dropping to "High" .. we need this to be fixed really
soon, but it doesn't break EVERYBODY
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1382607
Title:
[SRU] Backport python3.4 lo
This is fixed upstream in 3.4.2, so it only affects Trusty.
** Changed in: python3.4 (Ubuntu Utopic)
Status: Triaged => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1382607
Title
** Changed in: python3.4 (Ubuntu Trusty)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Clint Byrum (clint-fewbar)
** Changed in: python3.4 (Ubuntu Trusty)
Status: Triaged => In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
Looks like there is a backport of 3.4.2 to trusty in the works tracking
at bug #1348954
** Changed in: python3.4 (Ubuntu Trusty)
Assignee: Clint Byrum (clint-fewbar) => (unassigned)
** Changed in: python3.4 (Ubuntu Trusty)
Status: In Progress => Triaged
--
You received th
Raring is EOL since January 27:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Releases
Excerpts from Alessandro Moscatelli's message of 2014-06-12 22:23:52 UTC:
> It looks I have this problem with Ubuntu Raring
> kernel version : 3.8.13
>
> I attached a screenshot with dmesg after I tried to start again my
> containe
Public bug reported:
This fails terribly because the new chromium cannot lock the profile and
just generally doesn't work well. sensible-browser should be opening a
new window in an existing instance of a browser.
ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 14.04
Package: sensible-utils 0.0.9
Uname: L
Which is actually chromium itself.
** Package changed: sensible-utils (Ubuntu) => chromium-browser (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1332226
Title:
sensible-browser opens a new
FYI this may actually be about gnome-www-browser:
+ exec /usr/bin/gnome-www-browser
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1332226
Title:
sensible-browser opens a new chromium even if one is
Public bug reported:
Commands:
{info,clone,restore,restore-new-distro}
info Shoe info about a apt-clone archive.
ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.10
Package: apt-clone 0.2.3~ubuntu3
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.5.0-21.32-generic 3.5.7.1
Uname: Linux 3.5.0-21-
By that logic if select() is broken in the kernel and does not properly
handle its arguments or give proper error codes, my program which
expects to get proper error codes from the syscall is broken because it
doesn't know how to handle something not working as documented? I'm not
sure I agree with
Hello Daniel, or anyone else affected,
Accepted grub2 into precise-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at http://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/1.99-21ubuntu3.8
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
https://wik
Hello Serge, or anyone else affected,
Accepted grub2 into precise-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at http://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/1.99-21ubuntu3.8
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
https://wiki
Hello Dave, or anyone else affected,
Accepted grub2 into precise-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at http://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/1.99-21ubuntu3.8
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
https://wiki.
Everybody, the problem is by now well understood. There is a need to
have debconf not explode in a fiery ball of errors when something else
has the database locked.
As such, there's no need to post your ps tree anymore, but thank you
everyone who has!
--
You received this bug notification becaus
Actually I don't think this is network-manager's fault. By all rights,
it should be *dead* by this point.
umountnfs.sh emits unmounted-remote-filesystems, which stops networking
(stop on umounted-remote-filesystems), which emits deconfiguring-
networking, which causes dbus to stop (stop on deconfi
Hello Luis, or anyone else affected,
Accepted cloud-init into quantal-proposed. The package will build now
and be available at http://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cloud-
init/0.7.0-0ubuntu2.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
ht
Hello Joshua, or anyone else affected,
Accepted cloud-init into quantal-proposed. The package will build now
and be available at http://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cloud-
init/0.7.0-0ubuntu2.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
Hello Marti, or anyone else affected,
Accepted cloud-init into quantal-proposed. The package will build now
and be available at http://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cloud-
init/0.7.0-0ubuntu2.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
h
Hello Scott, or anyone else affected,
Accepted cloud-init into quantal-proposed. The package will build now
and be available at http://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cloud-
init/0.7.0-0ubuntu2.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
h
Hello Thomas, or anyone else affected,
Accepted cloud-init into quantal-proposed. The package will build now
and be available at http://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cloud-
init/0.7.0-0ubuntu2.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
Hello Scott, or anyone else affected,
Accepted cloud-init into quantal-proposed. The package will build now
and be available at http://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cloud-
init/0.7.0-0ubuntu2.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
h
Hello Alessandro, or anyone else affected,
Accepted cloud-init into quantal-proposed. The package will build now
and be available at http://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cloud-
init/0.7.0-0ubuntu2.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.
Please help us by testing this new package.
I really think we need to understand the impact of that patch before
accepting the current upload. Please explain in the bug description
above (under regression potential) what this flag does and how users can
test that it did not introduce a regression. Thanks!
--
You received this bug notificat
Excerpts from Gavin Graham's message of 2012-12-19 02:25:34 UTC:
> @Pieter
>
> I agree, it is not a fix (well, a permanent and proper one anyway) but
> it does suggest that it's a race condition and that it is in the Binary
> itself and not the /etc/init/lightdm script as some of the other
> poten
** Changed in: cloud-init
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1100920
Title:
In Ubuntu 12.10, the legacy 'user' cloud-config option is not handl
We saw issues like this in Ubuntu 11.10 as well, and it was resolved by
figuring out what is left running just before shutdown.
If you can edit /etc/init.d/umountroot and add this, just before the
line starting with 'mount', which on my 12.10 system is line 86:
/usr/sbin/lsof -n > /last-shutd
I wonder if somehow dhclient is being added to omitpids.
If you edit /etc/init.d/sendsigs, and uncomment the '#report_unkillable'
on line 132, then reproduce agian. Then look in /var/crash for apport
reports mentioning dhclient. If there are some, then its being added to
the list of pids the syst
Excerpts from Scott Moser's message of 2013-01-31 14:19:24 UTC:
> I'm pretty sure that the trunk commit "just works" when applied to
> quantal. I'm attaching a deb here and the patch that built it, mainly
> for future reference.
>
> I would appreciate feedback as to whether or not it works though.
Russell, the problem in network manager needs to be debugged. No
milestone is set yet, so its not known when it will be resolved, but it
does seem likely that the problem will be easy to fix given how
reproducible it is and how much insight we have into it now.
--
You received this bug notificati
Hello Alessandro, or anyone else affected,
Accepted cloud-init into precise-proposed. The package will build now
and be available at http://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cloud-
init/0.6.3-0ubuntu1.5 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.
Please help us by testing this new package.
Hello Luis, or anyone else affected,
Accepted cloud-init into precise-proposed. The package will build now
and be available at http://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cloud-
init/0.6.3-0ubuntu1.5 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
ht
Hello Scott, or anyone else affected,
Accepted cloud-init into precise-proposed. The package will build now
and be available at http://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cloud-
init/0.6.3-0ubuntu1.5 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
h
Hello Scott, or anyone else affected,
Accepted cloud-init into precise-proposed. The package will build now
and be available at http://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cloud-
init/0.6.3-0ubuntu1.5 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
h
Hello Ben, or anyone else affected,
Accepted cloud-init into precise-proposed. The package will build now
and be available at http://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cloud-
init/0.6.3-0ubuntu1.5 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
htt
Alberto thanks. The regression potential is great.
It sounds like this is not easily reproducible. Your Test Case is not
sufficient. Please explain the exact steps one would need to take
assuming they have never seen the issue. So, "create a google account,
set it to method X" etc. etc. This is ne
Rejecting the upload to quantal-proposed. Please respond and add the
necessary sections before re-uploading.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1091354
Title:
qjson does not serialise flo
Hello Kévin, or anyone else affected,
Accepted gwibber into quantal-proposed. The package will build now and
be available at
http://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gwibber/3.6.0-0ubuntu1.1 in a few
hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
https://
Hello outpost...@gmail.com, or anyone else affected,
Accepted nautilus into quantal-proposed. The package will build now and
be available at
http://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/1:3.5.90.really.3.4.2-0ubuntu4.2
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testin
Hi Phillip, thanks for the upload to quantal-proposed. The changelog
needs to be targetted at quantal-proposed, its only an accident that it
got into the quantal-proposed queue. Everything else is good, so please
re-upload with the changelog fixed and it should be accepted ASAP.
--
You received t
Hello Scott, or anyone else affected,
Accepted postfix into precise-proposed. The package will build now and
be available at
http://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/postfix/2.9.6-1~12.04.1 in a few
hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
https://w
Hello Kylin, or anyone else affected,
Accepted horizon into quantal-proposed. The package will build now and
be available at
http://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/horizon/2012.2.3-0ubuntu1 in a few
hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
https:/
Hello Adam, or anyone else affected,
Accepted cinder into quantal-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at
http://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cinder/2012.2.3-0ubuntu1 in a few
hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
https://wi
Hello Adam, or anyone else affected,
Accepted glance into quantal-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at
http://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/glance/2012.2.3-0ubuntu1 in a few
hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
https://wi
Hello Adam, or anyone else affected,
Accepted horizon into quantal-proposed. The package will build now and
be available at
http://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/horizon/2012.2.3-0ubuntu1 in a few
hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
https://
Hello Adam, or anyone else affected,
Accepted keystone into quantal-proposed. The package will build now and
be available at
http://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/keystone/2012.2.3+stable-20130206-82c87e56-0ubuntu1
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this
Hello Adam, or anyone else affected,
Accepted nova into quantal-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at http://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nova/2012.2.3-0ubuntu1
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
https://wiki.u
Hello Adam, or anyone else affected,
Accepted quantum into quantal-proposed. The package will build now and
be available at
http://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/quantum/2012.2.3-0ubuntu1 in a few
hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
https://
Hello Emilien, or anyone else affected,
Accepted quantum into quantal-proposed. The package will build now and
be available at
http://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/quantum/2012.2.3-0ubuntu1 in a few
hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
https
Hello Sergio, or anyone else affected,
Accepted nova into quantal-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at http://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nova/2012.2.3-0ubuntu1
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
https://wiki
Hello Stéphane, or anyone else affected,
Accepted lxc into precise-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at http://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lxc/0.7.5-3ubuntu67 in
a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
https://wiki.u
Hello Tristan, or anyone else affected,
Accepted lxc into precise-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at http://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lxc/0.7.5-3ubuntu67 in
a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
https://wiki.ub
Hello Tristan, or anyone else affected,
Accepted lxc into quantal-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at
http://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lxc/0.8.0~rc1-4ubuntu39.12.10.2 in a
few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
htt
Hello Francisco, or anyone else affected,
Accepted lxc into precise-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at http://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lxc/0.7.5-3ubuntu67 in
a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
https://wiki.
Hello Scott, or anyone else affected,
Accepted lxc into precise-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at http://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lxc/0.7.5-3ubuntu67 in
a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
https://wiki.ubun
Hello Matias, or anyone else affected,
Accepted lxc into precise-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at http://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lxc/0.7.5-3ubuntu67 in
a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
https://wiki.ubu
Hello Stéphane, or anyone else affected,
Accepted lxc into quantal-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at
http://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lxc/0.8.0~rc1-4ubuntu39.12.10.2 in a
few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
ht
My bad, I had thought that this was just an accident, and we still
wanted to use the -proposed upload target so as not to confuse it with
release pocket.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1
** Also affects: cloud-init (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: cloud-init (Ubuntu Quantal)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: cloud-init (Ubuntu Raring)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: cloud-init (Ubuntu Quan
We fix kernels in stable releases when they don't conform to the
documentation, not the other way around.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/882147
Title:
overlayfs does not implement ino
Just FYI, the fix that is going into trunk requires some things to be
present in /etc/cloud/cloud.cfg. I'm not sure fixing this is worth a
conffile update, so we might have to just leave this as a Won't Fix for
quantal unless we do something clever, and clever usually leads to
regressions.. :-P
**
Given that the details have been missing for well over a month, I am
rejecting the upload. Please re-upload after the details are added.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1054122
Title:
Given that this bug has been missing the details required by the SRU
process for more than 2 months, I am rejecting the upload. Please re-
upload after adding the details to the bug.
If this bug is not part of the delta, then please remove mention of it
from the changelog, as bug #1035219 does hav
Hi Jonathan. It has been 13 days without a response. Can you please add
a test case and regression potential? Otherwise we'll have to remove the
upload from the quantal-proposed queue. Thanks.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ub
Can somebody comment on the fact that there is an upload for signon-
plugin-oauth2, and not one for account-plugins in quantal-proposed? As
Brian said, its not clear that signon-plugin-oauth2 should proceed
without account-plugins being fixed.
Also the description of this bug and comment #26 is no
Hello Bryce, or anyone else affected,
Accepted xdiagnose into quantal-proposed. The package will build now and
be available at http://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xdiagnose/3.2.1 in a
few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
https://wiki.ub
Hello Scott, or anyone else affected,
Accepted euca2ools into quantal-proposed. The package will build now and
be available at
http://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/euca2ools/2.0.2-1ubuntu2.1 in a few
hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
http
Hello Markus, or anyone else affected,
Accepted x11-apps into quantal-proposed. The package will build now and
be available at
http://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/x11-apps/7.7~2ubuntu1.1 in a few
hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
https:/
Hello Rohan, or anyone else affected,
Accepted transmission into precise-proposed. The package will build now
and be available at
http://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/transmission/2.51-0ubuntu1.2 in a
few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
Hello! Thanks for the fix uploaded to quantal-proposed. This bug is
lacking the required documentation to move through the SRU process.
Please update it according to
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates. In particular, the bug
description needs a test case and a regression potential to help
Hi please disregard that comment. at-api2-core is covered under Gnome's
micro release exception.
** Changed in: at-spi2-core (Ubuntu Quantal)
Status: New => Fix Committed
** Tags added: verification-needed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, whi
Hello Luke, or anyone else affected,
Accepted at-spi2-core into quantal-proposed. The package will build now
and be available at http://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/at-
spi2-core/2.6.3-0ubuntu0.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. Se
Hi! Thanks for the uploaded fix to quantal-proposed. This bug is lacking
the necessary documentation for the fix to be verified once accepted.
Please update the description according to
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates with a test case and
discussion of regression potential.
--
You re
Hello Chris, or anyone else affected,
Accepted whois into oneiric-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at http://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/whois/5.0.11ubuntu3 in
a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
https://wiki.ub
This bugfix upload seems to contain a lot of extra changes. The test
case is really not sufficient, it needs to include a plan for verifying
most of the program functionality and not just this bug. That said,
since pithos is totally non-functional in precise at the moment, it
seems better to accept
Hello Peter, or anyone else affected,
Accepted cobbler into precise-proposed. The package will build now and
be available at
http://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cobbler/2.2.2-0ubuntu33.2 in a few
hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
https:/
Public bug reported:
Test case:
1. Setup multiple monitors in unity where one screen is smaller than the other
2. open firefox on the larger screen
3. ctrl-super-right so it takes up the right half of the screen (left works too)
3. maximize it so it is full screen
4. drag it using the title bar t
FYI I have upgraded my macbook air 4,1 to raring and it is still
affected.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1046675
Title:
macbook air 4,1 trackpad does not work on upgrade to quantal f
And same for 3.8.0.5 as well.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1073062
Title:
modprobe: Assertion `kmod_module_get_initstate(m) ==
KMOD_MODULE_BUILTIN' failed
To manage notifications
Excerpts from Enrico Tagliavini's message of 2013-02-12 16:02:35 UTC:
> It would be extremely nice if someone would make an update about the
> Precise situation. This is a very major bug for an LTS, and the last
> update was in September. 12.10 works like a charm but I'm willing to
> deploy strongs
mxxcon, you are welcome to submit a backported fix upload to precise-
proposed for review. I don't think anybody is actively working on it
though. Please see https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates
** Also affects: rrdtool (Ubuntu Precise)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You
Excerpts from sundeep's message of 2013-03-05 15:46:32 UTC:
> Above being the output of init/init.d/rc2.d
>
> I hit this issue with every apt-get install/remove
>
> root:/tmp# apt-get install ssh
> Reading package lists... Done
> Building dependency tree
> Reading state information... Done
Excerpts from maxim's message of 2013-03-05 09:02:15 UTC:
> isn't it upstart issue? I removed it and it's booting and working good.
>
You removed what?
The issue is that something in the system is not ready when lightdm
tries to start, so either the upstart job needs more start on conditions
(th
Public bug reported:
Since updating to raring from quantal, two of my machines (a MacBookPro
5,1 and a MacBookAir 4,1) have exhibited this behavior. It seems to be
more of a problem the faster I type, but that just increases the
frequency of keypresses. Ocassionally while typing a key that I have
** Also affects: kvm (Ubuntu Natty)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: libvirt (Ubuntu Natty)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: libvirt (Ubuntu Natty)
Status: New => Fix Committed
** Tags removed: verification-needed
** Tags added: verifi
Igor, all releases available in May of 2008 except Hardy (8.04) have
reached their end of life. I'm going to close this bug, as the boot and
handling of runlevels has changed in very significant ways on all
current releases, and this would not be a candidate for SRU to Hardy.
If you still have an
Seems like the 'service' command should be smarter, and map to the
"sysvinit" way in the same way that invoke-rc.d does for packages.
restart is usually expected to start the service if it isn't started,
but by passing directly through to upstart's restart, we are breaking
that assumption, leading
Tried on 12.04, 'service portmap restart' does seem to work. Also
/etc/default/portmap is not used and nowhere to be found.
With no confirmations, I wonder if this was just a local issue.
Remi, I'm going to close this bug report, if you can provide the exact
version of the portmap package you hav
** Changed in: sysvinit (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged => In Progress
** Changed in: sysvinit (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Clint Byrum (clint-fewbar)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
I know this is a very old bug report (thanks for reporting it) but it
doesn't seem to have any +1's and there's some information missing for
being able to reproduce or understand it.
Please if you are still experiencing this on a currently supported
release of Ubuntu, open a new bug report with
a
I can't see this as being an SRU for hardy given its stage of support.
In 10.04 and later, mountall handles this by re-trying NFS mounts after
every interface comes up.
Given that, I'm marking this as Won't Fix.
** Changed in: sysvinit (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Won't Fix
--
You recei
** Changed in: sysvinit (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => In Progress
** Changed in: sysvinit (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Clint Byrum (clint-fewbar)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
I'm not sure this is still an issue in releases with mountall, which I
think is everything 9.10 and higher. With mountall every time an
interface comes up it tries to mount all the NFS filesystems.
So, I'm closing this as Fix Released. Please re-open if it affects a
supported release.
** Changed
Can somebody reproduce this on a more current release of Ubuntu?
rc.local is run as part of the sysvinit compatibility mode handling of
runlevel 2, so I don't really see how it would kill off any processes.
** Changed in: sysvinit (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Incomplete
--
You received t
mountoverflowtmp no longer exists as of 9.10. For 8.04, this is not
critical enough for a Stable Release Update. So, closing as Won't Fix.
** Changed in: sysvinit (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Won't Fix
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which i
I don't believe 9.10 and later have this script, as mountall decides
when to run fsck on the root filesystem. With Hardy's desktop support
ending in less than 6 months, I'd rather not have peoples' limited time
spent testing this fix to Hardy, so closing as Won't Fix.
** Changed in: sysvinit (Ubun
601 - 700 of 4746 matches
Mail list logo
